are you a member of the BNP ????

Kathy Ellen · Post by **Kathy Ellen** » Sat Oct 17, 2009 10:51 am

WOW gmc.

Well said....I agree with everything that you've said:D

farmer giles · Post by **farmer giles** » Sat Oct 17, 2009 12:03 pm

well said GMC

i dont believe there is a seret racist klan on fg contacting each other and agreeing on their racist agenda in secret via pm

i think oscar was using the hitler you policy of people not knowing who they can trust and she was trying to sow the seeds of doubt into the minds of fg members stopping them speaking out against the BNP because they might of thought they would have a secret facist army on fg waiting in the wings to pick on them via PM

well it did not work if there was and i doubt it many fascist racist members of the BNP on fg then they are indeed to ashamed to admit it themselves in fact not one person has had the guts to admit that they are a vile racist

sorry brain went off on one then ...er carry on :rolleyes::rolleyes:

Post by **Oscar Namechange** » Sat Oct 17, 2009 2:28 pm

gmc;1253092 wrote: I would agree with you there. I wasn't a child in the seventies and it was bloody awful believe me. But now we have the churches (of all denominations and religions) complaining that because divorce is more prevalent because people are not forced to stay with unhappy marriages society is breaking down when the reality is women actually have a choice they didn't before, because single parents are no longer pariahs, condemned for ever as sluts, and forced to give up their children to orphanages or find themselves in mental hospitals having been deemed to be inadequate they think society has broken down. If people are more tolerant of alternative lifestyles and no longer agree people such as homosexuals are sick or an abomination and should be made to suffer for their crime the churches are horrified and how dare people be allowed to say being different is OK.

All the recent cases of child abuse form the seventies and eighties being brought out in the open by those are now adults highlight the hypocrisy of the past. Abuse didn't happen in the old days-it did people preferred to ignore it and punish the child for telling lies. Society hasn't broken down family values are as strong as they have ever been it's just the hypocrisy that people are less inclined to tolerate and take lectures from organisations that thought it was OK to protect priests abusing children or like to pretend teenagers are not interested in sex and would prefer then celibate, homophobic and going to church.

The BNP are a blast form the past as well. They offer nothing except hysteria and fear.

posted by oscar

I really don't care what political party people support-for the record I am not affiliated to any of them-I want to see proportional representation in this country-until we get it politics is a farce and Westminster does not reflect the way people actually vote and the two main parties have a vested interest in not changing things. arsehole tony was gong to remember?

As to these clever people who think it amusing to converse with their oppressors while keeping them in the dark as to who they are.

Up yours you muppets!
Well said.

Life is far too short to judge anyone on their political stance. I treat people exactly how they deserve to be treated. You earn respect... you do not demand It.

I remember the hysteria over Oswald Mosely and Enoch Powell who both went on to be knighted by the Queen. Times change, views change, society changes.

Post by **Oscar Namechange** » Sat Oct 17, 2009 2:33 pm

farmer giles;1253106 wrote: well said GMC

i dont believe there is a seret racist klan on fg contacting each other and agreeing on their racist agenda in secret via pm

sorry brain went off on one then ...er carry on :rolleyes::rolleyes:
Not at all... Merely pointing out that most people do not have a clue about the people they think they know. it can be said of anyone... Even the most respectable of people on the outside can be guilty od gutless corruption. Not being a member of the BNP doesn't make the human race all saints.

farmer giles · Post by **farmer giles** » Sat Oct 17, 2009 2:44 pm

oscar;1253150 wrote: Not at all... Merely pointing out that most people do not have a clue about the people they think they know. it can be said of anyone... Even the most respectable of people on the outside can be guilty od gutless corruption. Not being a member of the BNP doesn't make the human race all saints.

what has not being in the BNP and not being a saint got to do with it :rolleyes::rolleyes:

the BNP are racist and if you support them you are a racist

racism and genacide go hand in hand

Post by **Oscar Namechange** » Sat Oct 17, 2009 2:54 pm

farmer giles;1253152 wrote: what has not being in the BNP and not being a saint got to do with it :rolleyes::rolleyes:

the BNP are racist and if you support them you are a racist

racism and genacide go hand in hand

Genocide ?? That's a bit strong. What on earth do you think Griffin will do If we ever see a BNP run England? Round up all those nasty Johnny Foriegners and shoot them? Or maybe, some Concentration camps?

