M J Autopsy

Lon · Post by **Lon** » Thu Jul 02, 2009 7:11 am

Now that MJ has had his two autopsies and had all his organs removed, including his brain, dissected and weighed, fluids sent to toxicology labs along with tissue, and then put back into his chest and abdominal cavity mixed with sawdust and formaldehyde powder somewhat randomly, what we have left is a shell that the embalmers will restore to a likeness of what once was.

Those viewing the remains will never see the X or Y cut incision across the chest or abdomen, or the incision from ear to ear around the back of the skull to remove the brain. Going to the Wax Museum to see his likeness would give a better viewing.

Nomad · Post by **Nomad** » Thu Jul 02, 2009 5:53 pm

So anyway whos going to see some fireworks ?

hoppy · Post by **hoppy** » Thu Jul 02, 2009 6:13 pm

The other day I took a walk into the alley behind my building. A janitor was picking up bunches of red tampons. I said "WTF"? He told me every year around the 4 th of July, the building's housekeeping crew gets bunches of tampons, paints them red and gives them to old Emil Beemus on the 9 th floor. He lights the string "fuse" and tosses them out his window over the alley. He's deaf and only imagines they explode. Before they did that he would get real fireworks and once set a roof on fire of a building on the other side of the alley.

I love living around senile old people.

Nomad · Post by **Nomad** » Thu Jul 02, 2009 6:51 pm

hoppy;1212608 wrote: The other day I took a walk into the alley behind my building. A janitor was picking up bunches of red tampons. I said "WTF"? He told me every year around the 4 th of July, the building's housekeeping crew gets bunches of tampons, paints them red and gives them to old Emil Beemus on the 9 th floor. He lights the string "fuse" and tosses them out his window over the alley. He's deaf and only imagines they explode. Before they did that he would get real fireworks and once set a roof on fire of a building on the other side of the alley.

I love living around senile old people.

I have cat hair all over my face right now.

Odie · Post by **Odie** » Fri Jul 03, 2009 6:05 am

Lon;1212476 wrote: Now that MJ has had his two autopsies and had all his organs removed, including his brain, dissected and weighed, fluids sent to toxicology labs along with tissue, and then put back into his chest and abdominal cavity mixed with sawdust and formaldehyde powder somewhat randomly, what we have left is a shell that the embalmers will restore to a likeness of what once was.

Those viewing the remains will never see the X or Y cut incision across the chest or abdomen, or the incision from ear to ear around the back of the skull to remove the brain. Going to the Wax Museum to see his likeness would give a better viewing.

and your point?

did you not know this is what any autopsy entails?

Lon · Post by **Lon** » Fri Jul 03, 2009 7:25 am

Odie;1212675 wrote: and your point?

did you not know this is what any autopsy entails?

I have been involved in well over 1,000 autopsies.

Post by **Oscar Namechange** » Fri Jul 03, 2009 8:02 am

Odie;1212675 wrote: and your point?

did you not know this is what any autopsy entails? There is no point other than to upset his fans. My brother's baby girl died two years ago and she had to have an autopsy. Thanks for the memories Lon :-5

Lon · Post by **Lon** » Fri Jul 03, 2009 8:21 am

oscar;1212704 wrote: There is no point other than to upset his fans. My brother's baby girl died two years ago and she had to have an autopsy. Thanks for the memories Lon :-5

Any of your memories are stored in your brain, not in my words.

Post by **Oscar Namechange** » Fri Jul 03, 2009 8:25 am

Lon;1212708 wrote: Any of your memories are stored in your brain, not in my words.
Yes, some are, true. Then there is days when you can forget the horror of her passing and subsequent autopsy until some dipstick comes along and graphically extols the details.

In time, it's possible to replace the memories you don't want to remember with only the happy times.

Lon · Post by **Lon** » Fri Jul 03, 2009 8:27 am

The Point? It's the fact that this whole MJ thing is a Circus and will continue to be so for years to come, preempting much more important news that affects the everyday life of people. It does however show the average person's misplaced priorities and the medias need to stay solvent.

Post by **Oscar Namechange** » Fri Jul 03, 2009 8:31 am

Lon;1212713 wrote: The Point? It's the fact that this whole MJ thing is a Circus and will continue to be so for years to come, preempting much more important news that affects the everyday life of people. It does however show the average person's misplaced priorities and the medias need to stay solvent.
I disagree. MJ was unique in that what ever language people spoke or what far flung country they live in, he was a world celebrity. His coverage is only in proportion with his global fame.

Lon · Post by **Lon** » Fri Jul 03, 2009 8:44 am

oscar;1212715 wrote: I disagree. MJ was unique in that what ever language people spoke or what far flung country they live in, he was a world celebrity. His coverage is only in proportion with his global fame.

You are so right, he was unique and appealed to many people of limited interests all over the world.

Post by **Oscar Namechange** » Fri Jul 03, 2009 8:47 am

Lon;1212718 wrote: You are so right, he was unique and appealed to many people of limited interests all over the world. Don't be so insulting. You don't have to have limited interests to appreciate his genious of music and dance. He was an inspiration for many kids the world over for 30 yrs not some one hit wonder. So what if some folk do have limited interests and worship Jacko? It's their life.

You could say the same of Diana, Princess of Wales.

Lon · Post by **Lon** » Fri Jul 03, 2009 8:58 am

oscar;1212719 wrote: Don't be so insulting. You don't have to have limited interests to appreciate his genious of music and dance. He was an inspiration for many kids the world over for 30 yrs not some one hit wonder. So what if some folk do have limited interests and worship Jacko? It's their life.

You could say the same of Diana, Princess of Wales.

Yes, you are right, she also was obsessively of interest to many of limited interests.

Post by **Oscar Namechange** » Fri Jul 03, 2009 9:01 am

Lon;1212724 wrote: Yes, you are right, she also was obsessively of interest to many of limited interests.
Horses for courses Lon. I never had the slightest interest in Diana.

Post by **spot** » Fri Jul 03, 2009 9:23 am

oscar;1212715 wrote: he was a world celebrity.That, surely, is the reason it's all so utterly trivial. Celebrities are the creation of the mass markets, consumers of celebrity are society's illness, "unique" or "genius" are the most abused words in the language. If people spent more time thinking and less time consuming we'd all have a far better environment. What Michael Jackson purveyed was dismal, trite and corrupting of moral health, and I'm not talking about his bedtime habits I'm talking about his "entertainment".

Odie · Post by **Odie** » Fri Jul 03, 2009 9:35 am

Lon;1212700 wrote: I have been involved in well over 1,000 autopsies.

so why broadcast it just for MJ?

farmer giles · Post by **farmer giles** » Fri Jul 03, 2009 9:39 am

spot;1212740 wrote: That, surely, is the reason it's all so utterly trivial. Celebrities are the creation of the mass markets, consumers of celebrity are society's illness, "unique" or "genius" are the most abused words in the language. If people spent more time thinking and less time consuming we'd all have a far better environment. What Michael Jackson purveyed was dismal, trite and corrupting of moral health, and I'm not talking about his bedtime habits I'm talking about his "entertainment".

the best post on fg in ages

:-6:-6

Bruv · Post by **Bruv** » Fri Jul 03, 2009 9:57 am

spot;1212740 wrote: That, surely, is the reason it's all so utterly trivial. Celebrities are the creation of the mass markets, consumers of celebrity are society's illness, "unique" or "genius" are the most abused words in the language. If people spent more time thinking and less time consuming we'd all have a far better environment. What Michael Jackson purveyed was dismal, trite and corrupting of moral health, and I'm not talking about his bedtime habits I'm talking about his "entertainment".

Set aside the utterly trivial, forget the mass marketing media hype, forget the "unigue" and "genius" labels attributed to the late Michael Jackson.

On a scale of world importance he was insignificant.

But should you moaning people ever want to let your hair down (if you have any) just boogie on down to some Jackson vibes.......

There are none better.

His music might not be to your taste, but I would expect a few of you have lodged in your memory a refrain from the one and only Jacko.

And remember " Man can't live by bread alone"

farmer giles · Post by **farmer giles** » Fri Jul 03, 2009 10:23 am

Bruv;1212755 wrote: Set aside the utterly trivial, forget the mass marketing media hype, forget the "unigue" and "genius" labels attributed to the late Michael Jackson.

On a scale of world importance he was insignificant.

But should you moaning people ever want to let your hair down (if you have any) just boogie on down to some Jackson vibes.......

There are none better.

His music might not be to your taste, but I would expect a few of you have lodged in your memory a refrain from the one and only Jacko.

And remember " Man can't live by bread alone"

i do believe i'm going to throw up :yh_rotfl:yh_rotfl

i may or not of danced very badly at cheeky petes at richmonds the castle to mj off the wall when i was 18 :-3:-3

o

Bruv · Post by **Bruv** » Fri Jul 03, 2009 10:35 am

What I am trying to say....

You don't have to endorse somebodies lifestyle to hum their music.

farmer giles · Post by **farmer giles** » Fri Jul 03, 2009 10:39 am

Bruv;1212774 wrote: What I am trying to say....

You don't have to endorse somebodies lifestyle to hum their music.

so if i sing out loud gary glitter songs as his funeral is on tv ,people will understand that will they :rolleyes::rolleyes:

Post by **spot** » Fri Jul 03, 2009 12:43 pm

Bruv;1212774 wrote: What I am trying to say....

You don't have to endorse somebodies lifestyle to hum their music.

If you find me humming an MJ track - or even recognizing one - you have my full permission to shoot me.

Mozart, Stockhausen and Richard Thompson spring to mind as worth listening to. Or, if you're looking for a contender from the New World, Leonard Cohen and Bob Dylan work equally well. They have... what's the word I'm looking for... Content.

Post by **Oscar Namechange** » Fri Jul 03, 2009 1:28 pm

spot;1212824 wrote: If you find me humming an MJ track - or even recognizing one - you have my full permission to shoot me.

Mozart, Stockhausen and Richard Thompson spring to mind as worth listening to. Or, if you're looking for a contender from the New World, Leonard Cohen and Bob Dylan work equally well. They have... what's the word I'm looking for... Content. Then thank goodness no-one is the same. I reject your suggestions and offer up in comparison, 'The Stranglers', 'The Verve', 'U2', Micheal Jackson', The Rolling Stones' and 'Shawaddy waddy'.

Snowfire · Post by **Snowfire** » Fri Jul 03, 2009 1:34 pm

oscar;1212837 wrote: Then thank goodness no-one is the same. I reject your suggestions and offer up in comparison, 'The Stranglers', 'The Verve', 'U2', Micheal Jackson', The Rolling Stones' and 'Shawaddy waddy'.

I nearly choked and baulked when I read Leonard Cohen. I felt the bread knife drawing across my wrist

But ! Showaddy Waddy ??

What did the world do to deserve such tosh ? Such unadulterated drivvle ?

Lon · Post by **Lon** » Fri Jul 03, 2009 1:35 pm

Odie;1212745 wrote: so why broadcast it just for MJ?

OK----what other celebrity died recently and had two autopsies? I would be happy to discuss their post mortem exams as well. If it bothers you, just scroll on by.

Lon · Post by **Lon** » Fri Jul 03, 2009 1:37 pm

oscar;1212719 wrote: Don't be so insulting. You don't have to have limited interests to appreciate his genious of music and dance. He was an inspiration for many kids the world over for 30 yrs not some one hit wonder. So what if some folk do have limited interests and worship Jacko? It's their life.

You could say the same of Diana, Princess of Wales.

Golly gee whiz----------were you insulted or do you always take it upon yourself to speak for others?

Post by **Oscar Namechange** » Fri Jul 03, 2009 1:37 pm

Snowfire;1212839 wrote: I nearly choked and baulked when I read Leonard Cohen. I felt the bread knife drawing across my wrist

But ! Showaddy Waddy ??

What did the world do to deserve such tosh ? Such unadulterated drivvle ? :yh_rotfl I was joking about shawaddywaddy but wondered if anyone would notice :yh_rotfl:yh_rotfl

Post by **Oscar Namechange** » Fri Jul 03, 2009 1:39 pm

Lon;1212842 wrote: Golly gee whiz----------were you insulted or do you always take it upon yourself to speak for others?
No, i'm fine being opinionated all by myself thanks Lon

Post by **Sunshine** » Fri Jul 03, 2009 1:46 pm

Oh for heavens sake. Give it up. He was a pop star legend right along side elvis. He gave more back than he ever took and was a genius when it came to his music and dance. I am not saying I adored him, but I do have a deep respect for his talent. I think we have lost a great artist and think he has earned everything that is happening now. Do you also slam down Elvis because he died of a drug overdose? As I see it, the worst always comes out after someone of world fame, dies. I try and see the good that he did, not the bad. Let he who is without sin, cast the first stone.

Snowfire · Post by **Snowfire** » Fri Jul 03, 2009 1:46 pm

Incidentally Oscar. I'm not in agreement at all with your stance against Lon. I dont agree with his view at all but besides that he shouldnt be considering people sensibilities when posting about autopsies. A little while ago you were very defensive - quite rightly - when an objection was given to your posting of animal cruelty. You didnt care for people posting their disgust at the pictures or contents of the thread.

Lon's position is the same, as far as I'm concerned.

I happen to disagree with him and Spot about the musical legacy that Michael Jackson has left. That's personal taste I spose.

Stockhausen, I must admit, never made the hair on the back of my kneck stand on end and I struggle hugely with Leonard Cohen. Richard Thompson, however, does reach the parts other artists cannot reach. So we all may have some things in common

Showaddy bleedin waddy aint one of 'em

Lon · Post by **Lon** » Fri Jul 03, 2009 1:47 pm

oscar;1212845 wrote: No, i'm fine being opinionated all by myself thanks Lon

I understand. That sometimes goes along with limited interests.

Post by **Oscar Namechange** » Fri Jul 03, 2009 1:50 pm

Lon;1212852 wrote: I understand. That sometimes goes along with limited interests.
Meooooowwwwwww

Post by **Sunshine** » Fri Jul 03, 2009 1:50 pm

Lon;1212852 wrote: I understand. That sometimes goes along with limited interests.

