Woman tore off ex-lover's testicle

persephone · Post by **persephone** » Tue Jan 11, 2005 4:39 pm

A jilted woman has admitted ripping off her ex-lover's testicle with her bare hands after he refused to have sex with her.

Amanda Monti, 24, flew into a rage after her ex-boyfriend, 37-year-old Geoffrey Jones, rejected her advances at the end of a drunken house party. She yanked off his left testicle, which was later handed to him by a friend with the words: "That's yours."

Full story...

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/pages/live/a ... ge_id=1770

Tombstone · Post by **Tombstone** » Tue Jan 11, 2005 4:42 pm

letha wrote: A jilted woman has admitted ripping off her ex-lover's testicle with her bare hands after he refused to have sex with her.

Amanda Monti, 24, flew into a rage after her ex-boyfriend, 37-year-old Geoffrey Jones, rejected her advances at the end of a drunken house party. She yanked off his left testicle, which was later handed to him by a friend with the words: "That's yours."

Full story...

Woman tore off ex-lover's testicle
"Where did you find it?!"

capt_buzzard · Post by **capt_buzzard** » Tue Jan 11, 2005 4:46 pm

letha wrote: A jilted woman has admitted ripping off her ex-lover's testicle with her bare hands after he refused to have sex with her.

Amanda Monti, 24, flew into a rage after her ex-boyfriend, 37-year-old Geoffrey Jones, rejected her advances at the end of a drunken house party. She yanked off his left testicle, which was later handed to him by a friend with the words: "That's yours."

Full story...

Woman tore off ex-lover's testicle

Its called de-balled :wah:

persephone · Post by **persephone** » Tue Jan 11, 2005 4:48 pm

Sorry, don't know why it didn't work before, changed the link now

Tombstone · Post by **Tombstone** » Tue Jan 11, 2005 4:52 pm

Not the article, the testicle!

(That's what I would have asked!)

Cass · Post by **Cass** » Tue Jan 11, 2005 4:54 pm

Ouch... thats gotta hurt :-3

Paula · Post by **Paula** » Tue Jan 11, 2005 5:22 pm

I never realized they were (2) individual ornaments? I thought they were more like a pair of nuts-conjoined? I guess the one hanging the lowest was more easily ripped away? (1) is better than (2) now?

persephone · Post by **persephone** » Tue Jan 11, 2005 5:30 pm

Tombstone wrote: Not the article, the testicle!

(That's what I would have asked!)

Oh, I'm a bit slow tonight

Bullet · Post by **Bullet** » Tue Jan 11, 2005 9:40 pm

Boy, she sure was a bit testi (oh that was bad) :wah:

So it was at a house party, must have been a ball (I am sooo sorry)

He must have been NUTS to have been with her. (I am very very sorry):yh_rotfl

Now he is just a NUT.

She must have been in an Almond Joy mood. (sometimes you feel like a nut, sometimes you don't)

Does he remember the incident or is it a little fuzzy? (Oh my god that ones bad)

I hope the doctors really get on the ball.

Is he fixed?:yh_giggle

He is half the man he used to be. (I'm on a roll here):yh_worshp

abbey · Post by **abbey** » Wed Jan 12, 2005 3:03 am

You would'nt think it possible would you?? would'nt like to get on the wrong side of her........

Watch out all it'll be for auction on E-bay next week :wah: :wah:

Attached files

Bill Sikes · Post by **Bill Sikes** » Wed Jan 12, 2005 3:04 am

letha wrote: A jilted woman has admitted ripping off her ex-lover's testicle with her bare hands after he refused to have sex with her.

Yeah, that'll encourage him....

"Monti initially tried to hide the testicle by putting it in her mouth" - she sounds like a lovely piece of work.

greydeadhead · Post by **greydeadhead** » Wed Jan 12, 2005 4:39 am

brings a whole new meaning to the term "rocky mountain oyster".... I don't know if lovely piece of work covers this one Mr. Sikes.. be very very scared...

Bill Sikes · Post by **Bill Sikes** » Wed Jan 12, 2005 4:51 am

greydeadhead wrote: brings a whole new meaning to the term "rocky mountain oyster".... I don't know if lovely piece of work covers this one Mr. Sikes.. be very very scared...

(Lovely piece of work=irony). She's saying admits she did it, but doesn't remember it (therefore there must have been a few witnesses!). Hah. I'd be chary about the reliability of her statements...

