Oh dear, this is quite embarrassing. I did not post a goodbye in order to have people beg me to stay, as has been suggested, I just thought it rather rude to vanish without a word.
There are, however, a few things in this thread that need clearing up: Accountable, please do not say things that are not true. I replied to your PM (is it not customary to regard the contents of PMs as confidential?) by thanking you most sincerely for your apology. I now thank you again, in public. It was decent of you and I have no further issues in this respect.
Another poster has said that nobody was rude. I beg to differ:
"I'M QUITE SURE BOTHWELL'S RESERVES
THE RIGHT TO REFUSE SERVICE TO
ANYONE, I KNOW THE PROPRIETOR AND
HONEY, I'M MAKING SURE YOU GO TO THE HEAD OF THAT LIST!

Originally Posted by Ruth
What an extremely vulgar outburst. Don't you find it just a teeny little bit embarrassing that you have failed to detect the ironic humour in my message?
"ME? EMBARRASSED?
Don't YOU find it embarrassing that out of all the thousands and thousands
of posts in our beloved Pub, yours is the first and ONLY one to mention
a "mess"?
If that's humor, we don't need it. Okay, right, I shouldn't speak for others.
I'll come right out and say *I* don't need it. But I know for a fact"
I'm not alone in this.
__________________
I will not comment on the stupidity of the above; some things are better glossed over. Or should I endeavour to explain the joke? That I was taking the **** out of myself, that I was the one who made the virtual mess in the virtual pub that stirs such violent passion? That far from my callous sarcasm that one poster has mentioned, it was all self-mockery, I "disgraced myself" and shocked the civilised locals by getting virtually drunk on my first visit to the virtual pub and made a mess. It was a joke - oh god, this is excruciating!
Then the mid-thread instructions, the proprietary attitude to the forum:
"I think it is just common courtesy to let the person who started the
thread sort of direct it... "
"Uh, I thought LadyCop started the thread? What am I missing?"
"We quite often have lively debate around here, but for the most part
we refrain from unequivocally stating another's intent or premise
without that person's knowledge or input."
(I laboured in vain here to explain that there was no premise stated in the opening post of the thread, so if there was no premise, then I felt safe to assume there was none, without being told there was none by the person who started the thread. . . ):-5
There is something incestuous and oh-so-heavy in all these bizarre messages and misunderstandings. This is why I decided I did not want to stay with the forum and tip-toe through the labyrinth of unspoken understandings and complicated status systems and alpha-female rivalries.
My e-mail inbox is full of notifications that I have not been able to access, sorry, but thanks to all for the unread messages.
Ruth