ForumGarden

Getting out on bail? Were I her, I would be very nervous about that "bounty hunter" character. I would rather stay where I was and keep my mouth shut from here on out.

I'm surprised her fellow inmates aren't helping out the investigation a bit, unless they can't get at her.

He sounds entirely sensible and pretty much on her side in all of this. There's one sentence that has me entirely baffled in the Fox interview I just read though:Yesterday, Caylee's grandparents, Cindy and George Anthony, visited their daughter, Casey, in jail. Casey's parents left the jail understandably upset. They were visibly upset. Cindy was in tears. A tape of that jailhouse visit has not yet been released to the public.

http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,405262,00.html

What one earth does that imply about family visits to remand prisoners? I can't get the implications of that to register yet. Remand visits are taped and expected to be released to news broadcasters?

spot;956067 wrote: He sounds entirely sensible and pretty much on her side in all of this. There's one sentence that has me entirely baffled in the Fox interview I just read though:Yesterday, Caylee's grandparents, Cindy and George Anthony, visited their daughter, Casey, in jail. Casey's parents left the jail understandably upset. They were visibly upset. Cindy was in tears. A tape of that jailhouse visit has not yet been released to the public.

http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,405262,00.html

What one earth does that imply about family visits to remand prisoners? I can't get the implications of that to register yet. Remand visits are taped and expected to be released to news broadcasters?


They might be "upset" because she has been refusing to see them (and her brother) since last week with no explanation from her or her attorney. Apparently, her attorney suggested she not have any more visits with them. In my opinion its so they wont have to worry about any more released tapes.

TheNewDG;956191 wrote: They might be "upset" because she has been refusing to see them (and her brother) since last week with no explanation from her or her attorney. Apparently, her attorney suggested she not have any more visits with them. In my opinion its so they wont have to worry about any more released tapes.


But how can there possible be recordings of family visits to remand prisoners at all? I seriously don't get it - who records them? Who authorizes their release?

spot;956211 wrote: But how can there possible be recordings of family visits to remand prisoners at all? I seriously don't get it - who records them? Who authorizes their release?


I have no idea. Those things are pretty damning when taken out of context too, and they are almost ALWAYS taken out of context.

I'd say that girl needs to shut it.