ForumGarden

:wah: :wah: i gave my teenage sons that as a gag last year for xmas. :p

Two years ago when I started here in ForumGarden I didn't have to worry about my wife or one of my grandchildren walking by and looking at what I was doing. I do now. Thanks a lot.

Oh brother. I guess the sex jokes aren't as offensive?

it's all in CLEAN fun......:wah: :wah:

Guffaw !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Wow, that looks cool!! I want one!! (and some hand cream :-3)

Well said Clint, Hammy, Pinky!!!!!!

Guys, I'm gonna say something here in Clint's defence too. We've had some dialogue on other threads and so far at least, I agree with him on absolutely nothing at all. In fact my own position on most things is diametrically opposed to his ultracalvinistic stance. But he does have the right to express his views. And his views have been noted.

Now let's get on with some good raunchy humour. Where do I get a few of these one size fits all, weener cleaners?? I can think of a few Christmas stockings they could enhance... :sneaky:

:-4

Red, I had a professor once who delighted in being controversial. It was an Italian class and we had a number of nuns amongst the students. We were reading Boccaccio at the time and hey, he really does say it like it is!!! One of the nuns went a bit pale at one stage and the professor took out of his briefcase a copy of the Bible and - very gently - proceeded to show us that this book too had some extremely durrrrrty bits. He also expressed the view that if God hadn't had a sense of humour He/She wouldn't have invented sex at all, not to mention hilarious body parts. After that we all enjoyed the Boccaccio.

Pinky, I'd have thought that you have in your life seen at least one naked male????

Or the backside of a really large lady on a Saturday morning in Walmart or Sainsburys in skimpy tight pink lycra shorts

I mean.. QED

Hahaha!! :wah:

I've seen bath towels like that- they say face on one end and butt on the other. I'd probably buy the soap. :-3

Clint;461998 wrote: Two years ago when I started here in ForumGarden I didn't have to worry about my wife or one of my grandchildren walking by and looking at what I was doing. I do now. Thanks a lot.


It's the pictures, isn't it.

Pinky;462053 wrote: if this is on sale in shops then it can't be that offensive can it? I've seen a lot worse posted in here.

A lot of people have had sense of humour bypasses recently huh?:wah:


There's a lot of stuff for sale in shops that one wouldn't like plastered all

over one's nice big flat screen at home or at work, or even when viewing

in the library, when Miss Murgatroyd Entwhistle is tiodying the books up.

Perhaps that's what he means.

Clancy;462037 wrote: Hello Clint

Far be it for me to disagree with your opinion, or should I say your right to voice your displeasure. I don't.

What I always found strange about Forum Garden was the rare ability to make such comments to the newer members, and at the same time have an unwritten rule, or stance with turning a blind one to other more established members who in the past never had a problem with sex, and a few things related to it.

If you have a few minutes, I'd be grateful if you'd take a look at something. This is from last year....what I found "quaint" is it's just prior to another new member being called out shortly after this, and cited as a low life ....the remarkable thing about that, is here she is enjoying the camaraderie of others within a topic that no one seemed to mind having a laugh and joke about.

It isn't the OP .....see if you can pick her out. I should warn you though, I'd make sure there is no one peering over your shoulder.

http://www.forumgarden.com/forums/showt ... t=talk+sex

What I find strange is..... your were not in there voicing your opinion to those taking part that they shouldn't be doing it.

if you'd rather i picked another one, I'll do that when I come back in.....there's loads to choose from, but I thought this one was particularly relevent to what I'm saying.....

It's also particularly ironic, that a few of the members there never came round to say to us..... the more recent members, then....... that the person citing the woman in question as a low life.....turned out to be the biggest low-life of them all :guitarist



Enjoy the thread



.

.

.


You make a good point.

The difference now is the pictures...in your face pictures that don't allow you to just ignore the stuff you don't want to be part of. If your on the home page you have to look at the garbage. There also seems to be more gutter talk and less constructive view sharing.

For the record, if I had thought that what I posted was vulgar I would not have posted it. I found it stupidly amusing. I did not post a sex toy or lubricant ad or naked person or anything like that. My intention was not to offend the straightlaced. I won't apologize as I don't feel I did anything wrong. I believe it's off the main page now so please gloss it over. Thanks.

Pinky;462302 wrote: The fact that Red added 'Tacky' in the title should tell most people who don't find that sort of thing funny not to click on it.

It's not that hard to figure out is it?


"Tacky" just means in poor taste... I detect an imminent outbreak of forum

flouncing, however, so I'll just say that I agree with everybody...

it's fairly obvious to me that as the soap shrinks it will eventually fit everybody...... . it will only get tacky if you dont get it wet. and if you try to cram it on, ya might be flouncing around the shower........

Diuretic;462206 wrote: I haven't got a photo of this but I found it disgustingly funny. I was looking through a gift shop not far from my place and found this packaged soap similar to the one RG has posted but it bills itself as "Safe Soap" or "Sure Soap" or something similar and it has a word carved in a sort of bas-relief on each side.

On one side it has 'FACE' in big letters. On the other side it has 'ARSE' also in big letters.

I use shower gel so I didn't buy it.




:wah:

guppy;462330 wrote: it's fairly obvious to me that as the soap shrinks it will eventually fit everybody...... . it will only get tacky if you dont get it wet. and if you try to cram it on, ya might be flouncing around the shower........


:wah: "Cram it on!" I just got the funniest mental picture!

guppy;462330 wrote: it's fairly obvious to me that as the soap shrinks


Eh?? The theta of the soap ring will increase!



