Page 1 of 1
You can't know how you will react in a situation.
Posted: Thu Feb 12, 2015 10:59 am
by flopstock
I really credit these civil rights leaders for not only doing the test but also being open and honest about the results. Folks are always saying that they would have reacted in a different way, when these news stories come out, but they can't really KNOW unless they have lived through the situation.
Shoot or don't shoot: Police scenarios prove eye-opening for civil rights leaders | Fox News
You can't know how you will react in a situation.
Posted: Thu Feb 12, 2015 11:51 am
by Bruv
flopstock;1473915 wrote: I really credit these civil rights leaders for not only doing the test but also being open and honest about the results. Folks are always saying that they would have reacted in a different way, when these news stories come out, but they can't really KNOW unless they have lived through the situation.
Shoot or don't shoot: Police scenarios prove eye-opening for civil rights leaders | Fox News
Sorry to keep on banging the same drum....but ...........if there is every possibility anybody may be armed, then options are limited......so....how has mankind advanced ?
Only in the methods of dispatching each other.
You can't know how you will react in a situation.
Posted: Mon Feb 16, 2015 12:54 pm
by tude dog
flopstock;1473915 wrote: I really credit these civil rights leaders for not only doing the test but also being open and honest about the results. Folks are always saying that they would have reacted in a different way, when these news stories come out, but they can't really KNOW unless they have lived through the situation.
Shoot or don't shoot: Police scenarios prove eye-opening for civil rights leaders | Fox News
Reading who took the time to participate, I am impressed! I would suggest that lump which occupies the White House might do the same. Maybe him and his lackey Holder might learn something.
NAW, Just dreaming.
They have all the answers, Obama seeks more police training, avoids addressing Ferguson head-on
Nothing novel happened in Furgeson.
Problem wasn't police training. It was an uncivilized animal which died. Then the mob seeking freebies from their local merchant.
You can't know how you will react in a situation.
Posted: Mon Feb 16, 2015 1:07 pm
by FourPart
tude dog;1474099 wrote:
Nothing novel happened in Furgeson.
Problem wasn't police training. It was an uncivilized animal which died. Then the mob seeking freebies from their local merchant.
Sounds about right to me.
Rather than increase the level of armament the Police already have, thus increasing the spiral of one-upmanship even further, I reckon investment in better body-cam technology would be more appropriate. That way they have a defence when they are in the right & disciplinary action may be taken when they are in the wrong.
You can't know how you will react in a situation.
Posted: Mon Feb 16, 2015 1:11 pm
by tude dog
FourPart;1474101 wrote: Sounds about right to me.
Rather than increase the level of armament the Police already have, thus increasing the spiral of one-upmanship even further, I reckon investment in better body-cam technology would be more appropriate. That way they have a defence when they are in the right & disciplinary action may be taken when they are in the wrong.
I have a problem with all this.
Guilty without a body cam?
You can't know how you will react in a situation.
Posted: Mon Feb 16, 2015 2:11 pm
by Bruv
tude dog;1474102 wrote: I have a problem with all this.
Guilty without a body cam?
I think you have a problem.....as you say.....period.
You can't know how you will react in a situation.
Posted: Mon Feb 16, 2015 2:23 pm
by tude dog
Bruv;1474107 wrote: I think you have a problem.....as you say.....period.
Yea
I do.
You can't know how you will react in a situation.
Posted: Mon Feb 16, 2015 5:15 pm
by LarsMac
I think that kind of training should be required for every person who wishes to own a gun.