Spiderman 3

JacksDad · Post by **JacksDad** » Sat Aug 04, 2007 12:47 pm

I know there's already a thread for this film.

Yes. It's very good on many different levels. I was expecting crap but....

I was very impressed.

The reason for the second thread is look what I found at frame 1:45:08!

I post only one frame because the others were very graphic pics of slaughter.

I'm shocked!

Attached files

koan · Post by **koan** » Sat Aug 04, 2007 12:53 pm

are you saying there are subliminal messages in the film editing?

chonsigirl · Post by **chonsigirl** » Sat Aug 04, 2007 1:14 pm

Wow, sublliminal messages! Are there quite a few hidden in this film?

JacksDad · Post by **JacksDad** » Sat Aug 04, 2007 1:33 pm

I am an editor and no. This is not subliminal.

Subs are typically one or two frames.

This is fifteen. Here's the last frame.

No Chonsi. That's the only thing I found. But it still bothers me.

If you would like to see the full segment I could probably grab 30 frames and youtube it.

Attached files

koan · Post by **koan** » Sat Aug 04, 2007 3:48 pm

JacksDad;673887 wrote: I am an editor and no. This is not subliminal.

Subs are typically one or two frames.

This is fifteen. Here's the last frame.

No Chonsi. That's the only thing I found. But it still bothers me.

If you would like to see the full segment I could probably grab 30 frames and youtube it.

yes. I'd like to see what you mean with the preceding and following footage around the insert

JacksDad · Post by **JacksDad** » Sat Aug 04, 2007 3:51 pm

Fek.

I knew someone would make me work.

K. Coming up...:p

chonsigirl · Post by **chonsigirl** » Sat Aug 04, 2007 4:06 pm

I would like to see it too, fifteen frames-oh my.

JacksDad · Post by **JacksDad** » Sat Aug 04, 2007 5:34 pm

I'm not running AVID or Premier here at home so this was clipped with Window Movie Maker. That's why it's squashed from the 16:9.

I did it at a low res also just to save bandwidth. And the jump cut at the end?

I didn't notice that last night. What crap.

It's real. What shi1t.

sp3

chonsigirl · Post by **chonsigirl** » Sat Aug 04, 2007 6:44 pm

That is horrible, and it was all those frames inserted into the movie?

JacksDad · Post by **JacksDad** » Sat Aug 04, 2007 8:31 pm

chonsigirl;674029 wrote: That is horrible, and it was all those frames inserted into the movie?

I don't know if was the theater or the dvd release.

koan · Post by **koan** » Sat Aug 04, 2007 9:53 pm

I can't open that for some reason. Won't give me the "okay" option.

JacksDad · Post by **JacksDad** » Sun Aug 05, 2007 7:14 am

Try to download it to your desktop. Right click and Save As.

It's small so it should be a quick download.

buttercup · Post by **buttercup** » Sun Aug 05, 2007 7:25 am

Double click the ok button & then it works

koan · Post by **koan** » Sun Aug 05, 2007 8:25 am

The ok button is blanked out. Won't allow me to select it.

Right clicking doesn't give me a download option either.

eta: very weird. it wouldn't let me do that last night. it's working now.

koan · Post by **koan** » Sun Aug 05, 2007 8:29 am

that's absurd.

where did you get this copy from?

JacksDad · Post by **JacksDad** » Sun Aug 05, 2007 8:54 am

It's a torrent.

I'll pm you the link if you'd like to see the full D/L.

chonsigirl · Post by **chonsigirl** » Sun Aug 05, 2007 8:56 am

What's a torrent, JD?

JacksDad · Post by **JacksDad** » Sun Aug 05, 2007 9:41 am

chonsigirl;674361 wrote: What's a torrent, JD?

It's uh....

Not for FG.

Tombstone doesn't need anymore flak than he already gets.

My pm box is open however.

koan · Post by **koan** » Sun Aug 05, 2007 9:57 am

someone has added it.

There is no way the producers and director would have allowed that. Even if the director wanted to put a message in his film, it's not his film. This is a post addition from a party unconnected to the production probably the person advertised in the second frame you posted.

JacksDad · Post by **JacksDad** » Sun Aug 05, 2007 10:39 am

koan;674404 wrote: someone has added it.

There is no way the producers and director would have allowed that. Even if the director wanted to put a message in his film, it's not his film. This is a post addition from a party unconnected to the production probably the person advertised in the second frame you posted.

Yes. That's a given.

If that was in the theatre this would have been brought up awhile ago.

But has the dvd been compromised? Or is it just the rip that I viewed?

If the latter is the case then hackers are hacking hackers !:wah:

koan · Post by **koan** » Sun Aug 05, 2007 11:00 am

JacksDad;674433 wrote:

If the latter is the case then hackers are hacking hackers !:wah:

That would make sense It's not like you can ask for your money back :yh_tong2