Look back over history... Genocide is carried out by leaders against their own people... Remember Pol Pot? Idi Amin? Mugabe?

farmer giles · Post by **farmer giles** » Sat Oct 17, 2009 3:02 pm

oscar;1253156 wrote: Genocide ?? That's a bit strong. What on earth do you think Griffin will do If we ever see a BNP run England? Round up all those nasty Johnny Foriegners and shoot them? Or maybe, some Concentration camps?

Look back over history... Genocide is carried out by leaders against their own people... Remember Pol Pot? Idi Amin? Mugabe?

Genocide - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Genocide is the deliberate and systematic destruction, in whole or in part, of an ethnic, racial, religious, or national group.

the germans did not try to wipe out germans it was the jew etc racial genacide

Post by **Oscar Namechange** » Sat Oct 17, 2009 3:08 pm

farmer giles;1253159 wrote: Genocide - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Genocide is the deliberate and systematic destruction, in whole or in part, of an ethnic, racial, religious, or national group.

the germans did not try to wipe out germans it was the jew etc racial genacide The Nazi's also sent an estimated one million gypsies to the gas chambers. Griffin's family were Travellers so where is the logic in that?

farmer giles · Post by **farmer giles** » Sat Oct 17, 2009 3:10 pm

oscar;1253160 wrote: The Nazi's also sent an estimated one million gypsies to the gas chambers. Griffin's family were Travellers so where is the logic in that?

he is still a racist :rolleyes::rolleyes:

Post by **Oscar Namechange** » Sat Oct 17, 2009 3:11 pm

farmer giles;1253161 wrote: he is still a racist :rolleyes::rolleyes: Agreed.

;)

farmer giles · Post by **farmer giles** » Sat Oct 17, 2009 3:14 pm

oscar;1253162 wrote: Agreed.

;)

??????

thud ..................................that is the sound of jimbo fainting :-3

Daily Express | UK News :: Dark family secrets of BNP leader Nick Griffin

Post by **Oscar Namechange** » Sat Oct 17, 2009 3:20 pm

farmer giles;1253163 wrote: ??????

thud ..................................that is the sound of jimbo fainting :-3

Daily Express | UK News :: Dark family secrets of BNP leader Nick Griffin They are not dark secrets of Griffin. He is proud of his roots. The press tried to make it out to be some kind of big shock horror expose but he has always been well aware of his ancestry.

Clodhopper · Post by **Clodhopper** » Sun Oct 18, 2009 4:05 am

I don't give a monkeys about his ancestry. It's the causes and Party he represents that disgust me.

He is a white supremacist. Though now he call himself a survivalist.

He's a racist. Now he calls it a concern with national identity.

And yes, I do think if he got power we'd see the gestapo, concentration camps and state control by terror. Called different things though.

kazalala · Post by **kazalala** » Sun Oct 18, 2009 4:35 am

how can you trust a political party when its own members hide? Yes we have the right to keep our political preference to ourself, but not to the extent the BNP members go to and not for the same reasons. Why do their members feel the need to keep their mebership secret? It just does'nt instill trust in people does it

farmer giles · Post by **farmer giles** » Sun Oct 18, 2009 7:14 am

kazalala;1253346 wrote: how can you trust a political party when its own members hide? Yes we have the right to keep our political preference to ourself, but not to the extent the BNP members go to and not for the same reasons. Why do their members feel the need to keep their mebership secret? It just does'nt instill trust in people does it

well said

:)

well played the liverpools red spacehopper how funny was that

:D

kazalala · Post by **kazalala** » Sun Oct 18, 2009 8:13 am

farmer giles;1253367 wrote: well said

:)

well played the liverpools red spacehopper how funny was that

:D

Hiraaaaarious!!!:yh_rotfl

Post by **Oscar Namechange** » Sun Oct 18, 2009 9:20 am

kazalala;1253346 wrote: how can you trust a political party when its own members hide? Yes we have the right to keep our political preference to ourself, but not to the extent the BNP members go to and not for the same reasons. Why do their members feel the need to keep their mebership secret? It just does'nt instill trust in people does it

