so are the BNP racists

farmer giles · Post by **farmer giles** » Sat Jun 20, 2009 3:56 pm

i know i know its boring but the head supporter is wriggling like a worm on a hook and trying to get out :yh_rotfl:yh_rotfl

so are the BNP racist i say 100% yes no doubt about it

the head guy nick gremlin has convictions for it

and indeed the vile nazi party was set up by racists :rolleyes::rolleyes:

of course some people respect their honesty when they admit they are dropping the racist thing until they get into power then it will rear its ugly head again :rolleyes::rolleyes:

Post by **Oscar Namechange** » Sat Jun 20, 2009 4:09 pm

farmer giles;1206288 wrote: i know i know its boring but the head supporter is wriggling like a worm on a hook and trying to get out :yh_rotfl:yh_rotfl

so are the BNP racist i say 100% yes no doubt about it

the head guy nick gremlin has convictions for it

and indeed the vile nazi party was set up by racists :rolleyes::rolleyes:

of course some people respect their honesty when they admit they are dropping the racist thing until they get into power then it will rear its ugly head again :rolleyes::rolleyes:
Keep it up Jumbo......... every time you mention the BNP, you give them more oxygen and publicity on the web. :yh_loser:yh_loser:yh_loser

farmer giles · Post by **farmer giles** » Sat Jun 20, 2009 4:27 pm

oscar;1206290 wrote: Keep it up Jumbo......... every time you mention the BNP, you give them more oxygen and publicity on the web. :yh_loser:yh_loser:yh_loser

no i really believe you are wrong i think every time some one see's the vile racists for what they really are then they lose face

and every time some one tells lies on their behalf they get more and more discredited:)

i will always speak out against racists and bigots i will never ever be shouted down

call me bald thick ugly fat jumbo what ever you like

i stand up for what i believe even if i stand alone ... thanks to the fg person who posted that i use that a lot :sneaky::sneaky:

Kathy Ellen · Post by **Kathy Ellen** » Sat Jun 20, 2009 4:36 pm

Good on you Jim:-6

Always stand up for what you believe, even if you stand alone.

Post by **Oscar Namechange** » Sat Jun 20, 2009 4:37 pm

farmer giles;1206293 wrote: no i really believe you are wrong i think every time some one see's the vile racists for what they really are then they lose face

and every time some one tells lies on their behalf they get more and more discredited:)

i will always speak out against racists and bigots i will never ever be shouted down

call me bald thick ugly fat jumbo what ever you like

i stand up for what i believe even if i stand alone ... thanks to the fg person who posted that i use that a lot :sneaky::sneaky:
So i'm a liar am i for exposing the fact that you tried blaming the attck on 'Roma' in Belfast on the BNP when it clearly had nothing to do with them as the article i posted earlier on my thread shows you. I have also said in another thread that i'm in no doubt some hard core members of the BNP who made the switch from the National front in 1982 when John Tyndall started the BNP as a splinter group are indeed rascists. So where's the lie's Dumbo?

Kathy Ellen · Post by **Kathy Ellen** » Sat Jun 20, 2009 4:43 pm

[quote=oscar;1206297]So i'm a liar am i for exposing the fact that you tried blaming the attck on 'Roma' in Belfast on the BNP when it clearly had nothing to do with them as the article i posted earlier on my thread shows you. I have also said in another thread that i'm in no doubt some hard core members of the BNP who made the switch from the National front in 1982 when John Tyndall started the BNP as a splinter group are indeed rascists. So where's the lie's Dumbo?[/quote]

Jim is certainly the last person in FG I would call "Dumbo.":(

That's an awful thing to say to another member Oscar or was it in jest

??

farmer giles · Post by **farmer giles** » Sat Jun 20, 2009 4:44 pm

oscar;1206297 wrote: So i'm a liar am i for exposing the fact that you tried blaming the attck on 'Roma' in Belfast on the BNP when it clearly had nothing to do with them as the article i posted earlier on my thread shows you. I have also said in another thread that i'm in no doubt some hard core members of the BNP who made the switch from the National front in 1982 when John Tyndall started the BNP as a splinter group are indeed rascists. So where's the lie's Dumbo?

