Was Jesus Gay?

davieB · Post by **davieB** » Fri Dec 15, 2006 2:20 am

Since reading the bible last year, this is a question that's plagued me. After all, there's no mention of any sexual interaction between Jesus and another female.

So could he have been gay? Two things spring to mind. The long nightrobe thing, and the long hair/beard(I see this as a cover. Nobody ever accused the Vikings of being gay, they all had long hair and beards, and I'm sure Jesus was aware of this, and was well aware of their macho image), etc.

I know this is a thorny issue, but I must stress that I've absolutely nothing against poofs, and if Jesus was one then my belief would be unaffected.

Elvira · Post by **Elvira** » Fri Dec 15, 2006 2:53 am

davieB;487059 wrote: Since reading the bible last year, this is a question that's plagued me. After all, there's no mention of any sexual interaction between Jesus and another female.

So could he have been gay? Two things spring to mind. The long nightrobe thing, and the long hair/beard(I see this as a cover. Nobody ever accused the Vikings of being gay, they all had long hair and beards, and I'm sure Jesus was aware of this, and was well aware of their macho image), etc.

I know this is a thorny issue, but I must stress that I've absolutely nothing against poofs, and if Jesus was one then my belief would be unaffected.

Of course there was mention of Jesus having carnal interactions with women, only these parts were destroyed by those that wanted to control!

koan · Post by **koan** » Fri Dec 15, 2006 3:39 am

If he was, what's wrong with that?

I think it's about time the world had female presidents and a gay Christ.

If nothing else, everyone would coordinate with each other.

Uncle Kram · Post by **Uncle Kram** » Fri Dec 15, 2006 4:22 am

Don't know about Jesus, but I have my suspicions about George Michael. Just a gut feeling

lady cop · Post by **lady cop** » Fri Dec 15, 2006 4:24 am

Uncle Kram;487103 wrote: Don't know about Jesus, but I have my suspicions about George Michael. Just a gut feeling ;)and i'm worried about elton john. :yh_sungla

Uncle Kram · Post by **Uncle Kram** » Fri Dec 15, 2006 4:35 am

lady cop;487104 wrote: and i'm worried about elton john. :yh_sungla
....really?

koan · Post by **koan** » Fri Dec 15, 2006 4:44 am

Being gay doesn't seem to be a problem for them so why worry?

Accountable · Post by **Accountable** » Fri Dec 15, 2006 5:01 am

I don't think Jesus was gay. The Bible never mentioned him laughing or dancing, that I'm aware. He was mostly melancholy, I think. :yh_glasse

Accountable · Post by **Accountable** » Fri Dec 15, 2006 5:03 am

Uncle Kram;487103 wrote: Don't know about Jesus, but I have my suspicions about George Michael. Just a gut feeling

lady cop;487104 wrote: and i'm worried about elton john. :yh_sungla

We should introduce them. Maybe they could sing a love duet or something. :yh_bigsmi

lady cop · Post by **lady cop** » Fri Dec 15, 2006 5:06 am

Accountable;487128 wrote: We should introduce them. Maybe they could sing a love duet or something. :yh_bigsmicandle in the men's loo? :yh_rotfl

koan · Post by **koan** » Fri Dec 15, 2006 5:09 am

Gay bashing. How original. :rolleyes:

Accountable · Post by **Accountable** » Fri Dec 15, 2006 5:09 am

lady cop;487129 wrote: candle in the men's loo? :yh_rotfl
:guitarist "Don't Let the Son Go Down on Me!" :guitarist

koan · Post by **koan** » Fri Dec 15, 2006 5:11 am

Accountable;487133 wrote: :guitarist "Don't Let the Son Go Down on Me!" :guitarist

ok. now that's funny. :yh_clap

lady cop · Post by **lady cop** » Fri Dec 15, 2006 5:14 am

see ACC, if YOU say something it's NOT gay-bashing. :rolleyes:

Accountable · Post by **Accountable** » Fri Dec 15, 2006 5:16 am

lady cop;487135 wrote: see ACC, if YOU say something it's NOT gay-bashing. :rolleyes:
I'm told it's the way I walk. I tried to fix it but then it just looks fake.

koan · Post by **koan** » Fri Dec 15, 2006 5:19 am

Being in direct context with the thread helps the humour.

alobar51 · Post by **alobar51** » Fri Dec 15, 2006 5:29 am

davieB;487059 wrote: Since reading the bible last year, this is a question that's plagued me. After all, there's no mention of any sexual interaction between Jesus and another female.

