Kathy Ellen;1044459 wrote: Thank you Kev, I appreciate your honesty like Hoss:-6
Don't worry...I know you're not attacking....
I just don't understand how anyone could not see the deer as a beautiful animal...
I was never a big meat eater, but I did love cheese burgers, filet mignon steaks. and pork chops.
Now, I don't eat much meat, but I do love lobster,chicken, pork and sabrette hot dogs once in-a-while. I mostly eat pasta or rice with a little meat.
Think I stopped eating bloody meat when I dissected a chicken leg, and it finally clicked in my head that I'm eatting the muscles of an animal....That just sickened me. Guess I just enjoyed the meat and didn't think about what I was eating.
dunno.....
I only eat a little meat with lots of pasta, rice or bread..
Guess we're all different:wah:
I think the reason most people typically get turned off of meat is because they associate human beings with the animals they're eating merely because of their physical make up...
When such is the case I can understand why people give it a think...
The fact of the matter is is that every living thing on Earth is made up of the same sort of organisms...Everything has life but us humans have displayed our ability to be able to understand concepts to(in comparison to the rest of thinking animals) a monumental degree...The fact remains that human beings need to consume a living organism in order to survive...
What's left are the arguments pertaining to association...From the "pain" of the animals to the "cuteness" of the animals renders consuming food an idea of preferences, not necessity...Human beings survive quite well off of eating meat as much can be argued that vegetarians survive quite well as well so I think anything beyond the mentality of eating habits again falls strictly under ones outlook on "life"...
I personally feel eating meat is not wrong and I personally feel not eating meat is an insult not only to our ancestors that needed meat in order to live but people that still live today who would seriously become malnutritioned if they did not eat meat...
Omnivore Vs. Vegetarian
Commentary by Jim Walker
Evolution dictates our lot in life with the undisputable fact that in order to survive, all animals, including us, must consume the by-products of DNA (i.e., living things). Since living things provide the only DNA sources available, we must eat the flesh of life (plants and/or animals) to continue our existence. This presents a dilemma and a moral problem if we consider killing life as immoral and conserving life as moral. I hope to clarify some of the problems and to dispel some of the myths about eating plants and animals both from a health and moral perspective.
We can have no argument about the following: all animals consume either plants, animals or both. Every specie of animal falls into the category of either carnivore, herbivore, or omnivore (other classifications exist such as frugivore, granivore, insectivore, etc. but these fall under sub-classes of the three major groups).
Eating high concentrations of protein (meat) has evolutionary benefits for carnivores. Meat serves as an efficient way to build a body and to economically replenish lost muscle tissue. Carnivores usually have lean, fast moving bodies, good for running down or overpowering prey. They have short digestive tracts, good for quickly eliminating unnecessary mass and allowing a high-muscle, low-fat balance. Humans do not fall into the carnivore group.
Herbivores (vegetarians), on the other hand, need longer intestines to break down and assimilate tough-to-break-down plant fibers. This means that the food stays in the gut for long periods of time. Most herbivore mammals have higher fat concentrations than carnivores and they don't have the speed compared to carnivores. Just observe the large bellies of the great apes, and ruminants (oxen, cattle, sheep, etc.), and you will see how obese they seem compared to hunter-carnivores. Humans do not fall into the herbivore group either.
Homo sapiens, of course, fall into to the omnivore class. Through natural selection we evolved the teeth of omnivores, good for grinding grain, stripping leaves, and eating meat. We have long intestines (somewhere between carnivore and herbivore intestinal tracts), and a digestive system that will break down both acidic and alkaline based foods (protein, carbohydrates, and fat). Our closest relatives, the chimpanzees, also have an omnivore diet (not only do they eat plants and fruits but they hunt and eat monkeys, for example).
Humans beat all other omnivores by a large margin (omnivore comes from the Latin: omni, or everything). People will eat anything including bacteria, fungus, plants, and animals. From the plants we will eat roots, bark, sap, leaves, berries, fruits, nuts, flowers, and seeds. We will eat any animal, including worms, insects, crustaceans, fish, amphibians, reptiles, birds, and mammals (and in some cases, people). We will eat their meat, fat, eyes, brain, organs (including testicles), bones and shells (for calcium), milk, and blood. Humans will even eat rotten food such as cheese and sour cream (due to decomposition from bacteria). Risen bread and alcohol drinks made by fermentation comes about from the waste products of yeast. Japanese people eat nattoo, a form of rotten fermented soybean. Ræst kjøt comes from rotten mutton. Humans eat lots of rotten fish. The Icelandic delicacy hákarl comes from rotten shark; the Swedes love surströmming, a rotten herring dish; Ræstur fiskur describes a half-dried rotten fish delicacy; the Russian tresca comes from decomposed codfish. Some humans even drink urine. Yes urine*. Omnivore vs. Vegetarian
Animals are living organisms just like plants...No different...
One just has to accept the fact that humans are no different either.
dunno.....
