ForumGarden

Seems the donks send Boehner a letter warning him to not to overturn the socialized medicine that the vast majority of Americans don't want.

The Speaker's response:

Washington (Jan 4)

Senators Reid, Durbin, Schumer, Murray and Stabenow:

Thank you for reminding us – and the American people – of the backroom deal that you struck behind closed doors with ‘Big Pharma,’ resulting in bigger profits for the drug companies, and higher prescription drug costs for 33 million seniors enrolled in Medicare Part D, at a cost to the taxpayers of $42.6 billion.

The House is going to pass legislation to repeal that now. You’re welcome.



Wow! They got pwned!

Why do the donks hate senior citizens? :-1

I have heard the reactionaries whine about the higher drug costs in the "Obamacare" bill, yet I haven't found that section in the bill.

Perhaps you could point me to it?

LarsMac;1349740 wrote: I have heard the reactionaries whine about the higher drug costs in the "Obamacare" bill, yet I haven't found that section in the bill.

Perhaps you could point me to it?


Sure. I'll type s-l-o-w-l-y so you can keep up.

Medicare Part D is gutted. The donks needed to kill it because is/was 'free market' based. For the year of inception, the plan was over subscribed yet came in billions under the $72B(?) budget at $49.3B. The program aided in driving down drug costs. That looks really, really bad for the donk's and their Plan to Destroy Private Health Care. They're so looking forward to running the death panels.

For the record, it's prolly the underlying reason that AARP got on board with the donk's Plan to Destroy Private Health Care - it made their supplemental program more attractive.

OK, I'll ask more s-l-o-w-l-y, so you can keep up.

Please show me in the bill where it says that.

BaghdadBob;1349735 wrote: Seems the donks send Boehner a letter warning him to not to overturn the socialized medicine that the vast majority of Americans don't want.

The Speaker's response:

Washington (Jan 4)

Senators Reid, Durbin, Schumer, Murray and Stabenow:

Thank you for reminding us – and the American people – of the backroom deal that you struck behind closed doors with ‘Big Pharma,’ resulting in bigger profits for the drug companies, and higher prescription drug costs for 33 million seniors enrolled in Medicare Part D, at a cost to the taxpayers of $42.6 billion.

The House is going to pass legislation to repeal that now. You’re welcome.



Wow! They got pwned!

Why do the donks hate senior citizens? :-1Got a cite for that response? I ask because I think we all know it's complete fiction.

Accountable;1349816 wrote: Got a cite for that response? I ask because I think we all know it's complete fiction.


Sure.

Speaker Blog | Speaker of the House John Boehner | speaker.gov

1st item under Speaker Blog.

Apology accepted.

In the future, please remember than Google is your friend.

BaghdadBob;1350194 wrote: Sure.

Speaker Blog | Speaker of the House John Boehner | speaker.gov

1st item under Speaker Blog.

Apology accepted.

In the future, please remember than Google is your friend.


So Boehner did not actually so respond in Congress.

This was his press secretary writing in a blog.

It would be your resonsibility to offer supporting docs for your posts. not the reader's, I believe.

You never answered my question, though. Did that come from Mr Steel, as well?

LarsMac;1350200 wrote: So Boehner did not actually so respond in Congress.

This was his press secretary writing in a blog.

It would be your resonsibility to offer supporting docs for your posts. not the reader's, I believe.

You never answered my question, though. Did that come from Mr Steel, as well?


Got a cite for that response? I ask because I think we all know it's complete fiction.


Interesting. The poster implies I'm a liar while lying himself. I catch him on it and rather than call him out, you call me out for...umm, nothing.

You should stop :-5 because it won't knock any sense into you and it'll feel good when you stop.

Trust me. Would I lie to you? :wah:

Sorry, but you are confusing posters and posts.

I certainly never called you a liar, Sir.



This:

Got a cite for that response? I ask because I think we all know it's complete fiction.
was not my post.

LarsMac;1350235 wrote: Sorry, but you are confusing posters and posts.

I certainly never called you a liar, Sir.



This:

was not my post.


Your comprehension skills are bordering on zero.

BaghdadBob;1350239 wrote: Your comprehension skills are bordering on zero.


As my Grandaddy used to say, big words don't make you smart.

ROFLMAO the fact you can seriously make and attack on anyone using the word Donks and the name of a congressman that if you didn't know his name could be pronounced Boner is hillarious, how about we also try to Reince a Priebus. That would be and awesome ticket in 2012 Donks Boehner/ Reince Preibus just on the names alone.