So could he have been gay? Two things spring to mind. The long nightrobe thing, and the long hair/beard(I see this as a cover. Nobody ever accused the Vikings of being gay, they all had long hair and beards, and I'm sure Jesus was aware of this, and was well aware of their macho image), etc.

I know this is a thorny issue, but I must stress that I've absolutely nothing against poofs, and if Jesus was one then my belief would be unaffected.

Anything's possible, but not likely. A Rabbi of that day would not have had much clout if he were not married, leading an awful lot of historians to conclude that he and Mary Magdelene were.

The whole celibate priest nonsense didn't get introduced till a couple hundred years after his death.

My guess, and it's just that, is that he was straight, and married to Mary Magdelene.

And Jesus was alive about a thousand years before the Vikings.

chonsigirl · Post by **chonsigirl** » Fri Dec 15, 2006 5:32 am

Easy answer to original post, No.

koan · Post by **koan** » Fri Dec 15, 2006 5:40 am

If Jesus was gay, would it have changed the power of his message?

Though not likely the case with Jesus the main question in my mind is "Why care?"

Homosexuality was more of an elite behaviour. It most certainly existed as it does today.

In Christian Egypt (or "Coptic Egypt") there seems to have been fairly widespread literacy - in both Greek and Coptic languages - and much popular material has survived on papyrus. The particular climate of Egypt has alone made this possible. We are in a position then to explore aspects of Christian society in Egypt which remain obscure elsewhere. One set of sources which has been made available to English readers are the various collection of ritual "spells". These texts, dating from the first to the eleventh century, show a religious life quite different from that of the elite theologians who were writing at the same time. See for these texts - Marvin Meyer and Richard Smith, eds., Ancient Christian Magic: Coptic texts of Ritual Power, (San Francisco: HarperSanFrancisco, 1994)

One of the spells translated in this volume is for a man to obtain a male lover: evidence of a homosexual sub-culture, neither philosophic nor literary which we may believe existed at other times and places in the ancient world, but which has left little evidence.

source

Accountable · Post by **Accountable** » Fri Dec 15, 2006 5:42 am

koan;487150 wrote: Homosexuality was more of an elite behaviour. Woo Hoo! :yh_clap :yh_clap Finally! Somebody acknowledges that it's not a "lifestyle".

koan · Post by **koan** » Fri Dec 15, 2006 5:53 am

Quite frankly, I don't think homosexuality requires any justification at all.

"Do as thou wilt shall be the whole of the law."

Accountable · Post by **Accountable** » Fri Dec 15, 2006 5:55 am

koan;487159 wrote: Quite frankly, I don't think homosexuality requires any justification at all.

"Do as thou wilt shall be the whole of the law."
'kay

theia · Post by **theia** » Fri Dec 15, 2006 5:57 am

I think if anyone reads the Christian mystics (e.g. St John of the Cross, St Teresa of Avila) or speaks with someone who, through prayer and meditation, or simply good fortune, has reached the place of no thought, in which every cell of their being is in ecstasy and in union with God, they wouldn't have to ask questions about Jesus's sexuality...I guess it was, in all senses of the word, immaterial to Him.

Accountable · Post by **Accountable** » Fri Dec 15, 2006 6:00 am

Okay, Chonsi & Theia have raised the level to General Religious Discussion. I'll keep my remarks at that level now.

koan · Post by **koan** » Fri Dec 15, 2006 6:17 am

If the next great religious leader was a homosexual it would not affect my opinion of the words offered. A great mind is a great mind. The sexuality of the person is not a matter of concern.

chonsigirl · Post by **chonsigirl** » Fri Dec 15, 2006 7:23 am

If Jesus was gay, would it have changed the power of his message?

Yes, His message would have been contrary to Old Testament principles, and He would not have been a credible witness.

morphus · Post by **morphus** » Fri Dec 15, 2006 7:54 am

i don't know if Jesus was gay, but he seems to like children a lot:-3

catholicshopper.com/products/inspirational_sport_statues.html

Imladris · Post by **Imladris** » Fri Dec 15, 2006 8:02 am

morphus;487259 wrote: i don't know if Jesus was gay, but he seems to like children a lot:-3

catholicshopper.com/products/inspirational_sport_statues.html

These are truely naff

koan · Post by **koan** » Fri Dec 15, 2006 8:30 am

chonsigirl;487233 wrote: Yes, His message would have been contrary to Old Testament principles, and He would not have been a credible witness.

Assuming that he would not have made his sexuality a part of his world message, I think that his vision of people and the world would still have created a following. If not, then he wasn't a true prophet. A true prophet can be of either sex and any sexuality. If they have a powerful message it would not, or should not, be affected by such trivial things.

koan · Post by **koan** » Fri Dec 15, 2006 8:43 am

SnoozeControl;487290 wrote: Not trying to be a smart ass here, but I'd be interested in seeing you list any female prophets.

According to the Talmud there were also seven women who are counted as prophets whose message bears relevance for all generations: Sarah, Miriam, Devorah, Hannah (mother of the prophet Samuel), Abigail (a wife of King David), Huldah (from the time of Jeremiah), and Esther. There were, of course, other women who functioned as prophets, and the last prophet mentioned in the Bible, Noahdiah (Nehemiah 6:14) was a woman.

source

chonsigirl · Post by **chonsigirl** » Fri Dec 15, 2006 8:48 am

If they have a powerful message it would not, or should not, be affected by such trivial things.

Old Testament Law would not be considered trivial.........................

Unless this discussion is going somewhere relevant, I see these tangents as digressing from the original post.

koan · Post by **koan** » Fri Dec 15, 2006 8:51 am

chonsigirl;487299 wrote: Old Testament Law would not be considered trivial.........................

Unless this discussion is going somewhere relevant, I see these tangents as digressing from the original post.

But he changed the OT God from being wrathful and jealous to being a loving God.

That's a pretty big deviation and people seem ok with it.

morphus · Post by **morphus** » Fri Dec 15, 2006 8:56 am

Imladris;487264 wrote: These are truely naff

these are classier

members.aol.com/JesusImages/index.htm

i've always wanted to be a forest ranger:wah:

Imladris · Post by **Imladris** » Fri Dec 15, 2006 10:01 am

morphus;487311 wrote: these are classier

members.aol.com/JesusImages/index.htm

i've always wanted to be a forest ranger:wah:

Personally I like the bodybuilder one:wah:

morphus · Post by **morphus** » Fri Dec 15, 2006 10:18 am

it's clear that some of his followers are gay, so why not Jesus himself?

personally, i think it's more probable that Jesus was bi

devist8me · Post by **devist8me** » Fri Dec 15, 2006 10:21 am

I like the exptectant one and the soldier one.

weeder · Post by **weeder** » Fri Dec 15, 2006 10:32 am

My personal feeling is that he was androgenous. He was so spiritually evolved that fornicating just for pleasure was not something he considered, desired, or contemplated at all. He instinctively knew that love is not restricted to gender, and that there are many expressions of love. Physical being not necessarily the most important.

koan · Post by **koan** » Fri Dec 15, 2006 10:33 am

weeder;487459 wrote: My personal feeling is that he was androgenous. He was so spiritually evolved that fornicating just for pleasure was not something he considered, desired, or contemplated at all. He instinctively knew that love is not restricted to gender, and that there are many expressions of love. Physical being not necessarily the most important.

I see it that way too. :-6

Ted · Post by **Ted** » Fri Dec 15, 2006 5:51 pm

koan:-6

You do ask the damnedest questions.

According to Bart Ehrman, in "Misquoting Jesus", a Biblical scholar, there is no evidence whatsoever that Jesus was married. Nor is there any comment about his sexuality.

Ehrman also comments on the so called conspiracy theories of documents hidden in the Vatican. His response is this is not so.

In fact if anyone wants you can buy a book with all of the other writing considered for the canon of scripture.

I would say the short answer is no.

Shalom

Ted:-6

koan · Post by **koan** » Fri Dec 15, 2006 5:54 pm

whoa, whoa, whoa

wasn't me this time, Ted :wah:

I'm with you. My only point is that if Jesus was gay, he'd still be a righteous dude.

Accountable · Post by **Accountable** » Fri Dec 15, 2006 8:10 pm

Kathy Ellen;488020 wrote: Why do we care if he's gay or not???? Why does it matter to you? Wasn't he a good man?? He was a person who was trying to make the world a better place to live. Who gives a fig what his preferances are? Rumors abound about him having a loving family:wife, children, good friends, etc. What's bad about that?
He has a crush. :-4