ForumGarden

flopstock wrote: Ya know, folks can have a different take on things and not be a sh*t stirrer. You and everyone else is allowed to have a different take on things and not be called a sh*t stirrer, why can't she? Is her only other option to sit quietly when she disagrees?



I don't think that's good for anyone, myself.




I dont know if shes a **** stirrer but she did say an awfully stupid thing. Thats just my take though.

Nomad wrote: Oh my God ! I know your not stupid. So why do you keep saying stupid things ?
SnoozeControl wrote: Gee, cuz maybe she's a ... SH*T STIRRER!?!:rolleyes:


Personally, I think these two comments are **** stirring.

Not what Koan said.

Why this constant need to pick? I thought you were both better than this?

Why can't you play nice.

Nomad wrote: I dont know if shes a **** stirrer but she did say an awfully stupid thing. Thats just my take though.


I said an informed thing. Which makes your thing stupid.

koan wrote: I said an informed thing. Which makes your thing stupid.


Well ok then.































But my thing is way better than your thing !:p

flopstock wrote: And you're certainly entitled to your 'take'. I didn't read what she said as stupid, however. Nor did I read it as shitstirring. I read it as an attempt to clarify something.



Personally I would have preferred you respond intelligently to her post, argue the facts or merits of it... but like I said sweetie, you are entitled to your 'take'.



I wish I were able to just numbly agree with those of you I like alot, everytime you say something. I can't. And I think that is one of the reasons I like and respect about you, so much. You don't expect or want me too.




You know foop Ive tried very hard since Ive been here to (aside from my Nomad antics) be positive and loving and just all around decent ya know ? But sometimes ya just gotta say f*u*c*k it.

You called me baby :-4 thats very arousing :sneaky:

Nomad wrote: Well ok then.































But my thing is way better than your thing !:p


I see it more like this: ( if the gif works)

Attached files

koan wrote: I see it more like this: ( if the gif works)




No, its not like that. Im not as bad as you think and I dont think your the spawn of satan

thats a good start

we should have cyber sex and just start fresh ya know ?

If cyber sex is your game you might want to invest in one of these:

http://www.fu-fme.com/index.html

koan wrote: If cyber sex is your game you might want to invest in one of these:



http://www.fu-fme.com/index.html
How on earth did you come across that link? :-2

A 'No' uttered from the deepest conviction is better than a 'Yes' merely uttered to please, or worse, to avoid trouble.

Is that your sig or your answer ?

abbey wrote: How on earth did you come across that link? :-2


I have a good memory for things I've found on the net.

Nomad wrote: A 'No' uttered from the deepest conviction is better than a 'Yes' merely uttered to please, or worse, to avoid trouble.

Is that your sig or your answer ?


Just about sums it up.

Nomad wrote: No, its not like that. Im not as bad as you think and I dont think your the spawn of satan

thats a good start

we should have cyber sex and just start fresh ya know ?


:wah:

*shakes head*

Nomad Nomad Nomad.

koan wrote: Just about sums it up.




well ok then

no soup for you

Shucks folks, relax. She'll be back. She knows this thread exists and knows she has a big circle of friends waiting for her.

I don't have near the friends and I keep coming back

devist8me wrote: Shucks folks, relax. She'll be back. She knows this thread exists and knows she has a big circle of friends waiting for her.



I don't have near the friends and I keep coming back




Is this some kind of veiled threat ?

Nomad wrote: well ok then

no soup for you


S'ok

I prefer something a little more solid

This thread turned into a Nomad pick up thread.....:wah:

Nomad, that's what the pub is for.

MoreThanALover wrote: This thread turned into a Nomad pick up thread.....:wah:

Nomad, that's what the pub is for.


I never go in that place. I dont like it in there.

Nomad wrote: I never go in that place. I dont like it in there.


I won't push the subject any further.:yh_angel

Nomad wrote: Is this some kind of veiled threat ?


More like a promise. There are some of you I just can't stay away from

Wow, I go away for a few days & come back to this mess! What the hell is going on now! Val don't you dare not come back to the Garden, ya hear, or else!!! There is "no one" (especially nubies & or trolls, or you know who) in here that is worth you leaving for because they were out of line. You're better than that, so take a step back, & take some time for yourself to be refreshed. You're not a "quitter", now don't make a liar out of me, come back when you're ready! (So are you ready yet? )

We (I) miss you in here!!!

Nomad wrote: I never go in that place. I dont like it in there.




You never used to think that! :sneaky:

Pinky wrote: He's scared he might get perved on by us girlies!!!:D


The only one I would fear, is little mrs. hammy.:yh_giggle

You didn't hear it from me.

Mom fell alseep and we were watching a movie...now i am lonely :rolleyes:

AussiePam wrote: G'day Fisher!! Nice to meet you. Lemme get you a cold tinnie (beer in Oz!) - put some colour in those green Canadian cheeks. Felinessa - its a bit after 10pm here and Friday. Why am I in here and not out on the town???? Hey, that's a good question... the night is yet young!!!!! If I sneak out quietly, Chris won't see me and worry that I'll be up to no good. :sneaky:
Nice to meet you as well Pam. I'd love a cold beer, I had a few this weekend.We had our annual labor day camping weekend. Now I must recover.

Hamster wrote: Say what???? Its me who should fear you missy!!! :wah:


What are you talkin 'bout hammy? Oh, you want me to sing another song for you??

Clancy wrote: You have to be totally impartial, and be seen to be impartial, Chris, if it's a friend, foe, buddy, acquaintance, spouse , whatever. You have to remain impartial.


What about the idea that someone - I think it was Flops - had, to use anonymous moderators, limited in their power and length of service, rotating among a group of people? The board owner(s?) would set the criteria for being in the moderating pool. Nobody on the boards would know who has the hammer this week; impartiality would therefore be much easier to attain. The "and be seen to be impartial" caveat would not obtain, because the moderators would not be seen as such at all.

Perhaps another addition to that set of rules would be that if a moderator bragged of his or her status, the resulting consequence would be removal of that person from the pool of potential moderators.