Stability of the HA
Solid state electronics has only one current. So it has only one right
hand rule.
But in liquids and gases, you have two currents. The electron current
and the positive ionic current. Since these two currents move in the
opposite directions, you have to apply the left hand rule to the
positive current. The electron current is applied by the right hand
rule.
Incidentally, the physics books show the current as positive in solid
state electronics. This is another example of establishment mistakes.
In the HA where I use both hands, you have two currents. The electron
current and the positive proton spin current adjacent to the electron
side where both move in the same direction. So the thumbs of both hands
point in the same direction. But their charges are oposite so the left
hand rule would apply to the proton current.
As a result of this orientation, the resultant magnetic fields will
push against each other to repel the electron and the proton to prevent
a collapse of the hydrogen atom.
This visual explanation does not need QM to explain why the HA is
stable in its ground state and is intended to give credibility to the Bohr model of the HA as a planetary model.
Mike CT
Collapse of Hydrogen Atom
Collapse of Hydrogen Atom
Mike CT wrote: Stability of the HA
Solid state electronics has only one current. So it has only one right
hand rule.
But in liquids and gases, you have two currents. The electron current
and the positive ionic current. Since these two currents move in the
opposite directions, you have to apply the left hand rule to the
positive current. The electron current is applied by the right hand
rule.
Incidentally, the physics books show the current as positive in solid
state electronics. This is another example of establishment mistakes.
In the HA where I use both hands, you have two currents. The electron
current and the positive proton spin current adjacent to the electron
side where both move in the same direction. So the thumbs of both hands
point in the same direction. But their charges are oposite so the left
hand rule would apply to the proton current.
As a result of this orientation, the resultant magnetic fields will
push against each other to repel the electron and the proton to prevent
a collapse of the hydrogen atom.
This visual explanation does not need QM to explain why the HA is
stable in its ground state and is intended to give credibility to the Bohr model of the HA as a planetary model.
Mike CT
Hi Mike, sorry I didn't get a chance to look at this sooner, well, its an interesting hypothesis, you certainly do have a different way of looking at things. I think that there are lots of phenomena that this doesn't explain though, but I'm impressed with your doggedness in challenging fundamental physics. I'm wondering what has made you decide to take this path, and why the amateur interest in science, you do seem to have spent quite a lot of time in going into physics and then more in debunking it? I suppose thats a personal question, so of course you don't have to answer anything that you don't want to, but was there one sort of anomaly or something that made you it up one day and go "this stuff's not right, I want to find out what is really going on?" Just curious. I'm sorry that I'm not getting into specific physics issues here with you, which is what you want I suspect, but lets face it, I could quote chapter and verse on standard models of everything from atoms, nuclei, and galaxies, but you've obviously already gone through that and not been impressed, so it would be a bit of a sterile argument.
Solid state electronics has only one current. So it has only one right
hand rule.
But in liquids and gases, you have two currents. The electron current
and the positive ionic current. Since these two currents move in the
opposite directions, you have to apply the left hand rule to the
positive current. The electron current is applied by the right hand
rule.
Incidentally, the physics books show the current as positive in solid
state electronics. This is another example of establishment mistakes.
In the HA where I use both hands, you have two currents. The electron
current and the positive proton spin current adjacent to the electron
side where both move in the same direction. So the thumbs of both hands
point in the same direction. But their charges are oposite so the left
hand rule would apply to the proton current.
As a result of this orientation, the resultant magnetic fields will
push against each other to repel the electron and the proton to prevent
a collapse of the hydrogen atom.
This visual explanation does not need QM to explain why the HA is
stable in its ground state and is intended to give credibility to the Bohr model of the HA as a planetary model.
Mike CT
Hi Mike, sorry I didn't get a chance to look at this sooner, well, its an interesting hypothesis, you certainly do have a different way of looking at things. I think that there are lots of phenomena that this doesn't explain though, but I'm impressed with your doggedness in challenging fundamental physics. I'm wondering what has made you decide to take this path, and why the amateur interest in science, you do seem to have spent quite a lot of time in going into physics and then more in debunking it? I suppose thats a personal question, so of course you don't have to answer anything that you don't want to, but was there one sort of anomaly or something that made you it up one day and go "this stuff's not right, I want to find out what is really going on?" Just curious. I'm sorry that I'm not getting into specific physics issues here with you, which is what you want I suspect, but lets face it, I could quote chapter and verse on standard models of everything from atoms, nuclei, and galaxies, but you've obviously already gone through that and not been impressed, so it would be a bit of a sterile argument.
"We are never so happy, never so unhappy, as we imagine"
Le Rochefoucauld.
"A smack in the face settles all arguments, then you can move on kid."
My dad 1986.
Le Rochefoucauld.
"A smack in the face settles all arguments, then you can move on kid."
My dad 1986.
Collapse of Hydrogen Atom
wouldn't the electrons velocity have something to do with the prevention of collapse?
Collapse of Hydrogen Atom
Galbally
Yes, I do go against the current theory of the BB universe because it is simply unbelievable. But there are other problems like the 'cause of flares and sunspots' and the current dark matter problem that I think should have been solved by now which I have done but still remains a mystery for mainstream science.
Alfred quote
wouldn't the electrons velocity have something to do with the prevention of collapse?
reply
Certainly. Its momentum which is accelerated by the coulomb attraction is the main reason for its orbital stability. But mainstream science using Newtonian math have said the HA would collapse
There are other reasons why it would not collapse like energy exchange where the atom has to absorb energy before it can radiate energy.
Mike CT
Yes, I do go against the current theory of the BB universe because it is simply unbelievable. But there are other problems like the 'cause of flares and sunspots' and the current dark matter problem that I think should have been solved by now which I have done but still remains a mystery for mainstream science.
Alfred quote
wouldn't the electrons velocity have something to do with the prevention of collapse?
reply
Certainly. Its momentum which is accelerated by the coulomb attraction is the main reason for its orbital stability. But mainstream science using Newtonian math have said the HA would collapse
There are other reasons why it would not collapse like energy exchange where the atom has to absorb energy before it can radiate energy.
Mike CT