Cass · Post by **Cass** » Wed Jan 12, 2005 5:46 am

How did the friend know it was that guys testicle?.... I mean it could have been anybodies :sneaky:

beautyful · Post by **beautyful** » Wed Jan 12, 2005 6:06 am

letha wrote: She yanked off his left testicle, which was later handed to him by a friend with the words: "That's yours."

did he not realise it was gone till then? :wah:

Bill Sikes · Post by **Bill Sikes** » Wed Jan 12, 2005 6:11 am

Paula wrote: I never realized they were (2) individual ornaments? I thought they were more like a pair of nuts-conjoined? I guess the one hanging the lowest was more easily ripped away? (1) is better than (2) now?

Didn't know, and you a farming lass?!?!

persephone · Post by **persephone** » Wed Jan 12, 2005 9:46 am

Bill Sikes wrote: Didn't know, and you a farming lass?!?!
When you think about it though the skin on the testicles is joined and does look like one sac with two balls in it...

How did the other one not fall out... well not fall out of it's surrounding skin as far as the connecting parts would let it?

Bill Sikes · Post by **Bill Sikes** » Wed Jan 12, 2005 10:05 am

letha wrote: How did the other one not fall out... well not fall out of it's surrounding skin as far as the connecting parts would let it?

I don't know, mine can't though I've got me legs crossed!

(in fact the things don't just rattle around in their bag, they're held by the spermatic cord. For your further delictation, the testes are almost always of different sizes, and one (usu. left) hangs below and slightly behind the other. "There was an old man of Devizes", etc).

persephone · Post by **persephone** » Wed Jan 12, 2005 10:14 am

Bill Sikes wrote: (in fact the things don't just rattle around in their bag, they're held by the spermatic cord.An eye ball is much the same but it can still pop out and dangle on it's thread... That's the sort of image I had of the second testicle

Bill Sikes · Post by **Bill Sikes** » Wed Jan 12, 2005 10:21 am

letha wrote: An eye ball is much the same but it can still pop out and dangle on it's thread... That's the sort of image I had of the second testicle

I couldn't read that. I've got me eyes shut, too, innit.

Der Wulf · Post by **Der Wulf** » Wed Jan 12, 2005 11:57 am

Given the plasticity of the skin in that area, the scientific part of me wonders why the sac would split at the point where one testes could be extracted.

My lovely and helpful wife's cheerful offer to help resolve my curiosity, has left me whimpering in a permanent fetal position.

:-1

BabyRider · Post by **BabyRider** » Wed Jan 12, 2005 1:56 pm

Der Wulf wrote: My lovely and helpful wife's cheerful offer to help resolve my curiosity, has left me whimpering in a permanent fetal position.

:-1
She's a real ball-breaker, huh??? (I'm sorry, I could not resist....my apologies to Mrs. DerWulf...)

persephone · Post by **persephone** » Wed Jan 12, 2005 3:35 pm

Jack Sprat wrote: It's delightful to have one suddenly swell to three times normal.Only three times??? I've seen them (not yours obviously) so BIG the man can't walk and his penis appears to have shrunk inwards... Gentle pressure on either side tends to make it reappear though

capt_buzzard · Post by **capt_buzzard** » Wed Jan 12, 2005 3:44 pm

Jack Sprat wrote: And the individual sizes can change from hour to hour, especially in response to bladder infections and kidney stones. It's delightful to have one suddenly swell to three times normal.

That reminds me, I have a urology appointment on Friday. Amazing what delightful tidbits one shares on the Internet. Good luck on Friday Jack. Been there, done that - enlarged prostate, Ouch!

Paula · Post by **Paula** » Wed Jan 12, 2005 7:03 pm

Bill Sikes wrote: Didn't know, and you a farming lass?!?!

We only have (1) Bull here, AT A TIME... presently we don't have one--as our landscapers need a break...Believe me it only takes (1) nut to do the job? The woman who tore the nut away, was it a woman? or a transexual? You have to be pretty pissed off to depend on (1) man for a night of fun...I say if (it) ripped (it) off, they should eat it? hahahahaha..

AND...I have not been a farmer since 1994, I have a great love for cows, they don't show any hatred for the BUll, they just Run...Oh by the way our last Bulls Name was: Jeffery!! a A RED JERSEY...

