Galbally;714046 wrote: To be fair GMC, I think its about more than the oil, Scotland and England have been unified since 1707, the monarchy is based on that union, and Scotland contributed enourmously to the British Empire, and benefitted enourmously from it as well it has to be said, and as we all know, the empire might be gone, but its ghost has a big influence even now.
True it is. But it is a major factor none the less. We did benefit enormously but then so did England. It's a bit of a waste of time arguing about the past and I can put a case for either side. In recent times though we have benefited enormously from eu membership (regional development fund) -as did eire come to that-in a way that would never have been forthcoming from westminster-at the same time economic policies pursued to suit economic conditions in the south east have been damaging to both scotland and the north of england.
http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/business/the ... 197995.stm
The row erupted on Wednesday over comments Mr George made on Tuesday at a lunch for regional newspaper executives in London that unemployment in the north was a price worth paying to help the south.
Thee has been a kind of slow build up of resentment and discontent that a labour govt did nothing to dispel. As a nation we tend to be a bit more socialist in attitude than the english and the sight of scots labour MP's and MSP's toeing a party line set in Westminster and not responding to their constituents has alienated a lot of voters. How much support for the SNP is due to a desire to get at labour rather than real support for independence is a moot point. At the moment I think that is mostly the case-on the other hand if the SNP do a good job their case gets stronger.
As to the economic case, without taking in to account the revenue from oil scotlands contribution to the exchequer is about 8% of the total, our population is about 8.5% of the total UK population.
http://www.scottishexecutive.gov.uk/Pub ... 11084016/6
http://www.gro-scotland.gov.uk/press/ne ... oprep.html
With the oil revenues arguably we are subsidising england. Then it starts getting sily when you start tyinng to decide how many of the scots are actually english expats and how many english are scots etc etc. Take your pick as to who needs who the most. Malcolm Rifkind does have a valid point-also he is a scot himself and an MP for a scottish constituency until he got booted out along with the rest of the tories. The tories have nothing to lose if we go for independence Labour does. The next election could see Alastair Darling and Gordon Brown without seats and labour without a leader if they are not careful. Who will take over from Gordon brown?