ForumGarden

I love Reuters News Service. When the United States was attacked on September 11th 2001, they refused to call the perpetrators “terrorists”. I don’t know what you would have to do to be called a terrorist by Reuters?

When the Brits were victims of Al Qaeda’s European wing, once again Reuters, as well as other British media failed to see the “terrorists fingerprints” and instead referred to the killers as “bombers”.

What would someone have to do to be called a terrorist by Reuters?

You better wake up and smell the coffee. “They”, (terrorists) want you and me dead, period! There is no money in the world, no act we could render to make them like us. The hatred is taught to their very youngest from birth. Masque in Europe spew vile messages against the west. “They” hate you, don’t you get it?

There will be more attacks, and the more the media refuses to call them terrorists, the more embolden “they” (terrorists) become. The more legitimacy we give “them”, the longer it will take for the rest of the world to realize, “they” are (terrorists).

That’s how I see it!

Hey Homeowner! Who's side are these people on anyway? What's the point of being PC to people who don't have that word in their dictionaries most likely?

Wolverine wrote: I love Reuters News Service. When the United States was attacked on September 11th 2001, they refused to call the perpetrators “terrorists”. I don’t know what you would have to do to be called a terrorist by Reuters?

When the Brits were victims of Al Qaeda’s European wing, once again Reuters, as well as other British media failed to see the “terrorists fingerprints” and instead referred to the killers as “bombers”.

What would someone have to do to be called a terrorist by Reuters?

You better wake up and smell the coffee. “They”, (terrorists) want you and me dead, period! There is no money in the world, no act we could render to make them like us. The hatred is taught to their very youngest from birth. Masque in Europe spew vile messages against the west. “They” hate you, don’t you get it?

There will be more attacks, and the more the media refuses to call them terrorists, the more embolden “they” (terrorists) become. The more legitimacy we give “them”, the longer it will take for the rest of the world to realize, “they” are (terrorists).

That’s how I see it!


The BBC have also edited out the word "terrorist" or "terrorists" from their London bombing on air storys. Instead they use the term "bombers".

NPR (National Public Radio) did the same thing with the 9/11 attacks.

It is denial in the nth degree.

I didn't know about Rueters. Laura Ingraham (sorry I butchered the spelling) made a big deal about the BBC doing that. I'll have to point out the post in our eye to her.