What to do when democracy fails.
In a democracy the citizens are sovereign; when the citizens of a democracy haven’t the capacity to comprehend the problems of that democracy that democracy will fail.
Human ingenuity has proven to be capable of producing very sophisticated technology. But humans seem to be unable to develop the intellectual sophistication required to guide and control that technology. That is to say that democracy cannot function adequately in this high tech society we have created.
Our financial system’s abrupt collapse is one manifestation of this problem. Few of our experts, if any, have the sophistication to mange this high tech economy that we have created. Certainly few if any of our (USA) citizens have the sophistication to make decisions about this matter.
A large democratic state cannot consistently function within a world that is beyond the comprehension capacity of the citizens of that democracy.
We have tried Monarchy, Oligarchy, and now Democracy.
Where can we turn when our technology outstrips our intellectual sophistication?
To me the only direction that seems available is that since we cannot achieve the commensurate intellectual sophistication demanded by our technology then we must curtail the use of such sophisticated technology.
What to do when democracy fails.
What to do when democracy fails.
coberst;1091358 wrote: What to do when democracy fails.
In a democracy the citizens are sovereign; when the citizens of a democracy haven’t the capacity to comprehend the problems of that democracy that democracy will fail.
Human ingenuity has proven to be capable of producing very sophisticated technology. But humans seem to be unable to develop the intellectual sophistication required to guide and control that technology. That is to say that democracy cannot function adequately in this high tech society we have created.
Our financial system’s abrupt collapse is one manifestation of this problem. Few of our experts, if any, have the sophistication to mange this high tech economy that we have created. Certainly few if any of our (USA) citizens have the sophistication to make decisions about this matter.
A large democratic state cannot consistently function within a world that is beyond the comprehension capacity of the citizens of that democracy.
We have tried Monarchy, Oligarchy, and now Democracy.
Where can we turn when our technology outstrips our intellectual sophistication?
To me the only direction that seems available is that since we cannot achieve the commensurate intellectual sophistication demanded by our technology then we must curtail the use of such sophisticated technology.
Is that your own opinion or are you cutting and pasting someone else's?
Either way My response would be the same. Cobblers!!
In a democracy the citizens are sovereign; when the citizens of a democracy haven’t the capacity to comprehend the problems of that democracy that democracy will fail.
Human ingenuity has proven to be capable of producing very sophisticated technology. But humans seem to be unable to develop the intellectual sophistication required to guide and control that technology. That is to say that democracy cannot function adequately in this high tech society we have created.
Our financial system’s abrupt collapse is one manifestation of this problem. Few of our experts, if any, have the sophistication to mange this high tech economy that we have created. Certainly few if any of our (USA) citizens have the sophistication to make decisions about this matter.
A large democratic state cannot consistently function within a world that is beyond the comprehension capacity of the citizens of that democracy.
We have tried Monarchy, Oligarchy, and now Democracy.
Where can we turn when our technology outstrips our intellectual sophistication?
To me the only direction that seems available is that since we cannot achieve the commensurate intellectual sophistication demanded by our technology then we must curtail the use of such sophisticated technology.
Is that your own opinion or are you cutting and pasting someone else's?
Either way My response would be the same. Cobblers!!
What to do when democracy fails.
gmc;1091362 wrote: Is that your own opinion or are you cutting and pasting someone else's?
Either way My response would be the same. Cobblers!!
How does a self-actualizing self-learner, who reads often and broadly, determine which of his or her expressions are their own creation or are constructed from those of another? I suspect ideas are fungible much like money, or water in a well.
For those who do not read books I suspect that their source of opinions is much easier to determine.
Either way My response would be the same. Cobblers!!
How does a self-actualizing self-learner, who reads often and broadly, determine which of his or her expressions are their own creation or are constructed from those of another? I suspect ideas are fungible much like money, or water in a well.
For those who do not read books I suspect that their source of opinions is much easier to determine.
What to do when democracy fails.
coberst;1091358 wrote: ...................Where can we turn when our technology outstrips our intellectual sophistication?
To me the only direction that seems available is that since we cannot achieve the commensurate intellectual sophistication demanded by our technology then we must curtail the use of such sophisticated technology.
No way will progress be stopped. We are a consumer society and if there is a buck to be made, someone will upgrade their circumstances by marketing it.
To me the only direction that seems available is that since we cannot achieve the commensurate intellectual sophistication demanded by our technology then we must curtail the use of such sophisticated technology.
No way will progress be stopped. We are a consumer society and if there is a buck to be made, someone will upgrade their circumstances by marketing it.
"Out, damned spot! out, I say!"
- William Shakespeare, Macbeth, 5.1