On one side of the World, the Controllers want a North American Union. On the other side, they want a European Union (Which they have already created).
The ultimate goal of the Controllers is to merge the European Union with the North American Union in order to create a One World Global Government, also known as the New World Order.
The European Union has already been established. They've been working on that side of the World for awhile now. Now it's time for the North American Union. And the Controllers know that they must move rapidly if they expect to get it done in time.
The Ultimate Rundown
-
TruthBringer
- Posts: 3567
- Joined: Sat Feb 11, 2006 5:39 pm
The Ultimate Rundown
Link removed by moderator
-
TruthBringer
- Posts: 3567
- Joined: Sat Feb 11, 2006 5:39 pm
The Ultimate Rundown
The reason why the Controllers are allowing so many illegals from Mexico to enter into the United States without punishment is because they realize that when the numbers of illegal aliens in the United States becomes substantial enough, that it will be easier for them to install the North American Union because there will already be so many illegal aliens in America that it will already be as if Mexico and the United States have become one nation.
The Controllers will attempt to destroy the American economy so much so that it will appear as if there is no hope for the United States other than to join the North American Union. Thereby merging the economies of the United States, Mexico, and Canada together, and thereby completing their goal.
The Controllers have been attempting to destroy the American economy through many different means, with illegal trafficking and outsourcing at the top of their list.
The Controllers will attempt to destroy the American economy so much so that it will appear as if there is no hope for the United States other than to join the North American Union. Thereby merging the economies of the United States, Mexico, and Canada together, and thereby completing their goal.
The Controllers have been attempting to destroy the American economy through many different means, with illegal trafficking and outsourcing at the top of their list.
Link removed by moderator
-
TruthBringer
- Posts: 3567
- Joined: Sat Feb 11, 2006 5:39 pm
The Ultimate Rundown
Procedures for merging the economies of Mexico, the United States, and Canada have already been put into place. If we don't watch out, there will be a North American Union before we know what hits us.
Link removed by moderator
-
TruthBringer
- Posts: 3567
- Joined: Sat Feb 11, 2006 5:39 pm
The Ultimate Rundown
In order to take over the major economies of the World, the Controllers know that they must first figure out a way to get Asia and the Middle East to join their One World Government, when they eventually get around to creating it. And again, they are moving very fast to do so, because they know that it's now or never. In fact, they have less than 6 years to push ahead with their agenda.
However, in regards to Asia and the Middle East joining the Controllers under a One World Government, this is never going to happen. Asia and the Middle East will resist, thereby fullfilling the prophecies around the World of a Great World War 3 battle of East vs. West.
If the Controllers are successful with their plans, than with the combined forces of the European Union and North American Union merged together, they will take on various countries like China and Iran in possibly the bloodiest war that this World has ever experienced.
However, in regards to Asia and the Middle East joining the Controllers under a One World Government, this is never going to happen. Asia and the Middle East will resist, thereby fullfilling the prophecies around the World of a Great World War 3 battle of East vs. West.
If the Controllers are successful with their plans, than with the combined forces of the European Union and North American Union merged together, they will take on various countries like China and Iran in possibly the bloodiest war that this World has ever experienced.
Link removed by moderator
-
TruthBringer
- Posts: 3567
- Joined: Sat Feb 11, 2006 5:39 pm
The Ultimate Rundown
About half way through World War 3, the Pole-Shift will occur, thereby stopping both sides in their tracks, and thereby cleansing the entire Earth.
THE END
(And soon to be the beginning of the Golden Age of Peace)
THE END
(And soon to be the beginning of the Golden Age of Peace)
Link removed by moderator
The Ultimate Rundown
So. What's wrong with all that? What's wrong with the Controllers? What's wrong with the One World Order?
What's the truth?
What's the truth?
The Ultimate Rundown
I Am The Controller!!!
The Ultimate Rundown
A European and North American Union in 6 years time? Thats quite ambitious, seeing as its taken 52 years just to get the states of Europe to agree to having a single currency, and a semi-constiution, and there are still quite a few states that haven't adopted even the Euro and probably won't for the forseeable future. (Some like Britian because the people are not in favour of it, and won't be for the forseeable future, and some in the east like romania because they are not economically ready for it and won't be for a long time). I can't see the U.S.A and Mexico ever happening, from either side, maybe Canada, but then again, probably not as both countries have shown no interest in such an idea for the last 200 years so why now?
Here's what I think will happen in the next 10 years.
1. China will continue to emerge as a superpower and will be the nation along with the USA that sets the global agenda. What China's agenda in its own region is, is quite clear. It aims to be the single most influential nation in Asia economically and to confront US military power in SE Asia. In general outside of Asia, China will try to have good relations with the other major powers including the US out of economic self interest. Japan with US backing will continue to oppose china.
2. Russia will become more powerful and more assertive in its own policys once more, especially in the south, this will be some ways destabilizing, and in others suits the western agenda as Russia and the west now share several enemies and strategic interests, though if the west is not careful relations could deteriorate badly. Europe and the USA will have to be more careful in their policies towards the Russians, particularly in Europe.
3. Europe will continue to slowly integrate as an economic block, and will also reassess the basic military problems that the continent faces, but an EU military is not possible or desirable, so it will only mean that the larger countries Britain, Germany, and France will increase military budgets, and particularly in the commissioning of aircraft carriers and forces capable of being deployed quickly to other regions of the globe. In general countries will try to co-ordinate foreign policies as much as possible, the smaller countries will try and influence this process. The strategic issues in Europe are the Energy security, the US alliance, balkan security, the expansion of the EU into Turkey, the ex soviet states around the black sea region and their problems, (very very tricky), the security of the mediterranian region, and keeping a workable relationship with Russia despite Nato expansion. European countries general world policies will be to try to continue to rely on American military supremacy and European and American economic power (doing the bad cop good cop routine to try and keep as much stability as possible)
4. The U.S. will continue to be the single most powerful country for decades to come, though the brief period where it has been the only superpower is comign to and end, and the US will need to be multi-lateral in its approach to world affairs, this will mean adopting a less unilateral foreign policy (at least in public) ensuring the continued security of its own hemisphere, continuing the alliance with European nations (trading a demand for more effective strategic military cooperation from EU states with an acceptance of European concerns on climate, trade etc,) continuing to develop its relationship with china, and confronting what it sees as its strategic enemies, particularly in the middle east.
5. The Middle East; hard to know, there will probably be continuing conflict that will grow worse, though there will also be a backlash in islamic countries against the increasing tendency towards religious/political extremism that is leading to serious confrontation with the west and others and undermining the status quo in countries such as Egypt and Saudi Arabia. These 2 countries along with Iran are the most important actors at present. Iraq is a diaster and will probably split along ethnic lines following the civil war that will happen when US and British forces leave. This may result in a war in the middle east between Iran and Saudi Arabia/Syria (which may have been the plan all along though I doubt it). Israel will come to some kind of deal with the west bank palestinans whether it will work or last is anyone's guess.
Its a little less dramatic than the pole shift theory, but slightly more realistic.
Here's what I think will happen in the next 10 years.
1. China will continue to emerge as a superpower and will be the nation along with the USA that sets the global agenda. What China's agenda in its own region is, is quite clear. It aims to be the single most influential nation in Asia economically and to confront US military power in SE Asia. In general outside of Asia, China will try to have good relations with the other major powers including the US out of economic self interest. Japan with US backing will continue to oppose china.
2. Russia will become more powerful and more assertive in its own policys once more, especially in the south, this will be some ways destabilizing, and in others suits the western agenda as Russia and the west now share several enemies and strategic interests, though if the west is not careful relations could deteriorate badly. Europe and the USA will have to be more careful in their policies towards the Russians, particularly in Europe.
