This is what anti-gunners like about this guy:
http://www.bradycampaign.org/press/rele ... elease=283
This is what honest people have found out about the same guy:
http://www.nationalreview.com/seckora/seckora121702.asp
In short he is a liar.
Antigunners like this guy, but he is a liar
-
commie_kalafornian
- Posts: 49
- Joined: Sat Jun 25, 2005 6:48 pm
-
commie_kalafornian
- Posts: 49
- Joined: Sat Jun 25, 2005 6:48 pm
Antigunners like this guy, but he is a liar
flopstock wrote: Do you even realize that the stuff you are putting up is dated 2001 and 2002 respectively?
How about current events? More recent examples of erroneous representations? Make the argument, because this is pointless to me.
Win me over with facts, for goodness sake!
Brady.org is still around has not changed thier mind on Bellisiles. Notice there is NO retraction. They based thier public policy ideas on this man and he lied and Brady.org has not changed thier mind. Plus these are the same exact people who are now trying to push for the banning of even more guns of types and quantities. Plus this man is still out there writting more stuff trying to shot down gun rights.
Look at what one of his friends has to say in his defense:
"In the end," Finkleman said, "I don't think it matters if he cooked the data." - http://www.oah.org/cgi-data/view.html
Do you believe that? Do you think people who use his research to base political ideas should NOT care he cooked data?
How about current events? More recent examples of erroneous representations? Make the argument, because this is pointless to me.
Win me over with facts, for goodness sake!
Brady.org is still around has not changed thier mind on Bellisiles. Notice there is NO retraction. They based thier public policy ideas on this man and he lied and Brady.org has not changed thier mind. Plus these are the same exact people who are now trying to push for the banning of even more guns of types and quantities. Plus this man is still out there writting more stuff trying to shot down gun rights.
Look at what one of his friends has to say in his defense:
"In the end," Finkleman said, "I don't think it matters if he cooked the data." - http://www.oah.org/cgi-data/view.html
Do you believe that? Do you think people who use his research to base political ideas should NOT care he cooked data?