BaghdadBob;1350230 wrote: Interesting. The poster implies I'm a liar while lying himself. A lie requires that the teller knows that the truth is different. I didn't mean to imply that you lied, only that you were believing a work of fiction. To call a blog entry from an anonymous person logged in as Michael Steel (Not Steele, the RNC president) a response directly from Speaker Boehner sent directly to Senate democrats is as accurate as saying that Palin instigated the Arizona shooting.

No I'm not a liar and I didn't call you a liar, but to believe Speaker Boehner would publish or even approve such a smarmy, smartass response as the one you refer to is pretty gullible.

I just posted a response to that blog as "George Steponallofus" & it is submitted for approval. Let's see if it flies.

Accountable;1350338 wrote: I just posted a response to that blog as "George Steponallofus" & it is submitted for approval. Let's see if it flies.


"George Steponallofus commented on 1/11/2011

It's amazing that some people actually believe that this is an official response from Speaker Boehner."

Accountable;1350338 wrote: A lie requires that the teller knows that the truth is different. I didn't mean to imply that you lied, only that you were believing a work of fiction. To call a blog entry from an anonymous person logged in as Michael Steel (Not Steele, the RNC president) a response directly from Speaker Boehner sent directly to Senate democrats is as accurate as saying that Palin instigated the Arizona shooting.

No I'm not a liar and I didn't call you a liar, but to believe Speaker Boehner would publish or even approve such a smarmy, smartass response as the one you refer to is pretty gullible.

I just posted a response to that blog as "George Steponallofus" & it is submitted for approval. Let's see if it flies.


You libs on here are out of your minds. :-2

Had you even bothered to search Michael Steel you would have found he is the press secretary for Boehner.

Anyone can post comments, as you did, in response to the Speaker's blog post. The thought that you can't even tell the difference between your post and his is scary.



Geez. :wah:

BaghdadBob;1349774 wrote:

Medicare Part D is gutted. The donks needed to kill it because is/was 'free market' based. For the year of inception, the plan was over subscribed yet came in billions under the $72B(?) budget at $49.3B. The program aided in driving down drug costs. That looks really, really bad for the donk's and their Plan to Destroy Private Health Care. They're so looking forward to running the death panels.

For the record, it's prolly the underlying reason that AARP got on board with the donk's Plan to Destroy Private Health Care - it made their supplemental program more attractive.


Still waiting for your supporting documentation, Bucko.

BaghdadBob;1350397 wrote: You libs on here are out of your minds. :-2

Had you even bothered to search Michael Steel you would have found he is the press secretary for Boehner.

Anyone can post comments, as you did, in response to the Speaker's blog post. The thought that you can't even tell the difference between your post and his is scary.



Geez. :wah:


I know who Michael Steel(e) is.

My nephew went to school with him. He's a dolt, but he ain't Boehner.

Where you screwed up was quoting Steel(e) and crediting Boehner.

Where's that proof we keep asking for?

BaghdadBob;1350397 wrote: You libs on here are out of your minds. :-2I'm a lib?? :yh_rotfl

BaghdadBob;1350397 wrote: You libs on here are out of your minds.

:


Is it better to be out of your mind or in it? Even worse you could be under Government Mind Control.

Accountable;1350446 wrote: I'm a lib?? :yh_rotfl


Read the post immediately above yours. There's some significant brain damage there.

we all know it's complete fictionAt least you can now concede that what I quoted was a press release from Boehner's office. That you had no reason to imply that I was lying and that by proclaiming it to be a fiction, you were if fact lying.

If anyone on here is going to lie, don't you think it should be me? :wah:

BTW, I never said Boehner said it...anywhere. Here's some background: The Speaker's office sent that release out in an email a few hours before it was posted on the site.

The note was in response to a vile and arrogant threat from the donks to not try a repeal of socialized medicine.

LarsMac;1350412 wrote: Still waiting for your supporting documentation, Bucko.


Here you go.

You'll see that the program came in under budget as I stated.

In the future, do your own research. This isn't a publik failure factory and I'm not going to do your work for you. Whine to your mommy if you don't like it.

The truth would have more meaning for you chuckle heads if you would do your own work. Stop believing everything you're told and half of what you see and you'll be a better person for it. Better yet, stop spewing your silly liberish b.s. without background checking, and don't use the DU or dailyimbeciles as a source. I've seen a few c&p from there on here and that silliness just doesn't play. The truth is out there...find it yourselves.



