A Picture's Worth A Thousand Words
Posted: Mon May 23, 2005 6:50 am
Anyone agree or disagree with this point of view?
Should we take the gloves off over there and finish what we started instead of *****-footin around?
A PICTURE'S WORTH A THOUSAND WORDS
From the GI’s point of view, there are similarities and differences between reporters and insurgents.
They’re both working against you, but you can only shoot the insurgents.
That’s the only conclusion that can be drawn after recent days have seen an escalation of anti-American bigotry in the Middle East tied directly to idiocy on the part of the press.
“Newsweek†stabbed our troops in the back with the Koran-down-the-toilet story and “The Sun†has done its part by publishing pictures of Saddam Hussein in his BVDs. Both have put rioting idiots in the streets, both have fueled the anti-war/Bush/America crowd in the United States and both have offended the over-inflated Muslim ego.
Which is just what we need now.
In a conflict fueled by a religion that teaches its young men to blow themselves up in the name of God, giving the hotheads at the mosques something else to be ticked off about is just not a good idea.
And the press’s incessant banging of the drum against our troops, our president and our country is predictable and dangerous. Every story about the Saddam pictures brings up the Abu Ghraib matter and every story assumes and asserts the worst about our cause and our country.
Which is all a bunch of crap.
So let’s get some things straight.
First of all, everybody knew Saddam Hussein was in jail, didn’t they? Wasn’t that on TV? Isn’t that known?
So the notion he’s behind bars, living the life of a prisoner, shouldn’t take anybody by surprise.
And what do the pictures show?
They show a healthy man.
He doesn’t have any bruises. He doesn’t have any broken bones. He is being well fed and has the musculature to indicated that he’s getting appropriate exercise. He has clean and well-maintained clothes. He is in a clean environment and his hair and body seem clean, groomed and well taken care of.
And he has his head.
He’s not in shackles or chains, he’s not being mistreated, he has an area where he can move around and have a space of his own.
The pictures of Saddam in jail show that he is being treated better than every single prisoner who has been taken by our enemies in Iraq or Afghanistan.
And yet these people who hate us over there have their nose out of joints because the dignity of some Muslim man has been, according to them, disrespected.
Well tough luck.
This man is a mass murderer, and he’s being treated better than anyone he ever held in jail. And a sense of religious or national dignity that puts empty pride in front of common sense and decency is just short if insane.
This man killed more than a million people and Muslims are upset by the fact that an idiot newspaper published – for no reason other than sensation and commercialism – a picture that some other idiot had taken. It’s too much stupidity.
The pictures shouldn’t have been taken, they shouldn’t have been published, and they shouldn’t be taken this seriously.
But they are.
And that ought to tell us that we need to stop pussyfooting around the Middle East.
If you’ll forgive the vulgarity, we went over to kick ass – not to kiss ass. And our hand wringing over hurt Muslim feelings is an embarrassment. These people have contempt for us because we’re acting contemptible.
They detest weakness and respect strength, and we are bending over backwards like a bunch of pansies. We’ve tied our troops’ hands, we have oddball rules of engagement, we are using the Vietnam playbook.
We couldn’t win hearts and minds there, and we can’t win hearts and minds here.
Because that’s not what you do in war.
In war, you don’t try to make friends, you try to kill enemies. Period. When we firebombed Dresden – and anyplace else we could find – we weren’t that interested in winning the hearts and minds of Germans. We were intent on breaking their will.
Truman leveled Hiroshima and Nagasaki to send the clear message to the Japanese that they wouldn’t like us when we got mad.
Ditto for Sherman’s march to the sea. He didn’t burn Atlanta thinking it would make the Southerners welcome his troops as liberators. He did it to show that fighting against the American Army was an act of suicide.
So what possibly makes us think that all the military history of the world is going to change now? How can we possibly think that the dynamic of warfare is going to change just because we want happy stories in the paper?
You win wars by pounding the snot out of people. You lose wars by doing exactly what we’re doing. Peace comes through victory, and if you’re not willing to fight, you can never have either victory or peace.
We have been at war with these people for three years, and they’re not afraid of us. They have open disrespect for us. They burn our flag and march in the streets and send their sons off to plant bombs near our vehicles.
That means they’re winning.
And they’ll keep winning until we stand up and fight like Americans. They’ll keep winning until we turn our military loose and let it get the job done.
Until then, we better start calling Baghdad Saigon.
And we better get used to something as meaningless as a magazine paragraph or a newspaper photograph creating more trouble than we can handle.
This isn’t Girl Scout day camp, this is war. And it will be won with bullets and bombs, not press releases.
Somebody up the chain of command better catch on to that soon.
- by Bob Lonsberry © 2005
Comment on this Column:
http://www.lonsberry.com/comments.cfm?story=1664
Read Current Comments:
http://www.lonsberry.com/readcomments.cfm?story=1664
Go to Column:
http://www.lonsberry.com/writings.cfm?story=1664
Should we take the gloves off over there and finish what we started instead of *****-footin around?
