ForumGarden

A maniac who butchered three tots and impaled them on garden railings reported in todays Sun newspaper - evil David McGreavey ,54 dubbed the monster of Worcester has been allowed to casually stroll around Liverpool on day release.Mcgreavey has been allowed out of prison on a series of unsupervised jaunts as he is being prepaired for release .In 1973 David Mcgreavy a lodger in the home of Dorothy Urry who had three young children aged four,two and 9 months .He began baby sitting then one night he went berserk because the youngest child nine month old Samantha started crying .He smashed her head aganist a wall and killed her with a double -edged razor then used the weapon to kill her two year old sister Dawn, then strangled Paul aged four with curtain wire .He then impaled the tiny mights on a neighbours railings .Understanderbly the horror shocked the nation and at the trial in 1973 the animal was caged for life with the trail judge Mr Justice Ashworth describing him as using unspeakerble brutality and told him "it will be a very long time before those whose responsibility it will be to care for you can say with any degree of certainty that you are safe to be at large ".The childrens mother Dorpthy Urry aged now 54 said "i cannot believe it .This man took three childrens lives .He should of got the electric chair".While in jail Mcgreavey kept up an appalling record of behaviour of violence .A top prison service file reveals Mcgreavy frequently had sex in prison conducting a series of torrid affairs with female staff and visitors .On his days out Mcgreavy spends his time roaming liverpools streets from 7am until nightfall the terms of his trial ban him from boozing or going into pubs .Furious Dorothy has now vowed to write to the home office in the vain hope this animal be caged forever - wow this is unbelieveable .

jesus h. christ. [U.K.] SUN

:-5

need l say more!

They must be crazy to let him out! I read the story from LC's link! And someone with 2 children offered him a home!

i don't get it. Bothwell tells me the courts are too lenient in England, but this makes no sense whatsoever!! if i were a cop over there, i'd have to perform my own justice on scum like this. and i never felt that way here. WHY???? Why is he out????

Who ever let him out must be really running low on brain petrol. They should be held

responsible as well should he do anything

who is responsible for him being free? life doesn't mean life over there? he will kill again, he's pathological. this story sickened me, and i'm pretty immune.

This guy should NEVER be released. Jeez

then why is he?????????????

lady cop wrote: then why is he?????????????


Maybe they don't want to upset him of infringe upon his "Human Rights". Justice in this country is an embarrassing joke

ArnoldLayne wrote: The problem we face in this country is that we seem to breed extreme do-gooders. Remember Lord longford and his obsession with the well being of Myra Hindley. Nobody ever understood him but he was relentless


A VERY simple question : Would these foolish do-gooders campaign so tirelessly if the victim had been a member of their family? Hmmm let me think about that.

ArnoldLayne wrote: The problem we face in this country is that we seem to breed extreme do-gooders. Remember Lord longford and his obsession with the well being of Myra Hindley. Nobody ever understood him but he was relentlessmyra hindley should eat shite and die.

lady cop wrote: myra hindley should eat shite and die.


I believe it was her final meal

Killer release plan 'a disgrace'



Chief Constable Bernard Hogan-Howe said life "should mean life"



The Chief Constable of Merseyside is to write to the Home Secretary condemning a decision to allow a convicted triple child killer to go on day release.

David McGreavy has been allowed to walk around Liverpool unsupervised as part of preparations for his release from Ford Prison in Arundel, West Sussex.

Chief Constable Bernard Hogan-Howe said the decision was a "disgrace" and put children's safety at risk.

McGreavy, 54, was jailed in 1973 for murdering three children in Worcester.

He killed Paul Ralph, aged four, and his sisters Dawn, aged two, and nine-month-old Samantha before impaling their bodies on iron railings.

Why should society take the risk that those who released him got it wrong?





Chief Constable Bernard Hogan-Howe



In a webcast broadcast on Friday evening on the Merseyside Police website, Mr Hogan-Howe said he believed a life sentence should mean life.

He added: "The fact that McGreavy has been given day release is a disgrace.

"He should not have been released.

"For me, why should society and in this case it's children, take the risk that he offends again?

City ban

"Why should society take the risk that those who released him got it wrong?"

He added it was unlikely that McGreavy would be released in the Liverpool area as pictures of him had been publicised in local newspapers.

Mr Hogan-Howe's comments follow Worcester MP Michael Foster's call for McGreavy to be banned from entering the city as part of his release conditions. The Home Office has said it is normal practice to allow a life prisoner out of prison temporarily before their release and that all prisoners are risk assessed first.

Its about time the people of GB were heard im almost ashamed that i used to be part of the establishment .I want punishment to fit the crime not coppers ***** footing and fannying around .Crimninals are scum and jail time should mean jail time . :-5

lady cop wrote: then why is he?????????????


No offense LC, but why are you so confounded? It happens everyday over here. Had a man come in here the other day who videoed himself having sex with small children while other small children were running around through the room, went to jail, got out and was arrested again for. . . . . ready?. . . . .failure to register as a sex offender. The point is, he got out!

Life rarely means life here either.

I've meet a few I'd like to throw in boiling oil.

No offense LC, but why are you so confounded? ...........it was a rhetorical question. this kind of case is so frustrating , on either side of the pond. i wonder who will scream the loudest when he re-offends.

Probably the victim. . . . . .

Sounds to me like some group should get together like the parents in The Nightmare on Elm Street and torch the fuc%er.

Is it a good possibility he will be killed by a civilian over there? Im not sure of the laws regarding murder (i.e how harsh), but here, someone would rub him out.