3. Europe will continue to slowly integrate as an economic block, and will also reassess the basic military problems that the continent faces, but an EU military is not possible or desirable, so it will only mean that the larger countries Britain, Germany, and France will increase military budgets, and particularly in the commissioning of aircraft carriers and forces capable of being deployed quickly to other regions of the globe. In general countries will try to co-ordinate foreign policies as much as possible, the smaller countries will try and influence this process. The strategic issues in Europe are the Energy security, the US alliance, balkan security, the expansion of the EU into Turkey, the ex soviet states around the black sea region and their problems, (very very tricky), the security of the mediterranian region, and keeping a workable relationship with Russia despite Nato expansion. European countries general world policies will be to try to continue to rely on American military supremacy and European and American economic power (doing the bad cop good cop routine to try and keep as much stability as possible)
4. The U.S. will continue to be the single most powerful country for decades to come, though the brief period where it has been the only superpower is comign to and end, and the US will need to be multi-lateral in its approach to world affairs, this will mean adopting a less unilateral foreign policy (at least in public) ensuring the continued security of its own hemisphere, continuing the alliance with European nations (trading a demand for more effective strategic military cooperation from EU states with an acceptance of European concerns on climate, trade etc,) continuing to develop its relationship with china, and confronting what it sees as its strategic enemies, particularly in the middle east.
5. The Middle East; hard to know, there will probably be continuing conflict that will grow worse, though there will also be a backlash in islamic countries against the increasing tendency towards religious/political extremism that is leading to serious confrontation with the west and others and undermining the status quo in countries such as Egypt and Saudi Arabia. These 2 countries along with Iran are the most important actors at present. Iraq is a diaster and will probably split along ethnic lines following the civil war that will happen when US and British forces leave. This may result in a war in the middle east between Iran and Saudi Arabia/Syria (which may have been the plan all along though I doubt it). Israel will come to some kind of deal with the west bank palestinans whether it will work or last is anyone's guess.
Its a little less dramatic than the pole shift theory, but slightly more realistic.
"We are never so happy, never so unhappy, as we imagine"
Le Rochefoucauld.
"A smack in the face settles all arguments, then you can move on kid."
My dad 1986.
Le Rochefoucauld.
"A smack in the face settles all arguments, then you can move on kid."
My dad 1986.
The Ultimate Rundown
mikeinie;672904 wrote: I Am The Controller!!!
no ya not jimbo is
no ya not jimbo is
"To be foolish and to recognize that one is foolish, is better than to be foolish and imagine that one is wise."
The Ultimate Rundown
TruthBringer;672867 wrote: About half way through World War 3, the Pole-Shift will occur, thereby stopping both sides in their tracks, and thereby cleansing the entire Earth.
THE END
(And soon to be the beginning of the Golden Age of Peace)
Only 1,493 posts to get to the end! Whew I didn't know if I would make it. Good job TB.
THE END
(And soon to be the beginning of the Golden Age of Peace)
Only 1,493 posts to get to the end! Whew I didn't know if I would make it. Good job TB.
The Ultimate Rundown
Galbally;672955 wrote: A European and North American Union in 6 years time? Thats quite ambitious, seeing as its taken 52 years just to get the states of Europe to agree to having a single currency, and a semi-constiution, and there are still quite a few states that haven't adopted even the Euro and probably won't for the forseeable future. (Some like Britian because the people are not in favour of it, and won't be for the forseeable future, and some in the east like romania because they are not economically ready for it and won't be for a long time). I can't see the U.S.A and Mexico ever happening, from either side, maybe Canada, but then again, probably not as both countries have shown no interest in such an idea for the last 200 years so why now?
Here's what I think will happen in the next 10 years.
1. China will continue to emerge as a superpower and will be the nation along with the USA that sets the global agenda. What China's agenda in its own region is, is quite clear. It aims to be the single most influential nation in Asia economically and to confront US military power in SE Asia. In general outside of Asia, China will try to have good relations with the other major powers including the US out of economic self interest. Japan with US backing will continue to oppose china.
2. Russia will become more powerful and more assertive in its own policys once more, especially in the south, this will be some ways destabilizing, and in others suits the western agenda as Russia and the west now share several enemies and strategic interests, though if the west is not careful relations could deteriorate badly. Europe and the USA will have to be more careful in their policies towards the Russians, particularly in Europe.
3. Europe will continue to slowly integrate as an economic block, and will also reassess the basic military problems that the continent faces, but an EU military is not possible or desirable, so it will only mean that the larger countries Britain, Germany, and France will increase military budgets, and particularly in the commissioning of aircraft carriers and forces capable of being deployed quickly to other regions of the globe. In general countries will try to co-ordinate foreign policies as much as possible, the smaller countries will try and influence this process. The strategic issues in Europe are the Energy security, the US alliance, balkan security, the expansion of the EU into Turkey, the ex soviet states around the black sea region and their problems, (very very tricky), the security of the mediterranian region, and keeping a workable relationship with Russia despite Nato expansion. European countries general world policies will be to try to continue to rely on American military supremacy and European and American economic power (doing the bad cop good cop routine to try and keep as much stability as possible)
4. The U.S. will continue to be the single most powerful country for decades to come, though the brief period where it has been the only superpower is comign to and end, and the US will need to be multi-lateral in its approach to world affairs, this will mean adopting a less unilateral foreign policy (at least in public) ensuring the continued security of its own hemisphere, continuing the alliance with European nations (trading a demand for more effective strategic military cooperation from EU states with an acceptance of European concerns on climate, trade etc,) continuing to develop its relationship with china, and confronting what it sees as its strategic enemies, particularly in the middle east.
5. The Middle East; hard to know, there will probably be continuing conflict that will grow worse, though there will also be a backlash in islamic countries against the increasing tendency towards religious/political extremism that is leading to serious confrontation with the west and others and undermining the status quo in countries such as Egypt and Saudi Arabia. These 2 countries along with Iran are the most important actors at present. Iraq is a diaster and will probably split along ethnic lines following the civil war that will happen when US and British forces leave. This may result in a war in the middle east between Iran and Saudi Arabia/Syria (which may have been the plan all along though I doubt it). Israel will come to some kind of deal with the west bank palestinans whether it will work or last is anyone's guess.
Its a little less dramatic than the pole shift theory, but slightly more realistic.
Good Post----------I agree
Here's what I think will happen in the next 10 years.
1. China will continue to emerge as a superpower and will be the nation along with the USA that sets the global agenda. What China's agenda in its own region is, is quite clear. It aims to be the single most influential nation in Asia economically and to confront US military power in SE Asia. In general outside of Asia, China will try to have good relations with the other major powers including the US out of economic self interest. Japan with US backing will continue to oppose china.
2. Russia will become more powerful and more assertive in its own policys once more, especially in the south, this will be some ways destabilizing, and in others suits the western agenda as Russia and the west now share several enemies and strategic interests, though if the west is not careful relations could deteriorate badly. Europe and the USA will have to be more careful in their policies towards the Russians, particularly in Europe.
3. Europe will continue to slowly integrate as an economic block, and will also reassess the basic military problems that the continent faces, but an EU military is not possible or desirable, so it will only mean that the larger countries Britain, Germany, and France will increase military budgets, and particularly in the commissioning of aircraft carriers and forces capable of being deployed quickly to other regions of the globe. In general countries will try to co-ordinate foreign policies as much as possible, the smaller countries will try and influence this process. The strategic issues in Europe are the Energy security, the US alliance, balkan security, the expansion of the EU into Turkey, the ex soviet states around the black sea region and their problems, (very very tricky), the security of the mediterranian region, and keeping a workable relationship with Russia despite Nato expansion. European countries general world policies will be to try to continue to rely on American military supremacy and European and American economic power (doing the bad cop good cop routine to try and keep as much stability as possible)
4. The U.S. will continue to be the single most powerful country for decades to come, though the brief period where it has been the only superpower is comign to and end, and the US will need to be multi-lateral in its approach to world affairs, this will mean adopting a less unilateral foreign policy (at least in public) ensuring the continued security of its own hemisphere, continuing the alliance with European nations (trading a demand for more effective strategic military cooperation from EU states with an acceptance of European concerns on climate, trade etc,) continuing to develop its relationship with china, and confronting what it sees as its strategic enemies, particularly in the middle east.
