ForumGarden

Clancy;705773 wrote: They can be copy/pasted ...but isn't that more your style, and trying to breech other forums? But, more than likely, others will want to see for themselves how you are outwith Forum Garden If I'm asked I'll pass on the links privately

......you do know the meaning of privacy? I'm asking! And for a link rather than a copy/paste! I don't believe there's such a post!

Clancy;705779 wrote: Just a thought....

What if I'd typed folically selective instead of bald ....?

Is that considered an offence under the infraction code ?


I'm gonna have to remember that one. That's hilarious. :wah:

Clancy;705778 wrote: Let me see if I've got this correctly.

You insinuate that I'm having a cyber affair with a friend.....

You give me an infraction (which I've still to read up on......

Now your calling me a liar? That's hardly cricket is it? Then If I was to post a link where you're implying I was having a cyber affair.....I'd collect another infraction for posting a link to another board.....you know the way you yourself used to do? You do know, I suspect, that (a) you haven't got an infraction, that (b) I didn't give it to you anyway - the one you didn't get - and that (c) there's a PM from me all about the infraction you haven't got sat in your inbox.

What I showed you is the google results of your name on both sites you mentioned. Anyone can repeat them. You don't appear. I have no recollection of mentioning you on Caged Rage. Your request that I "remove your posts in Caged Rage where you have traduced my name You implied openly I was some kind of fancy-boy to a female member in there" is meaningless, you're frothing at the mouth. I've asked you to show me a link to whatever you're talking about, and I say it believing you can't. Is that calling you a liar or what? I'm hesitant to use the word, you always display some measure of wrath when people do that.

Clancy;705785 wrote: Ok, If I send the link to you by PM .....does that mean an infraction, for me I mean?

If I do send it ....given you weren't over there wiping it away, what happens then?


There's no such post as you describe anywhere on Caged Rage - I know that, I've been and looked. If you have one then by all means let's see a link here. Or in a PM if you feel happier about that.

No such post, that's the point. You're going out on a limb because you think you're amusing people but the backing-off will give it away.

Since it's so obvious that you can't actually produce a link to any post on Caged Rage which matches your claim that I insinuate you're "having a cyber affair with a friend", let me help you. I've never made any such assertion anywhere, I've never thought it was true, I've never heard it as a rumour from anyone, I've heard it directly from the horse's mouth that it never happened, I've never seen it hinted at other than when you've raised the matter yourself. Now, if you can actually show that I've said any different to that, anywhere at all, then post something into the thread here so we can all go and have a look at it.

You turn up here looking for a fight, Clancy. It's all you ever post for. Who, frankly, cares?

You've even hiacked poor val's thread just when it was getting interesting.

eta: 02:57 AM Guest Viewing Thread You are subscribed to this thread Hindu symbolism or not

Mozilla/4.0 (compatible; MSIE 6.0; Windows NT 5.1; MSN 6.1; MSNbMSFT; MSNmen-us; MSNcIA) - Hah! I recognise that one! Hiya Snooze! And these people claim they're not being orchestrated. Oh dear oh dear oh dear oh dear.

Clancy;705800 wrote: I found it ! Took ages, I couldn't use the search engine, as I'm not a member.

Would you like it sent by PM ? The reason I'm asking is, you've mentioned a few names.

...but I' have to ask, who's the idiot from Yorkshire in Forum Garden your refering to? Is it Six? (Sixyearsleft) ?


Do, please, PM me the link if the post mentions that fruitloop, but it still most certainly doesn't say what you've claimed it says.

Clancy;705803 wrote: http://caged-rage.com/index.php/topic,8 ... l#msg16258

I think it's Reply 357 ?Oh... THAT post! I thought you were talking about the other one!

"Clancy used to be Mimi's fancyboy as far as I can tell" - you think that implies you were having a cyber affair, do you? No, miles short Clancy. fancyboy describes it far better don't you think? I had a long description one evening and nothing resembling a cyber affair was mentioned. Just to be hideously specific, "Mimi's fancyboy" means exactly what it says - the "boy" that "Mimi" fancied. How accurate can a description get?

An anonymous but insignificant goad had crawled onto Caged Rage and I played guess-who with her. You were my guess number four but truly, I wasn't much interested in the answer by then.

Clancy;705811 wrote: Who's five? ....the one you quite respect?

....the sixth who wouldn't forgive you is ?


Well, you know they're not me or Spanky Franky or that bewildered fruitloop Six or Nomad or you, and you know they're male and on FG, so who does that leave? I don't think there are any other clues going apart from those.

Clancy;705813 wrote: Wouldn't you agree that on the basis of what we've seen....

That "You" talk about people quite openly? Yet you blew a gasket after breaking into a private area and cited everyone as malcontents .....and still are using that term with gay abandon?

Wouldn't it be fair to say that's being a hypocrite?


You have your history entirely confused.

Allow me to nail your head to the nearest mast so you'll be seeing straight in the morning. Nobody at any time broke into any private area. That poison-spider lady cop was sending reams of material out from a private area and Nomad chose to publicize the backbiting that was involved by making it clear that this was happening. A lot of people laughed at the explosion. Cya is what's left of the mayhem that ensued. God only knows what stone the spider crawled under afterwards. At least nobody accused her of taking steroids before winning three golds at Sydney so there are people in worse straits.

How does that have anything to do with talking about people quite freely? Where's the hypocrisy? Try to focus your mind and explain your position.

