Blog for Mickiel?

[Singh-Song]

Does anyone else think that things would be improved for everyone if Mickiel were to set up his own blog to handle his streams of consciousness, instead of saturating the General Religious Discussions forum with them? He would be free to say whatever he wanted to without receiving criticism or having insults aimed his way, and everyone else would be able to engage in actual religious discussions with one another. All those in favour?

[Oscar Namechange]

Why are you dragging all of this up again?

The site owner and admin have already ruled he carries on as usual.

What's your motive here?

[Singh-Song]

Oh. Sorry, I've been away for a while (driven away out of frustration, no prizes for guessing who by) and wasn't aware of this. Guess I'll just have to go and find another forum where the threads actually get discussed then... Please, feel free to delete this thread, and my profile while you're at it.

[Oscar Namechange]

Singh-Song;1445867 wrote: Oh. Sorry, I've been away for a while (driven away out of frustration, no prizes for guessing who by) and wasn't aware of this. Guess I'll just have to find a forum where the threads actually get discussed then... If you check out the ' Ban Mikiel ' thread, you'll see that this has been discussed at length.

Threads do get discussed here, why don't you join In a few ?

This forum has a religious section and Mikiel has every right to post In It...

Surely you can still be part of this forum with him In It ? There are plenty of other threads to join In with here.

[Mickiel]

Singh-Song;1445867 wrote: Oh. Sorry, I've been away for a while (driven away out of frustration, no prizes for guessing who by) and wasn't aware of this. Guess I'll just have to go and find another forum where the threads actually get discussed then... Please, feel free to delete this thread, and my profile while you're at it.


I have a thread I just started for anyone who wants to discuss whatever; I invite you to the thread. And it is not a perceived blog. I invite you to conversate.

But leave the accusations and fault finding behind please.

[Mickiel]

[QUOTE=Singh-Song;1445864



. All those in favour?




I just wanted to comment on a simularity between this thread request and Annes thread; both were trying to garner support for their cause. Instead of doing by themselves, they wanted others to join in with them. Interesting isn't it?

Now I could start a thread on WHY people need to do that; but I resist the temptation.

[Singh-Song]

It was just a suggestion, Mickiel. And a constructive one to boot. I'm guessing from the amount of time you spend posting on here that you don't get out much, so I just thought that garnering some extra income from what setting up a blog, and continuing to do what you do regularly anyway, might be worthwhile. Still, if you're lucky enough not to have any money worries (I know I'm not), then feel free to ignore it. Peace...

[Mickiel]

Singh-Song;1445874 wrote: It was just a suggestion, Mickiel. And a constructive one to boot. I'm guessing from the amount of time you spend posting on here that you don't get out much, so I just thought that garnering some extra income from what setting up a blog, and continuing to do what you do regularly anyway, might be worthwhile. Still, if you're lucky enough not to have any money worries (I know I'm not), then feel free to ignore it. Peace...




You put my name on a Thread title, then ask me to ignore it.

You insult me by suggesting I don't get out much

You pry into my personal busness, which you know nothing of, and suggest that I make extra money with your idea

I don't understand.

I mean I can understand why some people attack me; but this continued effort to control me is stunning. I don't control who post on this site and how often.

But I am being made an escape goat on this site and that is just revealing.

[LarsMac]

As the OP requested, I have closed this thread.