5. The Middle East; hard to know, there will probably be continuing conflict that will grow worse, though there will also be a backlash in islamic countries against the increasing tendency towards religious/political extremism that is leading to serious confrontation with the west and others and undermining the status quo in countries such as Egypt and Saudi Arabia. These 2 countries along with Iran are the most important actors at present. Iraq is a diaster and will probably split along ethnic lines following the civil war that will happen when US and British forces leave. This may result in a war in the middle east between Iran and Saudi Arabia/Syria (which may have been the plan all along though I doubt it). Israel will come to some kind of deal with the west bank palestinans whether it will work or last is anyone's guess.
Its a little less dramatic than the pole shift theory, but slightly more realistic.
Good Post----------I agree
The Ultimate Rundown
Galbally;672955 wrote: A European and North American Union in 6 years time? Thats quite ambitious, seeing as its taken 52 years just to get the states of Europe to agree to having a single currency, and a semi-constiution, and there are still quite a few states that haven't adopted even the Euro and probably won't for the forseeable future. (Some like Britian because the people are not in favour of it, and won't be for the forseeable future, and some in the east like romania because they are not economically ready for it and won't be for a long time). I can't see the U.S.A and Mexico ever happening, from either side, maybe Canada, but then again, probably not as both countries have shown no interest in such an idea for the last 200 years so why now?
Here's what I think will happen in the next 10 years.
1. China will continue to emerge as a superpower and will be the nation along with the USA that sets the global agenda. What China's agenda in its own region is, is quite clear. It aims to be the single most influential nation in Asia economically and to confront US military power in SE Asia. In general outside of Asia, China will try to have good relations with the other major powers including the US out of economic self interest. Japan with US backing will continue to oppose china.
2. Russia will become more powerful and more assertive in its own policys once more, especially in the south, this will be some ways destabilizing, and in others suits the western agenda as Russia and the west now share several enemies and strategic interests, though if the west is not careful relations could deteriorate badly. Europe and the USA will have to be more careful in their policies towards the Russians, particularly in Europe.
3. Europe will continue to slowly integrate as an economic block, and will also reassess the basic military problems that the continent faces, but an EU military is not possible or desirable, so it will only mean that the larger countries Britain, Germany, and France will increase military budgets, and particularly in the commissioning of aircraft carriers and forces capable of being deployed quickly to other regions of the globe. In general countries will try to co-ordinate foreign policies as much as possible, the smaller countries will try and influence this process. The strategic issues in Europe are the Energy security, the US alliance, balkan security, the expansion of the EU into Turkey, the ex soviet states around the black sea region and their problems, (very very tricky), the security of the mediterranian region, and keeping a workable relationship with Russia despite Nato expansion. European countries general world policies will be to try to continue to rely on American military supremacy and European and American economic power (doing the bad cop good cop routine to try and keep as much stability as possible)
4. The U.S. will continue to be the single most powerful country for decades to come, though the brief period where it has been the only superpower is comign to and end, and the US will need to be multi-lateral in its approach to world affairs, this will mean adopting a less unilateral foreign policy (at least in public) ensuring the continued security of its own hemisphere, continuing the alliance with European nations (trading a demand for more effective strategic military cooperation from EU states with an acceptance of European concerns on climate, trade etc,) continuing to develop its relationship with china, and confronting what it sees as its strategic enemies, particularly in the middle east.
5. The Middle East; hard to know, there will probably be continuing conflict that will grow worse, though there will also be a backlash in islamic countries against the increasing tendency towards religious/political extremism that is leading to serious confrontation with the west and others and undermining the status quo in countries such as Egypt and Saudi Arabia. These 2 countries along with Iran are the most important actors at present. Iraq is a diaster and will probably split along ethnic lines following the civil war that will happen when US and British forces leave. This may result in a war in the middle east between Iran and Saudi Arabia/Syria (which may have been the plan all along though I doubt it). Israel will come to some kind of deal with the west bank palestinans whether it will work or last is anyone's guess.
Its a little less dramatic than the pole shift theory, but slightly more realistic.
yes but china has its own probs brewing
they are going in to indresty too fast (cheap exports)
to much land is being taken out of food production
in the next decade china will not be able to feed it self
meaning importing food that they cannot afford
imo
Here's what I think will happen in the next 10 years.
1. China will continue to emerge as a superpower and will be the nation along with the USA that sets the global agenda. What China's agenda in its own region is, is quite clear. It aims to be the single most influential nation in Asia economically and to confront US military power in SE Asia. In general outside of Asia, China will try to have good relations with the other major powers including the US out of economic self interest. Japan with US backing will continue to oppose china.
2. Russia will become more powerful and more assertive in its own policys once more, especially in the south, this will be some ways destabilizing, and in others suits the western agenda as Russia and the west now share several enemies and strategic interests, though if the west is not careful relations could deteriorate badly. Europe and the USA will have to be more careful in their policies towards the Russians, particularly in Europe.
3. Europe will continue to slowly integrate as an economic block, and will also reassess the basic military problems that the continent faces, but an EU military is not possible or desirable, so it will only mean that the larger countries Britain, Germany, and France will increase military budgets, and particularly in the commissioning of aircraft carriers and forces capable of being deployed quickly to other regions of the globe. In general countries will try to co-ordinate foreign policies as much as possible, the smaller countries will try and influence this process. The strategic issues in Europe are the Energy security, the US alliance, balkan security, the expansion of the EU into Turkey, the ex soviet states around the black sea region and their problems, (very very tricky), the security of the mediterranian region, and keeping a workable relationship with Russia despite Nato expansion. European countries general world policies will be to try to continue to rely on American military supremacy and European and American economic power (doing the bad cop good cop routine to try and keep as much stability as possible)
4. The U.S. will continue to be the single most powerful country for decades to come, though the brief period where it has been the only superpower is comign to and end, and the US will need to be multi-lateral in its approach to world affairs, this will mean adopting a less unilateral foreign policy (at least in public) ensuring the continued security of its own hemisphere, continuing the alliance with European nations (trading a demand for more effective strategic military cooperation from EU states with an acceptance of European concerns on climate, trade etc,) continuing to develop its relationship with china, and confronting what it sees as its strategic enemies, particularly in the middle east.
5. The Middle East; hard to know, there will probably be continuing conflict that will grow worse, though there will also be a backlash in islamic countries against the increasing tendency towards religious/political extremism that is leading to serious confrontation with the west and others and undermining the status quo in countries such as Egypt and Saudi Arabia. These 2 countries along with Iran are the most important actors at present. Iraq is a diaster and will probably split along ethnic lines following the civil war that will happen when US and British forces leave. This may result in a war in the middle east between Iran and Saudi Arabia/Syria (which may have been the plan all along though I doubt it). Israel will come to some kind of deal with the west bank palestinans whether it will work or last is anyone's guess.
Its a little less dramatic than the pole shift theory, but slightly more realistic.
yes but china has its own probs brewing
they are going in to indresty too fast (cheap exports)
to much land is being taken out of food production
in the next decade china will not be able to feed it self
meaning importing food that they cannot afford
imo
"To be foolish and to recognize that one is foolish, is better than to be foolish and imagine that one is wise."
The Ultimate Rundown
TruthBringer;672862 wrote: On one side of the World, the Controllers want a North American Union. On the other side, they want a European Union (Which they have already created).
The ultimate goal of the Controllers is to merge the European Union with the North American Union in order to create a One World Global Government, also known as the New World Order.
The European Union has already been established. They've been working on that side of the World for awhile now. Now it's time for the North American Union. And the Controllers know that they must move rapidly if they expect to get it done in time.
How do you see a NAU, Canada does not want to join, we are just now growing up on our own coming out from under the heavy USA influence and I am certain the USA does not really want the corrupt Mexico.