The reason many are cautious Kaz is because we have a Nazi style hypocritical Government where folk can actually lose their jobs if found to be a member of the BNP. However much anyone disagree's with the BNP, they are still a bono fide registered political Party, not some Underground movement. In this day and age of Democracy, for some-one to lose their job for being a member is outrageous.

In actual fact, todays article in the Daily Mail is extremely accurate in Griffins views and not the crap the media are usually prone to writing.

BNP leader Nick Griffin: Lots of Hindus, Sikhs and ethnic minority Britons support my anti-immigrant views | Mail Online

Notice his comment on the Gurkha's.

kazalala · Post by **kazalala** » Sun Oct 18, 2009 9:33 am

oscar;1253409 wrote: The reason many are cautious Kaz is because we have a Nazi style hypocritical Government where folk can actually lose their jobs if found to be a member of the BNP. However much anyone disagree's with the BNP, they are still a bono fide registered political Party, not some Underground movement. In this day and age of Democracy, for some-one to lose their job for being a member is outrageous.

In actual fact, todays article in the Daily Mail is extremely accurate in Griffins views and not the crap the media are usually prone to writing.

BNP leader Nick Griffin: Lots of Hindus, Sikhs and ethnic minority Britons support my anti-immigrant views | Mail Online

Notice his comment on the Gurkha's.

come on you know people cant just fire people for any daft reason these days:rolleyes:

Taken form the link you provided

He went on: 'It's not a matter of racism; it's a matter of standing up for the indigenous. No-one in this country is here for the English, the Scots, the Irish, the Welsh.

'Caucasian is one phrase for it. Everyone knows who an indigenous Brit is. Everyone knows that someone for instance whose parents came from the West Indies and so on and has perhaps been in the Army and fought for this country, they are entitled to be here, they are entitled to be here, they are civically British, they are not ethnically British. It is not a racist position.'

Asked about comments that Islam was 'vicious and wicked', he said: 'I believe that a faith which puts half the population, the women, down as inferior to men, a faith which bans freedom of speech, a faith which stones rape victims to death, I believe that is vicious and wicked.

'It's not all of what Islam is about. Islam is also for instance about opposing usury and that is a very good position. But Islam and our society don't mix.'

He suggested a 'direct swap' with Muslims could solve the problem of the UK not having sufficient space to offer all former Gurkhas and their families the right to settle in the UK.

'We would actually be happy to have the Gurkhas if we can swap them, for instance, for the very significant number from the Muslim population in this country who identify with al Qaida and who are not loyal to this country. We would do a straight swap,' he said.

Mr Griffin said he would 'have a problem' with any BNP member marrying a non-white.

'We would have a problem with that just as many West Indians, many Sikhs, people of all different races and creeds and nationalities very often have a common natural human instinct which is to want their children and their grandchildren to look like them, to identify with their culture,' he said.

'The whole world faces a big problem with so many different peoples, different ethnic groups mixing that we are losing all our separate cultures and identities.'
Im sorry ,, he talks shyte! :yh_rotfl

Bruv · Post by **Bruv** » Sun Oct 18, 2009 9:34 am

I read with interest, the points I noticed ?

Mr Griffin said he would 'have a problem' with any BNP member marrying a non-white.

'The whole world faces a big problem with so many different peoples, different ethnic groups mixing that we are losing all our separate cultures and identities.'

What he sees as problems I see as advantageous..........strange how people differ.

Post by **Oscar Namechange** » Sun Oct 18, 2009 9:37 am

kazalala;1253411 wrote: come on you know people cant just fire people for any daft reason these days:rolleyes:

Taken form the link you provided

Im sorry ,, he talks shyte! :yh_rotfl
Yes, he does talk shyte alot of the time but what he is saying here I know myself to be true. As you know, I have many many Muslim friends of all Nationalities in this country. They came here to embrace the British way of life and are deeply embaressed by the fanatics. They also agree with Griffins stance that any Immigrant coming to this country should be able to support themselves and contribute to the country.

