Multiculturism

Raven · Post by **Raven** » Tue Jan 22, 2008 11:19 am

Pro's and cons. How about it?

Lon · Post by **Lon** » Tue Jan 22, 2008 12:14 pm

Pro or Con does not matter, it's inevitable, it's happening and will continue. A better question might be, how to live with it?

Raven · Post by **Raven** » Tue Jan 22, 2008 12:15 pm

And the effects of it. I think this one could get quite interesting.

Lon · Post by **Lon** » Tue Jan 22, 2008 12:40 pm

I suspect that in time there will be such a melding and blending of cultures and races, that there will be no such thing as being Irish, German, Romanian etc. People will eventually be such a admixture that their identity may just be that of "Human Being" (maybe not a bad idea). The strong genes will dominate and rather than future humans being inferior by cross breeding, they will in fact be bigger stronger and more intelligent.

I can foresee even todays religions being transformed as former Sunni's marry Jews, Hindus marry Catholics, new forms of religion could occur. Agnostic and Atheistic thinking will increase as more people fore go religion altogether.

There will not be countries as we know them today, but rather districts or territories, run and administered much like large Multinational Corporations are run today, except, there will be no stockholders. Management of these districts would be elected by the citizens of the districts.

Bruv · Post by **Bruv** » Tue Jan 22, 2008 1:00 pm

What would you define as Multiculturalism ?.....so we are talking about the same thing.

Lon · Post by **Lon** » Tue Jan 22, 2008 1:32 pm

Bruv;762082 wrote: What would you define as Multiculturalism ?.....so we are talking about the same thing.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Multiculturalism

Post by **Bryn Mawr** » Fri Feb 01, 2008 1:02 am

So we have the proposal, now who's going to chair and which rules would you prefer?

Raven · Post by **Raven** » Wed Feb 13, 2008 6:50 am

Bryn Mawr;769043 wrote: So we have the proposal, now who's going to chair and which rules would you prefer?
Straight debate, 2 for, 2 against, no holds barred, debate to the last man standing?:yh_bigsmi Now who wants to referee, erm chair?

Post by **Bryn Mawr** » Wed Feb 13, 2008 11:48 am

Raven;775723 wrote: Straight debate, 2 for, 2 against, no holds barred, debate to the last man standing?:yh_bigsmi Now who wants to referee, erm chair?

You set 'em up and I'll knock 'em down or t'other way round?

Who stands as seconds?