How to resolve the idealism-materialism dispute ?

[wise47]

I am currently presenting a different concept than the one presented in this thread: viewtopic.php?t=66268

Cosmical modeling can refer to idealism and materialism. In the geocentric model, matter has a significant advantage over mind. The sun next to the Earth in this model has some significance. This model corresponds to materialism and realism with the addition of idealism. And in the heliocentric model, mind has a significant advantage over matter. A big advantage, because the Earth plays a certain, albeit small, role in this model. The Bishop G.Berkeley system, which was a Copernican revolution in philosophy and the greatest philosophical system of all times and Berkeley can be considered the greatest philosopher in history, is not fully compatible with the heliocentric model because it does not take into account the Earth orbiting the Sun. The heliocentric model corresponds to idealism with a slight admixture of materialism and realism, where the Sun represents the subject and the Earth the object. The heliocentric model is subordinate to the Galactic Model 2 (other than the model presented in my text New horizons in physics), in which all the stars in the galaxy (subjects) orbit a supermassive black hole and accreation disc at the center of the galaxy. Galactic Model 2 corresponds to the idealism, where dominant is God the Father (accretion disc) and cosmical space (black hole) with the primeval star which was beginning of the cosmos (singularity inside the black hole).
It seems that the best solution to the materialism-idealism and realism-idealism problem is adoption of heliocentric model and galactic model 2 in my new positions of ideomaterialism and ideorealism. In the position of ideomaterialism, I assume a great advantage of mind over matter. There is only a small amount of matter (in a ratio of 95 percent mind and 5 percent matter). In the position of ideorealism, I assume a great advantage of mental existence over mentally independent existence. There is only a small participation of mentally independent existence.
The simulation concept assumes that God the Father creates a simulation of the entire cosmos and cosmoses, which can be confirmed by the appearance of a square microgrid of space that looks like a grid of computer representations of objects from the 1980s. The processor that creates and forms the microgrid would be God the Father. It is a computer model to some extent.
The eternal dispute between idealism and realism finds a solution in the synthesis of these positions, which is my ideomaterialism and ideorealism.
Microscopic phenomena are mental-material phenomena. But mind has a great advantage over matter in them. They are in big degree mental processes and therefore depend on the mind of the observer, as suggested by quantum mechanics.
It is worth noting that the concept of matter should be revised. The smallest particles are formed directly from space (a square microgrid of space of the order of 10^-80 m) then combine to form heavier matter. So matter is essentially space.
The fundamental difference between my system and Bishop G. Brekeley's system - is the existence of matter. Although there is only a small amount of it. The second difference between these systems is, in my system, the existence of particles. Although they are largely mental particles with a small addition of a material nature which however can be important. The third difference is the starting point of both systems. In Berkeley's case these are impressions systems, in my case this is a square microgrid of space that looks like a mental simulation. The fourth difference is that God the Father in some degree calculates the forms that the microgrid takes.
In my theory, one could speak of a combination of two concepts. The theory of the world as a simulation in the mind of God (the simulation theory, compare the shape of the microgrid of space which looks like the grids of computer simulations from the 1980s) and the theory of the world as an extension of God's body (the God's body theory). Probably the best solution is to combine these two theories, in some proportion, with great advantage of simulation concept. There is a possibility that God creates a hologram of the cosmos from a flat microgrid, from a plane.
It's worth noting that idealiths (see paragraph 3), as the third component of material structures, primarily living ones, exist outside spacetime (actually, according to my new theory, outside spacetime-matter) and beyond simulation. This means that these structures are characterized by a certain autonomy; perhaps we're dealing with 50 percent simulation and 50 percent autonomy.

(the above paragraph is from year 2024 and 2025)

Gregory Podgorniak, Poland

about the author, My name is Gregory Podgorniak (brn. 01.1977, Szczecinek, West Pomerania, Poland). I am working on field of natural as well as social sciences. During philosophical studies at Adam Mickiewicz University in Poznan (1996-1999) I was actively act in student scientific organisation, got a scientific scholarship, and one from my articles titled Circulus vitiosus and fourfold petitio principii in the system of Descartes was published in Humanistic Drafts of Publishing House of Humaniora Foundation in Poznan, no. 6, 1998. Unfortunately certain fate events made impossible to me continuing studies to master's and later doctor's degree. Thence I was forced to be content only with a title of bachelor.
Thanks to deep and penetrating researchings I was able to establish indisputably some number of my past incarnations reaching of ancient period, these data are certain, these incarnations are: Auguste Comte (1798-1857) French philosopher and sociologist, Edme Mariotte (1620-1684) French physicist and meteorologist, Aenesidemus (1 st century BC) Greek sceptical philosopher, Arcesilaus (315-241 BC) Greek sceptical philosopher, Gorgias (485-380 BC) Greek sophist.

email contact: podgorniakgre@gmail.com

above text comes from site: http://sresearch.scienceontheweb.net/philosophy.php
my other works are available here: http://sresearch.scienceontheweb.net/map_of_texts.php