Reported Post by LarsMac

[LarsMac]

LarsMac has reported a post.

Reason:This is pure trolling, in my not-so-humble opinion.
Post: Why have Muslim men lowered themselves to be babysitters for women?

Forum: Islam

Assigned Moderators: N/A

Posted by: Gnostic Christian Bishop

Original Content: Why have Muslim men lowered themselves to be babysitters for women?

As I understand it, many Muslim men have decided to become babysitters and chauffer to grown women by insisting that they be accompanied by a man when going out.

I also understand that Muslim men have taken on the womanly duty of teaching girls how to dress and a grandmother’s duty of teaching women how to dress and what is appropriate to wear.

In Canada, our customs are more of women accompanying women as they do their various chores and sorties and not having to bother men for such menial tasks as driving them about like a chauffeur, nor have Canadian men place ourselves in a grandmother’s position of determining what women’s fashions will be.

Our gays are into such things but not usually heterosexual men.

It seems to me that Muslim men are treating their women like immature children who cannot get around without them and who need to be told what to wear. This is quite a demeaning position for both Muslim women and especially Muslim men.

Where is a Muslim man’s honor in his lowering himself to be a babysitter, companion/chauffeur and a woman’s fashion coordinator?

Regards

DL

[spot]

The chap has turned trolling into a full-time occupation across the Internet, driven I would imagine by a deeply-held belief and a conviction that his belief is true. Truthbringer had it as well. And Dutch. And Pudu or whatever he's called, and Michel. It's different to board-destroyers like Glaswegian who just wanted a fight, so there's at least two meanings of troll. Short of euthanasia I can't suggest a solution. I think all of them are in need of therapy.

He's posting from Ottawa. We could set a miserable flag on his account and persuade him to go elsewhere that way. We could set the Coventry flag and let him talk to himself indefinitely. Personally, since he rarely strays from his own threads, I don't open them and I occasionally adjust his titles to get rid of the cut-paste artifacts.

I put AA-Andy-the-grumps on ignore, so that's another option - he's about as unfunny as Cholera.

I'll PM him and see if he'll discuss his use of the site rationally.

[spot]

We have a reply:





Gnostic Christian Bishop wrote: I do have a deeply held conviction that all immoral creeds should be banned as all they are are immoral creeds that no moral person should have to tolerate in his country.

If you wish to speak to their morality, or lack of, I am here for you.

From your own.





Regards

DL
The entire content of the reported post is intended to offend. It is trolling. If you want to discuss banning "all immoral creeds" then discuss it. What you posted has no bearing at all on the issue, it was a deliberate attempt to inflame.

The moderators will discuss how to proceed. If you have anything else you'd like to be taken into account, please let me know.

[Snowfire]

Do with them as you will.

[spot]

The thing is, this site is run within the protection and restraints of English law.

Having red the reported post several times, I think it qualifies as an incitement to religious hatred. I'm not happy that the thread is being hosted on ForumGarden, or that the poster is being provided with a platform to behave in this deliberately inflammatory way.

[LarsMac]

spot;1494043 wrote: The thing is, this site is run within the protection and restraints of English law.

Having red the reported post several times, I think it qualifies as an incitement to religious hatred. I'm not happy that the thread is being hosted on ForumGarden, or that the poster is being provided with a platform to behave in this deliberately inflammatory way.


His post regularly incite me to anger, but not against Muslims

[G#Gill]

I thought he was just passing an opinion. But then that is just me for you innit ?