I am not convinced this is going to happen.
The ultimate goal of the Controllers is to merge the European Union with the North American Union in order to create a One World Global Government, also known as the New World Order.
The European Union has already been established. They've been working on that side of the World for awhile now. Now it's time for the North American Union. And the Controllers know that they must move rapidly if they expect to get it done in time.
How do you see a NAU, Canada does not want to join, we are just now growing up on our own coming out from under the heavy USA influence and I am certain the USA does not really want the corrupt Mexico.
I am not convinced this is going to happen.
�You only live once, but if you do it right, once is enough.�
― Mae West
― Mae West
-
TruthBringer
- Posts: 3567
- Joined: Sat Feb 11, 2006 5:39 pm
The Ultimate Rundown
Galbally;672955 wrote: A European and North American Union in 6 years time? Thats quite ambitious, seeing as its taken 52 years just to get the states of Europe to agree to having a single currency, and a semi-constiution, and there are still quite a few states that haven't adopted even the Euro and probably won't for the forseeable future. (Some like Britian because the people are not in favour of it, and won't be for the forseeable future, and some in the east like romania because they are not economically ready for it and won't be for a long time). I can't see the U.S.A and Mexico ever happening, from either side, maybe Canada, but then again, probably not as both countries have shown no interest in such an idea for the last 200 years so why now?
Here's what I think will happen in the next 10 years.
1. China will continue to emerge as a superpower and will be the nation along with the USA that sets the global agenda. What China's agenda in its own region is, is quite clear. It aims to be the single most influential nation in Asia economically and to confront US military power in SE Asia. In general outside of Asia, China will try to have good relations with the other major powers including the US out of economic self interest. Japan with US backing will continue to oppose china.
2. Russia will become more powerful and more assertive in its own policys once more, especially in the south, this will be some ways destabilizing, and in others suits the western agenda as Russia and the west now share several enemies and strategic interests, though if the west is not careful relations could deteriorate badly. Europe and the USA will have to be more careful in their policies towards the Russians, particularly in Europe.
3. Europe will continue to slowly integrate as an economic block, and will also reassess the basic military problems that the continent faces, but an EU military is not possible or desirable, so it will only mean that the larger countries Britain, Germany, and France will increase military budgets, and particularly in the commissioning of aircraft carriers and forces capable of being deployed quickly to other regions of the globe. In general countries will try to co-ordinate foreign policies as much as possible, the smaller countries will try and influence this process. The strategic issues in Europe are the Energy security, the US alliance, balkan security, the expansion of the EU into Turkey, the ex soviet states around the black sea region and their problems, (very very tricky), the security of the mediterranian region, and keeping a workable relationship with Russia despite Nato expansion. European countries general world policies will be to try to continue to rely on American military supremacy and European and American economic power (doing the bad cop good cop routine to try and keep as much stability as possible)
4. The U.S. will continue to be the single most powerful country for decades to come, though the brief period where it has been the only superpower is comign to and end, and the US will need to be multi-lateral in its approach to world affairs, this will mean adopting a less unilateral foreign policy (at least in public) ensuring the continued security of its own hemisphere, continuing the alliance with European nations (trading a demand for more effective strategic military cooperation from EU states with an acceptance of European concerns on climate, trade etc,) continuing to develop its relationship with china, and confronting what it sees as its strategic enemies, particularly in the middle east.
5. The Middle East; hard to know, there will probably be continuing conflict that will grow worse, though there will also be a backlash in islamic countries against the increasing tendency towards religious/political extremism that is leading to serious confrontation with the west and others and undermining the status quo in countries such as Egypt and Saudi Arabia. These 2 countries along with Iran are the most important actors at present. Iraq is a diaster and will probably split along ethnic lines following the civil war that will happen when US and British forces leave. This may result in a war in the middle east between Iran and Saudi Arabia/Syria (which may have been the plan all along though I doubt it). Israel will come to some kind of deal with the west bank palestinans whether it will work or last is anyone's guess.
Its a little less dramatic than the pole shift theory, but slightly more realistic.
Good post indeed.
I usually enjoy reading other people's theories as much as I enjoy putting the thought into my own.
Thanks for your thoughts Gal.
Here's what I think will happen in the next 10 years.
1. China will continue to emerge as a superpower and will be the nation along with the USA that sets the global agenda. What China's agenda in its own region is, is quite clear. It aims to be the single most influential nation in Asia economically and to confront US military power in SE Asia. In general outside of Asia, China will try to have good relations with the other major powers including the US out of economic self interest. Japan with US backing will continue to oppose china.
2. Russia will become more powerful and more assertive in its own policys once more, especially in the south, this will be some ways destabilizing, and in others suits the western agenda as Russia and the west now share several enemies and strategic interests, though if the west is not careful relations could deteriorate badly. Europe and the USA will have to be more careful in their policies towards the Russians, particularly in Europe.
3. Europe will continue to slowly integrate as an economic block, and will also reassess the basic military problems that the continent faces, but an EU military is not possible or desirable, so it will only mean that the larger countries Britain, Germany, and France will increase military budgets, and particularly in the commissioning of aircraft carriers and forces capable of being deployed quickly to other regions of the globe. In general countries will try to co-ordinate foreign policies as much as possible, the smaller countries will try and influence this process. The strategic issues in Europe are the Energy security, the US alliance, balkan security, the expansion of the EU into Turkey, the ex soviet states around the black sea region and their problems, (very very tricky), the security of the mediterranian region, and keeping a workable relationship with Russia despite Nato expansion. European countries general world policies will be to try to continue to rely on American military supremacy and European and American economic power (doing the bad cop good cop routine to try and keep as much stability as possible)
4. The U.S. will continue to be the single most powerful country for decades to come, though the brief period where it has been the only superpower is comign to and end, and the US will need to be multi-lateral in its approach to world affairs, this will mean adopting a less unilateral foreign policy (at least in public) ensuring the continued security of its own hemisphere, continuing the alliance with European nations (trading a demand for more effective strategic military cooperation from EU states with an acceptance of European concerns on climate, trade etc,) continuing to develop its relationship with china, and confronting what it sees as its strategic enemies, particularly in the middle east.
5. The Middle East; hard to know, there will probably be continuing conflict that will grow worse, though there will also be a backlash in islamic countries against the increasing tendency towards religious/political extremism that is leading to serious confrontation with the west and others and undermining the status quo in countries such as Egypt and Saudi Arabia. These 2 countries along with Iran are the most important actors at present. Iraq is a diaster and will probably split along ethnic lines following the civil war that will happen when US and British forces leave. This may result in a war in the middle east between Iran and Saudi Arabia/Syria (which may have been the plan all along though I doubt it). Israel will come to some kind of deal with the west bank palestinans whether it will work or last is anyone's guess.
Its a little less dramatic than the pole shift theory, but slightly more realistic.
Good post indeed.
I usually enjoy reading other people's theories as much as I enjoy putting the thought into my own.
Thanks for your thoughts Gal.
Link removed by moderator
-
TruthBringer
- Posts: 3567
- Joined: Sat Feb 11, 2006 5:39 pm
The Ultimate Rundown
Some people have asked, "do the "Controllers" even know about the coming Pole-Shift? And if they do, don't you think it's logical that they would already have contingency plans in place for it?"
Well, they are absolutely correct in that the Controllers DO know about the coming Pole-Shift. And yes, they are also correct that the Controllers have been developing many contingency plans, including underground "security" bunkers all over the World.
The problem is, none of these Controllers understand the true power and devastation that accompanies a Polar-Shift on planet Earth. And why are they so oblivious to the fact that NO ONE CAN ESCAPE A POLE-SHIFT? Whether underground, above ground, or in the sea? Simple. It's because none of the Controllers have any conscious memory whatsoever of experiencing one. So how could they know? The poor bastards are planning for safety from the Pole-Shift that won't do a damn thing for them. It's actually really sad when you think about it. But then again, they are not planning for safety for us, so should we really feel that bad for them?