another insult :yh_rotfl:yh_rotfl

they are racist and by saying they are not is a lie

:)

Post by **Oscar Namechange** » Sat Jun 20, 2009 4:50 pm

farmer giles;1206300 wrote: another insult :yh_rotfl:yh_rotfl

they are racist and by saying they are not is a lie

:)
So who exactly is 'they'.?

Post by **Oscar Namechange** » Sat Jun 20, 2009 4:51 pm

Kathy Ellen;1206298 wrote: [quote=oscar;1206297]So i'm a liar am i for exposing the fact that you tried blaming the attck on 'Roma' in Belfast on the BNP when it clearly had nothing to do with them as the article i posted earlier on my thread shows you. I have also said in another thread that i'm in no doubt some hard core members of the BNP who made the switch from the National front in 1982 when John Tyndall started the BNP as a splinter group are indeed rascists. So where's the lie's Dumbo?[/quote]

Jim is certainly the last person in FG I would call "Dumbo.":(

That's an awful thing to say to another member Oscar or was it in jest

?? Kathy..... I am sure He takes it in as much of our British sense of humour as i did when he called me a Nazi several times on another thread as another American poster protested to him for what he called me. I take it in good fun, I'm sure it works both ways.

farmer giles · Post by **farmer giles** » Sat Jun 20, 2009 4:57 pm

oscar;1206303 wrote: Kathy..... I am sure He takes it in as much of our British sense of humour as i did when he called me a Nazi several times on another thread as another American poster protested to him for what he called me. I take it in good fun, I'm sure it works both ways.

actually you called me the nazi first :p:p

they are BNP they are racists

:D

the head honcho has been done for racism and admits he is lying about their racism until they get elected

thanks kathy but the more she insults me the more she loses face and so do her beloved racist BNP

Kathy Ellen · Post by **Kathy Ellen** » Sat Jun 20, 2009 4:58 pm

oscar;1206303 wrote: Kathy..... I am sure He takes it in as much of our British sense of humour as i did when he called me a Nazi several times on another thread as another American poster protested to him for what he called me. I take it in good fun, I'm sure it works both ways.

I hope so.....guess I really don't always get your humor. Never know when you're kidding or not:-2

Bruv · Post by **Bruv** » Sat Jun 20, 2009 4:59 pm

Oscar you know how the BNP stood up for the Gurkhas ?

How the men who fight for Britain should have the right to remain in Britain ?

Did you know they can fight and stay in Britain.......but they cant JOIN the BNP.....because they are not European.

Did you know that Oscar ?

Bruv · Post by **Bruv** » Sat Jun 20, 2009 5:02 pm

Kathy Ellen;1206306 wrote:

I hope so.....guess I really don't always get your humor. Never know when you're kidding or not:-2

Dont know if we have ever conversed Kathy , but I have noticed you post.....a bit.

Dont mind us English, we have a robust sense of humour (with two U's) and we actually enjoy laughing at ourselves.

Post by **Oscar Namechange** » Sat Jun 20, 2009 5:04 pm

farmer giles;1206305 wrote: actually you called me the nazi first :p:p

they are BNP they are racists

:D

the head honcho has been done for racism and admits he is lying about their racism until they get elected

thanks kathy but the more she insults me the more she loses face and so do her beloved racist BNP

So who are the BNP? Ok We've established that the leader Griffin has been convicted for inciting racial hatred. The polls showed the growing rise in popularity of the BNP. They won thousands of votes..... so who are the BNP..... it can't just be Griffin and Brons. That's just two people in thousands of votes.

Where does Griffin admit he's lying to get elected? Do you have a link or a bono fide statement by the BNP to state that griffin lied to get elected? Or are you just making it up as you go along again?