A PICTURE'S WORTH A THOUSAND WORDS
From the GI’s point of view, there are similarities and differences between reporters and insurgents.
They’re both working against you, but you can only shoot the insurgents.
That’s the only conclusion that can be drawn after recent days have seen an escalation of anti-American bigotry in the Middle East tied directly to idiocy on the part of the press.
“Newsweek†stabbed our troops in the back with the Koran-down-the-toilet story and “The Sun†has done its part by publishing pictures of Saddam Hussein in his BVDs. Both have put rioting idiots in the streets, both have fueled the anti-war/Bush/America crowd in the United States and both have offended the over-inflated Muslim ego.
Which is just what we need now.
In a conflict fueled by a religion that teaches its young men to blow themselves up in the name of God, giving the hotheads at the mosques something else to be ticked off about is just not a good idea.
And the press’s incessant banging of the drum against our troops, our president and our country is predictable and dangerous. Every story about the Saddam pictures brings up the Abu Ghraib matter and every story assumes and asserts the worst about our cause and our country.
Which is all a bunch of crap.
So let’s get some things straight.
First of all, everybody knew Saddam Hussein was in jail, didn’t they? Wasn’t that on TV? Isn’t that known?
So the notion he’s behind bars, living the life of a prisoner, shouldn’t take anybody by surprise.
And what do the pictures show?
They show a healthy man.
He doesn’t have any bruises. He doesn’t have any broken bones. He is being well fed and has the musculature to indicated that he’s getting appropriate exercise. He has clean and well-maintained clothes. He is in a clean environment and his hair and body seem clean, groomed and well taken care of.
And he has his head.
He’s not in shackles or chains, he’s not being mistreated, he has an area where he can move around and have a space of his own.
The pictures of Saddam in jail show that he is being treated better than every single prisoner who has been taken by our enemies in Iraq or Afghanistan.
And yet these people who hate us over there have their nose out of joints because the dignity of some Muslim man has been, according to them, disrespected.
Well tough luck.
This man is a mass murderer, and he’s being treated better than anyone he ever held in jail. And a sense of religious or national dignity that puts empty pride in front of common sense and decency is just short if insane.
This man killed more than a million people and Muslims are upset by the fact that an idiot newspaper published – for no reason other than sensation and commercialism – a picture that some other idiot had taken. It’s too much stupidity.
The pictures shouldn’t have been taken, they shouldn’t have been published, and they shouldn’t be taken this seriously.
But they are.
And that ought to tell us that we need to stop pussyfooting around the Middle East.
If you’ll forgive the vulgarity, we went over to kick ass – not to kiss ass. And our hand wringing over hurt Muslim feelings is an embarrassment. These people have contempt for us because we’re acting contemptible.
They detest weakness and respect strength, and we are bending over backwards like a bunch of pansies. We’ve tied our troops’ hands, we have oddball rules of engagement, we are using the Vietnam playbook.
We couldn’t win hearts and minds there, and we can’t win hearts and minds here.
Because that’s not what you do in war.
In war, you don’t try to make friends, you try to kill enemies. Period. When we firebombed Dresden – and anyplace else we could find – we weren’t that interested in winning the hearts and minds of Germans. We were intent on breaking their will.
Truman leveled Hiroshima and Nagasaki to send the clear message to the Japanese that they wouldn’t like us when we got mad.
Ditto for Sherman’s march to the sea. He didn’t burn Atlanta thinking it would make the Southerners welcome his troops as liberators. He did it to show that fighting against the American Army was an act of suicide.
So what possibly makes us think that all the military history of the world is going to change now? How can we possibly think that the dynamic of warfare is going to change just because we want happy stories in the paper?
You win wars by pounding the snot out of people. You lose wars by doing exactly what we’re doing. Peace comes through victory, and if you’re not willing to fight, you can never have either victory or peace.
We have been at war with these people for three years, and they’re not afraid of us. They have open disrespect for us. They burn our flag and march in the streets and send their sons off to plant bombs near our vehicles.
That means they’re winning.
And they’ll keep winning until we stand up and fight like Americans. They’ll keep winning until we turn our military loose and let it get the job done.
Until then, we better start calling Baghdad Saigon.
And we better get used to something as meaningless as a magazine paragraph or a newspaper photograph creating more trouble than we can handle.
This isn’t Girl Scout day camp, this is war. And it will be won with bullets and bombs, not press releases.
Somebody up the chain of command better catch on to that soon.
- by Bob Lonsberry © 2005
Comment on this Column:
http://www.lonsberry.com/comments.cfm?story=1664
Read Current Comments:
http://www.lonsberry.com/readcomments.cfm?story=1664
Go to Column:
http://www.lonsberry.com/writings.cfm?story=1664