ForumGarden

Chezzie;735911 wrote: your just pissed he didnt mention your breasts:wah:


Im just surprised people fall for that swill.

Nomad;735914 wrote: Im just surprised people fall for that swill.


Are you sure anybody did and they wernt just humouring a person in dire need?:wah::wah:

From what he was saying people did believe it, or maybe they didn't believe but found it a boost to their morale??

I found it all to swarmy from the start and he just seemed a perv but what really put me off was when he blew kisses to someone that had lost their partner to cancer, but now I realise that he was blowing himself as he was the orginal poster as well



No doubt about it though he could tell a story, practice really does make perfect :wah:

Nomad;735914 wrote: Im just surprised people fall for that swill.


Aren't you married?

Sure he can tell a story - he's creating one now

Drama Queen - I don't get it and I find it weird.. Take a pill and a nap..

wake up with your real name..!!

Patsy

AussiePam;735796 wrote: Lovely to see you again, MrsK!! I've missed you. Great thread on Australia, you started too!

:-6




Thanks AP.:-6

I can be FG's ambassador for Australian tourism:-6

SuzyB;735931 wrote: From what he was saying people did believe it, or maybe they didn't believe but found it a boost to their morale??

I found it all to swarmy from the start and he just seemed a perv but what really put me off was when he blew kisses to someone that had lost their partner to cancer, but now I realise that he was blowing himself as he was the orginal poster as well



No doubt about it though he could tell a story, practice really does make perfect :wah:


soz think ive made myself missunderstood, i wasnt referring to his stories just the post he made including members names and what he thought of them.

I was totally taken in by poor nikky d whos girlfriend emma donnadick or whatever her name was slept with his mate.....

Just didnt think peeps fell for his smarmy post to all the women hes loved before

Chezzie;735940 wrote: soz think ive made myself missunderstood, i wasnt referring to his stories just the post he made including members names and what he thought of them.

I was totally taken in by poor nikky d whos girlfriend emma donnadick or whatever her name was slept with his mate.....

Just didnt think peeps fell for his smarmy post to all the women hes loved before




I'm not surprised I've misunderstood you, I can't keep up with the cad :wah::wah:

SuzyB;735944 wrote: I'm not surprised I've misunderstood you, I can't keep up with the cad :wah::wah:


heh heh...tell you what bet kitnikij is bloody loving this thread:wah:

Chezzie;735948 wrote: heh heh...tell you what bet kitnikij is bloody loving this thread:wah:


Of course he/she/it/who is!!



Love ya

JJ

(Jolly Joker)

Should I flash my boobs for one last time???



naaaa, he/she/it left.....I'll save it for someone that appreciates my wonderboobs!

mrsK;735939 wrote: I can be FG's ambassador for Australian tourism:-6


Speaking of which I almost posted a comment about Henry Lawson in your "My Choice" thread but it said "My Choice" - do you mind if I pollute it? It seems a bit keep off the grass, I could do it elsewhere if you prefer.

Is this the guy who was supposed to be a great lover? Or was doing a census on what women found titillating in bed? So, now this is really a woman?? Fascinating.

weeder;736089 wrote: Is this the guy who was supposed to be a great lover? Or was doing a census on what women found titillating in bed? So, now this is really a woman?? Fascinating.


More importantly, how did i miss all this?:wah:

Pfft, hack.

weeder;736089 wrote: Is this the guy who was supposed to be a great lover? Or was doing a census on what women found titillating in bed? So, now this is really a woman?? Fascinating.


I dont think we know what sex they are yet, unless I missed that

Names he has used are jj and nikky daniels as a male and kitty paws as a woman, and maybe hundreds of others, who knows lol

weeder;736089 wrote: Is this the guy who was supposed to be a great lover? Or was doing a census on what women found titillating in bed? So, now this is really a woman?? Fascinating.


Remember that email you sent me a few months back? I'm not sure if I should be offended now or not.

That was way before the sexual technique, or galactic thread.

Nomad;735875 wrote: Oh for Christs sake !




:wah: Nomad.

I am leery of strangers telling other strangers they love them. I noticed that the first few days. I don't believe in "fast friends."

And for the record I'd like to state that I'm not trying to be a freaking news reporter. This keeps coming up. I post the stuff I do in hopes of garnering some conversation from you guys. That's all.

Nomad you crack me up.

Im with you Red. The love stuff is always a red flag for me, and I am apalled when I see people respond to strangers questions regarding sexual topics. But thats just me. Im supposed to be an antiquated prude. But my assesment of the world the way it is today.... leaves me perfectly charmed to be the way I am. Ive always had an adversion to sleazy stuff.

It's not just you, Weeder. I don't like that stuff either. Lots of people don't. I think to talk about your personal business in mixed company, as if everyone wants to hear it, is scuzzy.