Post by **Oscar Namechange** » Sat Jun 20, 2009 5:05 pm

Bruv;1206307 wrote: Oscar you know how the BNP stood up for the Gurkhas ?

How the men who fight for Britain should have the right to remain in Britain ?

Did you know they can fight and stay in Britain.......but they cant JOIN the BNP.....because they are not European.

Did you know that Oscar ? Yes Bruv, I am very much aware of BNP policy on the Ghurka's.

farmer giles · Post by **farmer giles** » Sat Jun 20, 2009 5:10 pm

IT DONT GET MUCH MORE LYING RACIST THAN THIS:yh_rotfl:yh_rotfl

YouTube - BNP MEP Nick Griffin + KKK Terrorist

Kathy Ellen · Post by **Kathy Ellen** » Sat Jun 20, 2009 5:12 pm

Bruv;1206308 wrote: Dont know if we have ever conversed Kathy , but I have noticed you post.....a bit.

Dont mind us English, we have a robust sense of humour (with two U's) and we actually enjoy laughing at ourselves.

Hi Bruv,:-6

Nice to meet ya. Well then, that's good to know:D

Carry on then:p

dubs · Post by **dubs** » Sat Jun 20, 2009 5:13 pm

oscar;1206309 wrote: So who are the BNP? Ok We've established that the leader Griffin has been convicted for inciting racial hatred. The polls showed the growing rise in popularity of the BNP. They won thousands of votes..... so who are the BNP..... it can't just be Griffin and Brons. That's just two people in thousands of votes.

Where does Griffin admit he's lying to get elected? Do you have a link or a bono fide statement by the BNP to state that griffin lied to get elected? Or are you just making it up as you go along again?

I can't think of any politician anywhere, that's admitted lying to get elected. But I'm willing to believe they all have at some time. Why do you think Griffin is any different?

Post by **Oscar Namechange** » Sat Jun 20, 2009 5:16 pm

farmer giles;1206311 wrote: IT DONT GET MUCH MORE LYING RACIST THAN THIS:yh_rotfl:yh_rotfl

YouTube - BNP MEP Nick Griffin + KKK Terrorist Your completely missing the plot arn't you?

If Griffin has been convicted for inciting racial hatred...... how can he lie about his rascism? Infact, the factor that most folk find so repulsive in Griffin is his constant racial bile induced speeches. So how can he rant racial hatred yet lie to voters? What part of that do you not understand?

Why don't you answer the question? WHO are the BNP?. They attracted thousands of votes in the EU elections, Griffin and Brons being only two people..... who are the rest exactly?

Post by **Oscar Namechange** » Sat Jun 20, 2009 5:19 pm

dubs;1206313 wrote: I can't think of any politician anywhere, that's admitted lying to get elected. But I'm willing to believe they all have at some time. Why do you think Griffin is any different?
Of course Griffin is no different as probably Andrew Brons who also won a seat in the EU elections for the BNP does. I just find it bloody hypocritical when i'm reading a two page spread in the Mail today about our government going down in history as the most corrupt government of modern england and here we are talking about two BNP leaders who have stated extremely verbosly exactly what their intentions are. Let's face it..... if they had not stated their exact intentions...... they would probably have achieved more votes not less.

farmer giles · Post by **farmer giles** » Sat Jun 20, 2009 5:19 pm

oscar;1206314 wrote: Your completely missing the plot arn't you?

If Griffin has been convicted for inciting racial hatred...... how can he lie about his rascism? Infact, the factor that most folk find so repulsive in Griffin is his constant racial bile induced speeches. So how can he rant racial hatred yet lie to voters? What part of that do you not understand?

Why don't you answer the question? WHO are the BNP?. They attracted thousands of votes in the EU elections, Griffin and Brons being only two people..... who are the rest exactly?

the plot is by his own words to lie about the bnp racist agenda

that is enough for me i dont want to talk about anything else the thread says are the bnp racist and yes they are

Bruv · Post by **Bruv** » Sat Jun 20, 2009 5:22 pm

oscar;1206310 wrote: Yes Bruv, I am very much aware of BNP policy on the Ghurka's.