Seems to me that you might be the one with the limited interest Lon. Maybe you should try and reach outside of your shell.

Post by **Oscar Namechange** » Fri Jul 03, 2009 1:57 pm

Sunshine;1212854 wrote: Seems to me that you might be the one with the limited interest Lon. Maybe you should try and reach outside of your shell. :wah:

Bruv · Post by **Bruv** » Fri Jul 03, 2009 1:57 pm

spot;1212824 wrote: If you find me humming an MJ track - or even recognizing one - you have my full permission to shoot me.

Mozart, Stockhausen and Richard Thompson spring to mind as worth listening to. Or, if you're looking for a contender from the New World, Leonard Cohen and Bob Dylan work equally well. They have... what's the word I'm looking for... Content.

So Spot,

in your Escoffier Haute cuisine world of Bouef bourguignon, Coquilles Saint Jacques, Bouillabaisse, washed down with Pinot noir or Champagne there is no room for a Burger and a coke ?

And you talk of 'worth' ?

Did Mozart use a 'better' scale (or whatever they call it) to write his music ?

What elitist codswallop, with due respect.

Lon · Post by **Lon** » Fri Jul 03, 2009 2:01 pm

Sunshine;1212854 wrote: Seems to me that you might be the one with the limited interest Lon. Maybe you should try and reach outside of your shell.

Interresting comment----------since my post to this link at 9 AM Pacific Time wherein I responded to Oscar, I have gone grocery shopping, played nine holes of golf with my wife, played water volleyball for two hours, paid some bills via internet banking, posted on Face Book to my grandchildren and talked to my niece in Malaga Spain via Skype. So what have you and Oscar been doing?

Post by **Oscar Namechange** » Fri Jul 03, 2009 2:08 pm

Lon;1212864 wrote: Interresting comment----------since my post to this link at 9 AM Pacific Time wherein I responded to Oscar, I have gone grocery shopping, played nine holes of golf with my wife, played water volleyball for two hours, paid some bills via internet banking, posted on Face Book to my grandchildren and talked to my niece in Malaga Spain via Skype. So what have you and Oscar been doing?
Having sex !!!

farmer giles · Post by **farmer giles** » Fri Jul 03, 2009 2:12 pm

mods come on my poor innocent ears

:-3:-3

Post by **Sunshine** » Fri Jul 03, 2009 2:16 pm

oscar;1212868 wrote: Having sex !!!

:yh_rotfl sure beats paying bills. :sneaky:

Lon · Post by **Lon** » Fri Jul 03, 2009 2:16 pm

oscar;1212868 wrote: Having sex !!!

With someone or by yourself?

Post by **Oscar Namechange** » Fri Jul 03, 2009 2:17 pm

Lon;1212872 wrote: With someone or by yourself?
In a group.

Lon · Post by **Lon** » Fri Jul 03, 2009 2:19 pm

oscar;1212873 wrote: In a group.

A group of people or animals?

Post by **Oscar Namechange** » Fri Jul 03, 2009 2:21 pm

Lon;1212878 wrote: A group of people or animals? Both

SuzyB · Post by **SuzyB** » Fri Jul 03, 2009 2:21 pm

Lon;1212878 wrote: A group of people or animals?

Sorry Oscar but that is :yh_rotfl:yh_rotfl Hope you are well Lon, Oscar and everyone else

Post by **Betty Boop** » Fri Jul 03, 2009 2:22 pm

Ok, can we remember the 13 age limit on this site please.

Lon · Post by **Lon** » Fri Jul 03, 2009 2:24 pm

oscar;1212879 wrote: Both

Was it as good for you as it was for them?

Odie · Post by **Odie** » Fri Jul 03, 2009 2:36 pm

Lon;1212841 wrote: OK----what other celebrity died recently and had two autopsies? I would be happy to discuss their post mortem exams as well. If it bothers you, just scroll on by.

The only reason you posted such tastelessness is because you hate MJ.

SuzyB · Post by **SuzyB** » Fri Jul 03, 2009 2:43 pm

Talking of autopsies, did anyone in the UK watch a show on the tv where they were performing live autopsies in front of an audience? I couldn't watch it but a couple of friends did, they said they found it interesting.

Rapunzel · Post by **Rapunzel** » Fri Jul 03, 2009 3:03 pm

Lon;1212852 wrote: I understand. That sometimes goes along with limited interests.

This is rich coming from someone who spends 90% of his posting time talking about meals he's eaten and 9% of his posting time talking about what he's doing. I'd call that quite egotistical and of limited interest. The last 1% of recent comments are reminiscent of a female dog. :yh_loser