You see my friends, you can't hide underground, because the entire Earth will be shifting it's crust. Volcanoes will be exploding from the heat and magma that will be rising from under the surface, so anything within that under layer could be easily burned to a crisp. So that won't work very well. And lets not forget about the fact of the Earthquakes that will occur, because that will shake the ground underneath the Earth as well as the ground above. And we are talking MASSIVE Earthquakes here, like nothing else seen in our lifetimes.
So it's all kind of a joke really. The Earth underneath the surface will suffer great changes and destruction (And you have to laugh at the thought of bunkers caving in on eachother), the Earth above the surface will suffer great changes and destruction (Probably some of the worst of all), and the Oceans and other water masses will suffer great changes and destruction (displacing many if not almost all things living in the sea).
So you see. There is no escape. It's going to happen, and when it does, no one, no matter how rich or connected, will be able to run. And thats the way it's supposed to be. It's time for the Earth to right the wrongs of Human Beings and other entities, and it's been way overdue for awhile now.
Well, they are absolutely correct in that the Controllers DO know about the coming Pole-Shift. And yes, they are also correct that the Controllers have been developing many contingency plans, including underground "security" bunkers all over the World.
The problem is, none of these Controllers understand the true power and devastation that accompanies a Polar-Shift on planet Earth. And why are they so oblivious to the fact that NO ONE CAN ESCAPE A POLE-SHIFT? Whether underground, above ground, or in the sea? Simple. It's because none of the Controllers have any conscious memory whatsoever of experiencing one. So how could they know? The poor bastards are planning for safety from the Pole-Shift that won't do a damn thing for them. It's actually really sad when you think about it. But then again, they are not planning for safety for us, so should we really feel that bad for them?
You see my friends, you can't hide underground, because the entire Earth will be shifting it's crust. Volcanoes will be exploding from the heat and magma that will be rising from under the surface, so anything within that under layer could be easily burned to a crisp. So that won't work very well. And lets not forget about the fact of the Earthquakes that will occur, because that will shake the ground underneath the Earth as well as the ground above. And we are talking MASSIVE Earthquakes here, like nothing else seen in our lifetimes.
So it's all kind of a joke really. The Earth underneath the surface will suffer great changes and destruction (And you have to laugh at the thought of bunkers caving in on eachother), the Earth above the surface will suffer great changes and destruction (Probably some of the worst of all), and the Oceans and other water masses will suffer great changes and destruction (displacing many if not almost all things living in the sea).
So you see. There is no escape. It's going to happen, and when it does, no one, no matter how rich or connected, will be able to run. And thats the way it's supposed to be. It's time for the Earth to right the wrongs of Human Beings and other entities, and it's been way overdue for awhile now.
Link removed by moderator
-
TruthBringer
- Posts: 3567
- Joined: Sat Feb 11, 2006 5:39 pm
-
TruthBringer
- Posts: 3567
- Joined: Sat Feb 11, 2006 5:39 pm
-
TruthBringer
- Posts: 3567
- Joined: Sat Feb 11, 2006 5:39 pm
The Ultimate Rundown
Interesting links.
However, paranoia aside, so what? It is a great idea.
The European Union is fantastic. There is no loss of country independence or sovereignty, yet you can travel with open borders from country to country and use a common currency anywhere you go.
Security and Prosperity does not mean becoming one country, it mean what it says.
In the list of parts of the world that are working towards this, you left one out. ‘The Africa Union’ where the 53 African countries are working towards the same objectives of free trade, open boarders and common currency.
If you remove your fears for a moment, it makes perfect sense.
The fact of the matter (if you like it or not) is that The Unites States, Mexico and Canada will need to do something different to continue being a world economic power. The Euro has already become a stronger currency that the US dollar. You need to look towards the future, or get left behind. The amount of trade and commerce between The States, Canada and Mexico is unbelievable, it makes perfect sense to move to a single currency model and open boarders. This in no way threatens sovereignty, Europe is doing it, why couldn’t North America?
Oh and by-the-way….polar shifts??? Going Underground??? Come on!
Why do you think we are trying to explore Mars???
Regards
The Controller
However, paranoia aside, so what? It is a great idea.
The European Union is fantastic. There is no loss of country independence or sovereignty, yet you can travel with open borders from country to country and use a common currency anywhere you go.
Security and Prosperity does not mean becoming one country, it mean what it says.
In the list of parts of the world that are working towards this, you left one out. ‘The Africa Union’ where the 53 African countries are working towards the same objectives of free trade, open boarders and common currency.
If you remove your fears for a moment, it makes perfect sense.
The fact of the matter (if you like it or not) is that The Unites States, Mexico and Canada will need to do something different to continue being a world economic power. The Euro has already become a stronger currency that the US dollar. You need to look towards the future, or get left behind. The amount of trade and commerce between The States, Canada and Mexico is unbelievable, it makes perfect sense to move to a single currency model and open boarders. This in no way threatens sovereignty, Europe is doing it, why couldn’t North America?
Oh and by-the-way….polar shifts??? Going Underground??? Come on!
Why do you think we are trying to explore Mars???
Regards
The Controller
-
TruthBringer
- Posts: 3567
- Joined: Sat Feb 11, 2006 5:39 pm
The Ultimate Rundown
mikeinie;673769 wrote: Interesting links.
However, paranoia aside, so what? It is a great idea.
The European Union is fantastic. There is no loss of country independence or sovereignty, yet you can travel with open borders from country to country and use a common currency anywhere you go.
Security and Prosperity does not mean becoming one country, it mean what it says.
In the list of parts of the world that are working towards this, you left one out. ‘The Africa Union’ where the 53 African countries are working towards the same objectives of free trade, open boarders and common currency.
If you remove your fears for a moment, it makes perfect sense.
The fact of the matter (if you like it or not) is that The Unites States, Mexico and Canada will need to do something different to continue being a world economic power. The Euro has already become a stronger currency that the US dollar. You need to look towards the future, or get left behind. The amount of trade and commerce between The States, Canada and Mexico is unbelievable, it makes perfect sense to move to a single currency model and open boarders. This in no way threatens sovereignty, Europe is doing it, why couldn’t North America?
Oh and by-the-way….polar shifts??? Going Underground??? Come on!
Why do you think we are trying to explore Mars???
Regards
The Controller
Free Trade, Open Borders, and common currency are destroying The United States of America.
As far as why I don't want to be a part of a One World Government?
If God wanted us all to be a part of a One World Government, He would have seen to it that way from the beginning. And not spread our cultures, and rich heritages across the World.
You destroy countries, you destroy cultures. Plain and simple. You destroy the memory of a people.
Also, the One World Government will be a POLICE STATE GOVERNMENT. And those who resist it will be severely punished. Even put to death.
We do not want to take orders on how to live our lives from Human Beings who sit on top of a control pyramid. Man is trying to play God. Man is not God. God gave us Free-Will. If man tries to take that away, he will also be severely punished.
However, paranoia aside, so what? It is a great idea.
The European Union is fantastic. There is no loss of country independence or sovereignty, yet you can travel with open borders from country to country and use a common currency anywhere you go.
Security and Prosperity does not mean becoming one country, it mean what it says.
In the list of parts of the world that are working towards this, you left one out. ‘The Africa Union’ where the 53 African countries are working towards the same objectives of free trade, open boarders and common currency.
If you remove your fears for a moment, it makes perfect sense.
The fact of the matter (if you like it or not) is that The Unites States, Mexico and Canada will need to do something different to continue being a world economic power. The Euro has already become a stronger currency that the US dollar. You need to look towards the future, or get left behind. The amount of trade and commerce between The States, Canada and Mexico is unbelievable, it makes perfect sense to move to a single currency model and open boarders. This in no way threatens sovereignty, Europe is doing it, why couldn’t North America?
Oh and by-the-way….polar shifts??? Going Underground??? Come on!
Why do you think we are trying to explore Mars???