But what about their policy on who can join the party ?

Hitler could join .....as it happens....Martin Luther would be a no no.

The Arch Bishop of York wouldn't even get the enrollment forms

Post by **Oscar Namechange** » Sat Jun 20, 2009 5:23 pm

farmer giles;1206316 wrote: the plot is by his own words to lie about the bnp racist agenda

that is enough for me i dont want to talk about anything else the thread says are the bnp racist and yes they are

Then your not only completely missing the point of a forum but you are as equally biased as you claim the BNP to be.

The hammer attack on a BNP member was carried out by the UAF. The violent protest staged outside the HOC when Griffin went to speak was carried out by the UAF as they later admited to the press, 'they did not believe in free speech'. The main funder and supporter of the UAF who attacked an innocent man with a hammer and denies the right of freedom of speech is David Cameron. There-fore, anyone who votes Tory is a supporter and advocate of violence.... right?

Post by **Oscar Namechange** » Sat Jun 20, 2009 5:25 pm

Bruv;1206317 wrote: But what about their policy on who can join the party ?

Hitler could join .....as it happens....Martin Luther would be a no no.

The Arch Bishop of York wouldn't even get the enrollment forms So why do they have Jewish members holding Council?

farmer giles · Post by **farmer giles** » Sun Jun 21, 2009 12:35 am

oscar;1206318 wrote: Then your not only completely missing the point of a forum but you are as equally biased as you claim the BNP to be.

The hammer attack on a BNP member was carried out by the UAF. The violent protest staged outside the HOC when Griffin went to speak was carried out by the UAF as they later admited to the press, 'they did not believe in free speech'. The main funder and supporter of the UAF who attacked an innocent man with a hammer and denies the right of freedom of speech is David Cameron. There-fore, anyone who votes Tory is a supporter and advocate of violence.... right?

no oscey it is you who completely misses the point of a forum time and time again

as with your i love gordon brown episode despite all the evidence of what was going on and all the good points made by all the fg members for months on end all we got was his loveliness this ,his lovelines this ,you are doing it again

i dont want to talk about Tories or the UAF ,even though i have posted a vid of nick gremlin with the KKK and he is saying pretty much the BNP are racists but they are keeping it quite for a while just like the gordon brown episode you ignore it and spout on about something else .your opinion does not matter to me at all ,you seem incapable of having a discussion about it in a way i find acceptable wether it is your fault or mine matters not

my aim here is to show the good people of FG the other side of the BNP the side you seem to want to keep quite ,i'd have more respect for you if you said ,yes the bnp are racist so what?? but to know they are racists and lie despite the head honcho admitting it and then admitting he is lying about it well its gordon all over again aint it :rolleyes::rolleyes:

abbey · Post by **abbey** » Sun Jun 21, 2009 1:36 am

so are the BNP racists

Absolutely!

buttercup · Post by **buttercup** » Sun Jun 21, 2009 2:40 am

Hello Oscar

Your a bit like a politician, you dont ever answer the question but use something else to sideline it :wah:

The leader of a party is the most influencial person in the party so if he is a known racist by voting for him to get into any kind of seat of power you find his beliefs acceptable. Thats it plain and simple in layman's terms. Not many 'Joe Public' figures spend much of their time involving themselves in politics or vote for their local councilor, jeez most people dont even know who their local councilor is. Your everyday 'Joe Public' is voting for the head of the party no matter what local name is on the form.

kazalala · Post by **kazalala** » Sun Jun 21, 2009 2:54 am

buttercup;1206415 wrote: Hello Oscar

Your a bit like a politician, you dont ever answer the question but use something else to sideline it :wah:

The leader of a party is the most influencial person in the party so if he is a known racist by voting for him to get into any kind of seat of power you find his beliefs acceptable. Thats it plain and simple in layman's terms. Not many 'Joe Public' figures spend much of their time involving themselves in politics or vote for their local councilor, jeez most people dont even know who their local councilor is. Your everyday 'Joe Public' is voting for the head of the party no matter what local name is on the form.

exactly,, you cant just dismiss the Leader of a Party, and say oh never mind him theres plenty other good folk there:rolleyes:

Snowfire · Post by **Snowfire** » Sun Jun 21, 2009 3:03 am

So are the BNP racist.

