ForumGarden

In case you want to get the creationist side of things.

Plesiosaur Washes Up On Beach In Georgia. Evolutionists Claim They Died Out Millions Of Years Ago. Can't Explain This One:



https://www.newsweek.com/mystery-sea-cr ... ach-850622

No comments on the supposed millions of year old dinosaur that washed up on the beach?

xfrodobagginsx;1524048 wrote: No comments on the supposed millions of year old dinosaur that washed up on the beach?


A single photo does not a dinosaur make.

LarsMac;1524052 wrote: A single photo does not a dinosaur make.


There is more than one photo of it. They have the BODY of it. This isn't the only case & every Dinosaur bone that they find has measurable Carbon 14 in it, even though, if they were really millions of years old, the Carbon 14 should have been gone after several thousands years, let alone millions of years according to the evolutionists themselves.

xfrodobagginsx;1524061 wrote: There is more than one photo of it. They have the BODY of it. This isn't the only case & every Dinosaur bone that they find has measurable Carbon 14 in it, even though, if they were really millions of years old, the Carbon 14 should have been gone after several thousands years, let alone millions of years according to the evolutionists themselves.


Correction. They have a picture of a "body".

and whatever point you are trying to make with Carbon 14 is irrelevant when looking at a recently deceased critter.

LarsMac;1524066 wrote: Correction. They have a picture of a "body".

and whatever point you are trying to make with Carbon 14 is irrelevant when looking at a recently deceased critter.


First of all, no they don't just have 1 picture of it. They have the Body of the creature as well. Also, the Carbon 14 is relevant because this isn't the only dinosaur that has been discovered. Of the thousands that they have discovered, ALL of the fossils that have ever been measured have carbon 14 still in them, proving that they aren't millions of years old either is my point.

xfrodobagginsx;1524072 wrote: First of all, no they don't just have 1 picture of it. They have the Body of the creature as well. Also, the Carbon 14 is relevant because this isn't the only dinosaur that has been discovered. Of the thousands that they have discovered, ALL of the fossils that have ever been measured have carbon 14 still in them, proving that they aren't millions of years old either is my point.


You did not read that article very well. Did you?

Some are still trying to live in the ancient pre historic era.

LarsMac;1524079 wrote: You did not read that article very well. Did you?


What is it that you got from the article that I did not?

xfrodobagginsx;1524097 wrote: What is it that you got from the article that I did not?


Just read the article.

LarsMac;1524079 wrote: You did not read that article very well. Did you?


All I can do is laugh. They are just trying to explain away that fact that a dinosaur washed up on the shore that proves their theory wrong and they don't want to accept the truth in their face.

xfrodobagginsx;1524123 wrote: All I can do is laugh. They are just trying to explain away that fact that a dinosaur washed up on the shore that proves their theory wrong and they don't want to accept the truth in their face.


That film is not conclusive evidence of what that creature might have been. The guy did not get close enough or film long enough to really give any examiner enough evidence to prove anything. One possibility was that the film continues and shows it to be something completely mundane, and so was deleted by the flimer or an editor because it would no longer be at all newsworthy.

I, personally would really love to see evidence that such creatures still live. How cool would that be?

But that film is very disappointing. It offers up nothing useful.

LarsMac;1524125 wrote: That film is not conclusive evidence of what that creature might have been. The guy did not get close enough or film long enough to really give any examiner enough evidence to prove anything. One possibility was that the film continues and shows it to be something completely mundane, and so was deleted by the flimer or an editor because it would no longer be at all newsworthy.

I, personally would really love to see evidence that such creatures still live. How cool would that be?

But that film is very disappointing. It offers up nothing useful.


This is not the only one that they have found. I am sure they have the body. You see, the reason that it is so small is that before the flood, they grew to those huge sizes for several reasons. One reason is that the earth was like a hyperbaric chamber, the oxygen pressure was much higher which made the creatures much more healthy. Secondly, creatures lived 10x longer because of that and there was a protective canopy of water above the atmospher which distributed the sun's harmful rays to where they were much less.

Ted;1524083 wrote: Some are still trying to live in the ancient pre historic era.


The Bible is timeless and ancient, but it's not prehistoric, or is it? God doesn't ever get old fashioned and out of touch but people do.

So, is there a way to use the emoticons?

What can Mt. St. Helens tell us about creation?



https://www.wnd.com/2019/08/what-can-mt ... -creation/

Can the emoticons be used?

Why won't you just answer me Lars?

xfrodobagginsx;1524207 wrote: Why won't you just answer me Lars?


About the emoticons? Damfino.

LarsMac;1524210 wrote: About the emoticons? Damfino.


Is that a name?

Irreducible Complexity: The Challenge to the Darwinian Evolutionary Explanations of many Biochemical Structures

http://www.ideacenter.org/contentmgr/sh ... php/id/840

xfrodobagginsx;1524214 wrote: Is that a name?


You'll have to figure that one out on your own, my friend.

xfrodobagginsx;1524241 wrote: Irreducible Complexity: The Challenge to the Darwinian Evolutionary Explanations of many Biochemical Structures

http://www.ideacenter.org/contentmgr/sh ... php/id/840


That was good for a few laughs

LarsMac;1524245 wrote: You'll have to figure that one out on your own, my friend.


Games, games, games....

LarsMac;1524246 wrote: That was good for a few laughs


So, you aren't even willing to use common sense?

xfrodobagginsx;1524284 wrote: So, you aren't even willing to use common sense?


Common Sense? From Behe?

"Irreducible Complexity" is a joke.

We might as well be discussing "Flat Earth"

LarsMac;1524288 wrote: Common Sense? From Behe?

