In Defense of ChiptBeef

Accountable · Post by **Accountable** » Tue Jan 17, 2006 7:50 pm

orpheus wrote: Ok,

I wasn't going to get involved but I think (hope) my input will be welcome.

Accountable, you appear to have a problem with chiptbeef and his threads/posts even to the extent that you opened a thread about one of his comments.

http://www.forumgarden.com/forums/showt ... hp?t=11837

it was about us not being indigenous, now, I admit I didn't read his original thread, but replied to your thread (the thread above).

Now to be honest I don't think on the face of what you said on your thread his comment/theory merited the reaction of a thread, started in what looks like the hope of getting a 'angry mob' together.

instead of reading everything he says, just ignore it, this forum is fairly huge, if you see a thread by him don't get drawn into it, as, from what I see, a simple thread about us being indigenous to this planet upsets you so much.

now I am not taking sides,

I am just saying that if you think he posts such piffle, why start another thread about it?

sorry if i have trod on any toes......I didn't mean to i was just making a observation.:wah: Apparently you didn't read the thread you referenced, either. That was a response to Moverguy.

ChiptBeef · Post by **ChiptBeef** » Tue Jan 17, 2006 7:52 pm

Raven wrote: I SAAAAAAAAID England had already banned slavery EXCEPT in their colonies!!!
But the geneological and fiscal / commercial ties between slavery, "the world's greatest slave trader"[England] and The Middle Passage still exist. That was the beginning of the scurge of slavery that infested our country.

Note: Link to source provided in previous post.

ChiptBeef · Post by **ChiptBeef** » Tue Jan 17, 2006 7:55 pm

Jives wrote: Now, how about taking these nice people's advice and hanging around some fun, fluffy, light threads for a while?:D
How's that "ignore list" working for you?

ChiptBeef · Post by **ChiptBeef** » Tue Jan 17, 2006 8:02 pm

Never. I always send my cat in first. :guitarist

ChiptBeef · Post by **ChiptBeef** » Tue Jan 17, 2006 8:21 pm

The thread was started in my defense, so let me give myself a...

BUMP, BUMP, BUMP!!!! :-6 (boy, this is fun... look I'm having fun!!)

ChiptBeef · Post by **ChiptBeef** » Tue Jan 17, 2006 8:56 pm

Far Rider wrote: see we knew you could do it! now doesnt that feel better?
There is a lighter side to chipped beef. Just flip the toast. :wah:

ChiptBeef · Post by **ChiptBeef** » Tue Jan 17, 2006 9:36 pm

Lil~Basco wrote: OMG...don't tell me you are one of those porcupine people???
I don't know what that is. I hope it's not harmful. But I try to accomodate the best I can (on the lighter side). Knock Knock.....

Nomad · Post by **Nomad** » Wed Jan 18, 2006 2:40 am

[quote=ChiptBeef]There is a lighter side to chipped beef.

Just flip the toast. :wah:

Is this you being zippy creamed beef ?

Your a real hoot ! :-6

ChiptBeef · Post by **ChiptBeef** » Wed Jan 18, 2006 7:26 am

Nomad wrote: [quote=ChiptBeef]There is a lighter side to chipped beef.

Is this you being zippy creamed beef ?

Your a real hoot ! :-6

I got a little side-tracked by the unfounded "nazis," "racist" and "bigot" attacks, but I'm doing my best. Early on I accepted an invite to "the pub." I hope soon I will be able to buy a round for the house. "Whiskey for my men, beer for my horses." (So sings Tobey and Willie) :guitarist

ChiptBeef · Post by **ChiptBeef** » Wed Jan 18, 2006 11:09 am

orpheus wrote: dont want to delete it, at the time it was pretty much right.....................beef bloke used is as a defence.......
It was not my intent to use your post "as a defence." I was merely trying to point out prior events with the offending party that may have given rise to some of your concerns. I have, and will continue, to do my level best not ride other members coat-tails (except for quotes no and then). Again, no offense meant.

Lil~Basco · Post by **Lil~Basco** » Wed Jan 18, 2006 11:36 am

ChiptBeef wrote: I don't know what that is. I hope it's not harmful. But I try to accomodate the best I can (on the lighter side). Knock Knock.....
:wah: ahhhhh Chipt....ya have a sense of humor!

Who's there?

ChiptBeef · Post by **ChiptBeef** » Wed Jan 18, 2006 11:55 am

Lil~Basco wrote: :wah: ahhhhh Chipt....ya have a sense of humor!

Who's there?