Absolutely, irrefutably yes

From the top of their heads to the tips of their toes.

Allowing a few right wing Jews in the party doesnt make them respectable

Oscar, you spend a lot of time here bemoaning the UAF. Sure they have members that are undesirable. Sure they have members who have been at the center of violence. But never once have you condemned the sort of behaviour and actions that has been the bread and butter for the BNP for decades.

I'll say it AGAIN. The BNP are just the NF in tidy suits. They think they can con the British public into thinking they are respectable if they kiss a few babies.

Their proportion of the vote ISNT on the increase. Less people voted for them this time than last time. It was because so many people abstained from voting that they got the proportion that enabled them to gets the seats.

What is it that everybody can see but you cant. Why are you so mesmerised by them ?

The arguement you seem constantly to take is that they are the only ones talking about Immigration. Well thats obvious nonsense. ALL parties have some sort of manifesto for Immigration. Even UKIP have a robust set of parameters set in place. It doesnt make them Fascists. It doesnt make them racist.

How anyone can even consider supporting this party is beyond me. You say you have done your research so you should know as well as anyone what they stand for. Your clearly an intelligent woman, so what gives ?

kazalala · Post by **kazalala** » Sun Jun 21, 2009 3:14 am

Snowfire;1206419 wrote: So are the BNP racist.

Absolutely, irrefutably yes

From the top of their heads to the tips of their toes.

Allowing a few right wing Jews in the party doesnt make them respectable

Oscar, you spend a lot of time here bemoaning the UAF. Sure they have members that are undesirable. Sure they have members who have been at the center of violence. But never once have you condemned the sort of behaviour and actions that has been the bread and butter for the BNP for decades.

I'll say it AGAIN. The BNP are just the NF in tidy suits. They think they can con the British public into thinking they are respectable if they kiss a few babies.

Their proportion of the vote ISNT on the increase. Less people voted for them this time than last time. It was because so many people abstained from voting that they got the proportion that enabled them to gets the seats.

What is it that everybody can see but you cant. Why are you so mesmerised by them ?

The arguement you seem constantly to take is that they are the only ones talking about Immigration. Well thats obvious nonsense. ALL parties have some sort of manifesto for Immigration. Even UKIP have a robust set of parameters set in place. It doesnt make them Fascists. It doesnt make them racist.

How anyone can even consider supporting this party is beyond me. You say you have done your research so you should know as well as anyone what they stand for. Your clearly an intelligent woman, so what gives ?

Thts how i feel,, they are trying to con people,, therefore laughing at the guillable

How exactly does that work again? See how ignorant i am about politics:rolleyes::-3

See thats what im having a really hard time with,, oscar cannot be that guilable surely?? and then the alternative is?

buttercup · Post by **buttercup** » Sun Jun 21, 2009 3:18 am

Maybe she just enjoys the wind up?

I dont know what its like for most people living in England but for Scotland we by and large welcome other nationalities. We are in population decline, many of our eastern european workers are returning home and its now noted that by the second part of the century our population will fall below five million. This of course will impact our economy. We would like to have the power to administer our own immigration service as our needs are somewhat different from Englands.

Snowfire · Post by **Snowfire** » Sun Jun 21, 2009 3:22 am

kazalala;1206422 wrote:

How exactly does that work again? See how ignorant i am about politics:rolleyes::-3

Because of the electorates disgust at Parliaments greed in the expenses scandal and an understandable reaction to this governments less than satisfactory Immigration policy among other things, many people stayed away from the polling booths, in protest.