"Irreducible Complexity" is a joke.

We might as well be discussing "Flat Earth"


Explain why it's wrong then.

It's nothing like Flat Earth. Creationism is supported by the actual evidence, Flat Earth is not.

MYSTERIOUS, ANCIENT RADIO SIGNALS KEEP PELTING EARTH

Astronomers designed an AI to hunt them down

https://www.wnd.com/2019/08/mysterious- ... orig=world

Gym not needed to improve heart health, study finds



https://www.wnd.com/2019/08/gym-not-nee ... udy-finds/

Please look at the actual arguments presented here and see if you can factually refute them.

xfrodobagginsx;1524373 wrote: Please look at the actual arguments presented here and see if you can factually refute them.


People have done that for nearly every one of the arguments presented here, and disproved them.

No need to do it all over again.

LarsMac;1524375 wrote: People have done that for nearly every one of the arguments presented here, and disproved them.

No need to do it all over again.


They haven't disproven a single thing. I have yet to see anyone here take the facts that I give and then refute them with logic. Name calling doesn't count.

Why not discuss your reason for disagreeing?

The Neanderthals were just regular men.

Mysterious, ancient radio signals keep pelting Earth

https://www.wnd.com/2019/08/mysterious- ... ing-earth/

xfrodobagginsx;1524431 wrote: The Neanderthals were just regular men.


The Neanderthals were another species with a common ancestor - just as Chimps are.

xfrodobagginsx;1524431 wrote: The Neanderthals were just regular men.


They were probably Communists.

LarsMac;1524474 wrote: They were probably Communists.


No, that's the Democrats.

FourPart;1524469 wrote: The Neanderthals were another species with a common ancestor - just as Chimps are.


Wrong. They were just people. You have just been conditioned to believe that.

Your insomnia is killing you, study says

https://www.wnd.com/2019/08/your-insomn ... tudy-says/

FourPart;1524469 wrote: The Neanderthals were another species with a common ancestor - just as Chimps are.


Interesting how most often these supposed common ancestors don't exist in the fossil record, but neanderthals were just people.

'Rapid geology' challenges view of evolution



https://www.wnd.com/2019/08/rapid-geolo ... evolution/

Mummified Dinosaur Found Almost Perfectly Preserved. No Feathers Because Dinosaurs Were Lizards Not Birds As Evolutionists Claim.

xfrodobagginsx;1524549 wrote: Mummified Dinosaur Found Almost Perfectly Preserved. No Feathers Because Dinosaurs Were Lizards Not Birds As Evolutionists Claim.




Like I said, there is a ton of evidence that Dinosaurs could NOT have died out 65 million years ago and this is another piece.

xfrodobagginsx;1524489 wrote: Wrong. They were just people. You have just been conditioned to believe that.


DNA Evidence confirms this. It is unquestionable FACT. All you have to go on is a superstitious story book, thousands of years old, from before Neaderthals were even known about. And YOU believe I'VE been conditioned?

FourPart;1524589 wrote: DNA Evidence confirms this. It is unquestionable FACT. All you have to go on is a superstitious story book, thousands of years old, from before Neaderthals were even known about. And YOU believe I'VE been conditioned?


DNA evidence confirms that they were genetically men. It does NOT confirm them being half monkey. Bull crap! The FACT is that they were men. All you have is your godless religion evolution and you have FAITH that it's true when it's not. YOU have been conditioned. Yes.

xfrodobagginsx;1524593 wrote: DNA evidence confirms that they were genetically men. It does NOT confirm them being half monkey. Bull crap! The FACT is that they were men. All you have is your godless religion evolution and you have FAITH that it's true when it's not. YOU have been conditioned. Yes.


According to preliminary sequences from 2010, 99.7% of the nucleotide sequences of the modern human and Neanderthal genomes are identical, compared to humans sharing around 98.8% of sequences with the chimpanzee.

xfrodobagginsx;1524593 wrote: DNA evidence confirms that they were genetically men. It does NOT confirm them being half monkey. Bull crap! The FACT is that they were men. All you have is your godless religion evolution and you have FAITH that it's true when it's not. YOU have been conditioned. Yes.


The very fact that you refer to Neanderthal as being "Half-Monkey" demonstrates that you have no understanding of how Evolution works.

Neanderthals were never our Ancestors, they were our Cousins, in the same way as Chimpanzees are. They went off on one divergence of evolution, and failed. As a consequence they became extinct. We went on another branch and succeeded.

When you get 2 apples on a tree on different branches, one is not an ancestor of the other. They do, however, have a common ancestor, namely the branch that both of their branches share, right down to the common trunk. Furthermore, dependant on conditions, the apples on one branch may thrive whilst those on the others fail.

By describing Evolution as a Religion demonstrates that you don't even have any concept of what a Religion is. Let me enlighten you...

noun: religion the belief in and worship of a superhuman controlling power, especially a personal God or gods. "ideas about the relationship between science and religion" synonyms: faith, belief, divinity, worship, creed, teaching, doctrine, theology; More sect, cult, religious group, faith community, church, denomination, body, following, persuasion, affiliation "the right to freedom of religion" a particular system of faith and worship. plural noun: religions "the world's great religions" a pursuit or interest followed with great devotion. "consumerism is the new religion"

A belief in Evolution has nothing to do with belief in a Superhuman or an Afterlife, as Religions do. It is also not exclusively non-Religious. After all, even the Catholic Church freely accepts Evolution as a Scientific fact now (although it goes on to accredit their God as having been responsible for it).

You are correct, however, in describing Evolution as 'Godless', as it is not reliant on a non-exsistant being. It is a simple demonstrable fact of Nature.