Nomad;735875 wrote: Oh for Christs sake !




:wah: i feel like im following you :wah: but thats twice i have agreed with you today:D

RedGlitter;736260 wrote: It's not just you, Weeder. I don't like that stuff either. Lots of people don't. I think to talk about your personal business in mixed company, as if everyone wants to hear it, is scuzzy.


Well, you knew I'd disagree with you two on this one.:wah:

There is no difference between an open discussion of ones sex life(there I said it!) and and open discussion of ones politics, abuse of any kind someone feels they may have suffered, illnesses they may be suffering, cures that may have worked for them, holidays they hope to take and/or their body and how it functions. These are all personal business, IMO.

Everyone has topics they don't care for. That's fine. You've expressed the same opinion repeatedly. Why? Why don't you just move on to a topic that does interest you? If I have no interest in the cooking threads and find them a total waste of time, I don't feel the need to point it out at every opportunity. I simply find a thread that does interest me.

grh;736269 wrote: I have no interest in the cooking threads and find them a total waste of time
spot bursts into tears, throws his whisk into the skillet, turns off the burners and stomps off to his room to sulk indefinitely.

spot;736280 wrote: spot bursts into tears, throws his whisk into the skillet, turns off the burners and stomps off to his room to sulk indefinitely.


I'm with you Spot.....I could watch the cooking shows alllll day and cook up a storm a few times a week:wah:

spot;736280 wrote: spot bursts into tears, throws his whisk into the skillet, turns off the burners and stomps off to his room to sulk indefinitely.


Aha see, there's no cooking needed when you eat icecream..........:wah:

spot;736280 wrote: spot bursts into tears, throws his whisk into the skillet, turns off the burners and stomps off to his room to sulk indefinitely.




:yh_rotfl:yh_rotfl:yh_rotfl:yh_rotfl:yh_rotfl

kazalala;736265 wrote: :wah: i feel like im following you :wah: but thats twice i have agreed with you today:D




Run little camper ! Run like the wind while you still can !

Nomad;735875 wrote:

I love that emote :wah:

Snooze;736297 wrote: I love that emote :wah:


Must of had one of them "all you can eat deals" loads of spew ewwww

It's the tongue action that always cracks me up.

Snooze;736299 wrote: It's the tongue action that always cracks me up.


Oeeeeeerrrrrrrr Matron I say!:p:p:p

grh;736269 wrote: Well, you knew I'd disagree with you two on this one.:wah:

There is no difference between an open discussion of ones sex life(there I said it!) and and open discussion of ones politics, abuse of any kind someone feels they may have suffered, illnesses they may be suffering, cures that may have worked for them, holidays they hope to take and/or their body and how it functions. These are all personal business, IMO.

Everyone has topics they don't care for. That's fine. You've expressed the same opinion repeatedly. Why? Why don't you just move on to a topic that does interest you? If I have no interest in the cooking threads and find them a total waste of time, I don't feel the need to point it out at every opportunity. I simply find a thread that does interest me.


I was agreeing with Weeder, that's why. I figure everyone else has thrown their two cents in so why not put mine in as well. We just differ, you and I on this one and that's fine. I think sex is personal and I don't enjoy hearing about how someone bedded whoever they picked up last night, it's tacky.

Rather than point it out at every opportunity which I don't, believe me, it was pertinent to the conversation after remembering JJ's thread about whether or not his women get off. I don't want to hear that sh*t especially from a stranger. *shudder*

RedGlitter;736323 wrote: I was agreeing with Weeder, that's why. I figure everyone else has thrown their two cents in so why not put mine in as well. We just differ, you and I on this one and that's fine. I think sex is personal and I don't enjoy hearing about how someone bedded whoever they picked up last night, it's tacky.

Rather than point it out at every opportunity which I don't, believe me, it was pertinent to the conversation after remembering JJ's thread about whether or not his women get off. I don't want to hear that sh*t especially from a stranger. *shudder*


:-2

I'm confused.

I recall you having the longest date thread after the Dating Game was won, writing some pretty risque stuff in the games and being the top poster in the Innuendo thread.

grh;736269 wrote: Well, you knew I'd disagree with you two on this one.:wah:

There is no difference between an open discussion of ones sex life(there I said it!) and and open discussion of ones politics, abuse of any kind someone feels they may have suffered, illnesses they may be suffering, cures that may have worked for them, holidays they hope to take and/or their body and how it functions. These are all personal business, IMO.

Everyone has topics they don't care for. That's fine. You've expressed the same opinion repeatedly. Why? Why don't you just move on to a topic that does interest you? If I have no interest in the cooking threads and find them a total waste of time, I don't feel the need to point it out at every opportunity. I simply find a thread that does interest me.