Sorry Kaz, your wrong. Police Officers are banned from joining the BNP and nurses are sacked if found to be members.

kazalala · Post by **kazalala** » Sun Oct 18, 2009 9:49 am

oscar;1253414 wrote: Yes, he does talk shyte alot of the time but what he is saying here I know myself to be true. As you know, I have many many Muslim friends of all Nationalities in this country. They came here to embrace the British way of life and are deeply embaressed by the fanatics. They also agree with Griffins stance that any Immigrant coming to this country should be able to support themselves and contribute to the country.

Sorry Kaz, your wrong. Police Officers are banned from joining the BNP and nurses are sacked if found to be members.

oh well if you say its is so then it must be true:yh_rotfl

well then it has to be legal to do that,, and that tells you summat then dont it. We re too PC to let people get away with blatant prejudice such as that;)

Post by **Oscar Namechange** » Sun Oct 18, 2009 9:53 am

kazalala;1253418 wrote: oh well if you say its is so then it must be true:yh_rotfl

well then it has to be legal to do that,, and that tells you summat then dont it. We re too PC to let people get away with blatant prejudice such as that;) But they can join the EDL ????

kazalala · Post by **kazalala** » Sun Oct 18, 2009 10:00 am

oscar;1253420 wrote: But they can join the EDL ????

I dont make the rules :yh_rotfl let the BNP fight its own causes:p

Raven · Post by **Raven** » Mon Oct 19, 2009 4:22 am

Britain is funny 'ol place. This guy is the only one who has the courage to stand for SOMETHING. And that SOMETHING does not involve what Europe pushes down every other party's gullet. But it is too late. Britain is holding it's breath, just waiting to see if it can hold a referendum on the Lisbon treaty. It doesnt want to be a colony of 'Rome' again, yet it has already been 'invaded'.

It's too late to protest now. Britain is changing it's colour. It is no longer 'white', 'blue-eyed' and 'blonde/ginger'. Pretty soon the language 'English' is going to be like Welsh and Gaelic. The 'English' are going to Spain, and elsewhere. They have forsaken their country to others. Or been driven out. Take your pick. If you dont believe me, just take a look at London, Manchester, Birmingham, Leeds, Hull for cryin out loud. It's not the English that are land owners these days. It's the Indian continent who have moved in. The English are elswhere. You have Mayors who are wearing turbans. Britain is in a state of flux. Who knows? Maybe it is just a part of a natural cycle that goes on here. Looking back over history, every 1000 years or so, the face of Britain changes. I'm not sure, but it seems to me this has historically been a popular invasion spot. At first I didnt understand why my husband was so keen to come to America. Now I kinda do. I'm not ready to go just yet. I am confident enough in knowing who I am, to be able to stay and watch the natural phenomena going on around me. I will wait and watch Britain change. Kind of like waiting to see what colour a butterfly's wings will be as it emerges. I am watching history take place, right in front of my eyes. The time for me to go is when they adopt sharia. I am not muslim, nor will i ever be. And with my big mouth, my tongue would be first in line to be hacked out. So until then, I'm in it for the long haul. :rolleyes:

Post by **Oscar Namechange** » Mon Oct 19, 2009 10:01 am

Raven;1253647 wrote: Britain is funny 'ol place. This guy is the only one who has the courage to stand for SOMETHING. And that SOMETHING does not involve what Europe pushes down every other party's gullet. But it is too late. Britain is holding it's breath, just waiting to see if it can hold a referendum on the Lisbon treaty. It doesnt want to be a colony of 'Rome' again, yet it has already been 'invaded'.

