ForumGarden

Peace to you!

I've published material:

my666.boom.ru/666_en.html

This material makes understanding of Revelation more clear and will help to be saved for many many people and will help to avoid terrible plagues for many other people! You will not carry any responsibility for this link since this material was signed by me! But availability of this material is important for now!

Be bless!

Er thanks, we will let you know how we get on during the rapture.

nickols_k wrote: Peace to you!

I've published material:

my666.boom.ru/666_en.html

This material makes understanding of Revelation more clear and will help to be saved for many many people and will help to avoid terrible plagues for many other people! You will not carry any responsibility for this link since this material was signed by me! But availability of this material is important for now!

Be bless!


Thanks Nicklos K. I've just cut my boy's hair and there was this really strange marking on his scalp, 3 numbers...hey, your get the gist. Funny thing is our nanny just recently committed suicide! Right in full view of a garden party that we were holding, it really did spoil the occasion:(

Anyhow, must dash, I've an appointment with a priest to keep......

My cell phone number adds up to 666...does this mean that I am the beast? Because, if so, I'd like to begin collecting souls now. It's always seemed fun to have your own MINIONS...

Lulu2 wrote: My cell phone number adds up to 666...does this mean that I am the beast? Because, if so, I'd like to begin collecting souls now. It's always seemed fun to have your own MINIONS...


Maybe you could collect them like they collect ghosts in Ghostbusters, check to see if there is a Proton Pack attatchment available for your model. I'll go out and buy an old ambulance.....

COOL! Maybe we can paint it black, with DAY-GLO accents?

It's a deal. I'll start looking for an old Fire Station to do up and we'll be in business.

When I was in college, my campus mailbox number was 666. I felt pretty posessed during that time..especially since I was going to a Catholic school, run by nuns.

I did go to church every Sunday, just to be safe.

Damn, I thought I was the antichrist, I was getting very excited about armageddeon and I was arranging interviews for the four horsemen. Oh well, I will just have to go back to being plain old Napoleon again. Sacre Bleu.

Marie5656 wrote: When I was in college, my campus mailbox number was 666. I felt pretty posessed during that time..especially since I was going to a Catholic school, run by nuns.

I did go to church every Sunday, just to be safe.


Prudent, if nothing else.

Lulu2 wrote: My cell phone number adds up to 666...does this mean that I am the beast? Because, if so, I'd like to begin collecting souls now. It's always seemed fun to have your own MINIONS...




I have indigestion. Is this you collecting my soul ?

:-3 it's cary when you have several folks who consider your friends claim they are the antichrist. Wondering if I should dig a hole and bury myself.



:wah:

Sheryl wrote: :-3 it's cary when you have several folks who consider your friends claim they are the antichrist. Wondering if I should dig a hole and bury myself.







:wah:


Well you should believe them. Then shoot them and save the world.:wah:

:wah: Oh Arnold...................

Is number 999 the Beast standing on his head?

(Just as a side note, I've created some SMASHING new outfits for those of my MINIONS who care to be chic while collecting the souls of the damned and bringing them to my throne.)

Lulu2 wrote: (Just as a side note, I've created some SMASHING new outfits for those of my MINIONS who care to be chic while collecting the souls of the damned and bringing them to my throne.)


Ooooh do tell......... satin, velour or nylon?

Satin.....and leather! :sneaky:

(Oh, and NOMAD, your soul has been mine for a thousand years. :sneaky: )

Meh, there's evidence saying that the maths were all wrong on that, and the number of the beast really should've been translated as 616, not 666. Funny thing...the BF's area code is 616.... :sneaky: :-2

As for the leather...sign me up. Tallish curvy redhead in black leather. What's not to love?

ArnoldLayne wrote: I am 667. The neighbour of the beast :rolleyes:


Well, I have been on a diet..so I am just 333. Beast lite.

When saying "beast" are you talking about the antichrist?

I think you're all be666ing beastly to the poor bloke who's trying to save our sorry souls. And if you start projectile vomiting and your balls spin backwards it's all yer own fault.

REPENT NOW

Silver crucifixes, wooden stakes, witch-away spray and garlic available from

1800 666 666

CALL NOW

ERRINA " Tallish curvy redhead in black leather. What's not to love?"

++++++++++++ BLIMEY! YOU, TOO? Now there're TWO of us! :sneaky: Want a managerial position among the MINIONS?