Its all in the presentation... and the vibes listeners pick up from the initiator of the topic. Ive had some very liberal conversations, with many people. Then there are those who could make Q Tips sound sleazy.

weeder;736364 wrote: Then there are those who could make Q Tips sound sleazy.That was aimed at me, wasn't it.

It always is my pet.... especially when Q Tips are involved.

weeder;736377 wrote: It always is my pet.... especially when Q Tips are involved.


If you'd had Q Tips pushed where I've had... except of course you couldn't, thinking about it.

Forget I even thought of saying that.

Where's that vomit emote when you really need it?

Hey, I like the cooking threads. I also like sexual discussion; to a point of course. I love Jimbo.

Awwwwww man love... Its so special:D:wah::wah:

kazalala;736549 wrote: Awwwwww man love... Its so special


:wah::wah::wah:

I'm glad you said it...I thought it, you said it....love how that works!!:wah:

WonderWendy3;736551 wrote: :wah:

I'm glad you said it...I thought it, you said it....love how that works!!:wah:


yea my mouth does work independantly of my brain sometimes:wah::wah: Must have been your brain working my mouth:wah: Thats my story anyway:D

koan;736336 wrote: :-2

I'm confused.

I recall you having the longest date thread after the Dating Game was won, writing some pretty risque stuff in the games and being the top poster in the Innuendo thread.


That was what we were supposed to do. I remember you mentioning to me something about wanting to heat up the dating game or something to that effect. Besides I wanted to win. I think Weeder said it best when she mentioned presentation. There's, in my eyes, a big difference between a suggestion of sex and coming right out with shall we say , the anal sex thread for example. God. That kind of stuff is too much information. It's just different viewpoints and personal codes I think.

By the way, what happened to the Innuendo Thread anyway? We tried to revive it several times.

Most certainly I wanted to heat it up... and I'm the one who started the Innuendo thread, which is why I'm not criticising anyone for writing sexual content.

What is sexy to one might be seen by two others as extremely lame or sickening in detail respectively, yet both might be talking about the same post. Members flirt all the time on every forum and how they go about doing that determines the type of person they get responding to them. If someone is looking for a conservative person they will likely be more conservative with their flirting. If looking for a sex maniac they will post more bluntly and risque. If everyone wrote the way I did and thought the way I did the world would be a very unstable place :wah: So I'm quite happy to see that others think and function in a way that may seem foreign to me.

I really enjoy writing whatever is on my mind in the way that it occurs to me to write. Why should anyone else be made to feel guilty for that?

I notice that you are big on having the right to your opinion no matter what the response is, so I'm just wondering why you are now criticising how other people express themselves. I'm not intent on arguing it out, just stating my opinion on the matter

RedGlitter;736577 wrote: That was what we were supposed to do. I remember you mentioning to me something about wanting to heat up the dating game or something to that effect. Besides I wanted to win. I think Weeder said it best when she mentioned presentation. There's, in my eyes, a big difference between a suggestion of sex and coming right out with shall we say , the anal sex thread for example. God. That kind of stuff is too much information. It's just different viewpoints and personal codes I think. By the way, what happened to the Innuendo Thread anyway? We tried to revive it several times.


koan;736588 wrote: Most certainly I wanted to heat it up... and I'm the one who started the Innuendo thread, which is why I'm not criticising anyone for writing sexual content.

What is sexy to one might be seen by two others as extremely lame or sickening in detail respectively, yet both might be talking about the same post. Members flirt all the time on every forum and how they go about doing that determines the type of person they get responding to them. If someone is looking for a conservative person they will likely be more conservative with their flirting. If looking for a sex maniac they will post more bluntly and risque. If everyone wrote the way I did and thought the way I did the world would be a very unstable place :wah: So I'm quite happy to see that others think and function in a way that may seem foreign to me.

I really enjoy writing whatever is on my mind in the way that it occurs to me to write. Why should anyone else be made to feel guilty for that?

I notice that you are big on having the right to your opinion no matter what the response is, so I'm just wondering why you are now criticising how other people express themselves. I'm not intent on arguing it out, just stating my opinion on the matter


I didnt take reds post as a critisism of other people, i just thought she was expressing her opinion that its not really her thing. Also i think Innuendo is different to downright blunt staright forward sex talk:wah: It doesnt really bother me personally if we were talking about comedians i would say i prefer innuendo rather than a crude joke. I know i have digressed ,,, sorry:o

Who's making anyone feel guilty, Koan? Surely if they feel guilty that's their own doing.

Also, who's criticizing anyone? I wonder why so many others could have said the same thing but when Red Speaks it's seen as criticism. I just said what I didn't like, the same as others said what they did. That's all.

spot;736043 wrote: Speaking of which I almost posted a comment about Henry Lawson in your "My Choice" thread but it said "My Choice" - do you mind if I pollute it? It seems a bit keep off the grass, I could do it elsewhere if you prefer.


You may .

They are just my choice of poems that I like or think funny.