ForumGarden

I have tried to bring posts back down to the post level.

Geez...this site has gotten so corrupted. I visit less and less.......the people who attack are just incredibly low life people. Come and get me .......you low life people need to hurt other people and we are so easy for you. NOT ANY MORE.

Yes.......BTS got banned and you have lost another voice.....how sad to lose a non-comformist.........how sad to lose someone who makes you think about your politics and personal beliefs.

BTS has always stood up for me as I did for him............we have love in our relationship, we have committment, we have a closeness that makes us great.......Do Any of you have that?



ARE YOU PEOPLE HAPPY NOW?

nvalleyvee wrote: I have tried to bring posts back down to the post level.

Geez...this site has gotten so corrupted. I visit less and less.......the people who attack are just incredibly low life people. Come and get me .......you low life people need to hurt other people and we are so easy for you. NOT ANY MORE.

Yes.......BTS got banned and you have lost another voice.....how sad to lose a non-comformist.........how sad to lose someone who makes you think about your politics and personal beliefs.

BTS has always stood up for me as I did for him............we have love in our relationship, we have committment, we have a closeness that makes us great.......Do Any of you have that?



ARE YOU PEOPLE HAPPY NOW?
Well I do not want to get "banned". there are too many nice people here.

:yh_flower :yh_hugs :yh_frustr :yh_flag

As usual, I am so freaking lost here. I thought when it said banned it was the user title he created? Someone give me a clue wtf is going on around here this time.

Kwanzaa

when a man addresses a woman here as a "ku#t" that is an affront to all women at FG. it's a filthy word. THAT'S why he's banned. it has nothing to do with politics or any other high-minded crap...'bye.

But it's okay that she calls him a f*ckwad first? Not quite balanced it seems.

Accountable wrote: But it's okay that she calls him a f*ckwad first? Not quite balanced it seems.
a sh!t-stirring, megalomaniac, with the personality of a venereal disease....and an @sshole.


Exactly where does FG draw the line on name calling? Seriously. I'm very curious now.

lady cop wrote: when a man addresses a woman here as a "ku#t" that is an affront to all women at FG. it's a filthy word. THAT'S why he's banned. how do YOU like it? has nothing to do with politics or any other high-minded crap...'bye, see ya. i don't believe you'll leave anyway. saying goodbye at 10:51, in the pub at 11:17. LOL


please don't taunt.

anastrophe wrote: please don't taunt.OK.

Accountable wrote: But it's okay that she calls him a f*ckwad first? Not quite balanced it seems.


who said what "first" is not the issue.

Peg wrote: Exactly where does FG draw the line on name calling? Seriously. I'm very curious now.


http://www.forumgarden.com/terms.html



that is the whole of the law. there's nothing else on the issue to be discussed.

anastrophe wrote: who said what "first" is not the issue.yeh okay.

we, tombstone and i, are the head forumgardeners. you all know that. i think you all know that in the main, we do not rule either heavy-handedly, nor capriciously. by and large, we stay the hell outa things. we want people to settle their differences themselves. and if they can't settle them, then they need to either stay the hell out of each other's hair, or find another forum. and a number of people have done so, voluntarily. on the other hand, a few people have been unapologetic in having a vendetta, and even after warnings, have continued in behavior that disrupts the garden. those folks get banned. in the last few months, we've been employing the short-term ban as a means of getting the message across with force, but without finality. it has worked in several cases. it did not work in this case.



ultimately, how we run this place is *how we run this place*. if i decided i wanted to post a photo of a pink paisley pussycat into every single thread on forumgarden, and once per minute into every single thread thereafter, well, i could certainly do it. and it would be 100% within our terms and conditions. and if someone else chose to do the same thing - we could either ban them, or let them do it. we have the power to be capricious, but i believe the historical reality shows that we are not so.



so i would counsel those interested to reflect upon the historical reality, and use that as your guide as to where we draw lines, what we believe in, how we choose to wield our power, and how we choose to stay out of people's hair, up to the point that the gumwad is making it impossible for us to comb our own.



we now return you to our regularly scheduled program, "The Prisoner", already in progress.

Is it any wonder why I love this man?!?!?



i may have said something similar a time or two before...







Sincerely yours...

Mrs. Anastrophe



:-4 :-4

He hath decreed.

i'm almost certainly violating copyright with this, but i think old walt would forgive me. fair use, maybe.

Attached files

anastrophe wrote: we, tombstone and i, are the head forumgardeners. you all know that. i think you all know that in the main, we do not rule either heavy-handedly, nor capriciously. by and large, we stay the hell outa things. we want people to settle their differences themselves. and if they can't settle them, then they need to either stay the hell out of each other's hair, or find another forum. and a number of people have done so, voluntarily. on the other hand, a few people have been unapologetic in having a vendetta, and even after warnings, have continued in behavior that disrupts the garden. those folks get banned. in the last few months, we've been employing the short-term ban as a means of getting the message across with force, but without finality. it has worked in several cases. it did not work in this case.



ultimately, how we run this place is *how we run this place*. if i decided i wanted to post a photo of a pink paisley pussycat into every single thread on forumgarden, and once per minute into every single thread thereafter, well, i could certainly do it. and it would be 100% within our terms and conditions. and if someone else chose to do the same thing - we could either ban them, or let them do it. we have to power to be capricious, but i believe the historical reality shows that we are not so.



so i would counsel those interested to reflect upon the historical reality, and use that as your guide as to where we draw lines, what we believe in, how we choose to wield our power, and how we choose to stay out of people's hair, up to the point that the gumwad is making it impossible for us to comb our own.



we now return you to our regularly scheduled program, "The Prisoner", already in progress.
Look, I understand. You made a bad call, based on friendship rather than fairness. You banned someone more because you disliked him than anything else. So I guess it's natural that when you get called on it you bring out the "I'm in charge here!" big stick.