It's too late to protest now. Britain is changing it's colour. It is no longer 'white', 'blue-eyed' and 'blonde/ginger'. Pretty soon the language 'English' is going to be like Welsh and Gaelic. The 'English' are going to Spain, and elsewhere. They have forsaken their country to others. Or been driven out. Take your pick. If you dont believe me, just take a look at London, Manchester, Birmingham, Leeds, Hull for cryin out loud. It's not the English that are land owners these days. It's the Indian continent who have moved in. The English are elswhere. You have Mayors who are wearing turbans. Britain is in a state of flux. Who knows? Maybe it is just a part of a natural cycle that goes on here. Looking back over history, every 1000 years or so, the face of Britain changes. I'm not sure, but it seems to me this has historically been a popular invasion spot. At first I didnt understand why my husband was so keen to come to America. Now I kinda do. I'm not ready to go just yet. I am confident enough in knowing who I am, to be able to stay and watch the natural phenomena going on around me. I will wait and watch Britain change. Kind of like waiting to see what colour a butterfly's wings will be as it emerges. I am watching history take place, right in front of my eyes. The time for me to go is when they adopt sharia. I am not muslim, nor will i ever be. And with my big mouth, my tongue would be first in line to be hacked out. So until then, I'm in it for the long haul. :rolleyes::yh_clap:yh_clap:yh_clap

You only have to look at the results so far on the poll of Immigration 17 to 6 to see that most people are concerned with mass immigration. I believe that over the past 12 years especially under Blair that we have become such a nanny State with equality Laws that most folk are frightened to open their mouths about Immigration for fear of being called rascist. Not that long ago, the Tories were even accusing Gordon Brown of rascism when he spoke of curbing the numbers coming into the country.

Griffin is capable of being a prize Pillock and it's why he now has an extrememly adept press advisor. Having said that, I agree that he is the only Politician who is brutally honest. I honestly don't know how anyone can actually critise him for his honesty when we are seeing so many Labour, and Tory MP's guilty of practical fraud over their expenses.

Bruv · Post by **Bruv** » Mon Oct 19, 2009 10:54 am

My main criticism of the man is his dishonesty.

farmer giles · Post by **farmer giles** » Mon Oct 19, 2009 10:54 am

oscar;1253739 wrote: :yh_clap:yh_clap:yh_clap

You only have to look at the results so far on the poll of Immigration 17 to 6 to see that most people are concerned with mass immigration. I believe that over the past 12 years especially under Blair that we have become such a nanny State with equality Laws that most folk are frightened to open their mouths about Immigration for fear of being called rascist. Not that long ago, the Tories were even accusing Gordon Brown of rascism when he spoke of curbing the numbers coming into the country.

Griffin is capable of being a prize Pillock and it's why he now has an extrememly adept press advisor. Having said that, I agree that he is the only Politician who is brutally honest. I honestly don't know how anyone can actually critise him for his honesty when we are seeing so many Labour, and Tory MP's guilty of practical fraud over their expenses.

yep he is sooo honest that there are a dozen vidoes posted on fg where he is admitting to lying about being a racist

so if a man admits he is a liar then he must be telling the truth right :yh_rotfl:yh_rotfl

mass immigration is a bit different than being racist :rolleyes:

like a pervo fondling a scarecrow once again oscey you are clutching a straws :rolleyes::rolleyes:

Raven · Post by **Raven** » Mon Oct 19, 2009 11:29 am

oscar;1253739 wrote: :yh_clap:yh_clap:yh_clap

You only have to look at the results so far on the poll of Immigration 17 to 6 to see that most people are concerned with mass immigration. I believe that over the past 12 years especially under Blair that we have become such a nanny State with equality Laws that most folk are frightened to open their mouths about Immigration for fear of being called rascist. Not that long ago, the Tories were even accusing Gordon Brown of rascism when he spoke of curbing the numbers coming into the country.

Griffin is capable of being a prize Pillock and it's why he now has an extrememly adept press advisor. Having said that, I agree that he is the only Politician who is brutally honest. I honestly don't know how anyone can actually critise him for his honesty when we are seeing so many Labour, and Tory MP's guilty of practical fraud over their expenses.
I followed that circus everyday it ran in the Telegraph! It's why I quit smoking! I'm not paying for anybodies moat!