Regards
The Controller
Free Trade, Open Borders, and common currency are destroying The United States of America.
As far as why I don't want to be a part of a One World Government?
If God wanted us all to be a part of a One World Government, He would have seen to it that way from the beginning. And not spread our cultures, and rich heritages across the World.
You destroy countries, you destroy cultures. Plain and simple. You destroy the memory of a people.
Also, the One World Government will be a POLICE STATE GOVERNMENT. And those who resist it will be severely punished. Even put to death.
We do not want to take orders on how to live our lives from Human Beings who sit on top of a control pyramid. Man is trying to play God. Man is not God. God gave us Free-Will. If man tries to take that away, he will also be severely punished.
Link removed by moderator
-
TruthBringer
- Posts: 3567
- Joined: Sat Feb 11, 2006 5:39 pm
-
TruthBringer
- Posts: 3567
- Joined: Sat Feb 11, 2006 5:39 pm
-
TruthBringer
- Posts: 3567
- Joined: Sat Feb 11, 2006 5:39 pm
-
TruthBringer
- Posts: 3567
- Joined: Sat Feb 11, 2006 5:39 pm
-
Singh-Song
- Posts: 119
- Joined: Sun Jun 24, 2007 2:49 pm
The Ultimate Rundown
Wait... I've seen this before... Isn't this the whole storyline of the PC game, 'Battlefield 2142'? The Pole shift occuring in the middle of the third world war, between the Western, European and N.American Alliance and the Pacific-Asian coalition, the volcanoes erupting in the background of some scenes, earthquakes, Fire and Brimstone, Oooh...:rolleyes: Yes, I know it's a good game, Truthbringer, but it's still JUST A GAME, the storyline written as a work of FICTION- i.e, NOT REAL. Get off the computer game and come back to the real world, man...
-
Accountable
- Posts: 24818
- Joined: Mon May 30, 2005 8:33 am
The Ultimate Rundown
Note to self: buy stock in Youtube
-
TruthBringer
- Posts: 3567
- Joined: Sat Feb 11, 2006 5:39 pm
The Ultimate Rundown
Singh-Song;676668 wrote: Wait... I've seen this before... Isn't this the whole storyline of the PC game, 'Battlefield 2142'? The Pole shift occuring in the middle of the third world war, between the Western, European and N.American Alliance and the Pacific-Asian coalition, the volcanoes erupting in the background of some scenes, earthquakes, Fire and Brimstone, Oooh...:rolleyes: Yes, I know it's a good game, Truthbringer, but it's still JUST A GAME, the storyline written as a work of FICTION- i.e, NOT REAL. Get off the computer game and come back to the real world, man...
Actually, I've never played that game in my life....and...I don't know about you...but the whole Pole-Shift thing is over 500,000 years old. How about your video game?
Actually, I've never played that game in my life....and...I don't know about you...but the whole Pole-Shift thing is over 500,000 years old. How about your video game?
Link removed by moderator
-
TruthBringer
- Posts: 3567
- Joined: Sat Feb 11, 2006 5:39 pm
The Ultimate Rundown
If you have been scratching your head trying to figure out
why President Bush has pushed so hard for amnesty, here's
your "smoking gun."
An effort is underway to create a North American "framework"
that will all but eliminate hard borders between Mexico,
the U.S. and Canada. This "framework" includes a "trusted
travelers" program that allows "citizens of North America"
to move freely within the three countries.
No wonder the President is pushing amnesty!
On August 20-21, President Bush will join Mexican President
Calderon and Canadian Prime Minister Harper for the second
Security and Prosperity Partnership (SPP) summit.
The SPP is what many believe to be the beginnings of the
infrastructure for the North American Union. The SPP's
stated goal is to:
"...Consolidate our action into a North American
framework to confront security and economic challenges,
and promote the full potential of our people, addressing
disparities and increasing opportunities for all."
This tri-lateral agreement already has resulted in regulatory
changes and open borders initiatives that clearly undermine
our sovereignty. The SPP is the one touting the "trusted
travelers" program to encourage migration of "citizens of
North America."
+ + Petition opposing a North American Union
Today, Grassfire is launching a national petition formally
opposing these and other efforts to create a North American
"framework" and undermine our nation's sovereignty.
We need to rally 100,000 signers before the SPP meetings this
month and have them on hand in Canada as part of a building
citizen protest against such efforts.
Please go here for more information and to sign:
http://www.grassfire.org/89/petition.asp?RID=14117152
+ + Exclusive interview with author Jerome Corsi
New York Times bestselling author Jerome Corsi just completed
a new book detailing our government's rapid move toward a
North American "union." It's called "The Late Great USA."
Corsi agreed to record a special interview "briefing" on the
NAU for Grassfire team members. Go here to listen to
that interview and to access Grassfire’s detailed backgrounder
on the NAU and the NAFTA superhighway:
http://www.grassfire.org/89/petition.asp?RID=14117152
Of course the President denies that the SPP
is a precursor to a North American "Union." But there is
mounting evidence that the SPP is creating precisely that
structure -- all without any congressional oversight!
Will you help rally 100,000 citizens before this latest
SPP meeting convenes -- in less than two weeks?
why President Bush has pushed so hard for amnesty, here's
your "smoking gun."
An effort is underway to create a North American "framework"
that will all but eliminate hard borders between Mexico,
the U.S. and Canada. This "framework" includes a "trusted
travelers" program that allows "citizens of North America"
to move freely within the three countries.
No wonder the President is pushing amnesty!
On August 20-21, President Bush will join Mexican President
Calderon and Canadian Prime Minister Harper for the second
Security and Prosperity Partnership (SPP) summit.
The SPP is what many believe to be the beginnings of the
infrastructure for the North American Union. The SPP's
stated goal is to:
"...Consolidate our action into a North American
framework to confront security and economic challenges,
and promote the full potential of our people, addressing
disparities and increasing opportunities for all."
This tri-lateral agreement already has resulted in regulatory
changes and open borders initiatives that clearly undermine
our sovereignty. The SPP is the one touting the "trusted
travelers" program to encourage migration of "citizens of
North America."
+ + Petition opposing a North American Union
Today, Grassfire is launching a national petition formally
opposing these and other efforts to create a North American
"framework" and undermine our nation's sovereignty.
We need to rally 100,000 signers before the SPP meetings this
month and have them on hand in Canada as part of a building
citizen protest against such efforts.
Please go here for more information and to sign:
http://www.grassfire.org/89/petition.asp?RID=14117152
+ + Exclusive interview with author Jerome Corsi
New York Times bestselling author Jerome Corsi just completed
a new book detailing our government's rapid move toward a
North American "union." It's called "The Late Great USA."
Corsi agreed to record a special interview "briefing" on the
NAU for Grassfire team members. Go here to listen to
that interview and to access Grassfire’s detailed backgrounder
on the NAU and the NAFTA superhighway:
http://www.grassfire.org/89/petition.asp?RID=14117152
Of course the President denies that the SPP
is a precursor to a North American "Union." But there is
mounting evidence that the SPP is creating precisely that
structure -- all without any congressional oversight!
Will you help rally 100,000 citizens before this latest
SPP meeting convenes -- in less than two weeks?
Link removed by moderator
-
Singh-Song
- Posts: 119
- Joined: Sun Jun 24, 2007 2:49 pm
The Ultimate Rundown
One word- CREDIBILITY. If your so-called Pole Shift is going to be such a catastrophe, if it happened 500,000 years ago, why isn't there a mass extinction event that coincides? If, supposedly, '99.9 percent of all life WILL perish'- Why is there life on Earth at all? If you think that complex, multicellular life could evolve on a world where only a miniscule percentage survives every half-million years, you seriously need your head examining. If your so-called theory were true, life on Earth would never have got past the microbe stage...
In conclusion, your Pole Shift theory is weak, inconsequential, with more holes than a sponge and less substance than Earth's stratosphere. If this is the best your imagination can come up with, you'd have a hard time coming up with the plot for a Hollywood D-Movie.
This whole series of posts are just some Chicken Little, 'The Sky Is Falling', way for a sad, lonely man to try and garner some attention. This is the last time I'm posting on any of them, because all I'm doing is just harbouring your delusions. Trying to argue with you is like some sicko doctor getting laughs from teasing an asylum patient- pointless, unethical and detrimental to your recovery from your delusions. To any other posters out there, I advise you to follow in my lead...
In conclusion, your Pole Shift theory is weak, inconsequential, with more holes than a sponge and less substance than Earth's stratosphere. If this is the best your imagination can come up with, you'd have a hard time coming up with the plot for a Hollywood D-Movie.
This whole series of posts are just some Chicken Little, 'The Sky Is Falling', way for a sad, lonely man to try and garner some attention. This is the last time I'm posting on any of them, because all I'm doing is just harbouring your delusions. Trying to argue with you is like some sicko doctor getting laughs from teasing an asylum patient- pointless, unethical and detrimental to your recovery from your delusions. To any other posters out there, I advise you to follow in my lead...
-
TruthBringer
- Posts: 3567
- Joined: Sat Feb 11, 2006 5:39 pm
The Ultimate Rundown
Singh-Song;677358 wrote: One word- CREDIBILITY. If your so-called Pole Shift is going to be such a catastrophe, if it happened 500,000 years ago, why isn't there a mass extinction event that coincides? If, supposedly, '99.9 percent of all life WILL perish'- Why is there life on Earth at all? If you think that complex, multicellular life could evolve on a world where only a miniscule percentage survives every half-million years, you seriously need your head examining. If your so-called theory were true, life on Earth would never have got past the microbe stage...
In conclusion, your Pole Shift theory is weak, inconsequential, with more holes than a sponge and less substance than Earth's stratosphere. If this is the best your imagination can come up with, you'd have a hard time coming up with the plot for a Hollywood D-Movie.
This whole series of posts are just some Chicken Little, 'The Sky Is Falling', way for a sad, lonely man to try and garner some attention. This is the last time I'm posting on any of them, because all I'm doing is just harbouring your delusions. Trying to argue with you is like some sicko doctor getting laughs from teasing an asylum patient- pointless, unethical and detrimental to your recovery from your delusions. To any other posters out there, I advise you to follow in my lead...
And yet your post was the weakest of all.
At least I backed up my evidence with reports from scientists and researchers, as well as historians. What did you back up your's with?
In conclusion, your Pole Shift theory is weak, inconsequential, with more holes than a sponge and less substance than Earth's stratosphere. If this is the best your imagination can come up with, you'd have a hard time coming up with the plot for a Hollywood D-Movie.
This whole series of posts are just some Chicken Little, 'The Sky Is Falling', way for a sad, lonely man to try and garner some attention. This is the last time I'm posting on any of them, because all I'm doing is just harbouring your delusions. Trying to argue with you is like some sicko doctor getting laughs from teasing an asylum patient- pointless, unethical and detrimental to your recovery from your delusions. To any other posters out there, I advise you to follow in my lead...
And yet your post was the weakest of all.
At least I backed up my evidence with reports from scientists and researchers, as well as historians. What did you back up your's with?
Link removed by moderator
-
charles_r51
- Posts: 350
- Joined: Sun Jul 30, 2006 10:24 am
The Ultimate Rundown
Singh-Song;677358 wrote: One word- CREDIBILITY. If your so-called Pole Shift is going to be such a catastrophe, if it happened 500,000 years ago, why isn't there a mass extinction event that coincides? If, supposedly, '99.9 percent of all life WILL perish'- Why is there life on Earth at all? If you think that complex, multicellular life could evolve on a world where only a miniscule percentage survives every half-million years, you seriously need your head examining. If your so-called theory were true, life on Earth would never have got past the microbe stage...
In conclusion, your Pole Shift theory is weak, inconsequential, with more holes than a sponge and less substance than Earth's stratosphere. If this is the best your imagination can come up with, you'd have a hard time coming up with the plot for a Hollywood D-Movie.
This whole series of posts are just some Chicken Little, 'The Sky Is Falling', way for a sad, lonely man to try and garner some attention. This is the last time I'm posting on any of them, because all I'm doing is just harbouring your delusions. Trying to argue with you is like some sicko doctor getting laughs from teasing an asylum patient- pointless, unethical and detrimental to your recovery from your delusions. To any other posters out there, I advise you to follow in my lead...
you may not agree with what is said by some, but why do you assume what has happened in the past won't happen again? regardess of what you think about the possibility of a pole shift, scientific evidence is showing that it has happened numerous times over the earth's history. the last pole shift is supposed to have happened about a half million years ago. that is by today's PROVEN scientific evidence, not opinion.
truthbringer may not be perfectly accurate, but the evidence he presents has substance, though even i sometimes wonder at where he obtains it.
In conclusion, your Pole Shift theory is weak, inconsequential, with more holes than a sponge and less substance than Earth's stratosphere. If this is the best your imagination can come up with, you'd have a hard time coming up with the plot for a Hollywood D-Movie.
This whole series of posts are just some Chicken Little, 'The Sky Is Falling', way for a sad, lonely man to try and garner some attention. This is the last time I'm posting on any of them, because all I'm doing is just harbouring your delusions. Trying to argue with you is like some sicko doctor getting laughs from teasing an asylum patient- pointless, unethical and detrimental to your recovery from your delusions. To any other posters out there, I advise you to follow in my lead...
you may not agree with what is said by some, but why do you assume what has happened in the past won't happen again? regardess of what you think about the possibility of a pole shift, scientific evidence is showing that it has happened numerous times over the earth's history. the last pole shift is supposed to have happened about a half million years ago. that is by today's PROVEN scientific evidence, not opinion.
truthbringer may not be perfectly accurate, but the evidence he presents has substance, though even i sometimes wonder at where he obtains it.
-
charles_r51
- Posts: 350
- Joined: Sun Jul 30, 2006 10:24 am
The Ultimate Rundown
TruthBringer;677122 wrote: If you have been scratching your head trying to figure out
why President Bush has pushed so hard for amnesty, here's
your "smoking gun."
An effort is underway to create a North American "framework"
that will all but eliminate hard borders between Mexico,
the U.S. and Canada. This "framework" includes a "trusted
travelers" program that allows "citizens of North America"
to move freely within the three countries.
No wonder the President is pushing amnesty!
On August 20-21, President Bush will join Mexican President
Calderon and Canadian Prime Minister Harper for the second
Security and Prosperity Partnership (SPP) summit.
The SPP is what many believe to be the beginnings of the
infrastructure for the North American Union. The SPP's
stated goal is to:
"...Consolidate our action into a North American
framework to confront security and economic challenges,
and promote the full potential of our people, addressing
disparities and increasing opportunities for all."
This tri-lateral agreement already has resulted in regulatory
changes and open borders initiatives that clearly undermine
our sovereignty. The SPP is the one touting the "trusted
travelers" program to encourage migration of "citizens of
North America."
+ + Petition opposing a North American Union
Today, Grassfire is launching a national petition formally
opposing these and other efforts to create a North American
"framework" and undermine our nation's sovereignty.
We need to rally 100,000 signers before the SPP meetings this
month and have them on hand in Canada as part of a building
citizen protest against such efforts.
Please go here for more information and to sign:
http://www.grassfire.org/89/petition.asp?RID=14117152
+ + Exclusive interview with author Jerome Corsi
New York Times bestselling author Jerome Corsi just completed
a new book detailing our government's rapid move toward a
North American "union." It's called "The Late Great USA."
Corsi agreed to record a special interview "briefing" on the
NAU for Grassfire team members. Go here to listen to
that interview and to access Grassfire’s detailed backgrounder
on the NAU and the NAFTA superhighway:
http://www.grassfire.org/89/petition.asp?RID=14117152
Of course the President denies that the SPP
is a precursor to a North American "Union." But there is
mounting evidence that the SPP is creating precisely that
structure -- all without any congressional oversight!
Will you help rally 100,000 citizens before this latest
SPP meeting convenes -- in less than two weeks?
nafta, fortunately, will not work as some expect it to. it will cause chaotic, not orderly, conditions. in a couple of years, before it ever really takes hold, it will be tossed aside and another, more suitable, and far less dangerous agreement wil come about, but it will include many who are currently not to be included in order to cause the chaos which those in high places need to gain complete control. this is known and will be dealt with when, and only when, the time for the end approaches. the "controllers" you keep talking about will find their efforts will fail, even before they are ready to assume positions of import because there is one who cannot be dealt with on their terms. he has decided not to allow himself to be trapped into making any agreements which would be detrimental to the people as a whole. instead, he will do exactly as he needs to do to prevent a catastrophic set of conditions from interferring with what has been decided. the end has been written, and soon the fun begins!!!
:yh_giggle :sneaky:
why President Bush has pushed so hard for amnesty, here's
your "smoking gun."
An effort is underway to create a North American "framework"
that will all but eliminate hard borders between Mexico,
the U.S. and Canada. This "framework" includes a "trusted
travelers" program that allows "citizens of North America"
to move freely within the three countries.
No wonder the President is pushing amnesty!
On August 20-21, President Bush will join Mexican President
Calderon and Canadian Prime Minister Harper for the second
Security and Prosperity Partnership (SPP) summit.
The SPP is what many believe to be the beginnings of the
infrastructure for the North American Union. The SPP's
stated goal is to:
"...Consolidate our action into a North American
framework to confront security and economic challenges,
and promote the full potential of our people, addressing
disparities and increasing opportunities for all."
This tri-lateral agreement already has resulted in regulatory
changes and open borders initiatives that clearly undermine
our sovereignty. The SPP is the one touting the "trusted
travelers" program to encourage migration of "citizens of
North America."
+ + Petition opposing a North American Union
Today, Grassfire is launching a national petition formally
opposing these and other efforts to create a North American
"framework" and undermine our nation's sovereignty.
We need to rally 100,000 signers before the SPP meetings this
month and have them on hand in Canada as part of a building
citizen protest against such efforts.
Please go here for more information and to sign:
http://www.grassfire.org/89/petition.asp?RID=14117152
+ + Exclusive interview with author Jerome Corsi
New York Times bestselling author Jerome Corsi just completed
a new book detailing our government's rapid move toward a
North American "union." It's called "The Late Great USA."
Corsi agreed to record a special interview "briefing" on the
NAU for Grassfire team members. Go here to listen to
that interview and to access Grassfire’s detailed backgrounder
on the NAU and the NAFTA superhighway:
http://www.grassfire.org/89/petition.asp?RID=14117152
Of course the President denies that the SPP
is a precursor to a North American "Union." But there is
mounting evidence that the SPP is creating precisely that
structure -- all without any congressional oversight!
Will you help rally 100,000 citizens before this latest
SPP meeting convenes -- in less than two weeks?
nafta, fortunately, will not work as some expect it to. it will cause chaotic, not orderly, conditions. in a couple of years, before it ever really takes hold, it will be tossed aside and another, more suitable, and far less dangerous agreement wil come about, but it will include many who are currently not to be included in order to cause the chaos which those in high places need to gain complete control. this is known and will be dealt with when, and only when, the time for the end approaches. the "controllers" you keep talking about will find their efforts will fail, even before they are ready to assume positions of import because there is one who cannot be dealt with on their terms. he has decided not to allow himself to be trapped into making any agreements which would be detrimental to the people as a whole. instead, he will do exactly as he needs to do to prevent a catastrophic set of conditions from interferring with what has been decided. the end has been written, and soon the fun begins!!!
:yh_giggle :sneaky:-
henrychalder
- Posts: 154
- Joined: Tue Jul 31, 2007 6:27 am
The Ultimate Rundown
TruthBringer;672862 wrote: On one side of the World, the Controllers want a North American Union. On the other side, they want a European Union (Which they have already created).
The ultimate goal of the Controllers is to merge the European Union with the North American Union in order to create a One World Global Government, also known as the New World Order.
The European Union has already been established. They've been working on that side of the World for awhile now. Now it's time for the North American Union. And the Controllers know that they must move rapidly if they expect to get it done in time.
The reason for all of this is, my last comment of the 'Jews' thread under chit chat, its obvious for most to see.
America is now gearing up to attack Iran, ask yourself why?
What is the real reason?
The ultimate goal of the Controllers is to merge the European Union with the North American Union in order to create a One World Global Government, also known as the New World Order.
The European Union has already been established. They've been working on that side of the World for awhile now. Now it's time for the North American Union. And the Controllers know that they must move rapidly if they expect to get it done in time.
The reason for all of this is, my last comment of the 'Jews' thread under chit chat, its obvious for most to see.
America is now gearing up to attack Iran, ask yourself why?
What is the real reason?
The Ultimate Rundown
We can ALL stick our heads in the sand and say none of this is happening
(a North American Union NAU).
I agree with TruthBringer about .0005% of the time but on this, (not the end of the world and all that mumbo-jumbo.) the NAU I agree it is in the works.
GW Bush just as his father is a ONE WORLD-ER!!!!
President George Bush in a speech to Congress on SEPTEMBER 11, (9/11) 1990, SAID THIS: " a rare opportunity to move toward an historic period of cooperation. Out of these troubled times...a New World Order can emerge."
In his September 21, 1992 speech to the United Nations, President George Bush announced that foreign troops, would occupy America and train for a New World Order Army. He stated:
"Nations should develop and train military units for possible U.N. peacekeeping operations. ... If multinational units are to work together, they must train together. ... Effective multinational action will also require coordinated command & control and inter-operability of both equipment and communications
I challenge any interested in a non biased point of view to read this entire article:
http://www.rangemagazine.com/specialrep ... -union.pdf
And YES there are plans for a NAU......... if you want to stick your head in the sand so be it.........
But when you get bumped from behind don't bitch to me.
(a North American Union NAU).
I agree with TruthBringer about .0005% of the time but on this, (not the end of the world and all that mumbo-jumbo.) the NAU I agree it is in the works.
GW Bush just as his father is a ONE WORLD-ER!!!!
President George Bush in a speech to Congress on SEPTEMBER 11, (9/11) 1990, SAID THIS: " a rare opportunity to move toward an historic period of cooperation. Out of these troubled times...a New World Order can emerge."
In his September 21, 1992 speech to the United Nations, President George Bush announced that foreign troops, would occupy America and train for a New World Order Army. He stated:
"Nations should develop and train military units for possible U.N. peacekeeping operations. ... If multinational units are to work together, they must train together. ... Effective multinational action will also require coordinated command & control and inter-operability of both equipment and communications
I challenge any interested in a non biased point of view to read this entire article:
http://www.rangemagazine.com/specialrep ... -union.pdf
And YES there are plans for a NAU......... if you want to stick your head in the sand so be it.........
But when you get bumped from behind don't bitch to me.
"If America Was A Tree, The Left Would Root For The Termites...Greg Gutfeld."
-
TruthBringer
- Posts: 3567
- Joined: Sat Feb 11, 2006 5:39 pm
The Ultimate Rundown
I suggest people watch these sections of video to see exactly what those in power currently have planned for the World:
(Part 1)
(Part 2)
(Part 3)
(Part 4)
(Part 5)
(Part 6)
(Part 7)
(Part 8)
(Part 9)
(Part 10)
(Part 11)
(12)
(13)
(Part 1)
(Part 2)
(Part 3)
(Part 4)
(Part 5)
(Part 6)
(Part 7)
(Part 8)
(Part 9)
(Part 10)
(Part 11)
(12)
(13)
Link removed by moderator
The Ultimate Rundown
Conspiracy: A plot by one group against another group.
That pretty much describes the workings of government.
That pretty much describes the workings of government.