That didnt manifest itself in more people voting for the BNP, in fact less did than last time. It was because so many people walked away from voting for the main parties that gave the BNP a chance to gain 2 seats. Not because they are so universally popular.

They never will be

Snowfire · Post by **Snowfire** » Sun Jun 21, 2009 3:25 am

buttercup;1206424 wrote: Maybe she just enjoys the wind up?

I dont know what its like for most people living in England but for Scotland we by and large welcome other nationalities. We are in population decline, many of our eastern european workers are returning home and its now noted that by the second part of the century our population will fall below five million. This of course will impact our economy. We would like to have the power to administer our own immigration service as our needs are somewhat different from Englands.

Thats interesting and on the whole I agree. It shows just how stupid some of our politicians are when for years they try to convince us that mass immigration is good for the economy but recently announced that allowing a few thousand Ghurkas to stay would be far too expensive.

So which is it ?

Astonishing double standards but what did we expect from this lot ?

kazalala · Post by **kazalala** » Sun Jun 21, 2009 3:28 am

Snowfire;1206428 wrote: Because of the electorates disgust at Parliaments greed in the expenses scandal and an understandable reaction to this governments less than satisfactory Immigration policy among other things, many people stayed away from the polling booths, in protest.

That didnt manifest itself in more people voting for the BNP, in fact less did than last time. It was because so many people walked away from voting for the main parties that gave the BNP a chance to gain 2 seats. Not because they are so universally popular.

They never will be

Thank you:) I remember on the day my hubby saying he aint gonna bother,,and my mother,, i railed on at both of them until they changed their minds:sneaky:

Snowfire · Post by **Snowfire** » Sun Jun 21, 2009 3:35 am

kazalala;1206430 wrote: Thank you:) I remember on the day my hubby saying he aint gonna bother,,and my mother,, i railed on at both of them until they changed their minds:sneaky:

Good for you Kaz

Bruv · Post by **Bruv** » Sun Jun 21, 2009 5:25 am

oscar;1206320 wrote: So why do they have Jewish members holding Council?

Have you thought they might have a Jewish Member, just so they can say "Look we have a Jewish member."

You have 'seen' the conditions of membership havn't you ?

Only members of european tribes basically are allowed, despite the fact many Caribbeans have been born and bred here, have fought in our wars and see themselves as English.

Hell !!!! Even the mixed race children of Caribbeans cannot join the party.....so theoretically Mum or Dad can join, their spouse and children cannot.

Do you honestly think that is the way to run a political party in todays UK ?

farmer giles · Post by **farmer giles** » Sun Jun 21, 2009 5:54 am

Snowfire;1206419 wrote: So are the BNP racist.

Absolutely, irrefutably yes

From the top of their heads to the tips of their toes.

Allowing a few right wing Jews in the party doesnt make them respectable

Oscar, you spend a lot of time here bemoaning the UAF. Sure they have members that are undesirable. Sure they have members who have been at the center of violence. But never once have you condemned the sort of behaviour and actions that has been the bread and butter for the BNP for decades.

I'll say it AGAIN. The BNP are just the NF in tidy suits. They think they can con the British public into thinking they are respectable if they kiss a few babies.

Their proportion of the vote ISNT on the increase. Less people voted for them this time than last time. It was because so many people abstained from voting that they got the proportion that enabled them to gets the seats.

What is it that everybody can see but you cant. Why are you so mesmerised by them ?

The arguement you seem constantly to take is that they are the only ones talking about Immigration. Well thats obvious nonsense. ALL parties have some sort of manifesto for Immigration. Even UKIP have a robust set of parameters set in place. It doesnt make them Fascists. It doesnt make them racist.