Two nuns in a bath. The first one says, "Where's the soap?" The second one

replies, "Yes it does, doesn't it?

Does it come in a large?

Bill Sikes;462343 wrote: Eh?? The theta of the soap ring will increase!





Two nuns in a bath. The first one says, "Where's the soap?" The second one

replies, "Yes it does, doesn't it?




Ok...I ran over that one more than a few times and I'm not getting it. Help me out here, Bill.

RedGlitter;462376 wrote: Ok...I ran over that one more than a few times and I'm not getting it. Help me out here, Bill.


i dont get it either.......

OMG I love that joke! :wah: :wah:

Diuretic;462388 wrote: "where's" and "wears" - it's the homophonic nature of the words that provide the humour.


Homophobic?

GUFFAW

Loved them, Bill. Especially the wicked one about the greek letter.

:-5 Still not getting it! What's wrong with me??



"Where's the soap...."

Wears the soap..."



Who wears the soap?



I'm sorry! I'm trying here!

RedGlitter;462804 wrote: :-5 Still not getting it! What's wrong with me??



"Where's the soap...."

Wears the soap..."



Who wears the soap?



I'm sorry! I'm trying here!


dont feel bad. i am right there with ya..............

Well if it's that donut mens' soap......mebbe it's his wee willie winkie that "wears the soap".....mebbe there's someone in the bath with them. That's one of those noseeum jokes:wah:

weber;462811 wrote: Well if it's that donut mens' soap......mebbe it's his wee willie winkie that "wears the soap".....mebbe there's someone in the bath with them. That's one of those noseeum jokes:wah:




ooooooooohhhhhhh. .......................

Clancy;462846 wrote: Hello Clint

Just out of interest I had a look at my own threads (started threads) There are to date 154. After doing a speed read, I'd say 98% of those have little to no sexual references at all. The overwhelming majority of those threads started are of a comedic/humorous vein because that's how I relax and if I can get myself motivated, I'll come up with some of my own stuff, and some of it is in here....some are good, some aren't' the rest I get when I'm browsing around, and a few get sent to me.

I use a lot of restraint when it comes to submitting content to this forum because Forum Garden can't be classed as adult, however it is age restricted . Regarding the topic of age restriction, I did put forward a proposal for discussion (four posts I think it was) on my views on it, some agreed, some disagreed, and as usual there was the shooting it down and kicking from certain quarters which I've come to expect from certain members. Just so we're crystal clear, and on the right page with one another, I don't need to see soft porn in here either...but I'm of the opinion that what gets aired "picture/cartoon/photographs" etc., in here is very mild, and I think most people accept their is an acceptable level, and that level is probably less than you'd see in any U.K or US sea resort town shop. However I do take your point if you feel uncomfortable regarding this, and if you do, perhaps you yourself should open that one up for debate.

There has been quite a substantial influx of new members, and quite a few in a lower age bracket from you (and I) so they are getting to know one another, and testing each other out, as well as getting to know longer established members. I happen to think they are good fun, there has been few arguments, and what there was seemed to be resolved with a day or two, so they get my thanks , and my support for that. I wish I could say the same for some of the long established members, I can't. There will also be a few who think I'm not sitting in Scotland typing this of my own volition, in their mind their is a huge conspiratorial gang, and what your reading has been approved by committee....(yeah , it makes me laugh, too ) ....(kinda) So we have this to contend with before anyone joins in a normal debate.

Quite frankly it puts me off joining in with more serious topics, or even topics that might involve Forum Garden itself now when I felt like contributing. I hope he doesn't mind me saying this , I don't think he will ....I was in conversation with, UncleKram around, mid to late last year, when I was making a few of the observations I am to you. I liked his stance on all of this, and that is, post for your own amusement, and if there are any like minded people who like what you post, they'll respond, and those that don't, who cares....which I think is pretty sound.

I rarely look at the religious threads, any more. I used to , but when it starts , "My God , or my version of the Holy Scriptures is better than yours" ....it's time to give it a miss, for me anyway. The political threads can (not always) devolve into a morass of demands for source material, which I have neither the time nor inclination to do. I can give my opinion on my own countries political gaff's or success and some will think it's total bollocks,[/SIZE] I accept that.

Lastly I want to say this, and please try to take it the right way, as this isn't me getting or picking on you, or slamming or attacking you, this is the way I talk. Forum Garden isn't for your grandchildren, Clint, nor is it for my younger nephews or nieces to view. Part reason for my request for an age hike , was the many posts, and headers in the "Friends Relationships" threads, where discussions range from anything from, rape to aggravated assault, to paedophiles, as well as sexually related problems can and do appear. The only thing I can offer up to take you away from the pictures, in your opinion that are in bad taste, is to set your browser favourites FG page to something else when you sign on. It's very easy to over write it, then you can be more selective when you can see there is an attachment(s) along side a post in the general, or what's new page without going to the home page



.


Clancy i luv your bollocks :rolleyes: : :yh_bigsmi

Diuretic;462905 wrote: Does anyone need the nuns joke explained? I'm in a particularly daring mood and may push the envelope




Um, Diuretic...yes please. I can't believe I'm not understanding it. But I know I'm going to feel stupid once I do so please PM me.





Pinky- I understand about the discussions. I'd like to see more serious stuff and discussable topics (aside from politics, etc) myself but am kind of at a loss right now of what to post. Maybe you or or someone else would have some suggestions for us??