Maylasia MH370: Shot down by USA.

High Threshold · Post by **High Threshold** » Thu Dec 25, 2014 12:24 pm

FG;1470181 wrote: I have taken exception to your making things up and then challenging people to show it's not true. I had enough of that in years gone by, it may be the most aggravating thing any poster can do to another, and you've done it twice in this thread.

Oh! For F sake give it a rest. If you are so worried about who takes me seriously - and under what circumstances - then don't bother yourself. You have my permission.

FG-administator · Post by **FG-administator** » Thu Dec 25, 2014 12:34 pm

High Threshold;1470182 wrote: Oh! For F sake give it a rest. If you are so worried about who takes me seriously - and under what circumstances - then don't bother yourself. You have my permission.

I was speaking solely for myself.

G#Gill · Post by **G#Gill** » Thu Dec 25, 2014 1:02 pm

Seconds out, third round !

High Threshold · Post by **High Threshold** » Thu Dec 25, 2014 1:28 pm

FG;1470183 wrote: I was speaking solely for myself.

We are just two men facing one another, right? Don't know about you but I have no ego on the board, no face to lose. That also means that I can continue to contribute to FG – or simply saunter off on my merry way. I have two, rather mild issues here both of which I could quite easily let pass like water under the bridge. These can however, develop into something else if you are determined to dog me. It's all up to you. I have to say very honestly that I find this so silly that I need some strength to mention it ONE-MORE-TIME. What a waste!

1). I did not “make things up - you have accused me falsely. But you will have to come to that realization on your own because I have no interest in going on and on and on about it. So don't even think of asking me again. Believe what you like. I don't give a stuff.

2). I have what is called a “sense of humour. I like to think that it is well-developed. Those who see it ¦. great! Those who don't can ask for clarification or just make their own conclusions and sulk over it. I am not in the habit of switching off my personality just for the benefit of people who never developed a sense of humour themselves. Sorry, but that's the way it is. One hell of a nut, ain't it.

You know yourself better than I. So let me ask you a serious question. Yes-yes! A SERIOUS question. If you insist on continuing this badgering behaviour would you advise then I just ignore you and make no reply? I remind you that I am who I am. There will be no discussion on that point.

One last thing. You say now that you are only speaking for yourself on the issue of “taking me seriously or the difficulty in knowing whether one should or should not. That's good news. I thank you for that.

Are we finished now?

Post by **LarsMac** » Thu Dec 25, 2014 6:11 pm

Good advice:

Fuzzy · Post by **Fuzzy** » Thu Dec 25, 2014 6:48 pm

LarsMac;1470199 wrote: Good advice:

Hmmm....There's something in that for all of us.

FG-administator · Post by **FG-administator** » Fri Dec 26, 2014 4:49 am

Fuzzy;1470201 wrote: Hmmm....There's something in that for all of us.

I don't have FlashPlayer installed on this operating system. I tend to communicate with words.

I'd imagine there are more zero-day security vulnerabilities inside FlashPlayer than in the rest of my operating environment combined. It is, after all, an Adobe product. Adobe Reader suffers the same problem.

Besides which I have trouble enough avoiding commercial preference tracking systems with my browser, without letting FlashPlayer into the equation. My browser gives me fairly predictable add-on blocking options. I have seen the way FlashPlayer handles user preferences and it's both singularly unconvincing and temporary.