Page 7 of 7

Gun Control On FG

Posted: Tue Jan 23, 2007 10:29 am
by valerie
Clancy;526973 wrote: I cannot say.



I wish to remain a neutral observer and not influence the results of this magnificent thread.

-

-

-

-

-

-



Oh, all right. You used to be morally cajolled by a madman who imagined he bombed a, Walmart.



....now you've replaced him with, pedantic, Sgt, Burger King.


:yh_rotfl :yh_rotfl :yh_rotfl :yh_rotfl



Now that's funny right thar I don't care who you are...

Gun Control On FG

Posted: Tue Jan 23, 2007 11:49 am
by Lulu2
If I agree or disagree with a poster, I'll say so, friend or not. It's not necessary to "call in supporters," is it?

I'll admit I'm a little puzzled by this from Spot: "OK, let's put this thread to bed perhaps." Is there a limit to the number of pages in a thread? Or is it not "permitted" to let topics stray? Or is it not "permitted" if they stray away from the position of the originator?

Gun Control On FG

Posted: Tue Jan 23, 2007 11:55 am
by Bill Sikes
Lulu2;527148 wrote: If I agree or disagree with a poster, I'll say so, friend or not. It's not necessary to "call in supporters," is it?

I'll admit I'm a little puzzled by this from Spot: "OK, let's put this thread to bed perhaps." Is there a limit to the number of pages in a thread? Or is it not "permitted" to let topics stray? Or is it not "permitted" if they stray away from the position of the originator?


I read that as "perhaps it's time to put a stop to the whining and bitching that's

going on.". Do you think that that would be a good thing?

Gun Control On FG

Posted: Tue Jan 23, 2007 11:58 am
by Lulu2
No, I didn't read it that way at all. Anyone who intends to stop "whining and bitching" can state that plainly enough. Unless, of course, they were part of the act?

Gun Control On FG

Posted: Tue Jan 23, 2007 12:02 pm
by Bill Sikes
Lulu2;527169 wrote: No, I didn't read it that way at all. Anyone who intends to stop "whining and bitching" can state that plainly enough. Unless, of course, they were part of the act?


Well, you could always try *asking* him, since it's what 'e wrote!

Personally, I do think that it would be a good idea if the whining and bitching

were to stop. Do you?

Gun Control On FG

Posted: Tue Jan 23, 2007 12:04 pm
by Bill Sikes
Diuretic;527178 wrote: That assumes a couple of things - responding to Bill this is.

1. That there's whining and bitching.

2. That there's someone with the authority to say there's whining and bitching and something needs to be done about it.


Who's talking about "someone with the authority to say there's whining and bitching and something needs to be done about it"? Not me :shrug:

Gun Control On FG

Posted: Tue Jan 23, 2007 12:19 pm
by devist8me
Novelty;527220 wrote: Would you like my home address so you can come and say this to my face?

or give me yours?


I nominate this the gayest post in this thread :D

Gun Control On FG

Posted: Tue Jan 23, 2007 12:23 pm
by koan
Novelty;527220 wrote: Would you like my home address so you can come and say this to my face?

or give me yours?


It's actually the funniest one, considering what started the thread.

But we love our Novelty... because he's a novelty and he's fun. :-4

eta: and he's got the right to express himself, damn it!

Gun Control On FG

Posted: Tue Jan 23, 2007 12:58 pm
by weeder
Novelty;527220 wrote: Would you like my home address so you can come and say this to my face?

or give me yours?


Before I can laugh, I need to be clear... Did you mean " Are you home in a dress? Or, would you like to dress at my home? Or, give me your face and Ill give you mine at home... or was it would you like it if I gave you my address where my face is.. I just want to be sure.

Gun Control On FG

Posted: Tue Jan 23, 2007 1:02 pm
by koan
I think he wants devist8's face. And if you've ever seen it, I don't blame him.

Gun Control On FG

Posted: Tue Jan 23, 2007 1:28 pm
by koan
Or "would you like me to confess" ?

Gun Control On FG

Posted: Wed Jan 24, 2007 2:57 am
by spot
Lulu2;527169 wrote: I'll admit I'm a little puzzled by this from Spot: "OK, let's put this thread to bed perhaps." Is there a limit to the number of pages in a thread? Or is it not "permitted" to let topics stray? Or is it not "permitted" if they stray away from the position of the originator?

[...]

No, I didn't read it that way at all. Anyone who intends to stop "whining and bitching" can state that plainly enough. Unless, of course, they were part of the act?


Nothing to do with permission. Just a suggestion that, sticking to the OP rather than picking fights, we try to sum up since we've all gone round the houses with discussion. That's why it was followed in the same post with a rather inadequate conclusion of my thoughts.