Geez.

BaghdadBob;1350449 wrote: Read the post immediately above yours. There's some significant brain damage there.

At least you can now concede that what I quoted was a press release from Boehner's office. That you had no reason to imply that I was lying and that by proclaiming it to be a fiction, you were if fact lying.Already addressed, nimrod. http://www.forumgarden.com/forums/curre ... ost1350338

BaghdadBob;1350449 wrote: Read the post immediately above yours. There's some significant brain damage there.




I really dont remember telling you I had surgery to remove a brain tumor when I was 5, but I guess I did. It's so kind of you to remember.

Accountable;1350453 wrote: Already addressed, nimrod. http://www.forumgarden.com/forums/curre ... ost1350338


Did you and littleCJelkton get a two-for-one deal on that lobotomy? In the post you linked, you claim that the Press Sec's blog post was a fiction. In your fantasy world, that's your idea of having addressed the issue? wow...

Among lib traits is the lack of intellectual curiosity and the inability to come to grips with reality. Both of which you have exhibited in this thread.

At any point, are you going to concede that you were 100% wrong?

BaghdadBob;1350459 wrote: Did you and littleCJelkton get a two-for-one deal on that lobotomy? In the post you linked, you claim that the Press Sec's blog post was a fiction. In your fantasy world, that's your idea of having addressed the issue? wow...

Among lib traits is the lack of intellectual curiosity and the inability to come to grips with reality. Both of which you have exhibited in this thread.

At any point, are you going to concede that you were 100% wrong?


I stole a 50% off coupon from out of your mail box, you should of told us you get frequent customer discounts.

BaghdadBob;1350452 wrote: Here you go.

You'll see that the program came in under budget as I stated.

In the future, do your own research. This isn't a publik failure factory and I'm not going to do your work for you. Whine to your mommy if you don't like it.

The truth would have more meaning for you chuckle heads if you would do your own work. Stop believing everything you're told and half of what you see and you'll be a better person for it. Better yet, stop spewing your silly liberish b.s. without background checking, and don't use the DU or dailyimbeciles as a source. I've seen a few c&p from there on here and that silliness just doesn't play. The truth is out there...find it yourselves.



Geez.


Why should the reader have to research your claims.

You need to back your wild-ass claims. it is not my responsibility to do YOUR research.

Geez, back at ya.

BaghdadBob;1350452 wrote: Here you go.

You'll see that the program came in under budget as I stated.

In the future, do your own research. This isn't a publik failure factory and I'm not going to do your work for you. Whine to your mommy if you don't like it.

The truth would have more meaning for you chuckle heads if you would do your own work. Stop believing everything you're told and half of what you see and you'll be a better person for it. Better yet, stop spewing your silly liberish b.s. without background checking, and don't use the DU or dailyimbeciles as a source. I've seen a few c&p from there on here and that silliness just doesn't play. The truth is out there...find it yourselves.



Geez.


You've yet to do anything here but post the wild claims of others, and never offer any documentation to support those claims.

It seems you are the one who is guilty of "...believing everything you're told and half of what you see..."

All I've done is ask you for supporting docs - which you fail to supply - and read your insults.

Come on, Bucko, Man up.

Truth is, you haven't a clue what you're talking about.

Prove me wrong.

LarsMac;1350470 wrote: Why should the reader have to research your claims.

You need to back your wild-ass claims. it is not my responsibility to do YOUR research.

Geez, back at ya.




Among lib traits is the lack of intellectual curiosity and the inability to come to grips with reality


here ya go:

http://rpc.senate.gov/public/_files/whowillbehurtv2.pdf

http://www.cms.gov/MedicareProgramRates ... es2009.pdf

I've now linked articles for all of my assertions. Why don't you go back and challenge some of the totally assinine remarks made by liberals on here?

Not really interested in the truth? I didn't think so. :rolleyes:

BaghdadBob;1350473 wrote: here ya go:

http://rpc.senate.gov/public/_files/whowillbehurtv2.pdf

http://www.cms.gov/MedicareProgramRates ... es2009.pdf

I've now linked articles for all of my assertions. Why don't you go back and challenge some of the totally assinine remarks made by liberals on here?

Not really interested in the truth? I didn't think so. :rolleyes:


Being that the second link is already on the page the first link takes you to which is more of your bias confirmation. I think I much rather stick to my sillyness it is much more fun. Yours seems a bit to bitter for my taste.