Did someone read my article or this forum is for jokes only?

nickols_k wrote: Did someone read my article or this forum is for jokes only?
Nickols, the Beast is in all of us. The Christian Millenialist expectation of an imminent End-Time is fine for Christians, it creates a mindset of urgency in personal acceptance of faith and a continuous pressure to change. Those of us who explore God by other means are legitimately unconcerned with the Christian preoccupations of personal salvation. My own view is that Millenialism is a distraction from holiness. The Bible is true because it says so in the Bible, of course, but anyone outside of that loop has problems with such an inward-looking group claiming exclusive knowledge of the mind of God especially when it declares all other approaches to be in error, inadequate and (at best) partial.

spot wrote: Nickols, the Beast is in all of us.


Please don't mix flesh and beast!

Correctly to say: the Flesh is in all of us.

spot wrote:

The Christian Millenialist expectation of an imminent End-Time is fine for Christians, it creates a mindset of urgency in personal acceptance of faith and a continuous pressure to change. Those of us who explore God by other means are legitimately unconcerned with the Christian preoccupations of personal salvation. My own view is that Millenialism is a distraction from holiness. The Bible is true because it says so in the Bible, of course, but anyone outside of that loop has problems with such an inward-looking group claiming exclusive knowledge of the mind of God especially when it declares all other approaches to be in error, inadequate and (at best) partial.
Relevation was written in parable manner so it can't be clear for readers!

And revelation requires interpretation and my article does that!

How do you explain your phrase: Bible is true because bible proclaims itself as true book! Such arguments prove nothing!!!

nickols_k wrote: How do you explain your phrase: Bible is true because bible proclaims itself as true book! Such arguments prove nothing!!!Why do Christians believe that the Bible is the inerrant word of God? Because the Bible says that it is the inerrant word of God. The belief that Christianity is a true reflection of God's nature is a precondition for accepting the claims of the Bible. A non-Christian has no reason to hold such a belief. A Christian is obliged to accept the central teachings of his religion, and the Bible provides a fundamental grounding to the religion. To a Hindu the Bible is an interesting collection of early writings. To a Christian the Bible is God's relevation to his entire creation. How you view the internal claims of the Bible to be the inerrant word of God depends entirely on your belief.

spot wrote: Why do Christians believe that the Bible is the inerrant word of God? Because the Bible says that it is the inerrant word of God. The belief that Christianity is a true reflection of God's nature is a precondition for accepting the claims of the Bible. A non-Christian has no reason to hold such a belief. A Christian is obliged to accept the central teachings of his religion, and the Bible provides a fundamental grounding to the religion. To a Hindu the Bible is an interesting collection of early writings. To a Christian the Bible is God's relevation to his entire creation. How you view the internal claims of the Bible to be the inerrant word of God depends entirely on your belief.
If I'll add to my article something like:

words of my article are true and faithful

will you trust to every word of my article?

In Russia exist one interesting person - Vissarion! He teaches that he is second coming of Jesus in the flesh! And his teaching looks very similar to Jesus's teaching.

If somebody is interesting then I'm ready to translate chosen parts of his preaching!

nickols_k wrote: If I'll add to my article something like:

words of my article are true and faithful

will you trust to every word of my article?

In Russia exist one interesting person - Vissarion! He teaches that he is second coming of Jesus in the flesh! And his teaching looks very similar to Jesus's teaching.

If somebody is interesting then I'm ready to translate chosen parts of his preaching! ;)I would not feel compelled to accept every word of your article as true, because I don't believe that you're God. If you could attract followers who did believe that you were, and you claimed that your writings were true and faithful, then they'd accept your Word. There's a lot of Christians in the world who have gone that far with the Bible.

Vissarion's interesting - you'd better look first to see if English versions of his writing are already on the Internet though, rather than translating some and duplicating them. But your use of English is quite good enough to do it.

spot wrote: I would not feel compelled to accept every word of your article as true, because I don't believe that you're God. If you could attract followers who did believe that you were, and you claimed that your writings were true and faithful, then they'd accept your Word. There's a lot of Christians in the world who have gone that far with the Bible.


If you don't believe that I'm God then how do you believe that Apostles are Gods?

Bible was written by Apostles and prophets but not by God-Father directly!

Even more New Testament is collection of answers of Apostles for churches without question of those churches! Could you imagine self that somebody will collect all my answers and will publish them as standalone book? Such book will look very terrible because its readers will not know which questions I did answered! New Testament is

the same book i.e. collection of answers without questions!

spot wrote:

Vissarion's interesting - you'd better look first to see if English versions of his writing are already on the Internet though, rather than translating some and duplicating them. But your use of English is quite good enough to do it.
Sorry! I didn't meet english version of his teaching on his official site!

nickols_k wrote: If I'll add to my article something like:

words of my article are true and faithful

will you trust to every word of my article?

