POTUS Trump

tude dog · Post by **tude dog** » Wed Nov 23, 2016 3:13 pm

magentaflame;1503008 wrote: What i dont understand what Trump is on about when it comes to Clinton. First he says he's going to put her in prison then does a turn around like he's pardoned her or something....WTF? Who does he think he is? Its not up to him....its up to congress to decide.

He did say he would appoint a special prosecutor for go after Clinton. Apparently, he is listening to some good advice to let it go. She has enough legal problems and his investigation would only be a distraction from his agenda.

Oh, and the congress has nothing to do with his decision.

magentaflame;1503008 wrote: Its almost Python like...... lpicture this..... Trump standing on a mountain crying out "I'M KING OF THE WORLD"! Then his pants fall down and everyone see's him as he really is.

Rather sad really, though comical. Another Reagan...... it'll look good on the surface but in the long run dissapointing

Submit your storyline to Hollywood. They may actually give you a million dollars for that loser script.

Another Reagan?

One can only hope for a new day in America.

tude dog · Post by **tude dog** » Wed Nov 23, 2016 3:19 pm

Bryn Mawr;1503010 wrote: In what way was it warranted?

How can it not be illegal? The US was not at war with Libya but it carried out an unprovoked attack with the sole intent of murdering the lawful Head of State.

We were not at war with Libya when they killed American soldiers.

1986 Berlin discotheque bombing

Post by **Bryn Mawr** » Wed Nov 23, 2016 3:22 pm

tude dog;1503013 wrote: We were not at war with Libya when they killed American soldiers.

1986 Berlin discotheque bombing

A criminal act should be pursued through the criminal courts, not by the use of air strikes.

ZAP · Post by **ZAP** » Wed Nov 23, 2016 3:27 pm

I just noticed how many viewers are on this thread--3 members and 14 guests!

tude dog · Post by **tude dog** » Wed Nov 23, 2016 3:32 pm

Bryn Mawr;1503014 wrote: A criminal act should be pursued through the criminal courts, not by the use of air strikes.

Criminal act?

It was part of Libya's national policy of terrorism, and as a nation, we responded. We have the right to defend our citizens and as a sovereign nation we do not need permission.

Post by **Bryn Mawr** » Wed Nov 23, 2016 3:56 pm

tude dog;1503016 wrote: Criminal act?

It was part of Libya's national policy of terrorism, and as a nation, we responded. We have the right to defend our citizens and as a sovereign nation we do not need permission.

Firstly you have to prove that, you are not judge jury and executioner deciding that they're guilty and then invading to assassinate their Head of State - that's illegal all day and every day.

Ahso! · Post by **Ahso!** » Wed Nov 23, 2016 4:10 pm

There's an awful lot of stench still rising from the La Belle and Lockerbie bombings.

tude dog · Post by **tude dog** » Wed Nov 23, 2016 4:25 pm

Bryn Mawr;1503017 wrote: Firstly you have to prove that, you are not judge jury and executioner deciding that they're guilty and then invading to assassinate their Head of State - that's illegal all day and every day.

So call a cop.

Post by **spot** » Wed Nov 23, 2016 5:29 pm

tude dog;1503019 wrote: So call a cop.

What puzzles me is that Americans in general are so unconcerned at the extent to which they piss off non-Americans by adopting that sort of attitude. Perhaps it's what comes of feeling exceptional.