Yuck!
Posted: Thu Feb 03, 2005 3:34 am
*Why?*
I'm guessing you just spotted the new FG logo?
Page 1 of 1
Yuck!
Posted: Thu Feb 03, 2005 5:03 am
Bill Sikes wrote: *Why?*
I'm guessing you just spotted the new FG logo?
I'm guessing you just spotted the new FG logo?
Yuck!
Posted: Thu Feb 03, 2005 5:16 am
Cass wrote: I'm guessing you just spotted the new FG logo?
Well, it's not *really* a case of "yuck!" - the thing is that the logo, added to the rest of the gubbins on the screen, takes up (while I'm triping this moment) over half the screen. Added to "avatars", other information extraneous to the actual "posts", and odd fonts and effects, it makes the "usable" portion of the screen rather small (and rather work-unfriendly).
Someone passing my desk just now has made the remark "Rum garden???" - standing back a couple of feet, I can see the reason!
I did prefer the more "natural" old logo, though....
Well, it's not *really* a case of "yuck!" - the thing is that the logo, added to the rest of the gubbins on the screen, takes up (while I'm triping this moment) over half the screen. Added to "avatars", other information extraneous to the actual "posts", and odd fonts and effects, it makes the "usable" portion of the screen rather small (and rather work-unfriendly).
Someone passing my desk just now has made the remark "Rum garden???" - standing back a couple of feet, I can see the reason!
I did prefer the more "natural" old logo, though....
Yuck!
Posted: Thu Feb 03, 2005 5:24 am
Bill Sikes wrote:
Someone passing my desk just now has made the remark "Rum garden???"
LOL!! RUM Garden
(what did they thing the F.O. stood for) :-3
Someone passing my desk just now has made the remark "Rum garden???"
LOL!! RUM Garden
(what did they thing the F.O. stood for) :-3
Yuck!
Posted: Thu Feb 03, 2005 5:38 am
Cass wrote: LOL!! RUM Garden
(what did they thing the F.O. stood for)
That's probably a case of "better not ask"!
The design in the "O" or stylised people looks remarkably familiar to my eyes - something to do with recycling rubbish? A council logo? Save the children? Perhaps another UK-er who has a sharp mind will recall.
(what did they thing the F.O. stood for)
That's probably a case of "better not ask"!
The design in the "O" or stylised people looks remarkably familiar to my eyes - something to do with recycling rubbish? A council logo? Save the children? Perhaps another UK-er who has a sharp mind will recall.
Yuck!
Posted: Thu Feb 03, 2005 6:34 am
Am I the only one who doesn't see it? 
Yuck!
Posted: Thu Feb 03, 2005 6:40 am
Peg wrote: Am I the only one who doesn't see it?
You probably need to reboot ~ it is reading your cache and the old pic
You probably need to reboot ~ it is reading your cache and the old pic
Yuck!
Posted: Thu Feb 03, 2005 6:46 am
Cass wrote: You probably need to reboot ~ it is reading your cache and the old pic
I hope you don't have to reboot! You should be able to reload the page, or flush your browser's cache. If you're using Internet Exploder I seem to remember it's under tools->preferences or something.
I hope you don't have to reboot! You should be able to reload the page, or flush your browser's cache. If you're using Internet Exploder I seem to remember it's under tools->preferences or something.
Yuck!
Posted: Thu Feb 03, 2005 7:19 am
Bill Sikes wrote: That's probably a case of "better not ask"!
The design in the "O" or stylised people looks remarkably familiar to my eyes - something to do with recycling rubbish? A council logo? Save the children? Perhaps another UK-er who has a sharp mind will recall.
The logo looks to me like the one that the council puts on litter bins. :-3
The design in the "O" or stylised people looks remarkably familiar to my eyes - something to do with recycling rubbish? A council logo? Save the children? Perhaps another UK-er who has a sharp mind will recall.
The logo looks to me like the one that the council puts on litter bins. :-3
Yuck!
Posted: Thu Feb 03, 2005 7:22 am
My first words were what the....
Took ages to load as well.
Took ages to load as well.
Yuck!
Posted: Thu Feb 03, 2005 7:30 am
abbey wrote: The logo looks to me like the one that the council puts on litter bins.
Aha! That could well be it!
Aha! That could well be it!
Yuck!
Posted: Thu Feb 03, 2005 7:48 am
Maybe if the color could be adjusted to match the menu bars, it would blend in better. Right now it sticks out like a sore thumb. 
Yuck!
Posted: Thu Feb 03, 2005 7:48 am
Bill Sikes wrote: I hope you don't have to reboot! You should be able to reload the page, or flush your browser's cache. If you're using Internet Exploder I seem to remember it's under tools->preferences or something.
It worked. Thanks!
It worked. Thanks!
Yuck!
Posted: Thu Feb 03, 2005 8:35 am
Bill Sikes wrote: That's probably a case of "better not ask"!
The design in the "O" or stylised people looks remarkably familiar to my eyes - something to do with recycling rubbish? A council logo? Save the children? Perhaps another UK-er who has a sharp mind will recall.
The O resembles something of an explosive lable to me hehehehe as for the FO Rum sounds like your coming from the Ghetto.
Yo Homey, you up FO RUM? ahahahaha
Sooo Bill you peruse the forum while at work too huh me as well and the silly smilies are what get me, it sure don't look like a work doc when the smiles are all over the side and bottom hehehehe
Guess we are just in the wrong place to chat hehehehe
The design in the "O" or stylised people looks remarkably familiar to my eyes - something to do with recycling rubbish? A council logo? Save the children? Perhaps another UK-er who has a sharp mind will recall.
The O resembles something of an explosive lable to me hehehehe as for the FO Rum sounds like your coming from the Ghetto.
Yo Homey, you up FO RUM? ahahahaha
Sooo Bill you peruse the forum while at work too huh me as well and the silly smilies are what get me, it sure don't look like a work doc when the smiles are all over the side and bottom hehehehe
Guess we are just in the wrong place to chat hehehehe
Yuck!
Posted: Thu Feb 03, 2005 8:45 am
minks wrote: Sooo Bill you peruse the forum while at work too huh me as well
Yes, from home or wherever too.
minks wrote: and the silly smilies are what get me, it sure don't look like a work doc when the smiles are all over the side and bottom hehehehe
Yes, it's a pity there isn't a "no smileys or special effects" option.
minks wrote: Guess we are just in the wrong place to chat hehehehe
I tend to read/post to Usenet which (through Netscrape) looks beter....
Yes, from home or wherever too.
minks wrote: and the silly smilies are what get me, it sure don't look like a work doc when the smiles are all over the side and bottom hehehehe
Yes, it's a pity there isn't a "no smileys or special effects" option.
minks wrote: Guess we are just in the wrong place to chat hehehehe
I tend to read/post to Usenet which (through Netscrape) looks beter....
Yuck!
Posted: Fri Feb 04, 2005 1:49 am
I see we're back to normal again guys.. :guitarist
Yuck!
Posted: Fri Feb 04, 2005 6:05 am
Is it any coincidence that as soon as Lady Cop becomes a mod we are renamed Rum garden 
Yuck!
Posted: Fri Feb 04, 2005 6:34 am
Looks like the "Yuck" worked! (Back to normal)
Cars :driving:
(Back to normal)Cars :driving: