Woman President dangerous?

gmc · Post by **gmc** » Wed Sep 17, 2008 12:39 pm

kazalala;986593 wrote: im a northern lass:sneaky:

I married one. Home is where I hang my head -even if it's not my fault.

kazalala · Post by **kazalala** » Wed Sep 17, 2008 12:41 pm

gmc;986624 wrote: I married one. Home is where I hang my head -even if it's not my fault.

:wah::wah:well how lucky you are!:D

Post by **Oscar Namechange** » Wed Sep 17, 2008 2:25 pm

gmc;986547 wrote: :yh_rotfl good job she's not a northern (english northern that is ) lass she would just lash out and feel sorry afterwards and god help anyone that didn't do as they were told.
I've been eup north, it's a scary place, so are your lasses.:-3

Odie · Post by **Odie** » Wed Sep 17, 2008 2:27 pm

men are naturally intimidated by women leaders..........another reason there will never be a woman president.

Post by **Oscar Namechange** » Wed Sep 17, 2008 2:53 pm

Odie;986741 wrote: men are naturally intimidated by women leaders..........another reason there will never be a woman president. There has only ever been one true western leader---Thatcher. She was scarey. Balderdash, poppycock & piffle Odie. Men under-estimate women. They did that with Thatcher & look where it got them? I would back Hilary Clinton all the way if she was running. She has massive support in the U.K. That's why Obama dumped her. Scared of her:wah::wah::wah: It's also why Sarah Palin is being reported in the British press so favourably. She's stompin on Obama.

Post by **Bryn Mawr** » Wed Sep 17, 2008 3:09 pm

oscar;986326 wrote: They also found Polar bear bones in Scotland as well. Proof there is no global warming, it's a natural event every few thousand years. It won't change because man is on the earth.

If that was not so farcical it would be funny.

Consider time, consider the passing of time, consider the difference between cooling three degrees over a hundred thousand years to bring an ice age to Scotland and warming three degrees in a hundred years as a result of the industrial revolution - one is a natural event, the other?

Once upon a time London was a shallow sea sitting on the equator. As part of a natural event continental shift moved London fifty five degrees north - would it be a natural event if London was back on the equator a thousand years from now?

Consider change, consider rate of change, consider the difference between the twentieth century and the rest of history. Now tell me that global warming is a natural event - and back it up with evidence.

Post by **Bryn Mawr** » Wed Sep 17, 2008 3:12 pm

kazalala;986593 wrote: im a northern lass:sneaky:

That explains a lot :p

Post by **Oscar Namechange** » Wed Sep 17, 2008 3:34 pm

Bryn Mawr;986785 wrote: If that was not so farcical it would be funny.

Consider time, consider the passing of time, consider the difference between cooling three degrees over a hundred thousand years to bring an ice age to Scotland and warming three degrees in a hundred years as a result of the industrial revolution - one is a natural event, the other?

Once upon a time London was a shallow sea sitting on the equator. As part of a natural event continental shift moved London fifty five degrees north - would it be a natural event if London was back on the equator a thousand years from now?

Consider change, consider rate of change, consider the difference between the twentieth century and the rest of history. Now tell me that global warming is a natural event - and back it up with evidence. How do you explain Noah & the great floods in biblical times? How do you explain the findings of Nassa when there was a three day no fly zone at the time of 9/11--- Global Dimming scientists called it. How about Ice cores taken from artic regions showing a heating up & cooling down process every few thousand years? How about evidence of water under the Sahara? How about the theory that the Ancient Egyptian race died out due to the Nile drying up?

Post by **Bryn Mawr** » Wed Sep 17, 2008 3:58 pm

oscar;986805 wrote: How do you explain Noah & the great floods in biblical times? How do you explain the findings of Nassa when there was a three day no fly zone at the time of 9/11--- Global Dimming scientists called it. How about Ice cores taken from artic regions showing a heating up & cooling down process every few thousand years? How about evidence of water under the Sahara? How about the theory that the Ancient Egyptian race died out due to the Nile drying up?

Noah - the Pillars of Hercules used to be a land bridge and the Med was dry land. When the sea broke through the land flooded in a BIG way.

9/11 - a link to explain your meaning please.

Arctic cores - sure, temperatures go up and down - just not at the current rate. Care to show when the core data shows a delta v matching the last thirty years?

Sahara - of course it was a sea bed, millions of years ago - see continental drift.

Nile - yes, historical evidence shows that a prolonged drought caused widespread death. This is not evidence of previous global warming, just an extended drought in a localised area with insufficient food reserves.

Post by **Oscar Namechange** » Wed Sep 17, 2008 4:10 pm

Sorry Bryn, there may be a link out there but i don't have one as yet. Global Dimming is what scientists called the evidence that area's of America heated up by 3 degrees after 9/11 when there was a no fly zone. Maybe only theory at the moment but the idea was that carbon emmisions provided a blanket that some of the suns rays were reflecting back into space. Without this smog, the planet would already be hotter.

What about the idea that Iceland's ice has increased in mass?

Odie · Post by **Odie** » Wed Sep 17, 2008 4:43 pm

oscar;986769 wrote: There has only ever been one true western leader---Thatcher. She was scarey. Balderdash, poppycock & piffle Odie. Men under-estimate women. They did that with Thatcher & look where it got them? I would back Hilary Clinton all the way if she was running. She has massive support in the U.K. That's why Obama dumped her. Scared of her:wah::wah::wah: It's also why Sarah Palin is being reported in the British press so favourably. She's stompin on Obama.

I wanted Hiliary and alot did, but never gave her the chance.

go Sarah!

Post by **Oscar Namechange** » Wed Sep 17, 2008 5:07 pm

Odie;986848 wrote: I wanted Hiliary and alot did, but never gave her the chance.

go Sarah! We agree Odie:-6:-6:-6

Odie · Post by **Odie** » Wed Sep 17, 2008 5:16 pm

oscar;986855 wrote: We agree Odie:-6:-6:-6

and we don't even live in the US!:wah:

Sure wish I could vote there.................all of the world depends on the US unfortuately.

Kathy Ellen · Post by **Kathy Ellen** » Wed Sep 17, 2008 5:29 pm

Odie;986857 wrote: and we don't even live in the US!:wah:

Sure wish I could vote there.................all of the world depends on the US unfortuately.

yes, it is unfortunate since we're so hated.

Odie · Post by **Odie** » Wed Sep 17, 2008 6:11 pm

Kathy Ellen;986861 wrote:

yes, it is unfortunate since we're so hated.

Not what I meant at all! The US to me is our neighbours and always will be.................

its because the US has control over each country in the world, I would just like the opportununity to vote there.

Post by **Bryn Mawr** » Wed Sep 17, 2008 11:41 pm

oscar;986832 wrote: Sorry Bryn, there may be a link out there but i don't have one as yet. Global Dimming is what scientists called the evidence that area's of America heated up by 3 degrees after 9/11 when there was a no fly zone. Maybe only theory at the moment but the idea was that carbon emmisions provided a blanket that some of the suns rays were reflecting back into space. Without this smog, the planet would already be hotter.

What about the idea that Iceland's ice has increased in mass?

Iceland has very little ice and what there is is decreasing. Greenland next door is covered in ice but that's disappearing quickly.

Without anything to go on I cannot comment on this so called global dimming - it hasn't been reported in any serious, peer reviewed, papers that I've seen.

ETA Certainly, reflection from airborne particulates is playing a part in reducing the effects of global warming (Lovelock's been commenting on the fact that cutting all emissions would cause a short term warming for this reason for some time) but I have seen no suggestion or any recorded three degree rise from this cause within the last decade.

Post by **Oscar Namechange** » Thu Sep 18, 2008 2:31 am

Odie;986857 wrote: and we don't even live in the US!:wah:

Sure wish I could vote there.................all of the world depends on the US unfortuately. Yep, it's frightening. Tell me?? What happens, if some nutcase decides to pick Obama off, Biden takes office & dies? That's a bit scarey.

Post by **Oscar Namechange** » Thu Sep 18, 2008 2:33 am

Kathy Ellen;986861 wrote:

yes, it is unfortunate since we're so hated. No your not. We love America, it's why were all so interested in the election.:-6

Post by **Oscar Namechange** » Thu Sep 18, 2008 2:37 am

Bryn Mawr;986949 wrote: Iceland has very little ice and what there is is decreasing. Greenland next door is covered in ice but that's disappearing quickly.

Without anything to go on I cannot comment on this so called global dimming - it hasn't been reported in any serious, peer reviewed, papers that I've seen.

ETA Certainly, reflection from airborne particulates is playing a part in reducing the effects of global warming (Lovelock's been commenting on the fact that cutting all emissions would cause a short term warming for this reason for some time) but I have seen no suggestion or any recorded three degree rise from this cause within the last decade. Thanks Bryn. It was a one off documentary i saw on sky. Apparently they had believed in this global dimming for some years but never got the chance to prove it due to constant air traffic. It was only due to 9/11 & the no fly zone, they found an ideal opportunity. I hope they will produce their findings further in the near future. There was another one i saw about Mega lightning & the theory that it brought the shuttle down. I suppose scientists have to throw these theories around. It was actually "Jeremy Clarkson" who stated in The Sun that Iceland had increased it's ice mass. Therefore, i did take it with a huge pinch of salt.

Post by **Oscar Namechange** » Thu Sep 18, 2008 2:44 am

Thatcher had huge worldwide support but that was her elasticated panties:wah:

Nomad · Post by **Nomad** » Thu Sep 18, 2008 2:50 am

If we elect a woman president what will become the primary focus of the nation, putting the toilet paper roll over the top or coming out from underneath ?

No thanks !

Nomad · Post by **Nomad** » Thu Sep 18, 2008 2:58 am

Ian;986995 wrote: I love powerful women:-4

that's all I can say........

hmmmmmmmmmmmm

Sure ! If you mean powerful in the sense they can throw you around the room and tie you down and not let you leave until shes exhausted herself by having her way with you until your a crumpled heap and begging for mercy then yea, bring it on.

Post by **Oscar Namechange** » Thu Sep 18, 2008 3:30 am

Nomad;986994 wrote: If we elect a woman president what will become the primary focus of the nation, putting the toilet paper roll over the top or coming out from underneath ?

No thanks !She'll push the button if you leave the toilet seat up:-5:-5:-5

Accountable · Post by **Accountable** » Thu Sep 18, 2008 3:30 am

oscar;986985 wrote: Yep, it's frightening. Tell me?? What happens, if some nutcase decides to pick Obama off, Biden takes office & dies? That's a bit scarey.

I think this link will answer your question:

Beyond president and vice President

The Presidential Succession Law of 1947 addressed the simultaneous disability of both the president and vice president. Under this law, here are the offices and current office holders who would become president should both the president and vice president be disabled. Remember, to assume the presidency, a person must also meet all the legal requirements to serve as president.

1. Vice President of the United States

2. Speaker of the House

3. President pro Tempore of the Senate

Secretaries of the president's Cabinet now fill out the balance of list of succession:

4. Secretary of State

5. Secretary of the Treasury

6. Secretary of Defense

7. Attorney General

8. Secretary of the Interior

9. Secretary of Agriculture

10. Secretary of Commerce

11. Secretary of Labor

12. Secretary of Health & Human Services

13. Secretary of Housing & Urban Development

14. Secretary of Transportation

15. Secretary of Energy

16. Secretary of Education

17. Secretary of Veterans’ Affairs

18. Secretary of Homeland Security

So if I understand this right, Harry Reid would become president if both the pres and vp were to die.

Nomad · Post by **Nomad** » Thu Sep 18, 2008 3:31 am

oscar;987017 wrote: She'll push the button if you leave the toilet seat up:-5:-5:-5

Were in trouble

Post by **Oscar Namechange** » Thu Sep 18, 2008 3:31 am

Nomad;986999 wrote: Sure ! If you mean powerful in the sense they can throw you around the room and tie you down and not let you leave until shes exhausted herself by having her way with you until your a crumpled heap and begging for mercy then yea, bring it on.:wah::wah::wah: In your dreams:wah:

Post by **Oscar Namechange** » Thu Sep 18, 2008 3:34 am

Accountable;987018 wrote: I think this link will answer your question:

Beyond president and vice President

The Presidential Succession Law of 1947 addressed the simultaneous disability of both the president and vice president. Under this law, here are the offices and current office holders who would become president should both the president and vice president be disabled. Remember, to assume the presidency, a person must also meet all the legal requirements to serve as president.

1. Vice President of the United States

2. Speaker of the House

3. President pro Tempore of the Senate

Secretaries of the president's Cabinet now fill out the balance of list of succession:

4. Secretary of State

5. Secretary of the Treasury

6. Secretary of Defense

7. Attorney General

8. Secretary of the Interior

9. Secretary of Agriculture

10. Secretary of Commerce

11. Secretary of Labor

12. Secretary of Health & Human Services

13. Secretary of Housing & Urban Development

14. Secretary of Transportation

15. Secretary of Energy

16. Secretary of Education

17. Secretary of Veterans’ Affairs

18. Secretary of Homeland Security

So if I understand this right, Harry Reid would become president if both the pres and vp were to die. thanks for that Accountable. I did not know that & i appreciate you posting that for me. Do you get to vote on these or are they appointed?

