ForumGarden

Jester;1027336 wrote: Maybe, maybe not, at one time in America there were no gun laws and folks seemed to handle things just fine.


no they didn't, they slaughtered others cattle, raped and pillaged, gunned down others in streets for no reasons, slaughtered Buffalo for fun, they just going and going until the Buffalo no longer existed, shall I continue?

...................11 people in the bank and the tellers all reach for thier pistols, and shotguns... what are your chances of making it out alive?




Does that question include the innocent bystanders....like your daughter sucking on a popsicle in the doorway ?

Bruv;1027488 wrote: Does that question include the innocent bystanders....like your daughter sucking on a popsicle in the doorway ?


Absolutely, Just what about innocent bystanders??

Rhyes Jones anyone??

That would sicken you Jester. A bristish little 9 yr old kid on a bycycle. What were his rights that night to be protected by some scumbag flouting Britains no-gun law??

Perhaps i should link you the look on his mothers face as she sat in court this week listening to the details of how he lied dying in a car park rather than the link for statisticle evidence that panic causes more gunshot death than justifiable Intention?

Jester;1027442 wrote: We still got buffalo. They didnt slaughter them for fun they slaughtered them for food, problem is they just happened to be more wasteful than the indians about it.






The Indians hunted for food, everyone else hunted Buffalo for sheer fun!

Odie;1027546 wrote: [QUOTE=Jester;1027442]We still got buffalo. They didnt slaughter them for fun they slaughtered them for food, problem is they just happened to be more wasteful than the indians about it.






The Indians hunted for food, everyone else hunted Buffalo for sheer fun!


I understood they slaughtered them to kill off the food supply to the horrible redskins

Bruv;1027553 wrote: [QUOTE=Odie;1027546]

[FOLLOW LINKS TO READ ACTUAL QUOTE]


They massacared them as well :wah:

That was the way I learned about it.

Killed them for killing sake, knowing how much they relied on them for almost everything.

I wouldn't suppose we both learn from the same history books.....funny that

Jester;1027580 wrote: True why waste ammo on the buffalo?


Cos they used all the smallpox infected blankets on the native americans ?

Now YOU want to get logical ?

Oscar, post 182, why when you quoted me, you changed what I originally said?:mad:

no one should go in and change someone else's wordings!

Ok, in reading this, I think the quotes simply got mixed up.

First the "horrible redskins" appears in Bruv's post then it is falsely quoted in Odie's post. It appears Bruv said this and not Odie. Am I mistaken? I know it's very annoying when something is falsely attributed as one's quote so for future reference, just don't do it, it's not appreciated, however I am thinking that this was an honest goof.

Bruv;1027553 wrote:

I understood they slaughtered them to kill off the food supply to the horrible redskins


Very inappropriate usage of terms, Bruv.

Commercial hunting for profit was the main reason, the destruction of the Native American food supply was an unforseen advantage for encroaching white civilization.

The buffalo pelt was a commodity for Eastern markets-just like in the early 1800s it was beaver pelts, and they trapped those animals to a very low level of existence.

The timeline Jester is quoting from, is pretty acurate as far as executive/Congressional policy was towards the decimation of the buffalo herds, by the 1870s-1880s. Treaties were no longer written, Native Americans were made wards of the federal government, and assigned to live on reservations. The government decided the buffalo was a nuisance, in the way of settlers who would take over lands once shared by buffalo and Native Americans, and many other animals.

Bruv;1027553 wrote:

I understood they slaughtered them to kill off the food supply to the horrible redskins


Here is the original quote, by Bruv.

He misquoted Odie, and I copied it.

My apologies, Odie.

chonsigirl;1027618 wrote: Here is the original quote, by Bruv.

He misquoted Odie, and I copied it.

My apologies, Odie.


it wasn't you hun, check post 182, oscar had quoted me.

no biggy.......it was a goofup!

Jester;1027203 wrote: What?


Carrying a gun increases a person's readiness to use it would you or would you not agree?...

Jester;1027637 wrote: Like I said, what?

Yes since its far easier to pull it out of my holster at my belly than it is to run home to get it out of my closet then of course its more ready.:-2


Readiness is a verb not an adjective if I'm not mistaken...

I wasn't speaking in reference to the gun I was speaking in reference to the mindset of those brandishing them...

Hypothetically speaking...

Quote:

Originally Posted by oscar

Statistics prove that 'panic' contributes to more gunshot death than justifiable Intention.





Jester;1027332 wrote: Show me the money babe... (thats American for prove it):)


oscar, I have not seen those stats anywhere yet. Can you point them out to me if I missed em? Or is this just another way you brits sidestep a direct question that concerns a statement you made with no basis?

If not?

"Show me the money babe..."

Attached files

Odie;1027626 wrote: it wasn't you hun, check post 182, oscar had quoted me.

no biggy.......it was a goofup!


Sorry Odie, i didn't spot that one. Didn't mean to misqote anyone here.

You'll have to give me 40 lashes of the birch my girl.

Loved the e mail you sent me. very very funny. Although the undertone of Palin in the Whitehouse is slightly disturbing, do you agree?? :wah::wah::wah:

Sorry Jester, my little gunslinger, I have tried most of the night to find the link of the report about 'panic' attributing to gunshot death.

I saw it in our press, can't remember which of many papers we get here that it was in, and it was a few years back. If i could remember the title, i could google it. I'll keep looking though.

oscar;1027657 wrote: Sorry Odie, i didn't spot that one. Didn't mean to misqote anyone here.

You'll have to give me 40 lashes of the birch my girl.

Loved the e mail you sent me. very very funny. Although the undertone of Palin in the Whitehouse is slightly disturbing, do you agree?? :wah::wah::wah:


I thought you had changed my wordings.........it can be done, Iused to be on a forum, where folks purposely changed wordings in quotes to make the person look very inadequate, demeaned, ridiculed etc..................:-5



no lashings this time it was a goof up!:wah:

BTS;1027656 wrote: Quote:

Originally Posted by oscar

Statistics prove that 'panic' contributes to more gunshot death than justifiable Intention.







oscar, I have not seen those stats anywhere yet. Can you point them out to me if I missed em? Or is this just another way you brits sidestep a direct question that concerns a statement you made with no basis?

If not?

"Show me the money babe..."


My apologies, i thought it was Jester who asked the question. You seemed to have jumped in cutting and pasting posts again.

Do you not have any ability to make a political or personal opinion?

All i have seen from you, is a degree in cut and paste technique. When are you going to actually put forward a valid contribution to the topic of the thread?

Incidentally, 'Whipper snapper' is a British eupherism for another term. I checked your profile, your a lot older than me. :wah::wah::wah:

Odie;1027660 wrote: I thought you had changed my wordings.........it can be done, Iused to be on a forum, where folks purposely changed wordings in quotes to make the person look very inadequate, demeaned, ridiculed etc..................:-5



no lashings this time it was a goof up!:wah:


Yes Odie, i have noticed on here that some FG members seem to even take posts from entirely sperate threads in a vain attempt to ridicule the person they can not beat in debate fairly. Shame because the only one ridiculed is themselves.

I must say, i'd love it if we had herds of buffalo roaming the landscape here, it would certainly make the countryside less bland.

Also i'd like to see Maddona pick on one of them instead of our pheasents which is too easy.

By the way America, the bitch is on her way home hurrah, we got rid of her!!!!:wah:

oscar;1027663 wrote: Yes Odie, i have noticed on here that some FG members seem to even take posts from entirely sperate threads in a vain attempt to ridicule the person they can not beat in debate fairly. Shame because the only one ridiculed is themselves.


It should be forbidden to do take anyone's post and change their wording.

- and if you don't catch in time, you are then blamed for someone else's doings.

Odie;1027666 wrote: It should be forbidden to do take anyone's post and change their wording.

- and if you don't catch in time, you are then blamed for someone else's doings.


Absolutely. There's a thread called "What happens next" and my country men, galbally from Ireland and gmc from Scotland spent the last 3 pages coming out with the biggest load of bollocks you ever saw. It was all in humour. Galbally, gmc and myself were doing it deliberately just to make each other laugh but god forbid, anyone took us seriously, we'd be locked up.