I understand.

Accountable wrote: Look, I understand. You made a bad call, based on friendship rather than fairness. You banned someone more because you disliked him than anything else. So I guess it's natural that when you get called on it you bring out the "I'm in charge here!" big stick.



I understand.


wow. nice. and you are?

Just an honest person who calls it like I see it.





I guess the funeral's over.

Accountable wrote: Just an honest person who calls it like I see it.


'not having the first fraction of a clue' != honesty.

anastrophe wrote: if i decided i wanted to post a photo of a pink paisley pussycat into every single thread on forumgarden, and once per minute into every single thread thereafter, well, i could certainly do it.


Do you have a photo of a pink paisley pussycat?

Is it pretty? :rolleyes:

Can we see it?

Thanks, Anastrophe.

PS LOVE the site, you guys do a FAB job and the site is great because of it!!

Well, we are guests here at FG, and Anastrophe and Tombstone can call it as they see it-they are the head gardeners. I dislike the naming calling on anyside, and want peace to reign again in the garden. I think I speak for many who haven't been posting as much lately, because we are upset to see the constant fighting going on. (thank goodness we hide out in the arcade and RPG) Let Anastrophe and Tombstone call the shots, this is their lovely garden they are sharing with us.

chonsigirl wrote: Well, we are guests here at FG, and Anastrophe and Tombstone can call it as they see it-they are the head gardeners. I dislike the naming calling on anyside, and want peace to reign again in the garden. I think I speak for many who haven't been posting as much lately, because we are upset to see the constant fighting going on. (thank goodness we hide out in the arcade and RPG) Let Anastrophe and Tombstone call the shots, this is their lovely garden they are sharing with us.


That just about says it all, Chonsi, thank you. I love FG and all the people here and I know we can all disagree with others at different times, that's the way life is, but let's not let it spoil a lovely place.

chonsigirl wrote: Well, we are guests here at FG, and Anastrophe and Tombstone can call it as they see it-they are the head gardeners. I dislike the naming calling on anyside, and want peace to reign again in the garden. I think I speak for many who haven't been posting as much lately, because we are upset to see the constant fighting going on. (thank goodness we hide out in the arcade and RPG) Let Anastrophe and Tombstone call the shots, this is their lovely garden they are sharing with us.


You're absolutely right Chonsi, Theia.....I'm here as much as ever, but stick to frivolous threads...it's safer. Maybe 'frivolous' is the best policy anyway, but it is good to get into a more serious discussion sometimes.

Look forward to catching up with you both soon... :-4

Good GAWD!! Glad I'm not the proverbial fan! :-2.......(this time!)

anastrophe wrote: we, tombstone and i, are the head forumgardeners. you all know that. i think you all know that in the main, we do not rule either heavy-handedly, nor capriciously. by and large, we stay the hell outa things. we want people to settle their differences themselves. and if they can't settle them, then they need to either stay the hell out of each other's hair, or find another forum. and a number of people have done so, voluntarily. on the other hand, a few people have been unapologetic in having a vendetta, and even after warnings, have continued in behavior that disrupts the garden. those folks get banned. in the last few months, we've been employing the short-term ban as a means of getting the message across with force, but without finality. it has worked in several cases. it did not work in this case.



ultimately, how we run this place is *how we run this place*. if i decided i wanted to post a photo of a pink paisley pussycat into every single thread on forumgarden, and once per minute into every single thread thereafter, well, i could certainly do it. and it would be 100% within our terms and conditions. and if someone else chose to do the same thing - we could either ban them, or let them do it. we have the power to be capricious, but i believe the historical reality shows that we are not so.



so i would counsel those interested to reflect upon the historical reality, and use that as your guide as to where we draw lines, what we believe in, how we choose to wield our power, and how we choose to stay out of people's hair, up to the point that the gumwad is making it impossible for us to comb our own.



we now return you to our regularly scheduled program, "The Prisoner", already in progress.




Oh my God ! Anasafras is delusional !!!

I am the head gardener !!!

Dammit Im tired of the hired help taking liberties.

Go weed the garden please.



:D

:wah: Nomad, what kind of ruler are you-standard or metric?

SnoozeControl wrote: I'm the master of the universe. Don't sass me.




Not this universe sista !

On yer knees !

chonsigirl wrote: :wah: Nomad, what kind of ruler are you-standard or metric?




uhhh...the regular kind ???

Far Rider wrote: *Far talks into his radio..... yes its him alright, the Nomad.... Yeah, I got him, don't worry... am I authorized to place the shock collar again?, thanks. No, I won't need back up, he's a skinny drivily looking kid.... Thats right, get the rubber room and straight jackets ready.*

:wah:




Can I help ? Where is he ? Lets get that bastard !!!

*stashing tin cans and string under the chair*

Raven wrote: Good GAWD!! Glad I'm not the proverbial fan! :-2.......(this time!)


Me too Raven, this thread has some serious s*** flying, you don't wanna be the fan it hits?

Hey, let Ruler Nomad take care of that stuff...................

I think you cheated in superclicker, it's impossible to click that many times in that short of time....:p

sixyearsleft wrote: anastrophe,



if you would like me to moderate this forum for you just send me a pm:)




You meant Nomad right ? Slip of the finger ?

sixyearsleft wrote: Forgive me:-1 (bow's head in shame)




No harm done...carry on soldier.