ForumGarden

It is one thing for our military to be killed fighting abroad in Middle East Hot Spots, but to be killed on American soil by a Isis inspired Muslim radical is unacceptable. At least they are armed in the Middle East and can defend themselves. In the absence of any one else being able to protect them on American soil, let them carry their arms an at least be able to try and protect themselves.

Lon;1482859 wrote: It is one thing for our military to be killed fighting abroad in Middle East Hot Spots, but to be killed on American soil by a Isis inspired Muslim radical is unacceptable. At least they are armed in the Middle East and can defend themselves. In the absence of any one else being able to protect them on American soil, let them carry their arms an at least be able to try and protect themselves.


It is ironic.

Often times i go go a Kansas site dealing with personal carry of guns. No shock that I read several times soldiers at Ft Riley about the PITA it is to leave the post just to arm oneself. Then comeback and before the gate.

I find it fascinating we cannot trust our soldiers with firearms.

But then again, there is workplace violence, nothing to do with Islamic terrorism, eg Fort Hood Shooting

tude dog;1482946 wrote: It is ironic.

Often times i go go a Kansas site dealing with personal carry of guns. No shock that I read several times soldiers at Ft Riley about the PITA it is to leave the post just to arm oneself. Then comeback and before the gate.

I find it fascinating we cannot trust our soldiers with firearms.

But then again, there is workplace violence, nothing to do with Islamic terrorism, eg Fort Hood Shooting


It's not the soldiers some don't necessarily trust, it's their boss, the Federal Gov't. i.e. Ted Cruz thinking Texas is being "invaded" by the Feds for a military exercise. And, no, I would not trust ALL soldiers, some may not be stable people.