ForumGarden

valerie;985793 wrote: Now you're just really reaching. Wasn't it you who called for people to

not use names like "McSame"? Well I decided you were right and I'm

not going to do it any more. Wouldn't it be nice if you agreed to not

"slam" in return?



I think it would.What would be really nice Valerie, is if you checked who the post was made by before refering to it in haste. If you go back over the thread, you'll find it was not me who made any comment either way about "Mcsame" I'm sure you'll find it was another member. (unless i'm going senile) I certainly don't mind being critisized but at least get the poster correct first.

oscar;985828 wrote: What would be really nice Valerie, is if you checked who the post was made by before refering to it in haste. If you go back over the thread, you'll find it was not me who made any comment either way about "Mcsame" I'm sure you'll find it was another member. (unless i'm going senile) I certainly don't mind being critisized but at least get the poster correct first.


Guilty. I did call him Mc Lame. not Same

I called for people to use proper names, but I don't remember if it was this thread.

qsducks;985830 wrote: Guilty. I did call him Mc Lame. not SameThanks, you just saved me going back over 40 pages to find the guilty culprit. Valerie couldn't even quote the correct poster accurately. Jesus Christ!:wah::wah:

oscar;985839 wrote: Thanks, you just saved me going back over 40 pages to find the guilty culprit. Valerie couldn't even quote the correct poster accurately. Jesus Christ!:wah::wah:


You do know that I now have to take you out back for a good whipping, right?:wah: Bad, bad Oscar using such vulgarity.

Accountable;985836 wrote: I called for people to use proper names, but I don't remember if it was this thread. :oAre you having a Reagan moment????

qsducks;985841 wrote: You do know that I now have to take you out back for a good whipping, right?:wah: Bad, bad Oscar using such vulgarity.
You'll get me all excited talking about whipping, you naughty girl

Oh let's go. I've got the whip oiled today.:sneaky:

qsducks;985852 wrote: Oh let's go. I've got the whip oiled today.:sneaky:You oil it first??Now i really am excited;)

Accountable: Do you know, would Nancy Pelosi (sorry about the misspelling of her name) and Sarah Palin sit over the senate? It is good to be back, but what does BTW mean, I want to know so I'll know if I've been insulted. :)I don't text so I'm not up on abbvs.

Bridget;985875 wrote: Accountable: Do you know, would Nancy Pelosi (sorry about the misspelling of her name) and Sarah Palin sit over the senate? It is good to be back, but what does BTW mean, I want to know so I'll know if I've been insulted. :)I don't text so I'm not up on abbvs.


By the way. And yes Palin would be sitting in back of Nancy with her never ending perfect smile. The Colgate Chick.

Bridget;985875 wrote: Accountable: Do you know, would Nancy Pelosi (sorry about the misspelling of her name) and Sarah Palin sit over the senate? It is good to be back, but what does BTW mean, I want to know so I'll know if I've been insulted. :)I don't text so I'm not up on abbvs. Oh Bridget, you've gone all serious, i was just enjoying the whipping. I think BTW means a bacon, tomatoe & Wet lettuce. Lots of people text me & i don't understand. I don't like to ask incase they think i'm dumb. What the heck does LOL mean?

oscar;985897 wrote: Oh Bridget, you've gone all serious, i was just enjoying the whipping. I think BTW means a bacon, tomatoe & Wet lettuce. Lots of people text me & i don't understand. I don't like to ask incase they think i'm dumb. What the heck does LOL mean?


Oh yeah, wet lettuce.

qsducks;985900 wrote: Oh yeah, wet lettuce. Is that a sneaky reference to McCain?:sneaky:

Bridget;985875 wrote: Accountable: Do you know, would Nancy Pelosi (sorry about the misspelling of her name) and Sarah Palin sit over the senate? It is good to be back, but what does BTW mean, I want to know so I'll know if I've been insulted. :)I don't text so I'm not up on abbvs.
BTW is by the way :wah:. I know what you mean about the letters. Sometimes you just have to smile and nod like it's a foreign language.



Nancy Pelosi presides over the House of Representatives. The VP presides over the Senate and casts the deciding vote in case of a tie (Senate only).

oscar;985902 wrote: Is that a sneaky reference to McCain?:sneaky:


His hair does look like wet lettuce.

qsducks;985906 wrote: His hair does look like wet lettuce. I agree, but in a sexy old balding type way.:-4

Bill Clinton was sexy, very sexy. We just get old farts here.

Hoss;985916 wrote: Because as victors we are more just and fair than any other country in the world.Good point but to be just & fair, you have to have courage of your convictions. Obama is weak, he wants to please everyone & seems to steer his speeches in what ever direction he feels is best. At least Bush will tell everyone to ---- off if he doesn't like it. I respect that.

JAB;985920 wrote: It's stereotypical statements like this that set women back. Why do you degrade all women by implying they are so shallow that the only thing they talk about when they get together is clothes. Well said.

As we got personal & called Palin the "Colegate chick". can i just add that i think Gordon Brown is a scottish twat. It's 02.25 am here in Blighty. Oscar's off to bed.:eek:

Hoss;985934 wrote: I think John McCain is more of a man of conviction in comparison to Barack Obama. It bothers me that a man would vote 'present' instead of yes or no. Be a man of conviction, make your yes, a yes, and your no, a no. Be clear, be concise and give reasons. A clear 'NO' spoken for a good reason is far better than a 'present'.

