What???? Today's CNN POLL asks "Should the U.S. Join 100 other Nations In Banning Cluster Bombs"?
I don't know about you, but this struck me as dumb, dumb, dumb, unless I am missing something. Is it because of the potential threat to civilians? Is it because we may maim and cripple the recipients of the bombing? What about Napalm, Incendiaries and every other kind of bomb. How about banning War?
Who the hell comes up with this stuff?
100 Nations Ban Cluster Bombs
100 Nations Ban Cluster Bombs
Who the hell comes up with this stuff?
Third world countries who don't have cluster bombs but still want to raise hell and not have to worry about them.
Third world countries who don't have cluster bombs but still want to raise hell and not have to worry about them.
100 Nations Ban Cluster Bombs
Ban wars ?
NEVER !
Personally I think the cluster bombs are pretty neato.
NEVER !
Personally I think the cluster bombs are pretty neato.
I AM AWESOME MAN
100 Nations Ban Cluster Bombs
Nomad;912494 wrote: Ban wars ?
NEVER !
Personally I think the cluster bombs are pretty neato.
Me 2. And, a well layed out mine field is a real work of art. My own interest is in designing boobytraps. I missed my calling.
NEVER !
Personally I think the cluster bombs are pretty neato.
Me 2. And, a well layed out mine field is a real work of art. My own interest is in designing boobytraps. I missed my calling.
100 Nations Ban Cluster Bombs
Mmmmm, Napalm. Yum yum.
100 Nations Ban Cluster Bombs
hoppy;913059 wrote: Mmmmm, Napalm. Yum yum.
Try it in your coffee instead of creamer.
One hell of a kick.
Try it in your coffee instead of creamer.
One hell of a kick.
I AM AWESOME MAN
100 Nations Ban Cluster Bombs
Nomad;913066 wrote: Try it in your coffee instead of creamer.
One hell of a kick.
Rock on.
One hell of a kick.
Rock on.
100 Nations Ban Cluster Bombs
Lon;912475 wrote: What???? Today's CNN POLL asks "Should the U.S. Join 100 other Nations In Banning Cluster Bombs"?
I don't know about you, but this struck me as dumb, dumb, dumb, unless I am missing something. Is it because of the potential threat to civilians? Is it because we may maim and cripple the recipients of the bombing? What about Napalm, Incendiaries and every other kind of bomb. How about banning War?
Who the hell comes up with this stuff?
hoppy;912479 wrote: Who the hell comes up with this stuff?
Third world countries who don't have cluster bombs but still want to raise hell and not have to worry about them.
Yup, what we should really be doing is banning and getting rid of all those dispicable little despots (but not Nomie
;)) who cause the wars in the first place.
I don't know about you, but this struck me as dumb, dumb, dumb, unless I am missing something. Is it because of the potential threat to civilians? Is it because we may maim and cripple the recipients of the bombing? What about Napalm, Incendiaries and every other kind of bomb. How about banning War?
Who the hell comes up with this stuff?
hoppy;912479 wrote: Who the hell comes up with this stuff?
Third world countries who don't have cluster bombs but still want to raise hell and not have to worry about them.
Yup, what we should really be doing is banning and getting rid of all those dispicable little despots (but not Nomie
;)) who cause the wars in the first place.Behaviour breeds behaviour - treat people how you would like to be treated yourself
100 Nations Ban Cluster Bombs
News flash- South Sukistan just announced if cluster bombs are not banned, it will resume test firing it's new arrows and spears with explosive tips. Where will it ever end?