Der Wulf · Post by **Der Wulf** » Wed Jan 12, 2005 8:45 pm

BabyRider wrote: She's a real ball-breaker, huh??? (I'm sorry, I could not resist....my apologies to Mrs. DerWulf...)
Actually Der Wulfess is 100 lb. of sweet, refined, very caring nurse who early in our marriage suggested that he who misbehaves, then sleeps, should have no expectation of singing bass in the choir. A ball-breaker would be a lot less scary.:yh_hypno :yh_nailbi

BabyRider · Post by **BabyRider** » Wed Jan 12, 2005 9:01 pm

Der Wulf wrote: Actually Der Wulfess is 100 lb. of sweet, refined, very caring nurse who early in our marriage suggested that he who misbehaves, then sleeps, should have no expectation of singing bass in the choir. A ball-breaker would be a lot less scary.:yh_hypno :yh_nailbi
A woman after my own heart... :yh_worshp

Bullet · Post by **Bullet** » Wed Jan 12, 2005 10:18 pm

Paula, If an airplane crashes in my back yard, how many waffles will fit in the dog house? Do ya know yet? The answer is .......12 because icecream does not have hair. Get it? I knew you would.

Paula · Post by **Paula** » Wed Jan 12, 2005 10:26 pm

Bullet wrote: Paula, If an airplane crashes in my back yard, how many waffles will fit in the dog house? Do ya know yet? The answer is .......12 because icecream does not have hair. Get it? I knew you would.

Listen you FRiUTY wonder, your testies are wanting a man, i am not....

Bullet · Post by **Bullet** » Thu Jan 13, 2005 12:45 pm

Paula wrote: Listen you FRiUTY wonder, your testies are wanting a man, i am not....
Fruity wonder? wanting a man? You're just jealous because my sentences make sense and I can put together a completely coherent paragraph. And besides,I am not overly interested in transexuals and bull testes. You are really scaring me. Please just leave me alone AAAUUUGGGGGHHHHHHH!!!!:wah:

Oh, and yUo ShoUlD onLy CAPitalIZe the LeTter at tHe beGgininG of tHe seNtEnce.

persephone · Post by **persephone** » Thu Jan 13, 2005 1:14 pm

Can someone please tell me what I missed between Paula and Bullet?

Paula · Post by **Paula** » Thu Jan 13, 2005 1:21 pm

We're not talking anymore, we had a spat! :wah:

greydeadhead · Post by **greydeadhead** » Thu Jan 13, 2005 1:21 pm

Not much Letha..

Just Paula being her usual abrasive self and Bullet trying to make sense of her posts..

Paula · Post by **Paula** » Thu Jan 13, 2005 1:54 pm

Jack Sprat wrote: It's because I have been behaving myself. Paula needed someone else to instigate her. I finally figured it out: she does her best posting when angry at someone. (Actually, I have come to like her, isn't that frightening?)

YOU ARE wrong, i am never angry at anyone, i have no anger in my genetics at ALL--NO, NO, No....i am to the point, simple, whats wrong with that? I post my best after a gambling spree? thats motivation for me? No anger here, just fun....

persephone · Post by **persephone** » Thu Jan 13, 2005 2:09 pm

greydeadhead wrote: Not much Letha..

Just Paula being her usual abrasive self and Bullet trying to make sense of her posts..
I don't agree, here he started asking about waffles, directed at Paula... That's not trying to make sense of her that's an attack, all be it a fairly passive attack, but still an attack.

persephone · Post by **persephone** » Thu Jan 13, 2005 2:30 pm

Jack Sprat wrote: It's because I have been behaving myself. Paula needed someone else to instigate her. I finally figured it out: she does her best posting when angry at someone. (Actually, I have come to like her, isn't that frightening?)This is wrong too, I have read all of Bullets posts and it seems he has just decided to pick on Paula as an easy target... Shock horror she really didn't do anything this time :wah:

BabyRider · Post by **BabyRider** » Thu Jan 13, 2005 2:42 pm

Paula wrote: YOU ARE wrong, i am never angry at anyone, i have no anger in my genetics at ALL--NO, NO, No....i am to the point, simple, whats wrong with that? I post my best after a gambling spree? thats motivation for me? No anger here, just fun....
Just so everyone is clear: Bullet was responding to Paula's nonsensical ramblings from last night. Poke around, you'll see them.

And letha, if you want to see an attack, check out where Paula asks if maybe I'm an abuser in my post on domestic violence.

If I get banned for making a point about someone being straight-up wrong, mean, and heartless, so be it. What she did is just vicious, in my opinion.

persephone · Post by **persephone** » Thu Jan 13, 2005 2:48 pm

I read everything from last night. And yes she has done something to upset you, but sorry I wanted to know what it is that has upset Bullet.

After reading his posts he likes to "stir things up", seems that's what he is trying with Paula.