On the other hand Barack Obama has a committed relationship with his wife, his first and only wife. That speaks about his character in personal relationships.

I'm learning that everything is a trade off.In a similar post i said to Valerie, is McCain's past relationships that important? Is it not, What he can do for the future? If we get personal about his ex sex life, we could have had a riot with Clinton. Clinton did it whilst in Office then lied. That's far worse. "I repeat, i did not have sexual relations with that woman". McCain has not done that. What sort of standard did Clinton set with Monica Lewinski? Yet, he was a brilliant President. Before i go to bed, i just found this in "the Sun" newspaper by colomnist "Fergus Shanahan". Quote" Here are the most powerful shoes in the world. They are £40 red patent leather peep toe pumps with three-inch heels. Republican Sarah Palin is wearing them as she tramples Democrat Barack Obama underfoot. To be seen off by a woman after he snubbed Hilary Clinton is bad enough, but to be beaten by a pair of heels??? " Priceless reporting:wah::wah::wah:

JAB;985938 wrote: And yet, he was awfully quick to cast off his personal relationship with his Pastor when it became difficult to remain committed to him...:wah::wah::wah: Brilliant.

Hoss;985948 wrote: Brilliant President? Bill Clinton? Not in my opinion. He was the worst president in the history of the US. He has no honor.Why?

qsducks;985830 wrote: Guilty. I did call him Mc Lame. not Same


Senator John McCain may not be your favorite candidate but he is a Senator and he is a hero. His status as a honorable human being deserves better than your childish name calling. I served in Vietnam at the same time he was sitting in prison there. I find your cheap shots personally offensive.

oscar;985828 wrote: What would be really nice Valerie, is if you checked who the post was made by before refering to it in haste. If you go back over the thread, you'll find it was not me who made any comment either way about "Mcsame" I'm sure you'll find it was another member. (unless i'm going senile) I certainly don't mind being critisized but at least get the poster correct first.


Whoa, whoa, whoa there chief, I believe I ASKED if it was you:

"Wasn't it you that said... " etc. etc. and if it wasn't, all it would take

was a "No, it wasn't me" not all the snark directed at me. I was trying

to be nice in any case, I guess I see that isn't the way to go with

you.

Forgive me for thinking it was you, I will apologize for that, but as for

the rest, I still think it would be a nice gesture if you met me half way.

Hoss;985916 wrote: Because as victors we are more just and fair than any other country in the world.


I've just made a very rude noise - luckily it does not translate very well into text or I'd get an infraction for it.

Now try putting youself at their viewpoint and re-evaluating your reply.

Ian;986087 wrote: I wouldn't mind next weeks lottery results..
:wah:

Hoss;985952 wrote: 1. Perjured himself

2. Don't ask don’t tell policy

3. Military draw down based on poor leadership assessments of future needs

4. Baltic States issues (Kosovo), he took land that did not belong to him and gave it to others.

5. Somali withdrawal, not securing troops, giving orders to collect targets when he was negotiating a withdrawal.

6. Not seriously fighting terrorism, allowing it to build up and prepare unchallenged for the attacks on 9-11.





Those are off the top of my head, the ones I can recall right now. I have a long list somewhere. Probably on my PC, but I have to buy another charger before I can get to it.



The man literally turns my stomach sour when I think what he did. He is smug, and condescending, and every word he says to me is a question mark of what usage and definition the word is.



Men that sat at meals at my parents table are no longer breathing because of what he did in Somalia. He’s a lying coward, the lowest man on earth.
I'd love to see #2 &#3 in their own threads. I agree with #2 for probably the polar opposite reasons, and while I'm no historian I'd love to see those more knowledgeable than I am discuss #3.

Clint;985973 wrote: Senator John McCain may not be your favorite candidate but he is a Senator and he is a hero. His status as a honorable human being deserves better than your childish name calling. I served in Vietnam at the same time he was sitting in prison there. I find your cheap shots personally offensive.
As i said to Valerie in a previous post, i am not interested in either McCain or Obama's sex life with exception of McCain's service in Vietnam. My uncle was a WW11 Japanese p.o.w. I understand how you feel. Anyone who goes through that is a hero in my book.

Hoss;985948 wrote: Brilliant President? Bill Clinton? Not in my opinion. He was the worst president in the history of the US. He has no honor. Was he not your best economist?

valerie;985989 wrote: Whoa, whoa, whoa there chief, I believe I ASKED if it was you:

"Wasn't it you that said... " etc. etc. and if it wasn't, all it would take

was a "No, it wasn't me" not all the snark directed at me. I was trying

to be nice in any case, I guess I see that isn't the way to go with

you.

Forgive me for thinking it was you, I will apologize for that, but as for

the rest, I still think it would be a nice gesture if you met me half way. No hard feelings Valerie. I have done the same on another thread. Now i'm off to buy some peep toe red patent leather pumps with heels

Accountable;986112 wrote: :wah: I did win the lottery once Accountable. Not the full amount but a large win all the same.:p

I just got a pop up on my pc selling Sarah Palin action figure dolls.:wah: