- Posts: 248
- Joined: Tue Aug 24, 2004 5:12 pm
- Posts: 2
- Joined: Sun Feb 26, 2006 1:14 am
but the government has to make their money some how :-5
- Posts: 40
- Joined: Wed Feb 08, 2006 11:18 am
- Posts: 3202
- Joined: Mon Mar 21, 2005 10:47 am
BLUEDEVIL1 wrote: Since when does a reduction in the growth rate of a federal program constitute a cut? The program still gets more money than the previous year, just not as large of an increase as some had hoped. Instead of a program growing at 6% annually, it might grow at a 3% rate. That is a cut?
If a lib spends more but gets less than was proposed in the prior year it is a cut.................
Got it?.......... SPEND MORE=CUT.........
Now pipe down son
- Posts: 24818
- Joined: Mon May 30, 2005 8:33 am
thomas40 wrote: it seems like there are more fedral cuts for the disabled now which is not fair at all.
Should the fed gov't be tasked with caring for the diabled??