Post by **Oscar Namechange** » Mon Oct 19, 2009 11:30 am

Raven;1253801 wrote: I followed that circus everyday it ran in the Telegraph! It's why I quit smoking! I'm not paying for anybodies moat!

Or hanging baskets :yh_rotfl

Raven · Post by **Raven** » Mon Oct 19, 2009 12:42 pm

oscar;1253803 wrote: Or hanging baskets :yh_rotfl
I'm doing good to pay for our hanging baskets for petes sake! :rolleyes:

Clodhopper · Post by **Clodhopper** » Tue Oct 20, 2009 2:34 am

You only have to look at the results so far on the poll of Immigration 17 to 6 to see that most people are concerned with mass immigration.

If your poll had been "Are you concerned about immigration?" I'd have voted in it.

Not surprised you were in Sales. And good at it. Got all the tricks...

Using the phrase 'mass immigration" is an attempt to pre-determine the result. Highly emotive term, playing on people's fears. And what, precisely, is "mass" in this context? Over 1000? 100,000? And in what timescale? A year? A decade? All left very vague.

Mass immigration? The last time we had liners turning up and emptying shiploads of people into this country was when we invited the Afro-Carribeans and Indians in the '50s. Are you calling THAT mass immigration and saying we should be concerned about it? Is that what the people who voted "Yes" in your poll were thinking about?

Or did you just - very effectively - create an image of faceless alien hordes and say, "Is this scary?"

I go with the latter.

gmc · Post by **gmc** » Tue Oct 20, 2009 2:59 am

oscar;1253164 wrote: They are not dark secrets of Griffin. He is proud of his roots. The press tried to make it out to be some kind of big shock horror expose but he has always been well aware of his ancestry.

So what is this half pakistani descendant of economic migrants doing running the BNP? If his policies had been in force then his great great grandfather would never have been allowed in-no fixed abode, no income no skills just living selling crockery pegs door to door. Who need s economic migrants? If he'd settled in Germany his parents would probably been stuffed in an oven along with the rest of his relatives-except he denies that happened does he not? He has done well for a sub human (hitlers words not mine)

Actually black people have a longer history in this country than his and have arguably contributed far more to our society so let's get rid of all the gyppoes then.

The BNP are trying to do what hitler did, play on people's fears and prejudices and find someone to blame for it all. It's cave man mentality-let's stay in our cave and let the world go by. take away the racism and the BNP have nothing of any substance to offer.

I see on another thread you now view the BNP as an english national party which suggests you either don't understand what the word British actually means and know little about your own history or it was a feeble attempt to annoy. I suspect probably the former-you seem to be someone who picks through the chocolate box of politics and prejudice without giving anything any real thought.

farmer giles · Post by **farmer giles** » Tue Oct 20, 2009 3:28 am

Clodhopper;1253979 wrote: If your poll had been "Are you concerned about immigration?" I'd have voted in it.

Not surprised you were in Sales. And good at it. Got all the tricks...

Using the phrase 'mass immigration" is an attempt to pre-determine the result. Highly emotive term, playing on people's fears. And what, precisely, is "mass" in this context? Over 1000? 100,000? And in what timescale? A year? A decade? All left very vague.

Mass immigration? The last time we had liners turning up and emptying shiploads of people into this country was when we invited the Afro-Carribeans and Indians in the '50s. Are you calling THAT mass immigration and saying we should be concerned about it? Is that what the people who voted "Yes" in your poll were thinking about?

Or did you just - very effectively - create an image of faceless alien hordes and say, "Is this scary?"

I go with the latter.

great post :-6:-6

gmc;1253981 wrote: So why is this half pakistani descendant of economic migrants doing running the BNP? If his policies had been in force then his great great grandfather would never have been allowed in-no fixed abode, no income no skills just living selling crockery pegs door to door. Who need s economic migrants? If he'd settled in Germany his parents would probably been stuffed in an oven along with the rest of his relatives-except he denies that happened does he not? He has done well for a sub human (hitlers words not mine)

Actually black people have a longer history in this country than his and have arguably contributed far more to our society so let's get rid of all the gyppoes then.

The BNP are trying to do what hitler did, play on people's fears and prejudices and find someone to blame for it all. It's cave man mentality-let's stay in our cave and let the world go by. take away the racism and the BNP have nothing of any substance to offer.

I see on another thread you now view the BNP as an english national party which suggests you either don't understand what the word British actually means and know little about your own history or it was a feeble attempt to annoy. I suspect probably the former-you seem to be someone who picks through the chocolate box of politics and prejudice without giving anything any real thought.

another great post

i'm half romany gypsy and agree with everything you have said :-6

Nomad · Post by **Nomad** » Wed Oct 21, 2009 2:22 pm

farmer giles;1250967 wrote: I think its stands for the British nazi party

i dont think any of you will have the guts to admit you are vile racists

They dont know theyre racists? I can understand them not knowing theyre vile but if their cause is white supremacy then surely they know theyre racists. Or do they call it something else?

Post by **Oscar Namechange** » Wed Oct 21, 2009 2:41 pm

Nomad;1254533 wrote: They dont know theyre racists? I can understand them not knowing theyre vile but if their cause is white supremacy then surely they know theyre racists. Or do they call it something else?
I think more over imagination and paranoid delusion by some about a bono fide political Party. Funny how you never saw this outcry before they started to actually win elections. :rolleyes:

farmer giles · Post by **farmer giles** » Wed Oct 21, 2009 2:48 pm

[QUOTE=Nomad;1254533]They dont know theyre racists? I can understand them not knowing theyre vile but if their cause is white supremacy then surely they know theyre racists. Or do they call it something else?[/QUOTE]

they call it the BNP my friend

farmer giles · Post by **farmer giles** » Wed Oct 21, 2009 2:50 pm

oscar;1254535 wrote: I think more over imagination and paranoid delusion by some about a bono fide political Party. Funny how you never saw this outcry before they started to actually win elections. :rolleyes:

yawn :rolleyes::rolleyes:

a bona fide party that only lets whites join :rolleyes::rolleyes:

change the record fascist voice piece :yh_rotfl

Post by **Oscar Namechange** » Wed Oct 21, 2009 2:55 pm

farmer giles;1254538 wrote: yawn :rolleyes::rolleyes:

a bona fide party that only lets whites join :rolleyes::rolleyes:

change the record fascist voice piece :yh_rotfl I think you'll find your wrong on whites joining now... Dear dear, now there has been a change to party constitution, what on earth can you use for your arguement now? :yh_rotfl:yh_rotfl:yh_rotfl:yh_rotfl

Clodhopper · Post by **Clodhopper** » Wed Oct 21, 2009 3:19 pm

I think you'll find your wrong on whites joining now... Dear dear, now there has been a change to party constitution, what on earth can you use for your arguement now?

Absolutely BRILLIANT! :yh_rotfl:yh_rotfl:yh_rotfl

The BNP must accept non-white members on principle or be shut down.

Ok, they'll find a way around it - and anyway, what maniac would join them, but I'm LMAO.

I think you'll find your wrong on whites joining now...

Could you explain this one? I thought whites were the only ones who could join until the recent legal judgement?

Clodhopper · Post by **Clodhopper** » Wed Oct 21, 2009 3:24 pm

I can understand them not knowing theyre vile but if their cause is white supremacy then surely they know theyre racists. Or do they call it something else?

They call it something else: they call it a concern with national identity.

It fools some.

Post by **Bryn Mawr** » Wed Oct 21, 2009 4:59 pm

oscar;1254535 wrote: I think more over imagination and paranoid delusion by some about a bono fide political Party. Funny how you never saw this outcry before they started to actually win elections. :rolleyes:

They weren't worth pissing on before they started getting support - they never have been a bona-fide political party.

Post by **Oscar Namechange** » Wed Oct 21, 2009 5:03 pm

Bryn Mawr;1254611 wrote: They weren't worth pissing on before they started getting support - they never have been a bona-fide political party. Language Timothy !!!!

Great article from Tomorrows Mail

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/debate/artic ... -rise.html

farmer giles · Post by **farmer giles** » Thu Oct 22, 2009 12:31 am

oscar;1254539 wrote: I think you'll find your wrong on whites joining now... Dear dear, now there has been a change to party constitution, what on earth can you use for your arguement now? :yh_rotfl:yh_rotfl:yh_rotfl:yh_rotfl

so they have been forced to let non whites in :rolleyes:

what on earth can i use in my arguement now :rolleyes::rolleyes:

er let me see :sneaky

racist fascist vile scum for starters :rolleyes::yh_rotfl

farmer giles · Post by **farmer giles** » Thu Oct 22, 2009 12:36 am

oscar;1254614 wrote: Language Timothy !!!!

Great article from Tomorrows Mail

MELANIE PHILLIPS: Our leaders are queuing to prove their virtue by denouncing the vile BNP. But it's they who are to blame for its rise | Mail Online

is that you doing your best to support him and the racist scum ???? well i dont think you read it properly ,over and over he is branded a vile racist :yh_rotfl:yh_rotfl

Imladris · Post by **Imladris** » Thu Oct 22, 2009 7:01 am

Bryn Mawr;1254611 wrote: They weren't worth pissing on before they started getting support - they never have been a bona-fide political party.

I was going to reply to that but I would never have matched your eloquence :yh_worshp

Imladris · Post by **Imladris** » Thu Oct 22, 2009 7:12 am

It's always seemed to me that the people who protest so much that they are not racist are the most racist of all.

Surely if you have friends then that is what they are, they are not 'my black/asian/chinese/muslim/jew/jehovah's witness/sikh friends' they are just friends.

By noticing and defining the difference you're drawing attention to it.

By just not noticing and getting on with life and friendship it becomes a non-issue.

By changing the rules to allow a minority (of whatever, male, female, alien) to join they are saying 'Look at us, we're so tolerent we'll even allow ............ to join us' therefore drawing even more attention to the racism/discrimination!

Perhaps I have a far too simple way of looking at life.

farmer giles · Post by **farmer giles** » Thu Oct 22, 2009 7:57 am

Imladris;1254769 wrote: It's always seemed to me that the people who protest so much that they are not racist are the most racist of all.

Surely if you have friends then that is what they are, they are not 'my black/asian/chinese/muslim/jew/jehovah's witness/sikh friends' they are just friends.

By noticing and defining the difference you're drawing attention to it.

By just not noticing and getting on with life and friendship it becomes a non-issue.

By changing the rules to allow a minority (of whatever, male, female, alien) to join they are saying 'Look at us, we're so tolerent we'll even allow ............ to join us' therefore drawing even more attention to the racism/discrimination!

Perhaps I have a far too simple way of looking at life.

so whitey are you BNP or not :yh_rotfl:yh_rotfl

Imladris · Post by **Imladris** » Thu Oct 22, 2009 10:23 am

farmer giles;1254787 wrote: so whitey are you BNP or not :yh_rotfl:yh_rotfl
No sweetie I'm TTOF - Top Totty Of Course! :sneaky::D

theia · Post by **theia** » Thu Oct 22, 2009 10:26 am

Imladris;1254769 wrote: It's always seemed to me that the people who protest so much that they are not racist are the most racist of all.

Surely if you have friends then that is what they are, they are not 'my black/asian/chinese/muslim/jew/jehovah's witness/sikh friends' they are just friends.

By noticing and defining the difference you're drawing attention to it.

By just not noticing and getting on with life and friendship it becomes a non-issue.

By changing the rules to allow a minority (of whatever, male, female, alien) to join they are saying 'Look at us, we're so tolerent we'll even allow ............ to join us' therefore drawing even more attention to the racism/discrimination!

Perhaps I have a far too simple way of looking at life.

Well said, Imladris :-6

Imladris · Post by **Imladris** » Thu Oct 22, 2009 10:32 am

theia;1254914 wrote: Well said, Imladris :-6

Thanks Theia, I've been reading about your pom poms, I'm sorry to hear they're a bit bedraggled. Hope they're better soon! :yh_rotfl