Page 1 of 1

Galactical model of subquark particles

Posted: Thu Jul 17, 2025 5:09 am
by wise47
The following paragraph is from the larger text New horizons in physics:

Galactical model of subquark particles

Electrons, quarks and gluons possess internal structure, consist of quadrillion of particles of size about 10^-35 m [they correspond with photons], these then from quadrillion of particles about 10^-50 m [they correspond with gravitons]. To confirm legitimacy of assuming of hypothesis of internal structure of smallest from hitherto known structural subatomic particles as electrons, quarks and gluons it can be invoked the theory of science created by A.Comte (see after text Comte's Theory of Science).

Image
diagram. Galatical model

Every following field uses in a large extent from previous, sociology from biology - theory of evolution, biology from chemistry - an example biochemistry, chemistry from physics - even if structure of atom and periodic table, physics from astronomy. Invoking astronomy it can be in physics reach eg. conception of existence of atoms and their internal structure - stars, planets, planetary system. It can be also reach models applied in conception of subquark particles and QG. It is galactical and cosmical models. Mystery of dark matter can be explained in this way that preonical particles possess mass (the above part of this paragraph is from year 2014).
A more careful analysis of the galactical model leads to the conclusion that there are more types of particles of the right type. Types of stars, by supergiants, giants, dwarfs, all the way to the supermassive black hole at the center of the galaxy would correspond to the types of these particles. Cosmical model analysis leads to similar conclusions, where the types of particles would correspond to the appropriate types of galaxies.
In addition, it can be assumed that there are types of photon-like particles and corresponding waves with significantly higher speeds than the speed of light. So there are non-electromagnetic waves far above the speed of light (the above part of this paragraph is from year 2019).
Particles much faster than photons are related to the cosmical model and sizes in the order of 10^-50m. One can imagine building devices equipped with antennas for superelectromagnetic communication. The speed of such communication would be enormous, for example, communication with a base on Pluto could take less than a second.
Main particle from the galactical model will correspond to a supermassive black hole at the center of the galaxy. Perhaps quarks are made of such particles. One can also consider the hypothesis that these particles are micro black holes that have ended their lives as particles, by evaporating. These evaporating micro black holes can produce all the particles from the galactical model (compare stars in the galaxy). The only issue is that these particles can also be building blocks of, for example, quarks.
The bonds of particles from the galactic model and higher models are probably - like quark-gluon bonds - indecomposable. All particles from the galactical model are somehow related to the main particle of the model, which is related to the rotation of the galaxy where the center is a supermassive black hole (black star). There are three types of galaxies, spiral, elliptical and irregular, just as there are three kinds of particles, electrons, quarks and gluons. The largest particles in the galactic model would correspond to hypergiant stars (the above part of this paragraph is from year 2023).

author of text: Gregory Podgorniak, Poland

about the author, My name is Gregory Podgorniak (brn. 01.1977, Szczecinek, West Pomerania, Poland). I am working on field of natural as well as social sciences. During philosophical studies at Adam Mickiewicz University in Poznan (1996-1999) I was actively act in student scientific organisation, got a scientific scholarship, and one from my articles titled Circulus vitiosus and fourfold petitio principii in the system of Descartes was published in Humanistic Drafts of Publishing House of Humaniora Foundation in Poznan, no. 6, 1998. Unfortunately certain fate events made impossible to me continuing studies to master's and later doctor's degree. Thence I was forced to be content only with a title of bachelor.
Thanks to deep and penetrating researchings I was able to establish indisputably some number of my past incarnations reaching of ancient period, these data are certain, these incarnations are: Auguste Comte (1798-1857) French philosopher and sociologist, Edme Mariotte (1620-1684) French physicist and meteorologist, Bodhidharma (5th or 6th century) buddhist patriarch, Aenesidemus (1 st century BC) Greek sceptical philosopher, Arcesilaus (315-241 BC) Greek sceptical philosopher, Gorgias (485-380 BC) Greek sophist.

email contact: podgorniakgre@gmail.com

the text New horizons in physics is available here: http://sresearch.scienceontheweb.net/perspectives.php
my other research is avaialble here: http://sresearch.scienceontheweb.net/map_of_texts.php

Re: Galactical model of subquark particles

Posted: Thu Jul 17, 2025 8:17 am
by spot
wise47 wrote: Thu Jul 17, 2025 5:09 am The following paragraph is from the larger text New horizons in physics:

these then from quadrillion of particles about 10^-50 m [they correspond with gravitons].

Ah.

Someone mentioned the Planck length perhaps? lengths of around 10^−35 m?

Irrelevant bad scientist, old Max? Missed by 15 orders of magnitude? The petafold misestimation?

Re: Galactical model of subquark particles

Posted: Fri Jul 18, 2025 6:45 am
by Bryn Mawr
Very heavy in supposition and devoid of evidence.

I would suggest it should be rewritten starting with observable data followed by a logical derivation of the conclusions given here.

Re: Galactical model of subquark particles

Posted: Fri Jul 18, 2025 6:54 am
by spot
Bryn Mawr wrote: Fri Jul 18, 2025 6:45 am Very heavy in supposition and devoid of evidence.

I would suggest it should be rewritten starting with observable data followed by a logical derivation of the conclusions given here.
Sabine Hossenfelder - https://sabinehossenfelder.com/ - one of my favourite physics authors - constantly criticizes theoreticians who produce self-consistent models with no means of distinguishing them in the real world from any other self-consistent model. She considers it a waste of funding. She's German so she tends to swear a lot.

So I wonder - how would this proposed model differ from other such subquark models when tested against real observations?

Because Sabine says a whole stack of these models are untestable, and any that do get tested and fail to match observations will become an undetectable wastage from the hundreds of alternative theoretical models on the same subject.

So... what real-world properties reflect behaviours at 10^-50 m?

ForumGarden appears to be the seventh website, according to Google search, not to have deleted this thread.