ForumGarden

Hold up...................here comes fuzzywuzzy.

(Bruv's sitting in the corner cross legged going oooohhhmmmmmmmmmmm)

AnneBoleyn;1444847 wrote: . I will not add to his viewing his own threads constantly to get his numbers up; I'm sure that can be checked in some way. Quote

I will submit to any test to show that I am not personally pushing those numbers up; I think being accused of that is just more of a witch hunt; either I have to admit to cheating and boosting up those numbers, by some technology that is amazing, or it will show that you have to admit that others are interested; a thought I know just sickens you.









Quote

I think he is a very sick man & you are wasting your generosity in defending him. He is an offensive individual, kind of like your neighbors who took advantage of your natural good will.

.




I have some sicknesses; Burcitess; arthritis; enlarged heart; memory lost. Thats it! I am sick in those areas; but

I have some strengths; I can see through transparent people who claim one thing, when really the issue is another. You are transparent, and I can see through you. I have no need whatsoever to belittle you or speak ill words about you; what you are doing, anyone with a small amount of discernment can see through.

You are your own revelation.

Bruv;1444854 wrote: Hold up...................here comes fuzzywuzzy.

(Bruv's sitting in the corner cross legged going oooohhhmmmmmmmmmmm)


And what's that supposed to mean? lol

Meh . If someone wants to sit on a forum and talk to themselves all the time who am I to complain.

I'm not a fan of his threads anyway I've seen all that kind of writing before and it bores me.

oscar;1444840 wrote: We don't expect to get along with everyone we meet In real life and this Is an online forum for people of all walks of life. Sometimes, we lose sight of that.

There are a few here I have little time for but I can say, I don't ' despise' anyone here.

My advice here to you would be that If this thread Is resurrected yet again In a few weeks time, then resist feeling you have to defend yourself all the time.

And my advice to Anne Is If you have a problem with anything Mikiel has posted then either report It so It can be discussed by Green members or take It to Bryn. What you are doing here Is forcing Mikiel to enter Into a conversation he doesn't want. Sorry but that IS bullying.


I understand, but I will continue as long as the thread does; it is an unusual experience, having such a thread against you.

It is insulting and invading;

And yet evidence that if I choose to challange certain doctrines and dogma, then I must expect all kinds of response;

here the response is just fueled by the rage of a woman, which just makes it more attractive.

AnneBoleyn;1444847 wrote: Mickiel has 13 Threads that he is actively pushing right now. .




Which one is a threat to you? Which one can you delete?

And what difference does it make how many things I have to say?

And explain to me why you think this thread of yours is not helping my threads to grow more?

Because I think it is.

Also explain to me what the main ingredient of growth to a thread is? And why you can't stop them from growing?

fuzzywuzzy;1444856 wrote: And what's that supposed to mean? lol

Meh . If someone wants to sit on a forum and talk to themselves all the time who am I to complain.

I'm not a fan of his threads anyway I've seen all that kind of writing before and it bores me.


I was just chilling

" If someone wants to sit on a forum and talk to themselves all the time who am I to complain."

On the contrary.

Take the first 3 threads of Mikiel's on the front page.

Archaelogy and The Bible.... 5,403 views

The Seduction of The Christian Mind....700 odd views

Is God Real.... 97,588 views

Even my thread on National Hunt Horse Racing 2,631 views

So I beg to differ.... these threads are not someone talking to themselves... they are reaching a far wider audience than just FG members.

oscar;1444861 wrote: Even my thread on National Hunt Horse Racing 2,631 views




OK I confess......at least two of them are mine..........I slipped up twice.

Dear Mickiel:

Yawn.

I have only one thing against you. One thing. You're dismissive of those who try to converse with you from the level they are at. You don't care where others are coming from. You only care about your endless dribble, directed only at yourself. You never just shut up and listen, it's just yackity yack don't talk back. :yh_ttth

You want others to :yh_worshp your words or you send them away :yh_bye You have no respect. You diss people who want to get to know you. This is a Public Forum for INTER-Action. IMO, of course.

AnneBoleyn;1444865 wrote: Dear Mickiel:

Yawn.


That's it......chill

Bruv;1444864 wrote: OK I confess......at least two of them are mine..........I slipped up twice.


:wah::wah::wah:

oscar;1444861 wrote: " If someone wants to sit on a forum and talk to themselves all the time who am I to complain."

On the contrary.

Take the first 3 threads of Mikiel's on the front page.

Archaelogy and The Bible.... 5,403 views

The Seduction of The Christian Mind....700 odd views

Is God Real.... 97,588 views

Even my thread on National Hunt Horse Racing 2,631 views

So I beg to differ.... these threads are not someone talking to themselves... they are reaching a far wider audience than just FG members.


Or one obsessive/compulsive constantly hitting refresh while sitting in his own thread.

Snooz;1444873 wrote: Or one obsessive/compulsive constantly hitting refresh while sitting in his own thread. Sorry about that.

oscar;1444861 wrote: " If someone wants to sit on a forum and talk to themselves all the time who am I to complain."

On the contrary.

Take the first 3 threads of Mikiel's on the front page.

Archaelogy and The Bible.... 5,403 views

The Seduction of The Christian Mind....700 odd views

Is God Real.... 97,588 views

Even my thread on National Hunt Horse Racing 2,631 views

So I beg to differ.... these threads are not someone talking to themselves... they are reaching a far wider audience than just FG members.


Okay how about .I don't give a ****!!!!!!

AnneBoleyn;1444865 wrote: Dear Mickiel:

Yawn.

I have only one thing against you. One thing. You're dismissive of those who try to converse with you from the level they are at. You don't care where others are coming from. You only care about your endless dribble, directed only at yourself. You never just shut up and listen, it's just yackity yack don't talk back. :yh_ttth

You want others to :yh_worshp your words or you send them away :yh_bye You have no respect. You diss people who want to get to know you. This is a Public Forum for INTER-Action. IMO, of course.


I don't ignore people or send them away until they start treating me similar to how you do. And I refuse to listen to others when they get to your level of conversation.

Its a level that is just not for me; so I don't even bother with it.

However, if they are respectful, I will endure them, even in disagreement; but your type has no respect; and what's worse, they don't even realize how they are.

oscar;1444861 wrote: "

So I beg to differ.... these threads are not someone talking to themselves... they are reaching a far wider audience than just FG members.


And this truth is what bugs certain people here; they don't like the fact that they are reaching a far wider audience; and its no different where else I post at; its always the same result.

And this is exactly why I have been banned in many places; the envy it envokes; the jealously; the anger; and its not just from the Atheist, its from the Christians as well.

And I am accustomed to it rearing its ugly head; and the many different approaches and persona's that head takes on in disguise.

Mickiel;1444945 wrote: I don't ignore people or send them away until they start treating me similar to how you do. And I refuse to listen to others when they get to your level of conversation.

Its a level that is just not for me; so I don't even bother with it.

However, if they are respectful, I will endure them, even in disagreement; but your type has no respect; and what's worse, they don't even realize how they are. I'd love to discuss my theory of god with you one day...You may be surprised at my beliefs.... perhaps we could do a thread one day ?

oscar;1444947 wrote: I'd love to discuss my theory of god with you one day.


Well this certainly is not the thread for that.

Mickiel;1444949 wrote: Well this certainly is not the thread for that. True...:wah:

Snooz;1444873 wrote: Or one obsessive/compulsive constantly hitting refresh while sitting in his own thread.




What's it feel like? Knowing that so many others are consistently showing attention and interest, in something that you don't like?

What's that feel like? I am so curious about how you feel when its absolutely nothing you can do about something??

AnneBoleyn;1444865 wrote: Dear Mickiel:

Yawn.

I have only one thing against you. One thing. You're dismissive of those who try to converse with you from the level they are at. You don't care where others are coming from. You only care about your endless dribble, directed only at yourself. You never just shut up and listen, it's just yackity yack don't talk back. :yh_ttth

You want others to :yh_worshp your words or you send them away :yh_bye You have no respect. You diss people who want to get to know you. This is a Public Forum for INTER-Action. IMO, of course.


I am going to do you a favor Anne, and make this one of your longest threads! I am going to make the very thing you hate, one of your greatest accomplishments here.

Mickiel;1444977 wrote: I am going to do you a favor Anne, and make this one of your longest threads! I am going to make the very thing you hate, one of your greatest accomplishments here.




Or am I mistaken, and its already your longest thread here?

The irony of that is of interest; speaking of interest; why has it garnered so much interest? Is it like you claim, and I am magically producing more views to a thread that even wants me banned? Or are you unable to see the interest in the thread, may be the person of persecution in the thread?

The irony of that tickles me. Here you want me banned, and it may be your most significant work here. The work which gives you the most attention.

oscar;1444951 wrote: True...:wah:


That may may your truth, doesn't follow it is the truth.

gmc;1444979 wrote: That may may your truth, doesn't follow it is the truth. Please translate

oscar;1444980 wrote: Please translate


You can't handle the truth

I vote that this thread be put where it belongs. In the Compost pile.

LarsMac;1444750 wrote: I do check in on him, now and again to see if he has said anything rational. Now we have the two of them arguing.

No big deal.

I basically scan the list of threads with updates, read the ones I am interested in and then hit the "Mark all threads as read" link.

Who knows? maybe they'll come up with something really interesting, soon. Maybe Pahu will join in and they can all have a good time.


Absolutely wonderful - the best suggestion I've heard yet

Snooz;1444767 wrote: We had a member here named Ted, I think it was, that was interested in discussing religion and *HE* I actually enjoyed. Very good writer, incredibly well read and intelligent. I hope this is him in another incarnation.


Ted was a highly respected member but this does not have the same feel. Sadly I think Ted's worsening eyesight forced him to drop posting.

oscar;1444796 wrote: Ted was Bryn's brother. Or Is Bryn's brother I should say.


:yh_rotfl:wah::yh_rotfl



I fear you've added two and two to reach seven

Bryn Mawr;1445013 wrote: :yh_rotfl:wah::yh_rotfl



I fear you've added two and two to reach seven whoops...

gmc;1444999 wrote: You can't handle the truth What ? That Alex Salmond Is a deluded wanker?

Mickiel;1444815 wrote: How can you claim I am harmless, when its obvious that I did great harm to her head; without even trying to;

I wonder what would happen if I tried to hurt her head; get into her consciousness and just hurt it?

But I am not like that; she is safe with me. I won't hurt her.

Or anyonelse; but I may hurt the concepts they believe in; now that is what you crossed swords with, and you want no more of;

and I understand that. I don't get into your threads, you don't get in mine; this is how it is simply done.



Peace. And Peace is possible.


That is not the concept of the Garden - we are a discussion forum, a member posts an idea and other members comment and post alternatives and then the OP either defends his position or concedes the point.

This is not a forum for individuals to post monologues!

oscar;1445014 wrote: whoops...


Spot is my brother and he refers to me as Ted - that this transmutes to Ted being my brother is hilarious :wah:

Bryn Mawr;1445019 wrote: Spot is my brother and he refers to me as Ted


Be fair, so do your assorted nephews and nieces. It's how you're going down in history.

Bryn Mawr;1445019 wrote: Spot is my brother and he refers to me as Ted - that this transmutes to Ted being my brother is hilarious :wah: Ahhh that may explain a certain members confusion when she told me years ago.

Bryn mawr is real he even has a town in wales named after him.

Brynmawr - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Týr;1445041 wrote: Be fair, so do your assorted nephews and nieces. It's how you're going down in history.


I prefer El Capitan!!

Bryn Mawr;1445017 wrote: That is not the concept of the Garden - we are a discussion forum, a member posts an idea and other members comment and post alternatives and then the OP either defends his position or concedes the point.

This is not a forum for individuals to post monologues!


You misunderstand my reasoning for stating that; if a member despises another member, then my suggestion was for them to avoid the one they dislike; don't read what the member has to say and they exist in peace and leave each other alone. I am all for dialog, but when a member starts expressing hatred and severe diislike for another member, then that is no longer a discussion;

unless you somehow think it still is???

And I have never posted a monologue here; I don't have any threads that are monologues, there are posters on every thread I have started. I admit to backing away from those posters who get off hand and unusual, but I discuss anything with anybody who at least remains reasonable.

But of course if you have found fault in any of my threads, I have not been made aware of it.

Mickiel;1445131 wrote: You misunderstand my reasoning for stating that; if a member despises another member, then my suggestion was for them to avoid the one they dislike; don't read what the member has to say and they exist in peace and leave each other alone. I am all for dialog, but when a member starts expressing hatred and severe diislike for another member, then that is no longer a discussion;

unless you somehow think it still is???

And I have never posted a monologue here; I don't have any threads that are monologues, there are posters on every thread I have started. I admit to backing away from those posters who get off hand and unusual, but I discuss anything with anybody who at least remains reasonable.

But of course if you have found fault in any of my threads, I have not been made aware of it.


perhaps you don't know what a monologue is

mon·o·logue also mon·o·log (mn-lôg, -lg)

n.

1.

a. A dramatic soliloquy.

b. A literary composition in the form of a soliloquy.

2. A continuous series of jokes or comic stories delivered by one comedian.

3. A long speech made by one person, often monopolizing a conversation.


You post questions and answer them yourself and take umbrage if anyone interrupts your little discussion with yourself and you seem to regard anyone who does not agree with you or tell you how wonderful you are as offhand and unusual and assume they are hostile in intent. Methinks you play the victim so often you believe you really are one. Mind you maybe a thread entitled ban mickiel feeds in to your victim mentality.

gmc;1445173 wrote: Mind you maybe a thread entitled ban mickiel feeds in to your victim mentality.


Now you tell me! My next thread will be titled Ban AnneBoleyn!!

gmc;1445173 wrote: perhaps you don't know what a monologue is



You post questions and answer them yourself and take umbrage if anyone interrupts your little discussion with yourself and you seem to regard anyone who does not agree with you or tell you how wonderful you are as offhand and unusual and assume they are hostile in intent. Methinks you play the victim so often you believe you really are one. Mind you maybe a thread entitled ban mickiel feeds in to your victim mentality.


Only the Atheist here think so; and not all of them. You see, I already know the root of it all; certain Atheist here want full rein of the site; full control; full dominance; but I stand in the way of that; I stand in the way of their desire to dominate the religious discussion section. And they don't like it.

And I understand why.

I am not a victim, I am a source they cannot control or defeat. So the next best things are to belittle or banish what you cannot manipulate.

Tolja he's nuts. That's fine, except he thinks he's the 'anointed one' when in reality he is the 'annoying one'.

AnneBoleyn;1445206 wrote: Tolja he's nuts. That's fine, except he thinks he's the 'anointed one' when in reality he is the 'annoying one'.


Explain why I get the views; why are people outside and inside of this site reading what I have to say? Explain that to YOUR listeners; then why can't you stop my listeners from listening to a nut?

Mickiel;1445209 wrote: Explain why I get the views; why are people outside and inside of this site reading what I have to say? Explain that to YOUR listeners; then why can't you stop my listeners from listening to a nut?


There is power in attraction;

don't forget that. And I am going to make your thread grow more and more; a gift to you;

you just watch me do what you could not.

Grow thread grow!

Let her frustration become her greatest work here.

Mickiel;1445209 wrote: Explain why I get the views; why are people outside and inside of this site reading what I have to say? Explain that to YOUR listeners; then why can't you stop my listeners from listening to a nut?


Because it's hilarious!

Bruv has a bemused grin from ear to ear...........it could be from here to there.......but no.

Mickiel;1445209 wrote: Explain why I get the views; why are people outside and inside of this site reading what I have to say? Explain that to YOUR listeners; then why can't you stop my listeners from listening to a nut?


I often wonder the same when I hear how many people listen to Rush Limbaugh

I think it's the fascination we all feel for the absurd, the sense of disbelief and wonder that anyone can be daft enough to take nonsense seriously.

and on the eighth day god looked at what he had made and realised that with reason and compassion man would live together in harmony with one another and that would be pretty boring so he created religion and removed the ability to reason from some so that man would never know peace and tranquility for some idiot would always bring out the great sword of faith and create havoc wherever tolerance and understanding raised it's head for verily the lord god has a wicked sense of humour and only the truly chosen would ever be able to appreciate the irony of the destruction done in his name and they would not believe in him - irony piled on irony - for life is a joke and we do not know the punchline.

Is that from Genesis?