In Russia exist one interesting person - Vissarion! He teaches that he is second coming of Jesus in the flesh! And his teaching looks very similar to Jesus's teaching.

If somebody is interesting then I'm ready to translate chosen parts of his preaching!


That would make him the AntiChrist then. That is not how the Bible describes the Second Coming at all, someone walking around then later announcing themselves to be him. I suggest you go back and read through the book of Revalations again.

chonsigirl wrote: That would make him the AntiChrist then. That is not how the Bible describes the Second Coming at all, someone walking around then later announcing themselves to be him. I suggest you go back and read through the book of Revalations again.
No! That makes He as False-Christ but not as AntiChrist!

Matthew 24:5

for many shall come in my name, saying, I am the Christ, and they shall lead many astray

There are many who claim to be the Christ, but are not. He might not be the #1 AntiChrist, but his claim to be Christ-that alone is a sign to stay away from him!

Very good Scripture choice.

chonsigirl wrote: There are many who claim to be the Christ, but are not. He might not be the #1 AntiChrist, but his claim to be Christ-that alone is a sign to stay away from him!

Very good Scripture choice.


Please understand that AntiChrist will never call himself by Christ! AntiChrist is that who is against of Christ who disagree with Jesus' teaching who will give new religion. That will be religion of AntiCHrist!

nickols_k wrote: If you don't believe that I'm God then how do you believe that Apostles are Gods?

Bible was written by Apostles and prophets but not by God-Father directly!

Even more New Testament is collection of answers of Apostles for churches without question of those churches! Could you imagine self that somebody will collect all my answers and will publish them as standalone book? Such book will look very terrible because its readers will not know which questions I did answered! New Testament is

the same book i.e. collection of answers without questions!

Sorry! I didn't meet english version of his teaching on his official site!


Sorry are you claiming that you actually are God? If so I have some questions.

1. What is the fundamental particle in the universe you created?

2. Is it possible to have anything that is smaller than the planck length 10(x-33) cm?

3. What is the actual mechanism by which gravity works (is there a graviton?)

4. Did you create the universe from a point of seeminly infinte energy and mass with zero dimesions (or at least only the size of the planck lengh) approximately 15 billion years ago, or did you create it 6,000 years ago just to look like that?

5. If you are god, why do we have to try and understand anything to keep you happy, why didn't you just make everything apparent in the first place?

6. Why did you create imperfect beings in an imperfect universe and then give out to them because they were not perfect enough, whats the point? You could have made it all perfect in the first place, you are (allegedy) God after all. Is it your idea of a bad joke, or are you a bit malicious or something?

7. If you created the devil and he turned against you and defied your plans, how could he do that?, he is your creation, you made everything, so whats that about?

8. Why do you get so worked up about what music people are listening to, or what type of sexuality they have (which of course you created) when you didn't seem to bothered about what was going on in Eastern Poland around 1944?

9. Why is it that so many people who claim to beleive in you spend a lot of their time hating each other becuase of they way in which they choose to do this, do you think this is a good idea?

10. What were you doing before you created the universe, was it boring? Is ommipetence all its cracked up to be, or is it lonely at the top?

:yh_worshp Dr. G :yh_worshp

Galbally wrote: Sorry are you claiming that you actually are God? If so I have some questions.

1. What is the fundamental particle in the universe you created?

...


Please don't mix me with God-Father!

I'm man therefore I'm God!

John 10:33

The Jews answered him, saying, For a good work we stone thee not; but for blasphemy; and because that thou, being a man, makest thyself God. Jesus answered them, Is it not written in your law, I said, Ye are gods? If he called them gods, unto whom the word of God came, and the scripture cannot be broken

nickols_k wrote: Please don't mix me with God-Father!

I'm man therefore I'm God!

John 10:33

The Jews answered him, saying, For a good work we stone thee not; but for blasphemy; and because that thou, being a man, makest thyself God. Jesus answered them, Is it not written in your law, I said, Ye are gods? If he called them gods, unto whom the word of God came, and the scripture cannot be broken


Oh right I think I understand your point, so you represent the divine in terms of your humanity and the relationship of God to Man, well so does everyone else don't they then?, so why would we need you to interpret anything for us in that case, are we not all qualified in that regard? Or do you have some special "divine" nature that gives you the right to claim some sort of monopoly on the "truth" of apocalytic scriptural passages from the Holy Bible? If this is the case, state precisely why you feel more qualified than anyone else to interpret anything of this nature. Or is it that you percieve yourself to be cleverer than everyone else who have studied the passages in Revelation for the past 1,900 years? A bold assumption Nicolas, please elaborate.

nick:-6

Scholarship today recognizes that the Bible is man's response to his experiences of the Divine. The gospels of the NT are not biographies but the developing traditions of the church up to the time of writing. Their authors who are unknown did not have personal experiences of the historical Jesus.

The book of Revelation is not about some time in the distant future but rather a comment on the Roman empire of his day and warnings to the 7 major churches. Prophesy is not about some distant time but about the prophets own time.

Shalom

Ted:-6

Don't scare the lad off, Ted.

I have questions too. From the preface it sounds as if the poster had a near death experience. Is this the case or am I misreading?

I'm still confused on his whole idea of referring to himself as God

Sheryl wrote: I'm still confused on his whole idea of referring to himself as God
I think that came about as a response to spot's analogy. I haven't gotten past the preface of his article yet. And don't plan to unless the poster sticks around to answer a few questions on the way

Exactly how did you come up with the information for your article.

Galbally wrote: Oh right I think I understand your point, so you represent the divine in terms of your humanity and the relationship of God to Man, well so does everyone else don't they then?, so why would we need you to interpret anything for us in that case, are we not all qualified in that regard? Or do you have some special "divine" nature that gives you the right to claim some sort of monopoly on the "truth" of apocalytic scriptural passages from the Holy Bible? If this is the case, state precisely why you feel more qualified than anyone else to interpret anything of this nature. Or is it that you percieve yourself to be cleverer than everyone else who have studied the passages in Revelation for the past 1,900 years? A bold assumption Nicolas, please elaborate.
Relationship of God to Man was introduced in Old Tastement so every man have possibility to say: "I'm God" and will have no sins in this case!

I have no "divine" (predict) nature. My article explains Revelation but not catch monopoly of "truth"! Please understand that my article was based on prophecies received by me from God-Father! The fact that my article lives more than half year with phrases like: "God-Father told me" proves that these pharses were received by me from God-Father! If you will try to publish something from your mind as from God-Father then such article will be destroyed during hour! I have negative observations when some servers were unreachable during several days when admins of those servers tried to test that.

Ted wrote:

Scholarship today recognizes that the Bible is man's response to his experiences of the Divine. The gospels of the NT are not biographies but the developing traditions of the church up to the time of writing. Their authors who are unknown did not have personal experiences of the historical Jesus.

[QUOTE=Ted]

New Tastement is collection of answers of Saint Apostles to questions when were hiden from us.


The book of Revelation is not about some time in the distant future but rather a comment on the Roman empire of his day and warnings to the 7 major churches. Prophesy is not about some distant time but about the prophets own time.


IMHO, The book of Revelation about our days. I can prove that if you want!

God Spoke to Me is the first book of Eileen's guidance, published over 30 years ago. It continues to bring comfort and support to all who allow themselves to be touched by her simple faith.

The internet is awash with information about this book and Ms Caddy, co-founder of the Findhorn community. She has not been smitten.



So, back to you, what were the circumstances of your conversation with God?

koan wrote: God Spoke to Me is the first book of Eileen's guidance, published over 30 years ago. It continues to bring comfort and support to all who allow themselves to be touched by her simple faith.

The internet is awash with information about this book and Ms Caddy, co-founder of the Findhorn community. She has not been smitten.



So, back to you, what were the circumstances of your conversation with God?
If you are interesting with question about my communication with God-Father then please read section MATRIX of my article! There described the case when Creator temporary destroys the spirit of any man and fills his body with own Spirit! Yes, God-Father speaks to me through other people and through prophets of course!

nickols_k wrote: If you are interesting with question about my communication with God-Father then please read section MATRIX of my article! There described the case when Creator temporary destroys the spirit of any man and fills his body with own Spirit! Yes, God-Father speaks to me through other people and through prophets of course!


That section does not answer the question.

I have received the seal of the beast in afterlife world 20-22 years ago. So if someone is interested how I did feel myself in afterlife world then I inform you - almost the same as in this world (there is very slight difference).
This is the part I'm curious about. How did you receive "the seal"? How did you get to the afterlife? Was this a near death experience? Were you meditating? Were you watching The Matrix and suddenly a reflection from Laurence Fishbourne's glasses shone enlightenment through the windows of your soul?

Short form: At what point did you realise you had been in the afterlife and what signs made you believe it was true?