UFO filmed watching Obama's Inauguration

Post by **Oscar Namechange** » Fri Jan 23, 2009 6:11 pm

As Obama took his Inauguration speech, a Mysterious object seemed to be watching him!!!!!!

UFO sees Obama become President | The Sun |News

chonsigirl · Post by **chonsigirl** » Fri Jan 23, 2009 6:15 pm

Ah, it was a stealth bomber keeping an eye on the situation.........................

Post by **Oscar Namechange** » Fri Jan 23, 2009 6:17 pm

chonsigirl;1117196 wrote: Ah, it was a stealth bomber keeping an eye on the situation.........................

Nah, it was the bus load of mexicans he was welcoming :sneaky:

abbey · Post by **abbey** » Sat Jan 24, 2009 2:38 am

oscar;1117195 wrote: As Obama took his Inauguration speech, a Mysterious object seemed to be watching him!!!!!!

UFO sees Obama become President | The Sun |NewsIt must be true, it's in the Sun :rolleyes:

Post by **Oscar Namechange** » Sat Jan 24, 2009 7:28 am

Themis;1117363 wrote: I haven't seen the footage but I believe it was a bird from the discussions I've read,

but whats interesting is the Daily Suns decision to put UFO stories on front page on a regular basis...

I cant view this CNN video footage on my computer so I'm not sure if it's the correct one but I will post it anyway: U.S. celebrates as President Obama vows new era - CNN.com

Sorry Themis, I can get the link but can't get the video on it to play. I'll google later to see if i can find anything else on it.

If it had been a stealth, would one have been around in daylight?

I think Britain has gone UFO crazy since we have no explanation for those wind turbines being damaged yet and the area is noe very heavilly guarded.

along-for-the-ride · Post by **along-for-the-ride** » Sat Jan 24, 2009 7:49 am

That was Jimbo and his new alien buddies cruising.

mikeinie · Post by **mikeinie** » Sat Jan 24, 2009 7:51 am

such a crisp, clear photo. Obviously a beings from another world keeping an eye on things here....

Post by **Oscar Namechange** » Sat Jan 24, 2009 5:28 pm

Themis;1117482 wrote: It is no surprise that the area is guarded, the solid projectile didn't touch the ground, only conceivable explanation would be a missile or the strange lights(ufo), i guess the MOD will look at both alternatives and **** their pants and wont have a clue what to do except get someone to confess.

The MoD said: “Unless there is evidence of a potential threat, there is no attempt to identify the nature of each sighting.”

I think falling Ice is their best excuse, although I would be very surprised if the Mod didn't interview the witnesses who saw the lights.

There was a vast array of people who saw the lights and were interviewed by the MOD and newspapers. Most described the lights as having light 'tentacles' snaking down to the ground. The MOD have admited to testing robot Stelath in the area.

Latest UFO news update,MOD said Wind Turbine was damaged by stealth bomber not by Alien UFO,2009 ? | Latest UFO videos,,Aliens Pictures,UFOs Sightings,UFO News Updated Daily

One 30 foot turbine was completely destroyed, the other, one rotor knocked off and anothe bent out of shape. Surely, the Stealth must have been severley damaged? yet no debris has been found. The remains of the turbines are in Germany under-going tests for signs of impact with alien craft.

Post by **spot** » Sat Jan 24, 2009 5:35 pm

What part of a turbine is 30 foot?

Post by **Oscar Namechange** » Sat Jan 24, 2009 5:39 pm

spot;1117893 wrote: What part of a turbine is 30 foot?

My mistake, that should have been 300 foot.

Post by **spot** » Sat Jan 24, 2009 5:51 pm

oscar;1117897 wrote: My mistake, that should have been 300 foot.

And you're claiming two wind turbines at Conisholme were put out of commission on January 4th? Not just one?

Post by **spot** » Sun Jan 25, 2009 5:46 am

That's why I asked "What part of a turbine is 30 foot? " in response to "One 30 foot turbine was completely destroyed" and got "My mistake, that should have been 300 foot". The blades aren't 300 foot, are they? Maybe they are, maybe my sense of scale is non-existent.

The easier solution to all this back-and-fro is for people to use common terms like "wind turbine" and "blade" which everyone understands instead of 30 or 300 foot turbine which I don't.

Daniyal · Post by **Daniyal** » Sun Jan 25, 2009 9:17 am

First That Didn't Exist But Now They Do :wah::wah:

Post by **spot** » Sun Jan 25, 2009 3:28 pm

Themis;1118350 wrote: Lighten up my old friend and do some research, this did happen by the way???

Do some research? I'm the one who knows only one wind turbine was damaged, because I read news reports. Oscar's the one who seems to think two were damaged, one "totally" and "the other, one rotor knocked off and another bent out of shape" - what have I got wrong?

What is "this" that "did happen by the way"?