How anyone can even consider supporting this party is beyond me. You say you have done your research so you should know as well as anyone what they stand for. Your clearly an intelligent woman, so what gives ?

er thats what i meant

:D

gmc · Post by **gmc** » Sun Jun 21, 2009 6:39 am

Bruv;1206465 wrote: Have you thought they might have a Jewish Member, just so they can say "Look we have a Jewish member."

You have 'seen' the conditions of membership havn't you ?

Only members of european tribes basically are allowed, despite the fact many Caribbeans have been born and bred here, have fought in our wars and see themselves as English.

Hell !!!! Even the mixed race children of Caribbeans cannot join the party.....so theoretically Mum or Dad can join, their spouse and children cannot.

Do you honestly think that is the way to run a political party in todays UK ?

Actually the history of black people in England pre-dates the arrival of other refugee groups that have settled there like the Huguenots fleeing persecution by the french, flemish, italian and dutch encouraged to emigrate bringing their particular skills with them (that quintessentially english explorer john cabot was actually italian) Indeed you could put a good case that without the contribution brought by immigration the industrial revolution would never have started or been much later in starting in the UK. We've always had a relatively free flow attitude to immigration. The royal family are after all immigrants with a mopst dubious claim to a right to live here and the royal consort is a greek political refugee. If the BNP want to repatriate sponging immigrants maybe they could start with them.:sneaky:

The modern problems have started with the influx of people who are not only racially distinctive but also culturally and wish to remain so. We've made a rod for our own backs by allowing segregation on religious lines with separate schools for catholic and protestant and allowing c of e schools to continue. Race and religion it's the two together.

Yes the BNP are racist and anyone who thinks they aren't is an idiot.

farmer giles · Post by **farmer giles** » Sun Jun 21, 2009 6:53 am

who ever said FG was full of idiots was wrong .... there is only one :yh_rotfl:yh_rotfl:yh_rotfl

and before she says it i'm a moron not an idiot :rolleyes::rolleyes:

Bruv · Post by **Bruv** » Sun Jun 21, 2009 6:53 am

Andrew Brons, the BNP's first MEP, sparked outrage on Saturday after he said double Olympic gold medal winner Dame Kelly Holmes cannot be regarded as fully British.

Kelly Holmes

Only a racist could say such a thing.

Snowfire · Post by **Snowfire** » Sun Jun 21, 2009 6:59 am

Bruv;1206537 wrote: Andrew Brons, the BNP's first MEP, sparked outrage on Saturday after he said double Olympic gold medal winner Dame Kelly Holmes cannot be regarded as fully British.

Kelly Holmes

Only a racist could say such a thing.

We shouldnt be in the least bit surprised at anything they say. We should expect it. Its all their blinkered, narrow mind will allow. Those who give credance to such imbicilic drivvle should expect a rough reception

farmer giles · Post by **farmer giles** » Sun Jun 21, 2009 6:59 am

Bruv;1206537 wrote: Andrew Brons, the BNP's first MEP, sparked outrage on Saturday after he said double Olympic gold medal winner Dame Kelly Holmes cannot be regarded as fully British.

Kelly Holmes

Only a racist could say such a thing.

thank you very much for posting bruv

can anyone including ferenzia or what ever her name is who is a good judge of charactor and trusts oscar on these matters :yh_rotfl:yh_rotfl

THE BNP ARE RACIST ..... ITS A PROVEN FACT :-5:-5

Bruv · Post by **Bruv** » Sun Jun 21, 2009 7:23 am

Technically and legally Mr Bron is correct of course, if you read the his full explanation......but the logic is based on the melanin composition of the said person.....nothing else.

The logic to me is astounding.

