ForumGarden

NotToday;590661 wrote: Hmm.. I did not know that!!!



Guess I should pay more attention to terms and conditions when I sign up for things.



I'm horrible about reading fine print.



I'll watch my mouth from now on!!


i would watch my mouth but i tend to shoot it off to much...gotta protect my eyes....

AngelEyes82;590496 wrote: Does my avatar offend anyone?


I think it is great - sexy but not offensive - great choice

Pinky;590689 wrote: Some people have siad worse in their posts, yet we're all bing nice and wishing them well. How hypocritical?


Who was that directed at?

Pinky;590700 wrote: People who advocate stuff that they run others down for.

It's as simple as that.


oh ok

Pinky;590700 wrote: People who advocate stuff that they run others down for.

It's as simple as that.


:-2

magenta flame;590705 wrote: Have to admit I'm worried now


Am I missing something Not unheard of :wah: :wah:

magenta flame;590686 wrote: this is a better one

gratuitious violence




Thanks Magenta, had me and the boys laughing at both of those!!:wah:

I'll start a thread just for a discussion of how nude is PG?

I'd like to hear everyone's detailed thoughts on the matter. I just think it's more helpful if the title reflects the larger issue.

buh-bye

did i do something :-1

Pinky;590724 wrote: You're calling me out. Asking me about things I've said but appearing to not ask me. Decide which it is. I'm not known for my patience or my good will in taking out idiots.


HHHEEEELLLPPP!!!

Pinks. I don't think he knows what you're mad about.

I don't.

You lost me.

OK OK I will cancel my subscription and never be seen here again!!

Pinky;590729 wrote: [QUOTE=ThePheasant;590725]HHHEEEELLLPPP!!![/QUOT

Ok, fair enough...move on to summat else and we'll more than likely be good friends.


:-3 :-3

I think you just got caught in the middle this time, Pheasant.

The "huh" smilie came across as sarcastic, I think.

No big deal. You'll get used to it.

It's actually been a really weird day.



(It's after 1:30 isn't it Pinky? :wah: :wah: )

Pinky;590742 wrote: Okay, okay...mistaken intent and all that. Sorry Pheasant, I'm sure you're lovely really, I'm just a little on edge. I shouldn't take it out on you and i hope you'll forgive my idiotic paranoia.


yer awesome, Pinky.

I hate it when you go away. Even for a day.

You ride a broom. You sweep up behind you as you go.

photoshop his shorts black and you're probably safe at the smaller size. :wah:

AngelEyes82;590788 wrote: Why koan? There isn't anything wrong with it.

They aren't having sex & the only thing you're

complaining about is it's called "fromdaback"

A majority of people love the pic. Like I said

when i was 10-11 years old I seen worse than this.



Oh yeah i copied it from hotfreecomments.com

it's a myspace comment site.


You have no idea how unprudish I am. :wah:

When you shrink it you can't see the shorts and the girls legs are on either side of him. The large picture is fine. The small picture looks like they are screwing.

Personally, I've got a file full of stuff that would make your jaw drop on my PC. As far as FG goes, I don't post it here. The big pic would be fine. The small pic loses the necessary detail

AngelEyes82;590811 wrote: It's just a dry hump.. for now. :wah:


:wah: :wah:

He's doing it all wrong anyway...

almostfamous;591150 wrote: i'm a nun


hey that's pretty kinky:D

K.Snyder;591032 wrote: He's doing it all wrong anyway...


I know this is going to come as a shock to many of you....but ummm...... who is doing it wrong??? and what is HE doing wrong??

I'm confused...that's the shock of the day!!:wah:

AngelEyes82;591172 wrote: How was he doing it wrong..





Maybe he slipped it into the pooper on accident..

Thats some close observation K!


I thought he looked fine to me....was it a full moon last night???