Clancy;705815 wrote: IMy memory might be a bit hazy at this time in the morning, but, wasn't he a friend of yours? That really is bewildered. Not in a month of Sundays, no. "Was he still a member here at that time?" You'd have to check, he went through four different logins that year and asked for each in turn to be deleted.

Clancy wrote: You on the other hand can't admit to playing mind games with people. Can't? Where does can't come from? I play mind games with people. That was easy, wasn't it. You know it, I know it, everyone posting knows it. It's an expression with negative connotations I'm unaware of? What else is conversation if it's not mind games, more particularly in a written medium. You showing up this evening wasn't a mind game? If you don't know, go back to She Who Must Be Obeyed and get advice.

He started it!

Clancy;705848 wrote: .....what does owned mean ? You're such a prat, Clancy. All those quotes are accurate statements.

I'd far rather have even an off-topic post from Clancy than I would

on topic from anyone else. I consider him a man among men

and you spot aren't fit to wipe his boots. JMHO, of course. Accuse

he and I of a cyber affair. I'd love it.



Where did I criticize you spot? The fact is, I didn't. Poor baby, you.

Can't control The Val like you want. You're never going to be able to,

I'll tell you that right now. I'm far too strong and intelligent (no

matter how ignorant you call me) a person to let you do it.



More personal feelings... you are without question the worst personality

I've ever come across on the internet. Zero warmth. Oh, I'll grant

you that you did exhibit some at one point long ago. But your daily

modus operendi has far surpassed that in my view. See, it's kinda

like that symbol that got this whole thread started off. And the pig in

the frock again. I won't go search to find evidence of your warmth,

lest I face more accusations.



And speaking of a search... you know, spot, something in your brain

must have recognized my "paraphrase" yes indeedy. Why wouldn't

you just take it as something new I said for the first time? I wonder.



Calling someone who lies and obfuscates and spreads insulting names

around like cupcake sprinkles a MODERATOR is a joke. Calling FG'ers

ignorant, attacking members who are no longer here to defend

themselves... please. And yet you are allowed to run rampant.

Someone else is banned for being "disruptive" by bringing former

users names in and you aren't.



Have fun with it old man as I'm sure you do.



Here's a query for ya: If you were so all fired confident in your

precious Hindu symbolism why remove it? When I started this thread

why didn't you say sorry you are offended? Before you jump all over

me (EEEW!) yes I DO recall, you were trying to be REASONABLE.

GAG you probably want me to come grovelling and bestow multiple

kisses and thank yous. Your ego bruised a teense because I love

and respect Clancy and care not a whit for you? Well hie yourself

to the psychiatrist, it would do you some good, I'm sure.

valerie;706375 wrote: I'd far rather have even an off-topic post from Clancy than I would

on topic from anyone else.Then he took his own dear wife

and sat her on his knee

saying "who do you like the best of us,

your dead Matty Groves or me?"

And then spoke up his own dear wife,

never heard her speak so free

"I'd rather a kiss from dead Matty's lips,

than you or your finery"

And then Lord Arnold he jumped up,

Right loudly did he bawl.

He struck his wife right through the heart

and pinned her up to the wall.

"A grave, a grave", Lord Arnold cried

"to put these lovers in -

But bury my lady at the top

for she was of noble kin".

valerie;706375 wrote:

Here's a query for ya: If you were so all fired confident in your

precious Hindu symbolism why remove it?


Probably to give the benefit of the doubt to the cerebrally challenged, such as yourself.

And, val, it makes no sense to ride a high horse if it has a broken leg.

laneybug;706492 wrote: Probably to give the benefit of the doubt to the cerebrally challenged, such as yourself.

And, val, it makes no sense to ride a high horse if it has a broken leg.


With a comment like that the only one I see as cerebrally challenged is your self.

From what I have seen of Valerie she is a person with high integrity.

Some posting is this thread have shown no integrity at all and have values lower than that of a normal human being.

Victor Meldrew;706539 wrote: Some posting is this thread have shown no integrity at all and have values lower than that of a normal human being.You have to bear in mind that I'm without question the worst personality you'll ever come across on the internet and I have zero warmth, Victor, so I set a shocking example to the newcomers.

Victor Meldrew;706539 wrote: With a comment like that the only one I see as cerebrally challenged is your self.

From what I have seen of Valerie she is a person with high integrity.

Some posting is this thread have shown no integrity at all and have values lower than that of a normal human being.


Victor, get your head out of the sand and have a look around. I don't throw digs at people who haven't earned it. Am I lowering myself? You can call it that, if you like. Though, I think it's much more productive to say it than pussyfoot around and play like good boys and girls. I'm not into politically correct nonsense.

I'm not calling into question integrity. I'm calling into question intelligence. Big difference.

"Values lower than a normal human being?" Nice of you to develop the classification of what a normal human being is. Please, enlighten us, so that we can all be "normal." I'd have to pass on that, though, if your idea of normalcy is some of the BS that's been posted here.

To anyone concerned:

Yes, I'm stubborn. Yes, I'm assertive. Yes, I'm going to say exactly what I think. And, no, I don't care much if it hurts your "feelings." The world is already overrun with people who use their emotions versus their logic. And look where it gets us.

Case in point: Someone getting all huffy about a freaking Hindu swastika because their "feelings" say it isn't right because it looks similar to the Nazi swastika. Where's the logic there? Where are the facts? Where is the intellect?

If Valerie has an issue with spot's signature, than she has an issue with thousands of years of positive culture and tradition. Like I said, where is the logic there?

Laneyb

No your " immature"

Patsy