Not just taking the wording but also taking one sentance out of a paragraph to try to score points as well. Without the rest of the paragraph, the sentence is totally out of context.

oscar;1027668 wrote: Absolutely. There's a thread called "What happens next" and my country men, galbally from Ireland and gmc from Scotland spent the last 3 pages coming out with the biggest load of bollocks you ever saw. It was all in humour. Galbally, gmc and myself were doing it deliberately just to make each other laugh but god forbid, anyone took us seriously, we'd be locked up.

Not just taking the wording but also taking one sentance out of a paragraph to try to score points as well. Without the rest of the paragraph, the sentence is totally out of context.


but thats different, that was all in fun.

its when folks purposely change your post.

Would you not agree that the majority of people who carry credit cards spends more money?...

In association with "worth", of course, both overwhelmingly accepted and not...

K.Snyder;1027671 wrote: Would you not agree that the majority of people who carry credit cards spends more money?...

In association with "worth", of course, both overwhelmingly accepted and not...


I don't spend more, I used them constantly only for good credit rating and emergeries......if I cannot afford it, I don't buy it.

and when I get home from making a purchase, I then transfer the amount from my savings to cheqing.....done and paid for then............simple.

When that bill comes in, I authorize my payment over the phone for it..........(but its already been paid for, and in my cheqing account.)



Its a very unusual way to do it, doubt any have done it this way........but for me, it works.



I have never waited to get the bill in and decide can I afford this amount like most do and end up paying high interests rates because they cannot afford the full balance then.

think about my theory.............it works and its priceless!

Odie;1027675 wrote: I don't spend more, I used them constantly only for good credit rating and emergeries......if I cannot afford it, I don't buy it.

and when I get home, I transfer the amount from my savings to cheqing.....done and paid for then............simple.

I have never waited to get the bill in and decide can I afford this amount like most do and end up paying high interests rates because they cannot afford the full balance then.

think about my theory.............it works and its priceless!




Try my theory...

It's called charge your ass off and then file bankruptcy...:yh_wink...

Gets em every time...



:wah:

K.Snyder;1027677 wrote: Try my theory...

It's called charge your ass off and then file bankruptcy...:yh_wink...

Gets em every time...



:wah:


yup, actually know a few that do that, sure hope they never get caught!:sneaky:

Odie;1027678 wrote: yup, actually know a few that do that, sure hope they never get caught!:sneaky:


The way I see it is, is that anyone willing to lend money to people without being asked deserves to lose all of it because of their greed...Can't stand greedy people...I rate them lower than liars...

Odie;1027678 wrote: yup, actually know a few that do that, sure hope they never get caught!:sneaky:


Thanks Odie and yes, they're all real, not stuffed i promise you. :wah:

oscar;1027682 wrote: Thanks Odie and yes, they're all real, not stuffed i promise you. :wah:


How many do you have, 3?...:-2...



:wah:...

I have just found a wicked video here on u tube for all you American guys. I'm not on my own p.c. at the moment, so tomorrow, i'll link it for you. It's Bush and Blair, Priceless it is.

K.Snyder;1027684 wrote: How many do you have, 3?...:-2...



:wah:...


Errr 3 what KS?????

oscar;1027686 wrote: Errr 3 what KS?????


:-3...

:wah:...

Oh I thought you were refering to breast implants and you'd used a credit card only to file for bankruptcy...

:wah:...

And you said "all" and not "they're"...:wah:...

It's o.k. KS, i just got you. It's the middle of the night here in Blighty so you'll have to excuse me. Yes, i got three p.c's. :wah:

K.Snyder;1027687 wrote: :-3...

:wah:...

Oh I thought you were refering to breast implants and you'd used a credit card only to file for bankruptcy...

:wah:...

And you said "all" and not "they're"...:wah:...


I never said anything about bankrupcy yet. have you got me miixed up with Odie or Jester, you little whipper snapper???:wah:

oscar;1027688 wrote: It's o.k. KS, i just got you. It's the middle of the night here in Blighty so you'll have to excuse me. Yes, i got three p.c's. :wah:


Boy you wouldn't last long in an investigation...:wah:...

It's late here too...I'm getting tired myself...

Would love to see pictures of you're,.."Err"..."p.c's."...:wah:...

Hehe...

:yh_devil...



...















:yh_angel...

...























:yh_devil...

Hehe...



































:yh_whistl...

:yh_angel...

:wah:...