Paula · Post by **Paula** » Thu Jan 13, 2005 4:41 pm

To imagine how one nut has caused this much trouble? My Godness...This is in reference about the Thread. Woman tore....ya that one. This is beyond hilarious.

abbey · Post by **abbey** » Thu Jan 13, 2005 7:08 pm

Please everyone, its not often you'll hear me say this but can we please give Paula a little bit of lee-way here??

She obviously has some worries re; her husband in hospital & feeling a little frustrated and upset, and the forum is her only form of outlet i know it can be a little frustrating but it would'nt do us any harm to just step back and make allowances. :yh_peace

(or maybe i've just had one too many Bacardis & i'm feeling alls well with the world!!) PEACE MAN..... :wah: :wah:

BabyRider · Post by **BabyRider** » Thu Jan 13, 2005 7:25 pm

Guess what Abbey? EVERYONE has crap to deal with. Give Paula a bit of "lee-way"? How about simple, common courtesy? Did she show that to me, or the topic, or any of the people who have something to contribute besides nonsense or flat-out lies???? NO. She did not. So, her lee-way can go jump in the friggin' lake. The total disrespect is galling. How do you know if the Forum is her only outlet? Do you know her personally? She sure acted like she knew ME personally. I will NEVER "step back and make allowances" when someone makes a joke of violence, or accuses me of something I have never done. If this conversation had been taking place in person, I would have been less shocked if she'd spit into my face.

I intend to go on about my business...replying to posts, taking place in discussions, etc...If she implies or infers anything like she did earlier, I will not hesitate for one second to tell her what I think. And if I get banned for it, fine. She is a contributing member, and I am not. Yet. I have and still am considering supporting this forum financially. Depending on the actions taken here. I will not, however use that position to degrade, insult or attempt to embarrass other members. What she did is WRONG. And I will continue to say so.

Erinna1112 · Post by **Erinna1112** » Thu Jan 13, 2005 8:13 pm

letha wrote: I read everything from last night. And yes she has done something to upset you, but sorry I wanted to know what it is that has upset Bullet.

After reading his posts he likes to "stir things up", seems that's what he is trying with Paula.
Here's a clue-by-four.....

IT'S A JOKE.

Geez. Talking about giving Paula some slack?? Try giving Bullet some slack. IT WAS FUNNY.

:yh_eyerol

Erinna1112 · Post by **Erinna1112** » Thu Jan 13, 2005 8:17 pm

BabyRider wrote: I will not, however use that position to degrade, insult or attempt to embarrass other members. What she did is WRONG. And I will continue to say so.
And I'll continue to agree with you.

She was vicious, insulting, and degrading. Contributing money to the upkeep of the forum doesn't give her the right to be so, IMNSHO. If it does, this isn't the place I thought it was.

BabyRider · Post by **BabyRider** » Thu Jan 13, 2005 8:26 pm

Erinna1112 wrote: Here's a clue-by-four.....

IT'S A JOKE.

Geez. Talking about giving Paula some slack?? Try giving Bullet some slack. IT WAS FUNNY.

:yh_eyerol
So I'm NOT the only one who thought so!!!! :yh_rotfl

BabyRider · Post by **BabyRider** » Fri Jan 14, 2005 8:24 am

Erinna1112 wrote: And I'll continue to agree with you.

She was vicious, insulting, and degrading. Contributing money to the upkeep of the forum doesn't give her the right to be so, IMNSHO. If it does, this isn't the place I thought it was.
Erinna...Thank you. Sometimes I can be a bit touchy about things I feel are important, but you and MANY other members have made me see that I'm not overreacting, and I feel justified in my response to this attack. Thanks! To you, and to everyone who has backed me up on this.

Der Wulf · Post by **Der Wulf** » Fri Jan 14, 2005 10:36 am

:-3 At the risk of having my bushy tail stomped, here's my two cents.

I left a forum a few months ago because a dispute among posters caused the forum host's to go PC, and effectivly killed all creativity, kinda like kindergarden class.

I personally find Paula to be a pain in the ass 90% of the time. Because of the disjointed, and spastic nature of her expressions, I suspect she has a problem. I posted the link to dementia information not as a joke, but hoping she might follow up.

I agree with Babyrider about being insulted, and with her retaliation.

Now I am NOT a peacemaker, I support BOTH of their rights to post whatever they feel, censorship in any form really tic's me off. We're all old enough to tolerate some diversion, and frankly some quite creative things flow when the ideas are filtered through angst, delusion, a martini, or a pissed off mind.

Not meaning to just "opine and run", here's a suggestian, maybe we should start a thread specifically intended for spats, insults, and just simply bad manners.:yh_peace :rolleyes:

'