British soldiers abuse Afghan children.

Post by **Oscar Namechange** » Wed Jan 18, 2012 6:46 pm

Two British soldiers arrested over allegations of sex abuse with 10-year-old children while they served in Afghanistan | Mail Online

Whilst US Marines seem to carry much critism, the net Is awash with cases of abuse by British soldiers.... This Is the latest...

Post by **jones jones** » Thu Jan 19, 2012 11:13 am

oscar;1381610 wrote: Two British soldiers arrested over allegations of sex abuse with 10-year-old children while they served in Afghanistan | Mail Online

Whilst US Marines seem to carry much critism, the net Is awash with cases of abuse by British soldiers.... This Is the latest...

Can this be oscar? Wow, far out!

Now which would you consider to be worse ....

a) Grown men engaging in anal sex in the American Armed Forces?

OR

b) Paedophiles in the British Armed Forces?

I know which of the two get my vote!!

Post by **Oscar Namechange** » Thu Jan 19, 2012 3:35 pm

jones jones;1381673 wrote: Can this be oscar? Wow, far out!

Now which would you consider to be worse ....

a) Grown men engaging in anal sex in the American Armed Forces?

OR

b) Paedophiles in the British Armed Forces?

I know which of the two get my vote!!

If the grown men In the American armed forces are consenting adults, as far as I am concerned, that's not even up for debate...... However....

The sexual abuse of children by British Soldiers Is beyond contempt. I wonder just how much of this goes on but doesn't get reported on ?

gmc · Post by **gmc** » Fri Jan 20, 2012 5:14 am

Probably a lot less than you would like to think.

Post by **Oscar Namechange** » Sat Jan 21, 2012 2:31 pm

gmc;1381736 wrote: Probably a lot less than you would like to think. Wot ? As In Spot believing US Marines carry out most abuse In war zones?

Please refrain from assuming you know how I think.

Post by **jones jones** » Sat Jan 21, 2012 2:54 pm

Rather strange that a thread detailing abuse by US Marines gets soooooooooo many replies whilst this one does not!

I wonder why?

Post by **Oscar Namechange** » Sat Jan 21, 2012 3:05 pm

jones jones;1381890 wrote: Rather strange that a thread detailing abuse by US Marines gets soooooooooo many replies whilst this one does not!

I wonder why?

I just can't think why either :-2

:-3

gmc · Post by **gmc** » Sun Jan 22, 2012 10:44 am

perhaps because we don't set our military up on a pedestal.

Post by **jones jones** » Sun Jan 22, 2012 11:12 am

gmc;1381977 wrote: perhaps because we don't set our military up on a pedestal.

What kind of an answer is that? Its a cop out. Irrespective of how you view your military or any other countries armed forces, right is right and wrong is wrong.

Bruv · Post by **Bruv** » Sun Jan 22, 2012 11:27 am

What suitable reply would anyone be wanting ?

Post by **jones jones** » Sun Jan 22, 2012 11:39 am

Bruv;1381986 wrote: What suitable reply would anyone be wanting ?

Go read some of the replies on the "Peeing on dead Soldiers" thread.

theia · Post by **theia** » Sun Jan 22, 2012 11:49 am

jones jones;1381989 wrote: Go read some of the replies on the "Peeing on dead Soldiers" thread.

Sorry, I'm not sure what you mean :-3

Post by **jones jones** » Sun Jan 22, 2012 11:53 am

theia;1381998 wrote: Sorry, I'm not sure what you mean :-3

Well honey you don't have to know, cos my post was addressed to citizen Bruv!

Post by **Oscar Namechange** » Sun Jan 22, 2012 12:01 pm

The Peeing on dead soldiers thread saw a flurry of activity and passionate posting yet this one has failed to attract any serious takers.

Was It because 'Peeing on dead soldiers' was about US Marines ? And because this one Is about the British troops abusing Afghan Children,, we have all suddenly done that very British thing of ' Ahem' 'No comment'

theia · Post by **theia** » Sun Jan 22, 2012 12:30 pm

jones jones;1382000 wrote: Well honey you don't have to know, cos my post was addressed to citizen Bruv!

You're quite right, I don't have to know but, since this is an open forum, I was curious as to what you meant.

YZGI · Post by **YZGI** » Sun Jan 22, 2012 12:33 pm

Peeing on dead people or abusing children, both are despicable regardless of any military affiliation.

Post by **jones jones** » Sun Jan 22, 2012 12:47 pm

theia;1382009 wrote: You're quite right, I don't have to know but, since this is an open forum, I was curious as to what you meant.

Well basically what I meant was why was the thread about the wrongdoings of American armed forces so well patronised by some members whilst these self same members remained conspicuous by their absence on this thread.

theia · Post by **theia** » Sun Jan 22, 2012 12:59 pm

jones jones;1382012 wrote: Well basically what I meant was why was the thread about the wrongdoings of American armed forces so well patronised by some members whilst these self same members remained conspicuous by their absence on this thread.

Ah right, thank you.

Bruv · Post by **Bruv** » Sun Jan 22, 2012 1:33 pm

jones jones;1381989 wrote: Go read some of the replies on the "Peeing on dead Soldiers" thread.

Read it all again.............

jones jones;1382012 wrote: Well basically what I meant was why was the thread about the wrongdoings of American armed forces so well patronised by some members whilst these self same members remained conspicuous by their absence on this thread.

Most posters are absent from this thread who posted in that one.............still don't see your point.

I am slow witted though.......................compared to most.