A long serving soldier and a Dame who has achieved so much for her country cannot be excepted as a true Brit, ironically the off spring of a variety of anti British people are acceptable, based on the components of their skin tone.

gmc · Post by **gmc** » Tue Jun 23, 2009 9:16 am

Never mind not tolerating racists why do we tolerate religious bigots?

farmer giles · Post by **farmer giles** » Tue Jun 23, 2009 9:43 am

gmc;1207745 wrote: Never mind not tolerating racists why do we tolerate religious bigots?

god only knows

BNP warned it could face a legal injunction for racism unless it alters party rules by next month | Mail Online

Post by **Oscar Namechange** » Tue Jun 23, 2009 9:54 am

gmc;1207745 wrote: Never mind not tolerating racists why do we tolerate religious bigots?
As the muslims would say...... 'YANNI'

Religeous bigots discriminate against race, colour, breed and culture. They are no different to the BNP.

farmer giles · Post by **farmer giles** » Tue Jun 23, 2009 9:55 am

oscar;1207769 wrote: As the muslims would say...... 'YANNI'

Religeous bigots discriminate against race, colour, breed and culture. They are no different to the BNP.

WHAT

you have changed your tune

Post by **Oscar Namechange** » Tue Jun 23, 2009 10:13 am

farmer giles;1207772 wrote: WHAT

you have changed your tune

Who said i had a tune to change and indeed, if i wanted a tune in the first place? That is not to say that i have never had a tune or indeed do not have a tune now. My tune could be a bono fide tune that in a free democratic society, i am at will to change when ever i like. My original tune could have been different to my present tune or i may have just altered my tune slighty to keep people who investigated tunes interested. Whatever, it is my tune and i may vary that tune depending on what my tune may or may not be in a tune moment. I certainly do not change my tune to keep in with those who's tune's may be varibly different to my own tune. I believe that all tunes should accept that every one of us has a right to have a tune of their choice. This is not included in the tune of the present government who seem to have no tune at all. My tune may change but that's not to say it will conflict with my present tune that could actually be different from the tune i had yesterday. the tune i have today there-fore could vary from the tune i may have tomorrow, however the tune i have tomorrow could infact be the same tune as i have today and the tune i had yesterday.

Logging off for a while now to go to a BNP meeting.

CHECKLIST

SHAVEN HEAD

UNION JACK TEE-SHIRT

COMBAT TROUSERS

DOC MARTIN'S

ANTI UAF BANNERS

BASEBALL BAT

yeah right.

farmer giles · Post by **farmer giles** » Tue Jun 23, 2009 11:40 am

oscar;1207785 wrote: Who said i had a tune to change and indeed, if i wanted a tune in the first place? That is not to say that i have never had a tune or indeed do not have a tune now. My tune could be a bono fide tune that in a free democratic society, i am at will to change when ever i like. My original tune could have been different to my present tune or i may have just altered my tune slighty to keep people who investigated tunes interested. Whatever, it is my tune and i may vary that tune depending on what my tune may or may not be in a tune moment. I certainly do not change my tune to keep in with those who's tune's may be varibly different to my own tune. I believe that all tunes should accept that every one of us has a right to have a tune of their choice. This is not included in the tune of the present government who seem to have no tune at all. My tune may change but that's not to say it will conflict with my present tune that could actually be different from the tune i had yesterday. the tune i have today there-fore could vary from the tune i may have tomorrow, however the tune i have tomorrow could infact be the same tune as i have today and the tune i had yesterday.

Logging off for a while now to go to a BNP meeting.

CHECKLIST

SHAVEN HEAD

UNION JACK TEE-SHIRT

COMBAT TROUSERS

DOC MARTIN'S

ANTI UAF BANNERS

BASEBALL BAT

yeah right.

ok i think for the benifit of fg i'm going to put you on ignore ... i just cant cope with all this total crap

:D

Post by **Oscar Namechange** » Tue Jun 23, 2009 11:42 am

farmer giles;1207842 wrote: ok i think for the benifit of fg i'm going to put you on ignore ... i just cant cope with all this total crap

:D So why keep answering?

Sorry, nearly forgot these: :yh_rotfl:yh_rotfl:yh_rotfl:yh_rotfl:yh_rotfl:yh_rotfl:yh_rotfl