ForumGarden

Do you Believe the jurors or MJ's paying talking head Tom M. well I think the jurors were very believeable on last night's new show the stared former Fox networks Rita Crosby.

The two fmr. Jurors said they were basically forced into submission by the othere Jurors to turn over a not guilty Verdit. They said even the formen threatened to write the judge to have the women removed for not argreeing. Tonight on Rita Crosby a third Juror tells her tale. MSNBC at 9 pm.

This is Tom M. MJ. Attonery:-5

[/B I personally have lost all my faith in the Judicial system. When you're very wealthy like MJ or other people YOU CAN BUY your way out of being convicted of any crime. My son was murdered, and his murderer walks free, and I know it's because HE is wealthy. Money talks, and you know what walks. So yes I can believe anything. My opinion MJ was guilty, it's not the first time he's been accused of such acts. CASEY]

Casey wrote: I personally have lost all my faith in the Judicial system. Got a better alternative? I'd like to see everybody get public defenders, whether they can afford better or not. Taxpayer-funded attorneys for both sides. That way, both sides would get crap representation.



BTW, I'm serious.

I personally think those jurors are weak.





Never catch anybody forcing ME to change my mind. I don't care

if they threatened to talk to the judge.



:mad:

valerie wrote: I personally think those jurors are weak.





Never catch anybody forcing ME to change my mind. I don't care

if they threatened to talk to the judge.



:mad:
I can't believe they're bragging about their weakness - and everybody's taking them seriously!:-5



Okay, you've told us you're weak and liars; therefore, we should believe you now?!? Good logic.

I am still stunned that they didn't speak up to this earlier.

kmhowe72 wrote: I am still stunned that they didn't speak up to this earlier.
Yeh. The best way to get your book published and made into a movie is to move while the story's still on page 1. They may have blown their chances.

12 Angry Men........................

Far Rider wrote: The jury system is only as good as the integrity of the men/women who sit on the jury.



Funny thing is both sides want to pick weak willed people, they want someone they can sway. Go figure?
Once an issue hits the courtroom, truth is irrelevant. The only thing that matters is what the lawyers can convince the jury to decide. Even the prosecutor is not there for justice. Any good prosecutor knows his political career depends on how many people he puts in jail. Anybody found not guilty is a bad mark on his book. Note the last two sentences said nary a word about crime, criminal, victim, or truth.

flopstock wrote: So, we talking about Michael Jackson or Jordan?
:yh_rotfl Bloody Hell. I think I gave the cat a coronary! :yh_rotfl

micheal Jackson