Page 1 of 1

Redknapp Not Guilty

Posted: Wed Feb 08, 2012 10:21 am
by Oscar Namechange
Harry Redknapp verdict: NOT GUILTY of taking £189k in 'bungs' in tax evasion trial | Mail Online

I'm pleased. In his evidence, he came across to me as a fairly decent sort of chap.

Shame the police, CPS and the Inland Revenue don't spend 5 years Investigating crooked bankers Instead.

Redknapp Not Guilty

Posted: Wed Feb 08, 2012 12:13 pm
by Bruv
oscar;1383871 wrote:

I'm pleased. In his evidence, he came across to me as a fairly decent sort of chap.




That was the plan...........it worked.

Redknapp Not Guilty

Posted: Wed Feb 08, 2012 12:57 pm
by Oscar Namechange
Bruv;1383901 wrote: That was the plan...........it worked.


Oh come on !!!!

He's worth millions... why would he defraud a piddly £189 grand ?

Redknapp Not Guilty

Posted: Wed Feb 08, 2012 2:05 pm
by Bryn Mawr
oscar;1383905 wrote: Oh come on !!!!

He's worth millions... why would he defraud a piddly £189 grand ?


Yes, he's an East End wide boy

Next up he'll sue for damages caused by the stress of the wrongful prosecution :wah:

Redknapp Not Guilty

Posted: Wed Feb 08, 2012 2:14 pm
by Bruv
oscar;1383905 wrote: Oh come on !!!!

He's worth millions... why would he defraud a piddly £189 grand ?


Why do any rich people/business squeeze every last penny out of the taxman.................because they can

Redknapp Not Guilty

Posted: Wed Feb 08, 2012 2:51 pm
by theia
Bruv;1383910 wrote: Why do any rich people/business squeeze every last penny out of the taxman.................because they can


Hey, Bruv! I was going to say that!

Redknapp Not Guilty

Posted: Wed Feb 08, 2012 3:03 pm
by Oscar Namechange
So being tried by a fair jury counts for nothing?

Redknapp Not Guilty

Posted: Wed Feb 08, 2012 3:18 pm
by Bryn Mawr
oscar;1383915 wrote: So being tried by a fair jury counts for nothing?


Nah, not when it's awr 'Arry

Redknapp Not Guilty

Posted: Wed Feb 08, 2012 3:48 pm
by Oscar Namechange
Bryn Mawr;1383917 wrote: Nah, not when it's awr 'Arry Fabio's just resigned,,,, awr Arry could be the new England Manager !!!!

Redknapp Not Guilty

Posted: Wed Feb 08, 2012 4:00 pm
by Bryn Mawr
oscar;1383919 wrote: Fabio's just resigned,,,, awr Arry could be the new England Manager !!!!


Constructive dismissal.

It's part of his job to select the team and appoint the captain

They've stopped him doing that

Redknapp Not Guilty

Posted: Wed Feb 08, 2012 4:05 pm
by Oscar Namechange
Bryn Mawr;1383920 wrote: Constructive dismissal.

It's part of his job to select the team and appoint the captain

They've stopped him doing that


He's resigned

England Manager Fabio Capello resigns - YouTube

Redknapp Not Guilty

Posted: Wed Feb 08, 2012 4:13 pm
by Bryn Mawr
oscar;1383921 wrote: He's resigned

England Manager Fabio Capello resigns - YouTube


That's the way constructive dismissal works, you resign in a huff and then go to the Industrial Tribunal claiming that the firm made it impossible for you to do your job and asking for compensation for loss of earnings.

Redknapp Not Guilty

Posted: Wed Feb 08, 2012 4:14 pm
by Oscar Namechange
Bryn Mawr;1383922 wrote: That's the way constructive dismissal works, you resign in a huff and then go to the Industrial Tribunal claiming that the firm made it impossible for you to do your job and asking for compensation for loss of earnings. Ahhh Got you now.

Redknapp Not Guilty

Posted: Thu Feb 09, 2012 3:02 am
by gmc
Bryn Mawr;1383922 wrote: That's the way constructive dismissal works, you resign in a huff and then go to the Industrial Tribunal claiming that the firm made it impossible for you to do your job and asking for compensation for loss of earnings.


No it doesn't, you need to be able to show a consistent pattern of undermining your ability to do your job or inconsistent treatment when it comes to disciplinary action. John Terry might have a case but I doubt cappalo does.

Redknapp Not Guilty

Posted: Thu Feb 09, 2012 10:17 am
by Bryn Mawr
gmc;1383937 wrote: No it doesn't, you need to be able to show a consistent pattern of undermining your ability to do your job or inconsistent treatment when it comes to disciplinary action. John Terry might have a case but I doubt cappalo does.


It was very tongue in cheek :-)