Urinals with a View.

Rapunzel · Post by **Rapunzel** » Fri Mar 05, 2010 6:29 pm

Urinals with a View. Probably not a reason to plan a trip, but if you're going to these cities anyway, you'll want to "go" and see the scenery. :rolleyes:

Urinals With Views | Gadling.com

ZAP · Post by **ZAP** » Fri Mar 05, 2010 7:05 pm

Very interesting.

My daughter gave me a "book for the John" entitled A Loo With a View From Waterloo to Honolulu by Luke Barclay. Interesting photos for my guest bathroom.

Odie · Post by **Odie** » Fri Mar 05, 2010 8:11 pm

woah, not for me!:yh_rotfl

AussiePam · Post by **AussiePam** » Fri Mar 05, 2010 8:30 pm

No, they're for blokes, Odie. Usually.

In the Today's Posts list.. this one precedes 'What Pissed You Off Today' - and I think there's something in that for all of us.

The old French version of le pissoir in the street meant that a gentleman could be seen by all from the knees down and the chest up. I'll see if I can find a pic, to add to our collection here.

K.Snyder · Post by **K.Snyder** » Fri Mar 05, 2010 8:31 pm

Wtf is it with boys that call themselves "men" not having the ability to flush the damn toilet after having used it!?!?!?

AussiePam · Post by **AussiePam** » Fri Mar 05, 2010 8:34 pm

Voilà!

A Loo with a View !!

Attached files

Odie · Post by **Odie** » Fri Mar 05, 2010 9:39 pm

AussiePam;1294782 wrote: Voilà!

A Loo with a View !!

got a camera Pam?:yh_rotfl

along-for-the-ride · Post by **along-for-the-ride** » Sat Mar 06, 2010 5:50 am

Gentlemen don't need to be distracted whilst performing this bodily function. It's all in the aim.

:D

Post by **LarsMac** » Sat Mar 06, 2010 7:44 am

along-for-the-ride;1294816 wrote: Men don't need to be distracted whilst performing this bodily function. It's all in the aim.

:D

Or lack of.

Rapunzel · Post by **Rapunzel** » Sat Mar 06, 2010 5:23 pm

along-for-the-ride;1294816 wrote: Gentlemen don't need to be distracted whilst performing this bodily function. It's all in the aim.

:D

I didn't think it was to do with the aim. I thought it was more hit-and-miss!

;)

:D

K.Snyder · Post by **K.Snyder** » Sat Mar 06, 2010 11:46 pm

Rapunzel;1294904 wrote: I didn't think it was to do with the aim. I thought it was more hit-and-miss!

;)

:D

No, it's pure luck me lady...:yh_wink :yh_kiss