Me!! :-6

StupidCowboyTricks · Post by **StupidCowboyTricks** » Wed Jan 18, 2006 2:04 pm

ChiptBeef wrote: [quote=Nomad]

I got a little side-tracked by the unfounded "nazis," "racist" and "bigot" attacks, but I'm doing my best. Early on I accepted an invite to "the pub." I hope soon I will be able to buy a round for the house. "Whiskey for my men, beer for my horses." (So sings Tobey and Willie) :guitarist

I want a six pack of ****-n-bull ginger beer ok?:-4

StupidCowboyTricks · Post by **StupidCowboyTricks** » Wed Jan 18, 2006 2:06 pm

Hey why was my brand of ginger beer messed up?

nnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnn:-4

ChiptBeef · Post by **ChiptBeef** » Wed Jan 18, 2006 5:38 pm

StupidCowboyTricks wrote:

Hey why was my brand of ginger beer messed up?
I don't know about the missing information. Ask the moderators. If that's your favorite brand, by all means. Which part of the label is your favorite? It seems to be a 50/50 shot.

BabyRider · Post by **BabyRider** » Wed Jan 18, 2006 5:40 pm

I do believe the word "c0ck" is subject to deletion as it's slang for penis. Is that right, Tombstone?

ChiptBeef · Post by **ChiptBeef** » Wed Jan 18, 2006 5:57 pm

BabyRider wrote: I do believe the word "c0ck" is subject to deletion as it's slang for penis. Is that right, Tombstone?
That makes sense to me. I remember forum rules when I registered stating something to the affect that members should not post any explicit sexual content. The actual label is product information, to wit acceptable. But then, with all due respect to the parties, "Tombstone" appears to be the final arbitrator, based on your pointed post. I'm just a rookie.

Interesting Factoid: Post #120 does not contain the product picture. Yet, Post #121 contains the product picture and a label close-up. Why the need for such scrutiny by photograph in a post?

BabyRider · Post by **BabyRider** » Wed Jan 18, 2006 7:00 pm

ChiptBeef wrote: That makes sense to me. I remember forum rules when I registered stating something to the affect that members should not post any explicit sexual content. The actual label is product information, to wit acceptable. But then, with all due respect to the parties, "Tombstone" appears to be the final arbitrator, based on your pointed post. I'm just a rookie.

Interesting Factoid: Post #120 does not contain the product picture. Yet, Post #121 contains the product picture and a label close-up. Why the need for such scrutiny by photograph in a post?
It's quite amusing to me that a beverage should be subject to editing! There are ways around getting **** when you want to say sh!t, though.

And yes, Tombstone is one of the forum owners.

ChiptBeef · Post by **ChiptBeef** » Wed Jan 18, 2006 7:15 pm

BabyRider wrote: It's quite amusing to me that a beverage should be subject to editing! There are ways around getting **** when you want to say sh!t, though.

And yes, Tombstone is one of the forum owners.
I know as fact that I have much to learn about posting, after reading yours. I'll leave the editing / moderating / administrating to the forum owners. Please, just keep doing what your doing. It motivates me. :sneaky:

StupidCowboyTricks · Post by **StupidCowboyTricks** » Wed Jan 18, 2006 7:31 pm

No prob, I just wasn't expecting to see(****) that after I posted it and read it. lol

A question to my friends "down under" You have a very nice Ginger Beer they sell over here (when you can find it) but I cant think of the name....I think it starts with a "B" when I see it I now it......(the product)

It's very tasty!:sneaky: -burp!

,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,:-6

ChiptBeef · Post by **ChiptBeef** » Wed Jan 18, 2006 8:06 pm

StupidCowboyTricks wrote: "down under"
Is that a sexual reference? :-3

StupidCowboyTricks · Post by **StupidCowboyTricks** » Wed Jan 18, 2006 8:09 pm

ChiptBeef wrote: That's not a sexual reference, is it? :-3

............................................

I can't win!

Nomad · Post by **Nomad** » Wed Jan 18, 2006 8:09 pm

ChiptBeef wrote: I don't know about the missing information. Ask the moderators. If that's your favorite brand, by all means. Which part of the label is your favorite? It seems to be a 50/50 shot.

We dont like labels around here creamed beef ! :rolleyes:

ChiptBeef · Post by **ChiptBeef** » Wed Jan 18, 2006 8:12 pm

Nomad wrote: We dont like labels around here creamed beef ! :rolleyes:
I know from personal experience (on the receiving end). And while I'm at it.........

BUMP!!!

StupidCowboyTricks · Post by **StupidCowboyTricks** » Wed Jan 18, 2006 8:12 pm

StupidCowboyTricks wrote: ............................................

I can't win!

Now the smilies are giving me a bad time

Lon · Post by **Lon** » Wed Jan 18, 2006 8:13 pm

StupidCowboyTricks wrote: No prob, I just wasn't expecting to see(****) that after I posted it and read it. lol

A question to my friends "down under" You have a very nice Ginger Beer they sell over here (when you can find it) but I cant think of the name....I think it starts with a "B" when I see it I now it......(the product)

It's very tasty!:sneaky: -burp!

,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,:-6

That would be BUNDABEG GINGER BEER I believe.