Accountable · Post by **Accountable** » Thu Sep 18, 2008 3:36 am

oscar;987025 wrote: thanks for that Accountable. I did not know that & i appreciate you posting that for me. Do you get to vote on these or are they appointed?
The cabinet members are appointed by the pres with advice and consent of the Senate. In other words, no.

Post by **Oscar Namechange** » Thu Sep 18, 2008 3:42 am

Odie;986867 wrote: Not what I meant at all! The US to me is our neighbours and always will be.................

its because the US has control over each country in the world, I would just like the opportununity to vote there.Just for the record. During WW11, my grandparents had a pub in the middle of nowhere. I still go there. Nothing but fields all around. They put a U.S air force base one side, Canadian the other. Perfect harmony & my gran got great nylons. Thanks guys.:-6:-6:-6 My father was away in the brit raf. My mother wrote to him to ask if a young American man called Frank Devatore from Ohio could have permission to escort her to the local dance. My father replied "Only if he is a true gentleman". She replied "MY dear, they are all true gentlemen". I have the letters.

Nomad · Post by **Nomad** » Thu Sep 18, 2008 3:48 am

oscar;987032 wrote: my gran got great nylons. Thanks guys.:-6:-6:-6

Im sure granny is great and all but do we really need to discuss her panty hose ?

Post by **Oscar Namechange** » Thu Sep 18, 2008 3:48 am

Ian;987027 wrote: I do believe that a Woman's place is in the home tending to Mens needs, I believe that a women should have power in the bedroom and that's it.. you can roll play from time to time but best not to give a women to much responsibility they may get above their station and put holes in your socksOr a hole in you wise guy:wah:

Post by **Oscar Namechange** » Thu Sep 18, 2008 3:51 am

Nomad;987037 wrote: Im sure granny is great and all but do we really need to discuss her panty hose ?She's dead Nomad, on account of it being during the last war.Derrrrrrr:-2

Nomad · Post by **Nomad** » Thu Sep 18, 2008 3:58 am

oscar;987041 wrote: She's dead Nomad, on account of it being during the last war.Derrrrrrr:-2

And Im sorry about that, I really am but I still dont want to discuss her panties. Its not right.

kazalala · Post by **kazalala** » Thu Sep 18, 2008 4:26 am

Bryn Mawr;986789 wrote: That explains a lot :p
:eek: im sure i dont know what you mean by that:sneaky:

Ian;987027 wrote: I do believe that a Woman's place is in the home tending to Mens needs, I believe that a women should have power in the bedroom and that's it.. you can roll play from time to time but best not to give a women to much responsibility they may get above their station and put holes in your socks

:yh_rotfl:yh_rotfl:yh_rotfl

Post by **Oscar Namechange** » Thu Sep 18, 2008 4:40 am

Nomad;987043 wrote: And Im sorry about that, I really am but I still dont want to discuss her panties. Its not right.:wah::wah::wah: I like you/:-4

sunny104 · Post by **sunny104** » Thu Sep 18, 2008 6:45 am

Ian;987027 wrote: I do believe that a Woman's place is in the home tending to Mens needs, I believe that a women should have power in the bedroom and that's it.. you can roll play from time to time but best not to give a women to much responsibility they may get above their station and put holes in your socks

that's hot!

Post by **Oscar Namechange** » Thu Sep 18, 2008 8:39 am

sunny104;987266 wrote: that's hot! :DWill she be able to reach the socks from the sink?

Kathy Ellen · Post by **Kathy Ellen** » Thu Sep 18, 2008 3:11 pm

Kathy Ellen;986861 wrote:

yes, it is unfortunate since we're so hated.

Good Odie:-6

I'm glad that we have a few friends here in the FG.

Odie · Post by **Odie** » Thu Sep 18, 2008 6:49 pm

Kathy Ellen;988292 wrote: Good Odie:-6

I'm glad that we have a few friends here in the FG.

why would you think Canadians hate the US?

try and leave here and see how damn cold it is!:wah:

Post by **Oscar Namechange** » Fri Sep 19, 2008 7:41 am

Odie;988385 wrote: why would you think Canadians hate the US?

try and leave here and see how damn cold it is!:wah:Come to Britain & see how wet it is Kathy.:-1