ForumGarden

Shweet tatersalad;468000 wrote: Hey some one tell me how close i came too being Beheaded!

That would be way cool,Wait,do still get a condom?:p
:yh_rotfl :yh_rotfl

Accountable;468004 wrote: :yh_rotfl :yh_rotfl


Glad you liked that,I was trying capture the era of the state of mind this follows.

Accountable;467992 wrote: :yh_rotfl



Wearing your terrycloth judge's robe, are ya?


Are you suggesting a new way of forum life where, despite the fact that all posts are available for review, a person can accuse others of crimes and not be able to produce examples?

It's not like we need to rely on memory or eyewitnesses.

If he could write an essay on how wrongly he'd been treated he could surely produce a link to the crime. Robes are not required when there simply isn't a case.

SnoozeControl;468014 wrote: Oh! I've got one more comment.

Please don't make any more wavs/mp3s of your singing, Koan. I beg you.


Please don't listen to them anymore.

SnoozeControl;468013 wrote: I think I need to get off line now... my 'mental masturbation' remark was completely wasted.


That was funny,awfull big words for third grade level fight this is.

But it was not unread.

SnoozeControl;468014 wrote: Oh! I've got one more comment.

Please don't make any more wavs/mp3s of your singing, Koan. I beg you.


I liked his version of "Jail house rock":guitarist

koan;468011 wrote: Are you suggesting a new way of forum life where, despite the fact that all posts are available for review, a person can accuse others of crimes and not be able to produce examples?



It's not like we need to rely on memory or eyewitnesses.



If he could write an essay on how wrongly he'd been treated he could surely produce a link to the crime. Robes are not required when there simply isn't a case.
What crime are you on about? What case are you referring to? What world are you living in?



Enquiring minds couldn't care less.

Accountable;468020 wrote: What crime are you on about? What case are you referring to? What world are you living in?



Enquiring minds couldn't care less.


No wonder this thread struggles. You have to follow it, Accountable.

Shweet clearly stated that he was personally attacked.

SnoozeControl;468013 wrote: I think I need to get off line now... my 'mental masturbation' remark was completely wasted. :oAs, perhaps, is its author just at the moment.

Why do certain threads have to turn personal, it's a shame.

abbey;468030 wrote: Why do certain threads have to turn personal, it's a shame.


especially when they could be reading my prize winning entry on pinkibits thread, abbey

abbey;468030 wrote: Why do certain threads have to turn personal, it's a shame.


Well Abbs

Weren't we just about due for another FG 'situation'?

I must admit

I'm enjoying reading all the insulting

since none of it is directed towards me :p

cherandbuster;468036 wrote: since none of it is directed towards me :pBat-loving daughter of the night, begone!

cherandbuster;468036 wrote: Well Abbs



Weren't we just about due for another FG 'situation'?



I must admit



I'm enjoying reading all the insulting



since none of it is directed towards me :pYou..you..you....Buster loving harlot. :-4

abbey;468043 wrote: You..you..you....Buster loving harlot. :-4


Why thank you very much!

abbey;468030 wrote: Why do certain threads have to turn personal, it's a shame.
Yeh, but it's okay when they start personal, right?

Accountable;468052 wrote: Yeh, but it's okay when they start personal, right?


Ahhh

Acc: 1, Koan: 0

Accountable;468052 wrote: Yeh, but it's okay when they start personal, right?
I did'nt specify any one poster Acc.

SnoozeControl;468057 wrote: I'm off to get wasted, have fun gang.


Wish I was there to share a few with you, Snoozie

Enjoy the journey as much as the destination :guitarist

SnoozeControl;468057 wrote: As someone said fairly recently, if you don't like a thread, there's nothing forcing you to read or post in it.It's probably incumbent on the OP to keep an eye on it and bring it back to the topic as far as possible, don't you think? I've not said much here, I'm an innocent bystander gawping at the carnage as more and more idiots pile into the back of the wreck in front.

abbey;468055 wrote: I did'nt specify any one poster Acc.
:yh_hugs I know

spot;468063 wrote: as more and more idiots pile into the back of the wreck in front.


Oh well

I guess I was just called an idiot by Spot

But I've been called worse by better :p

cherandbuster;468054 wrote: Ahhh

Acc: 1, Koan: 0


May it remain Koan: 0

The OP was due to a hijacking of the original thread by one presumably lunatic member who claims there is no such thing as HIV. The only possible way to address the original thread was to remove it to a new location.

koan;468071 wrote: May it remain Koan: 0



The OP was due to a hijacking of the original thread by one presumably lunatic member who claims there is no such thing as HIV. The only possible way to address the original thread was to remove it to a new location.
and infinite ways of starting it off right, right?

koan;468071 wrote: May it remain Koan: 0

The OP was due to a hijacking of the original thread by one presumably lunatic member who claims there is no such thing as HIV.


Koan

Did someone actually claim there is no such thing as HIV?

Because if that is true, the word 'lunatic' may have been a most appropriate choice of words :-6

Hi Cher welcome too the crazy train.:driving:

Accountable;468075 wrote: and infinite ways of starting it off right, right?And it was done with such grace and artistry that the witnesses awarded the driver both ears and the tail - but I digress.

Shweet tatersalad;468079 wrote: Hi Cher welcome too the crazy train.:driving:


Hiya my friend Shweet

Nothing like a good FG disagreement to get the blood flowing, eh? :-6

cherandbuster;468077 wrote: Koan

Did someone actually claim there is no such thing as HIV?Not entirely. http://www.forumgarden.com/forums/showp ... stcount=13 is the first of the rather warped views refered to.

Seems like a dumb reason too fight but I got lots of people lining behind me and We are having a good Ole domestic dispute here.

There are no fights like family fights dureing the holidays.

spot;468082 wrote: Not entirely. http://www.forumgarden.com/forums/showp ... stcount=13 is the first of the rather warped views refered to.


Thank you Spot

At least it was done by a member of whom I have no opinion

That is

Until he made that ignorant statement :-6

spot;468082 wrote: Not entirely. http://www.forumgarden.com/forums/showp ... stcount=13 is the first of the rather warped views refered to.


So your going too take the post of some one wirth onlt 5 posts and hold it as the holy grail.?

Shweet tatersalad;468090 wrote: So your going too take the post of some one wirth onlt 5 posts and hold it as the holy grail.?


Right on Shweet! :guitarist

Accountable;468075 wrote: and infinite ways of starting it off right, right?


You may disapprove of my writing style without affecting what the intentions were. Since you do not deny that you said the bits quoted then I have no idea what your problem is Accountable. Stand and defend. By all means.

cherandbuster;468085 wrote: Thank you Spot

At least it was done by a member of whom I have no opinion

That is

Until he made that ignorant statement :-6


It's a she. I made the mistake of checking out her homepage.

But the reason we are here now in this thread is so that we don't need to discuss her and can focus on the other ideas expressed in the original.

Shweet tatersalad;468090 wrote: So your going too take the post of some one wirth onlt 5 posts and hold it as the holy grail.?"The OP was due to a hijacking of the original thread by one presumably lunatic member who claims there is no such thing as HIV". The new thread was to distance this discussion from that context, not to support the 5-poster's authority.

koan;466366 wrote: MEMBERS OF ONLINE FORUM FIND SOLUTION TO CRIME

Shocking the sociological world, a small group from an online forum have managed to find the solution to both crime and the gay problem. Realizing that sex in jail helps spread AIDS through this undesirable community, they stumbled upon the solution that denying the prisoners condoms would help kill off the scourge of society. Though some might think the method of elimination cruel and unusual, aside from taking a potentially long time, they have thought it through carefully and realize that the longer it takes the criminals to die the larger the number of other undesirable people that will be killed along with them. It's a win-win scenario.

Realizing that some might find the solution unpalatable, Shweet replies that it is a good way to "thin the heard [sic] a little bit." When pointed out that this method might end up victimizing innocent people once the prisoners are released he had the incredibly valid point that "Perhaps you don't go too [sic] prison in the first place." It is this type of hard line reasoning that makes this solution so brilliant. Criminologists are dumbstruck that they didn't think of it themselves. "I'm with you on this one, Shweet" says Accountable, quick to realize the brilliance of the solution. The resident police official helpfully clarified that "sexual activity is an offense" and worried that "handing out condoms would appear to condone it". Flying in the face of prevention theory, this clever group has considered every aspect and the prison staff are quite excited. As to the men that are forcibly raped inside the jails, 911 offers "Oh, well..."


You maen this one? It seems a little full of sarcasism.

Doesanyone else see this or am I just not edjewcated enuff too understane the premiss.

koan;468095 wrote: You may disapprove of my writing style without affecting what the intentions were.Oh I think the intentions are quite clear indeed! Your writing style is impeccable and your message plain. koan wrote: Since you do not deny that you said the bits quoted then I have no idea what your problem is Accountable.Problem?koan wrote: Stand and defend. By all means.Defend what? I thought you didn't attack anyone.





:yh_think

koan;468096 wrote: But the reason we are here now in this thread is so that we don't need to discuss her and can focus on the other ideas expressed in the original.:wah: That's rich. Exactly what ideas were expressed in your OP, Koan?

Accountable;468101 wrote: Oh I think the intentions are quite clear indeed!
Yes. To restore the original discussion of a side tracked thread. Anyone who followed the link to the original should have been able to determine that quite clearly, I agree.



Your writing style is impeccable and your message plain.
*blush* why thank you.

Problem?Defend what? I thought you didn't attack anyone.




You've forgotten where you are? A discussion forum...where we present ideas then defend them or retract.

sheesh

Shweet tatersalad;468098 wrote: You maen this one? It seems a little full of sarcasism.

Doesanyone else see this or am I just not edjewcated enuff too understane the premiss.Do you feel it's not an accurate summary of what had been said? It carries quotes, it tells it the way it was, it leaves out the 5-poster's twaddle and it comments mocking on the moral bankruptcy of the participants.

Accountable;468103 wrote: :wah: That's rich. Exactly what ideas were expressed in your OP, Koan?


stop. think. (it works much better that way)

a few posters expressed the idea that the spread of AIDS among prisoners is a good thing. The OP bringing those opinions (ideas) forward for discussion. Go from A to B. There is no A1/2

koan;468107 wrote: stop. think. (it works much better that way)

a few posters expressed the idea that the spread of AIDS among prisoners is a good thing. The OP bringing those opinions (ideas) forward for discussion. Go from A to B. There is no A1/2


Oh I got it,But you ment no harm or too offend anyone.Right.?

I most certainly mean to challenge the opinions of those quoted. That is part of the function of forums. Two people. Two ideas. Discuss.

Unfortunately that is proving impossible. Why someone would post something then get upset when their post is pointed out....please, tell me. I've failed to understand why you would find your own ideas offensive.

koan;468118 wrote: I most certainly mean to challenge the opinions of those quoted. That is part of the function of forums. Two people. Two ideas. Discuss.



Unfortunately that is proving impossible. Why someone would post something then get upset when their post is pointed out....please, tell me. I've failed to understand why you would find your own ideas offensive.
Not the ideas, just the disrespect and disdain you showed. I know it's hard for you to understand pride and dignity, being such foreign concepts, so just move on.