ChiptBeef · Post by **ChiptBeef** » Wed Jan 18, 2006 8:15 pm

StupidCowboyTricks wrote: Now the smilies are giving me a bad time
Maybe you need to moderate. :yh_rotfl :yh_rotfl :yh_rotfl :yh_rotfl

StupidCowboyTricks · Post by **StupidCowboyTricks** » Wed Jan 18, 2006 8:20 pm

Lon wrote: That would be BUNDABEG GINGER BEER I believe.

Yeah that's it

I love it!

StupidCowboyTricks · Post by **StupidCowboyTricks** » Wed Jan 18, 2006 8:23 pm

ChiptBeef wrote: Maybe you need to moderate. :yh_rotfl :yh_rotfl :yh_rotfl :yh_rotfl

Well you certainly got Chipper!

ChiptBeef · Post by **ChiptBeef** » Wed Jan 18, 2006 8:34 pm

StupidCowboyTricks wrote: Well you certainly got Chipper!
Just trying to fit in. Gettin' slap happy!!!!!!!!:D

StupidCowboyTricks · Post by **StupidCowboyTricks** » Wed Jan 18, 2006 8:41 pm

ChiptBeef wrote: Just trying to fit in. Gettin' slap happy!!!!!!!!:D

Come a little closer so I can slap you and make you happy.

ChiptBeef · Post by **ChiptBeef** » Wed Jan 18, 2006 10:05 pm

StupidCowboyTricks wrote: Come a little closer so I can slap you and make you happy.

Is that how you like it?

ChiptBeef · Post by **ChiptBeef** » Thu Jan 19, 2006 2:16 am

SnoozeControl wrote: I haven't put him on ignore, I think he's kind of entertaining.

Just wait till I start juggling and tap-dancing. I'll really be having fun then. :yh_party

ChiptBeef · Post by **ChiptBeef** » Thu Jan 19, 2006 5:26 am

ArnoldLayne wrote: Lon... My decision to ignore is mine and should not concern you. I respect your decision to read his blinkered posts please respect my decision to do otherwise
How's that "ignore" thing working for you now?

chonsigirl · Post by **chonsigirl** » Thu Jan 19, 2006 5:42 am

ChiptBeef wrote: How's that "ignore" thing working for you now?

If he has you on ignore, he can't read your posts CB......................

Accountable · Post by **Accountable** » Thu Jan 19, 2006 5:57 am

ChiptBeef wrote: How's that "ignore" thing working for you now?

See Chip, this is why people question your motives. What possible reason would you have for dragging up this post from 3 days and dozens of posts ago, except to stir crap that's actually settling?

orpheus · Post by **orpheus** » Thu Jan 19, 2006 6:08 am

OK,

as I am a simple person, I will keep it simple this time.

If this person is indeed a 'troll', then surely the best bet is not to answer!, a 'troll' needs replies to troll, if replies are given then the 'troll' will have got what he wants.

*DISCLAIMER*

Not that I am saying anyone is a troll...............or infact any creature from middle earth or Terry Pratchett's over used imaginitation.

Accountable · Post by **Accountable** » Thu Jan 19, 2006 6:10 am

orpheus wrote: OK,

as I am a simple person, I will keep it simple this time.

If this person is indeed a 'troll', then surely the best bet is not to answer!, a 'troll' needs replies to troll, if replies are given then the 'troll' will have got what he wants.

*DISCLAIMER*

Not that I am saying anyone is a troll...............or infact any creature from middle earth or Terry Pratchett's over used imaginitation.
Assuming this is directed at me, we've addressed that and moved on. ... or at least I thought we had. :-3

orpheus · Post by **orpheus** » Thu Jan 19, 2006 6:16 am

Accountable wrote: Assuming this is directed at me, we've addressed that and moved on. ... or at least I thought we had. :-3
Right,

Its not aimed at anyone in particular,

the fact is I last posted on page 8 (I think), it is now on page 14+ (I think 15), so someone is replying and are arguing the toss.

that's all I am saying, if corned beef (or what ever his/her name is) is in fact a troll then replying is surely given the person what he/she wants.

ChiptBeef · Post by **ChiptBeef** » Thu Jan 19, 2006 6:21 am

Accountable wrote: See Chip, this is why people question your motives. What possible reason would you have for dragging up this post from 3 days and dozens of posts ago, except to stir crap that's actually settling?
First, the post wasn't directed to, or questioning you, to wit you are irrelevant. To humor you this morning... "those that don't learn from history are doomed to repeat it" ... there's a common saying like that. Carry on.

Accountable · Post by **Accountable** » Thu Jan 19, 2006 6:25 am

ChiptBeef wrote: First, the post wasn't directed to, or questioning you, to wit you are irrelevant. To humor you this morning... "those that don't learn from history are doomed to repeat it" ... there's a common saying like that. Carry on.
Ahh. The meds have worn off and he's back.

And to think I was going to actually defend you to Orpheus.

orpheus · Post by **orpheus** » Thu Jan 19, 2006 6:27 am

Accountable wrote: Ahh. The meds have worn off and he's back.

And to think I was going to actually defend you to Orpheus.

And to think................I never accused him/her of anything. :rolleyes: